This is very strange to me so someone maybe someone could explain. Why can we not use multiple poker freeroll points to buy into a table? Additionally, why at worst case scenario, could we not supplement those points with real points.
As I'm sure many of you know, playing short vs medium vs big stack in poker is a huge difference. I've played poker for money online since 2004. So for example if I have a 150 40 20 point win, I can't buy in to a table for 200. I have to choose one (either buying in for 150 40 20) and they all aren't pooled into the same "poker freeplay" fund.
I guess I wonder why as it seems really strange. Why not make it you have (from 150 40 20) 210 poker freeplay points or at least I could buy into a 200 point table with 150 and use 50 regular points, etc.
It seems retarded, produces less rake for sbr and I am just wondering why it was made that way. Never seen anything like it before. There's always a reason and I'm sure sbr has there. Just wondering why it's this way
Thanks and BOL at the tables everyone
As I'm sure many of you know, playing short vs medium vs big stack in poker is a huge difference. I've played poker for money online since 2004. So for example if I have a 150 40 20 point win, I can't buy in to a table for 200. I have to choose one (either buying in for 150 40 20) and they all aren't pooled into the same "poker freeplay" fund.
I guess I wonder why as it seems really strange. Why not make it you have (from 150 40 20) 210 poker freeplay points or at least I could buy into a 200 point table with 150 and use 50 regular points, etc.
It seems retarded, produces less rake for sbr and I am just wondering why it was made that way. Never seen anything like it before. There's always a reason and I'm sure sbr has there. Just wondering why it's this way
Thanks and BOL at the tables everyone
