It's "anti-Semitic" when it's about jews, but free speech when it's about muslims? Double standards much?
#IamNOTcharlie
#IamNOTcharlie
-
Comment -
Yeah, demanding an apology is on a par with murder. Keep trying.It's "anti-Semitic" when it's about jews, but free speech when it's about muslims? Double standards much?
#IamNOTcharlieComment -
Same magazine fired another of there employee and put him on trial for hate crime for making "anti-Semitic" cartoon. Where was free speech then?
#IamNOTcharlieComment -
Freedom of speech is freedom from prosecution by government, not freedom from retaliation by another party. The court case in question is a civil matter.Same magazine fired another of there employee and put him on trial for hate crime for making "anti-Semitic" cartoon. Where was free speech then?
#IamNOTcharlieComment -
Paco, you know we are cool with each other (Same magazine fired another of there employee and put him on trial for hate crime for making "anti-Semitic" cartoon. Where was free speech then?
#IamNOTcharlie
), but you are wrong here.
Case was entirely different than it looks like at first sight.
1. Phillipe Val (who fired Siné) and Siné had a long long history of fights with each other, you can really call it "hate".
2. Val wanted to get rid of Siné for a long time before that - and this simply was a welcome opportunity.
3. Val is known as a bootlicker, he was afraid that then-President Sarkozy (whose son was affected by the article from Siné) would pull some strings (which he had done a few times in other cases) to destroy Val and his career. So before that could happen (and adding to the fact that he hates Siné), he fired him.
4. (which is a "just btw" point here): Siné was married to a jewish woman and even has two kids with her (half-jews by definition), so you can see, that there was never really a case other than Val's dislike for Siné. ( I gotta admit though, that Siné once said that he was antisemite - but he explained himself that he is not antisemite per definition but rather wanted to state that he is not ok with Israel throwing bombs)
5. and very important: The Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l’Antisémitisme indeed did lay a charge against Siné.....
And WHY? Because they said that Siné showed antisemitism in his article against Jean Sarkozy and his future wife AND because of a series of cartoons that they said were a defamation of MUSLIM women! (and just btw: Siné won both cases in court
)
So you better not say, that the world (or here France) looks away when it is against Muslims, but supports Jews in each and every case.
I will absolutely admit, that often Israel gets more support than others. I will also admit, that often Palestine is overlooked. But not here. And just a fyi: In fact France is the most Muslim-friendly country of all in Europe (and that goes for each and every action the state takes!).
And to your post before: Yeah, they (Charlie Hebdo) offend a whole religion and it's founder. And another religion and it's founder. And another.... and another.... and another.... And you know what: If a religion (or better: some of their members) are such goddamn pussies, that they can't handle that - even more, that they have to fight fukking pens and paper with automatic guns - they better not hope to get any support of any rational and intelligent human being on earth and I hope that they get mocked even harder for the fact alone that a stupid fukkin cartoon is able to hurt their feelings like an eight year old girl that is told that she is ugly. Anyone who is THAT much offended by a piece of paper should cut their own heads off and should not be taken seriously whatsoever. And that goes for each and every religion as far as I am concerned. They are looking like a bunch of Manning fans on the internet that are butthurt when they are told, that Brady is the better QB. Sorry.Comment -
Dammit Zizou, it's much more effective to lob generalizations with no context or facts to back them up. It's not fair!
Comment -
hey paco, you know who runs this world right? it's not the muslims or christians. it's the fukking jews.It's "anti-Semitic" when it's about jews, but free speech when it's about muslims? Double standards much?
#IamNOTcharlie
international banking cartel are composed of jews. you ever heard of the "golden rule"?
you know why most countries have central banks owned by the jews? that's because they bought out the politicians so that they can own the country.
"HE WHO HAS THE GOLD MAKES THE RULES."
bottom line, everyone's fukked...Comment -
It's a shame btw, that Obama didn't feel the need to come to Paris... Or to send Kerry f.e. Now making stupid lame excuses.
Maybe someone should remind President Obama, that the French President Chirac was the first one to arrive in the USA after 911....Comment -
Obama administration a bunch of jerkoffs
Comment -
Sure looks like it Rubber, sure looks like it...Comment -
Really? Really?
Top five banks of the world
1) ICBC (China) non-Jewish
2) HSBC (UK) Stuart Gulliver non-Jewish
3) Deutsche Bank (Germany) Paul Achleitner non-Jewsih
4) Credit Agricole (France) Jean-Paul Chifflet non-Jewish
5) BNP Paribas (France) Jean Laurant Bonniafe non-Jewish
Would you like to see 6-10?
Next time you post, make sure you know what you are talking about.
Get it? Got it? Good !Comment -
And Obama wants to let everybody into America lolComment -
lol do you know why woodrow wilson is on the $100,000 bill? do you know why andrew jackson is on the $20? do you know who owns the federal reserve? do you know how federal reserve got started?
if it comes to banking rothchilds are involved. and there are names we've never heard of that's part of the banking cartel. this has been going on for centuries.Comment -
“Give me control over a nations currency, and I care not who makes its laws” – Baron M.A. RothschildComment -
study history pal. most of the assassination attempts were due to international banking cartel wanting to centralize our countries banking system. they succeeded in 1913.Comment -
Top five banks in the world are non Jewish owned.
8 out of the 10 top banks of the world are non Jewish owned.
Your turn.Comment -
Comment -
^
A blog by a nobody.
Well done, well done.
I present facts, you present fiction.
Have a good night.Comment -
lol that's what i thought. it's the fukking history you fool.Comment -
you're in denial. read the timelines at least. you don't learn the truth in school. i'm not bullshitting you.
at least find out why andrew jackson is on our $20 bill and why woodrow wilson is on our $100,000 bill.
it's a big joke that no one really knows about. people like you are too narrow minded to accept the truth.Comment -
It's a misconception, in this day and age the Jews do not own the banks, what the Jewish dominate is the entertainment buisiness, Hollywood, Spielberg, the Meyer family, that's where all that money is, China has the worlds largest bank, there is no Jewish money there, look at the bank ownership worldwide, it's not even 20 percent today.
My dads dad, he got rich 75 years ago when the television was first being marketted.
He made and fixed the tubes and what not, he was the one of the first to do that, he told my dad the "Jews" are getting in on the ground floor of the TV business, they already (this is when my dad was a kid, long time ago) monopolize the movies businessComment -
Atheist terrorist killed 3 muslim students today on anerican soil yet no one all of a sudden gives no fukkkkkks. #doubleStandards
ps, why is this thread not Salooned?Comment -
two completely different situations
That dude isn't exactly the American version of ISISComment -
I'm not saying I don't care about it. It reprehensible. I don't think murdering anyone is acceptable. But the difference between coordinated terrorist attacks on innocent people backed by a group that admittedly wants to subjugate or kill non Muslims and some dude killing his neighbors over a parking space and possibly their religion is night and day. He'll be prosecuted and likely convicted of murder. He's not a terrorist backed by billions in financing. He's a hillbilly dipshit who's probably mentally ill.Comment -
Yes paco, with all respect - that is exactly the difference here.
I don't see many atheists running around killing people because they are religious.
He did, yes.
And honestly, I don't see any decent guy is not condemning the murder of 3 muslims in the US (white or not).
And to be honest: media is reporting about it.
But if you don't see the difference here I am sorry.Comment -
I don't think this is a conversation worth having guys.
Yes there are double standards. I don't think anyone denies that.
Just because it isn't right doesn't mean they can't do it.Comment -
True.
Obv yes.
But the difference is, that I don't see many atheists running around killing religious people.
Yet I do see a lot of idiots (who I consider mentally ill as well), running around because other people don't believe in the religion they do.Comment -
fellas...fellas....fellas
you don't need to be backed by millions of dollars and have accomplices to be called a terrorist
please wake the fukk up
it was nothing but a hate crime...a long brewing hate crimeComment
