Originally posted by PickWinnerAllDay
And all of this leads you to believe that I'm the one who didn't address your points? As I said at the top of my post before, I went line by line and addressed each of your points in turn. I mean, come on, for someone who got such a high score on their LSAT, I'd expect to see some quality counterarguments to both my original points and my line by line response. Instead I get the equivalent of "Zomg, look at my LSAT score" and "Your argument is nothing I haven't heard before" The first of which isn't really a great response to my, "explain how your GPA does not explain away some sort of lack of ability or drive or how you're going to suddenly develop this awesome work ethic now that it "counts"". And the second of which isn't even a response to an argument, its a complete dismissal that I've never said anything, which just goes to prove that you can't change the mind of lemmings about jumping off the cliff.
Beyond that you respond with this, which indites your position more than anything I could say, and its straight from your own mouth:
Originally posted by PickWinnerAllDay
The point ultimate is this, BigLaw associates both hate their job and have to work at it so hard that it can't just be a means to an end, between sleeping and bodily functions working 80 hours a week basically means that you are actually physically hurting yourself or you have no time to make work anything but your life. There is no means to an end with BigLaw because BigLaw is both your means and your end. But continue to think that working 80/hr week gives you time to do what you really love, that is to say if you make it as one of the 20% who make BigLaw.