I can't find the thread, but your choice on options two and three was accurate; the no. 1 girl in the photo was a cold fish with a boyfriend and i couldn't corral her into the bedroom with the other two; she cabbed it home..........
and RR, I thank you for pickin' "all of em".... it was somewhat of a trick question, as i got the photographer the next time we went out, along with no. 2 in the photo............
but never had 2, 3 and the photog all at once; it was always with no. 2 involved, and either or; never got no. 3 and the photog at the same time witout no. 2. No. 1 still never tagged, and presumably never will.........
so, contest over: jj, i owe u fifty points.........
also, JJ, I am interested in what you saw from that photo that tipped you off that no. 1 was a no-go, and that two and three were playuhs.......
you may have more skills at reading women than you know, or at least are willing to let on about.....
photo for reference:
and RR, I thank you for pickin' "all of em".... it was somewhat of a trick question, as i got the photographer the next time we went out, along with no. 2 in the photo............
but never had 2, 3 and the photog all at once; it was always with no. 2 involved, and either or; never got no. 3 and the photog at the same time witout no. 2. No. 1 still never tagged, and presumably never will.........
so, contest over: jj, i owe u fifty points.........
also, JJ, I am interested in what you saw from that photo that tipped you off that no. 1 was a no-go, and that two and three were playuhs.......
you may have more skills at reading women than you know, or at least are willing to let on about.....
photo for reference: