bobby::coward::ducking::waves:
ussy::excuses
ussy::excuses
-
Comment -
I don't think my name has come up anywhere in this thread.
Comment -
OTL
UK = good-dude-pizza-loooooovvveeeerrrr.Comment -
People hammering Bobby. Why?Comment -
[QUOTE=bobbywaves;21971589]Because I'm outperforming them on the felt, bunch of sore losers.[/QUOTE
Shougun Rua. Smich124, Sportfun, just to name a few are way ahead of you and we are not diminishing your accomplishment, so, please be a bit more humble.
Best regards
SinmiedoComment -
[QUOTE=sinmiedo;21971835]I realize there's a "few" players ahead of me. However, they obviously aren't the ones "hammering Bobby." I'm outperforming the players who are talking smack (AutoDonkey & TripeD), thus doling out a huge slice of "humble pie" to both of them.
Comment -
Sin is way off base requesting me to be humble, when there's a couple players talking smack who are trailing me. Obviously AutoDonkey & TripeD need the humbling & Waves will "set those people straight."
I have nothing but respect for the players ahead of me. It would be ignorant to smack talk players who are outperforming me, therefore I never engage in this classless behavior. But if I did, I'm sure they wouldn't appreciate the disrespect & would have every right to correct me.
Just as I don't appreciate the lack of respect. I have no problem correcting AutoDonkey & Tripe with leaderboard links, who are both ignorant & classless enough to engage the Waves in smack talk while trailing.
Comment -
Bobbo's biggest problem isn't not knowing when to be humble; it's knowing what constitutes success in the first place. He thinks that by spending more time to win fewer points, he's somehow better than others. Even towards the people who haven't won as much as bobby have, he should realize that "crushing" penny-ante poker for a ~15-25% ROI (as it's actually defined, not bobbo's made-up feel-good definition) isn't an accomplishment in any sense of the word
Comment -
bobby::coward::ducking:ussy::waves
Comment -
this wussywaves talked some shit, then refused to back it up. Then he only wants to "flip" anytime I join his puzzy ass on a table..... he rants about being on leader bds, which I'm on as well, and b/c he happened to run hot and stacked chips in the first half of the year and now professes "superiority", I challanged this wuss, who I'd never heard of, with a contest, heads up, that I would have more pts on the main poker leader bd by 12-31-14, (giving him his 700-800 pt lead), and the puzzy ducked that too..... he makes bullshit excuses and can't back up his smack...... he's a loudmouth coward who's afraid to play me in either omaha or holdem, at any stakes..... he has so little confidence in his game he wouldn't even accept a challange in which I spot him 750 or so points..... bottom line:
bobby::coward::ducking:ussy::waves::excu sesComment -
Coming from a Donkey who ducked my annual challenge in January. And with good reason, as you would be losing chump.Comment -
Fact of the matter is you have much higher poker deposits, so it's quite obvious you spent way more time with your countless hours in ring games. If I chose to waste more time on SBR that way, I would obviously have a higher net profit. As I would still have the same lofty & correctly defined ROI, compared to your pathetic ROI.Bobbo's biggest problem isn't not knowing when to be humble; it's knowing what constitutes success in the first place. He thinks that by spending more time to win fewer points, he's somehow better than others. Even towards the people who haven't won as much as bobby have, he should realize that "crushing" penny-ante poker for a ~15-25% ROI (as it's actually defined, not bobbo's made-up feel-good definition) isn't an accomplishment in any sense of the word
Comment -
if you're so superior, cowardpussyexcusesboy, why don't you accept my heads up 5k end o year donk challenge, eh fahgit? why??? because you know I will blow by you with ease...... keep ducking me in ring games and keep making lame excuses as to why you can't accept what should be, if you're so damn great, an easy move for you to pick up 5k in pts..... you could accept, but you won't..... because you're a p u z z y!!!!!
bobby::coward::duckingussy::waves::excuses
Comment -
this is what is confusing me with all this shit talk in the poker forums. with how the daily tourneys are set up any donk can get onto the leaderboards if they are committed to playing every day. poker points are like dave and buster tickets.Bobbo's biggest problem isn't not knowing when to be humble; it's knowing what constitutes success in the first place. He thinks that by spending more time to win fewer points, he's somehow better than others. Even towards the people who haven't won as much as bobby have, he should realize that "crushing" penny-ante poker for a ~15-25% ROI (as it's actually defined, not bobbo's made-up feel-good definition) isn't an accomplishment in any sense of the wordComment -
My annual challenge will start every January, why didn't you sign up then pussy?
You want to bet 5k that you don't even have, typical broke dikk fukk behavior.Comment -
Last edited by Auto Donk; 06-02-14, 08:41 PM. Reason: i cash my pts out, pussywaves! tell me who u trust to hold em, pussy, i'll have 5k tomorrow.... coward!!!!Comment -
Just judging by the forum topics...Bobbywaves would have to be #1 ?Comment -
Not sure anyone playing for fractions of a cent each hand can be a villian. You need to have big-time shit in mind to be a villian.Comment -
It's hard to say...bobbo's behavior is poor at the tables primarily because of his inconsiderate slowrolling, which is definitely pointlessly rude but not really 'villain' material imo, especially when you consider how easy it is to outplay him in general.
On the other hand, he is the biggest stiff on the boards currently by principal stiffed, is frequently and hypocritically dense, and centy's list seems to be mostly "villains" who also play poker, instead of villains because of their poker play.
By centy's definition, maybe...but it's hard to think of a guy as a poker villain when he's really just inconsiderate. dumb and easy to take chips from. "Sucker" fits much better than "villain", maybe "attention whore sucker" or the like.Comment -
Aside from the proven fact that you're routinely outplayed, you winning 29k from me doesn't seem to square with the excuse you gave jay (when you turned down his bet because he "irresponsibly" wagered 20% of his "bankroll"). Considering 29k was far more than 20% of what you or I had for points at the time, how could you have accepted a wager above 20% of our bankrolls when you clearly consider it reason not to bet?
Do you mean to say that caring about what % of someone's bankroll they wager is only an excuse you dig out when you're too embarrassed to admit you're scared? Are you just not able to keep track of your excuses? Or are you really consistent in your thought processes, and you'd like to void this accidental wager where you went against what you claim to believe in? Help us out here bobbo
Comment -
My general rule of thumb of betting no more than 5% of bankroll is lifted, when there's a virtual lock to bet on. My 29k bet against you Tripe was that virtual lock, as the results proved.
Now Jay's irresponsible last longer bet against me was virtual suicide, given my style of play & superior poker skills, as the results proved. As a man of God I can't in good conscience steal Jay's 1k, despite him being an ignorant troll. Even if I accepted Jay's bet for the easy 1k, we all know Jay wouldn't post up the 1k with a 3rd party. So it's a moot point anyway.Do you mean to say that caring about what % of someone's bankroll they wager is only an excuse you dig out when you're too embarrassed to admit you're scared? Are you just not able to keep track of your excuses? Or are you really consistent in your thought processes, and you'd like to void this accidental wager where you went against what you claim to believe in? Help us out here bobbo
Comment -
So if we make the huge assumption that what you say here is accurate (and not just pulled out of your ass as most of your excuses are), how did you let me bet against you when it was (in your words) "virtual suicide"? Where was your "lolz he wouldn't have posted up" opinion when you didn't make me post up?
That's the problem with trying to use excuses to bail yourself out of excuses bobbo, you just end up throwing out more contradictions to bury yourself
Comment -
I accepted your bet to teach you a lesson & shut up your arrogant opinions. At least I succeeded on the former, I sent you into hibernation for awhile. But now you're struggling on the latter, despite getting your ass handed to you. I was able to goat you into accepting a 29k bet, to obtain maximum value from you. I didn't make you post up 29k, as I trusted you would pay. My judgement call was spot on, as you paid. (Albeit a few days late & ignorantly declining my generous buyout offers). That's gratitude for ya.
No excuses or contradictions coming from me. I've always been a str8 shooter, call it as I see it. You may want to try looking in the mirror, hopefully the glass doesn't crack.That's the problem with trying to use excuses to bail yourself out of excuses bobbo, you just end up throwing out more contradictions to bury yourself
Comment -
In other words: sometimes you'll accept a large wager that's against what you claim to believe for bankroll management, and other times you'll use it as an excuse not to bet or not to let someone else bet. When you accept wagers from me and win, you were 'goating' me...when you lose bets to me, or take bets from DS and donk and lose several times over, those were all part of your plan too? Presumably this master plan will turn up a win somewhere after all your recent losses??I accepted your bet to teach you a lesson & shut up your arrogant opinions. At least I succeeded on the former, I sent you into hibernation for awhile. But now you're struggling on the latter, despite getting your ass handed to you. I was able to goat you into accepting a 29k bet, to obtain maximum value from you. I didn't make you post up 29k, as I trusted you would pay. My judgement call was spot on, as you paid. (Albeit a few days late & ignorantly declining my generous buyout offers). That's gratitude for ya.
No excuses or contradictions coming from me. I've always been a str8 shooter, call it as I see it. You may want to try looking in the mirror, hopefully the glass doesn't crack.
It's been amusing as often pointing out the holes in your make-believe, and I get why you see the need to create an escape from reality. I'd feel a lot worse about poking holes in your coping mechanism if I didn't know how impervious it is to reality
Comment -
As previously explained, I will accept large wagers on occasion when it's a virtual lock. Such as our 29k poker bet was a virtual lock, as results showed. I will also lose some smaller bets on purpose, to set up a larger bet. I demonstrated this by dumping a small bet to DS, in a concerted effort to set you up for accepting a 29k bet.
My master plan worked to perfection, with a net profit of 26k. This is not even counting the approx.6k profits from side wagers made with others, regarding the outcome of our bet.Comment -
You've lost a few bets to me sir, its actually 2-1 in my favor(your only win coming when I spotted you a substantial lead) and you will duck me with any contest for a large wager for higher standings on contest leaderboards.
Of course I will offer you a higher finish bet again this time for 5000 points and you will decline or counter with some other meaningless stat contest.Comment -
Cool story bobbo...except of course for the part where you "lost on purpose" to DS and donk the following year, and ducked every one of their challenges after that. And there was the several bets you "lost on purpose" to me after we'd already bet everything. Then of course there was you "losing on purpose" on a wager you offered DS and stiffed on. A child can see through the pretense of losing being on purpose after the fact, and your ability to deceive yourself on the matter speaks volumes
As DS notes, you haven't managed to beat him in a straight forward contest...even that 29k crutch you keep falling back, 26k of it you won from being the underdog (acknowledged by the board and you yourself through your actions) who was spotted a large lead. Winning with a head start doesn't prove you're the better player, and you losing almost every time you're not spotted a lead demonstrates the exact opposite. How does that fit into your master plan of re-imagined excuses?
Comment -
I don't recall requesting you to spot me a lead, that was your choice sir. I offered you an annual pts & annual cashes challenges, but you refused knowing you would lose. I clearly demonstrated beating you without leads: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/Last edited by bobbywaves; 08-17-16, 02:03 PM.Comment
