-
Comment -
hey paco how you been?Comment -
As unpopular as this opinion is, I absolutely agree. There's never been any scientific proof made that certain people are born predetermined to be homosexuals. I think without scientific proof, it is impossible to conclude someone was "born like that." Not only does declaring homosexuals are born like that give them justification, it is also an attempt to bring sympathy for their unnatural lifestyles. They want to equate homosexuality to being a person being born with a birth defect. That's simply not the case.
Its no different than the way the Aids epidemic terror was shoved down our throats. All we ever heard was "Aids affects everyone." "No one is safe from this terrible disease." "Heterosexuals are just as likely to get it as homosexuals."
What a crock. The simple truth is that Aids is a disease that you should definitely be very concerned about......if you're an intravenous drug user or a male into cornholing, or getting cornholed, by other males. If your choice of lifestyle doesn't often bring you into close contact with these two types of folks, well then....you're good!
Comment -
Who the fukk besides college chicks who think making out with other girls in bars makes them look sexy to guys would ever WANT to be gay? They're bullied, discriminated against, and sometimes killed for this. It's as much of their genetic makeup as my brown eyes or your big wang. Homosexuality exists in many species of animals - they all choose to be gay or play with dolls?
So if your son comes home and tells you he's gay - and you know that you've never let him play with Barbies - what do you do?
A friend sent me these two letters on the weekend. Which one is closest to what you'd write your son?
2. Dear Hypothetically Gay Son,
You’re gay. Obviously you already know that, because you told us at the dinner table last night. I apologize for the awkward silence afterwards, but I was chewing. It was like when we’re at a restaurant and the waiter comes up mid-bite and asks how the meal is, only in this metaphor you are the waiter and instead of asking me about my meal you said you were gay. I don’t know why I needed to explain that. I think I needed to find a funny way to repeat the fact that you’re gay… because that is what it sounds like in my head right now. “My son is gay. My son is gay. My son is gay.”
Let me be perfectly clear. I love you. I will always love you. Since being gay is part of who you are, I love that you’re gay. I’m just trying to wrap my head around the idea. If you sensed any sadness in my silence last night, it was because I was surprised that I was surprised. Ideally, I would have already known. Since you were an embryo, my intent has always been to really know you for who you are and not who I expect you to be. And yet, I was taken by surprise at last night’s dinner. Have I said “surprise” enough in this paragraph? One more time… surprise!
OK. Let’s get a few things straight about how things are going to be.
1. Our home is a place of safety and love. The world has dealt you a difficult card. While LGBT people are becoming more accepted, it is still a difficult path to walk. You’re going to experience hate and anger and misunderstandings about who you are out in the world. That will not happen here. You need to know with every fiber of who you are that when you walk in the front door of your home you are safe and you are loved. Your mother is in complete agreement with me on this.
2. I am still, as always, your biggest defender. Just because you’re gay doesn’t mean you’re any less capable of taking care of/defending yourself. That said, if you need me to stand next to you, in front of you, write letters, sign petitions, advocate, or anything else, I am here. I will go to war for you.
3. If you’re going to have boys over, you now need to leave your bedroom door open. Sorry kiddo. Thems are the breaks. I couldn’t have girls in my room with the door shut, you don’t get to have boys.
4. You and I are going to revisit that talk we had about safe sex. I know it’s going to be awkward for both of us, but it is important. I need to do some research first, so let’s give it a few weeks. If you have questions or concerns before then, let me know.
That’s enough for now. Feel free to view this letter as a contract. If I ever fail to meet any of the commitments made herein, pull it out and hold me to account. I’ll end with this: You are not broken. You are whole, and beautiful. You are capable and compassionate. You and your sister are the best things I have ever done with my life, and I couldn’t be more proud of the people you’ve become.
Love,
Dad
P.S. Thanks to a few key Supreme Court decisions and the Marriage Equality act of 2020 you’re legally able to get married. When I was your age, that was just an idea. Pretty cool huh?Comment -
shari you have too much time on your hands
Comment -
I'm going with the first one..Comment -
Opie
Get out of the shell you're living in, in 1892 and diversify your culture. Don't be afraid to talk to a queer and you just may see that they are people too. They aren't aliens I promise. Now I'm not telling you to want it in the ass because let's be honest, nothing is better than T and A, well of course vagina is but ya long winded rant ended. All I am saying is talk to some queers and realize they are normal people that just like to suck rooster and take it up the turd cutter.Comment -
whoreshit.
Gays aren't "born that way" -- a lesbian says so
<small>RenewAmerica.com ^ | Sept. 14, 2011 | Bryan Fischer
</small>
In an astonishing column published in the winger-left publication, "The Atlantic," openly "queer woman" (her words) Lindsay Miller says flatly, "In direct opposition to both the mainstream gay movement and Lady Gaga, I would like to state for the record that I was not born this way."
Tellingly, she argues that saying people are "born this way" is a form of condescension, and she resents it mightily. "I get frustrated with the veiled condescension of straight people who believe that queers 'can't help it,' and thus should be treated with tolerance and pity."
I've got news for Ms. Miller — it's not straights saying that you can't help it, it is your co-belligerents in the homosexual movement. In the pro-family movement, we entirely agree with you that sexual behavior in the end is always a matter of choice. We have no condescension towards you in the least — we regard you as men and women made in the image of God who are perfectly capable of making responsible and mature decisions regarding your sexuality.
Ms. Miller concludes her piece by saying, "The life I have now is not something I ended up with because I had no other options. Make no mistake — it's a life I chose."
Homosexual activists must be seething at this point, since Ms. Miller has blown their entire civil rights argument — we're just like blacks — to smithereens. Blacks did not choose to be black. Race is immutable, assigned at birth. But homosexuality is not immutable and it is not fixed at birth. Ms. Miller has chosen lesbianism, which means she is perfectly capable of choosing sexual normalcy if she becomes so inclined.
Ms. Miller confirms what Colin Powell said long ago, that the comparison between race and sexual preference is "convenient but invalid."
It's time to send the "born that way" myth to the graveyard of misbegotten ideas, buried in the plot next to the myth that the sun revolves around the earth.
And we don't just need to take Lindsay Miller's word for it. Psychiatrists William Byne and Bruce Parsons wrote in Archives of General Psychiatry (March 1993) that, "Critical review shows the evidence favoring a biologic theory to be lacking ... In fact, the current trend may be to underrate the explanatory power of extant psychosocial models." In other words, nurture plays a greater role in sexual preference than homosexual activists want you to believe.
As Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council points out, rigorous studies of identical twins have now made it impossible to argue seriously for the theory of genetic determination. If homosexuality were fixed at birth, as the misguided thinking of homosexual activists goes, then if one twin is homosexual, the other should be as well. The "concordance rate" should be 100%.
But it's not. One early proponent of the "born that way" thesis, Michael Bailey, conducted a study on a large sample of Australian twins and discovered to his chagrin that the concordance rate was just 11%.
Peter Bearman and Hannah Bruckner, researchers from Columbia and Yale, looked at data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and found concordance rates of just 6.7% for male and 5.3% for female identical twins.
They determined that social environment was of far greater significance, and their research led them to reject "genetic influence independent of social context" as an explanation for homosexuality. They concluded, "..[O]ur results support the hypothesis that less gendered socialization in early childhood and preadolescence shapes subsequent same-sex romantic preferences."
As Sprigg observes, "If it was not clear in the 1990's, it certainly is now — no one is 'born gay.'"
The implications, of course, of this simple truth are far-reaching. If homosexual behavior is a choice, then our public policy can freely be shaped by an honest look at whether this behavioral choice is healthy and should be encouraged or unhealthy and dangerous and consequently discouraged.
The elevated health risks associated with homosexuality are by now so well established that not even homosexuals pretend otherwise. The Gay and Lesbian Medical Association warns that active homosexuals are at elevated risks of HIV/AIDS, substance and alcohol abuse, depression and anxiety, hepatitis, a whole range of STDs such as syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, pubic lice, Human Papilloma Virus, and anal papilloma, and prostate, testicular and colon cancer.
Bottom line: this is not behavior that any rational society should condone, endorse, subsidize, reward, promote or sanction in domestic policy or in the marketplace. It's a choice, and a bad one at that. It's long past time for our culture to say a simple and direct "No" to homosexuality and the homosexual agenda.Comment -
That took no time at all. I have a child. I work with many gay people at my other job. I have many gay friends. I ran 10ks yesterday - and almost killed my arse - to support gay marriage in Australia. Something that 62% of the population here supports as well. Maybe if I didn't have a kid I wouldn't care as much. I just think there are SOOOOOOOOO many other issues in first world countries that need to be dealt with. The whole concept of marriage is much removed from the times when you could only get married in a Church and could never divorce. People get married on the beach, in Vegas, whatever. Some get divorced before the ink is dry. I've just never heard one good argument for why it shouldn't be legalised and I will NEVER turn my child away if he comes home some day and tells me he's gay. I'll love him just as much as I do now and probably be even more protective because the world sadly contains assholes who thinks it's ok to belittle and degrade people who if they had one brain cell - and considering some of our greatest scientists, techies, Dr's, etc were gay obviously they do - would not choose this because of the hatred that exists. I don't care enough to preach but enough to say that this just seems very wrong. Hard enough to find someone in the world who you love who loves you back and isn't with you because of cash, because they want to have kids, they're desperate, etc. GL though... what I think doesn't matter since I'm not a politician. But if a Republican ever smartened up and supported gay marriage, he'd get all those rich gays who hate everything else about the Dems right behind him and they'd be able to toss Obama, etc easily which they're obviously not going to do this time.Comment -
And nice source, Mr. Hick Opie. "Renew America"
Comment -
As crazy as she is, she makes a good point in this quote. Being gay is not normal. But whatever floats ur boat.
“Our children will be forced to learn that homosexuality is normal and natural and that perhaps they should try it, and that’ll be very soon in our public schools all across the state, beginning in kindergarten.” — Senator Michele Bachmann, appearing as guest on radio program “Prophetic Views Behind The News”, hosted by Jan Markell, KKMS 980-AM, March 6, 2004. Comment -
And for those trying to use the word of "God" as their argument, the same word of "God" promoted slavery:
When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment.
Comment -
I hope for all your kids' sakes that none of them are born gay. I can only imagine how shitty their life would be made.Comment -
Err.. what?
Comment -
Not sure why you can't get this through that bulbous head of yours......I am not against gays. I couldn't give a fukk less what anyone does in their own home. You and your man can suck and cornhole one another to your hearts content. Have at it!!
I simply oppose gay marriage. I am fine with a civil union, but not the benefits and standing that come with a man and a woman marrying.
I am against it, and I always will be. I don't think its right, its unnatural, and I don't want kids to be brainwashed into believing its normal.
That's it.Comment -
You're actually wrong about how your fellow Republicans view gay marriage but I'll leave you to find those links for yourself.
However I actually respect your opinion on some things and think you'll give me an honest answer so can you try to answer me this without the SBR bs? I'm really just curious because I don't see how intelligent people oppose it and when I don't understand someone's point of view it drives me batty.
Oh and since I'm in the minority here as a female, I see how some hetero guys don't tend to feel comfortable with the sex part. For some reason they'll watch girl on girl porn but never guy on guy. Both homosexual acts but one is more acceptable and in fact, looked at as hot. I've never understood that when those same people then bash homosexuals verbally or sadly physically.
But please don't use any of these reasons:
1. Bible stuff: If we went by the Bible, women on their period are unclean, you can own a slave and you could still kill your mother for working on a Sunday. And you'd be able to explain to me how it went from Adam and Eve and 3 sons to suddenly more people on Earth? Either they fukked their mother or the people who decided they should interpret God's words started to leave out and misinterpret stuff. (The only time I was smacked in Catholic school was for asking this in grade 10)
2. The word marriage is sacred: That word is already ruined and words get redefined all the time. Look at Kim Kardashian and every other dirtbag you know of who has spit on the supposed holiness of marriage.
3. People get married to have kids: But we let those who have had vasectomies, are infertile or who are past menopause marry.
4. Kids only should be raised by their parents: Adoption is legal and most of us know at least one person who has been raised by a grandparent, aunt, foster parent, etc.
5. It's the law: Laws change constantly. No need to explain that one obviously.
These are just the reasons I hear so I'm hoping you have some new insight for me.
Comment -
Oh and as far as the school stuff, what kind of school would even be bringing this up? Maybe I'm out of the US loop but Australia is way more socialist than the US is and they sure as hell don't teach anything about homosexuality in schools. They teach about acceptance of race, religion, different family structures, etc. Not getting into specifics about "yeah we should all be Muslims" "yeah we should all hate poor people" "yeah we should all be gay". Is that what you think would really happen?Comment -
They dont teach shit about man and women in school. If anything keeping it "illegal" will sway kids more than it being legal because kids always reject the norm. Pot is illegal yet 85% of 15 year olds have smoked tree. That logic baffles me. It isn't a choice. It's something you're born with. You think with all the pussy Neil Patrick Harris could swim in that he chooses to smoke pole because it's trendy and he played with barbies and I assure you it's not because someone told him to be a queer. It's embedded in genetic code and many studies have been performed.
If your kid decides to be queer because society accepts it, your kid is queer real simple. Family values??
Comment -
This topic is irritating. It's a never ending debate. People will stand there grounds here.
Im gonna go back to watching my spankwire.comComment -
Don't let your kid gamble or jerk off either. Society shuns it and gambling offshore is ILLEGAL!!!Comment -
Opposing gay marriage stems from a lack of intelligence or an abundance of insecurity. Any intelligent secure person doesn't care enough about gay marriage to oppose it. You have to look inward if you really believe gay marriage devalues your own marriage, or you really care about what people do in their bedroom.Comment -
Pedophilia is NOT the same as being homosexual. Peds actually go after the opposite sex more so than they do the same sex and unfortunately girls/young females are more at risk than males. Please don't confuse the two. One is a horrific behaviour that robs children of their innocence. The other involves consenting adults having sex.Comment -
What are u talking about Shari? I am quicker than u
Comment
