Originally posted by Betn247
Can A Banged Up Jokovic Beat Raffy Nadal AGAIN????
Collapse
X
-
StatmanSBR MVP
- 12-04-10
- 1212
#36Total sets for Joker/Nadal over 3.5 is now sitting at -205 at 5dimes. Good luck in your plays.Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388208
#37I am taking Nadal but no angle
The due theory..how can one guy keep beating a world class player?Comment -
ApricotSinner32Restricted User
- 11-28-10
- 10648
#38Undecided on this matchup as of now.Comment -
mathdotcomSBR Posting Legend
- 03-24-08
- 11689
#39sad to see such a boring player at #1Comment -
PR9SBR MVP
- 12-30-11
- 2813
#40Well they said the same thing before the Fed/Rafa match a few days ago. Federer hasn't beaten Nadal in a Grand Slam since 2007.Originally posted by jjgoldI am taking Nadal but no angle
The due theory..how can one guy keep beating a world class player?Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388208
#41Nadal said in an interview his game is better and he is going for more winners but he might not be ready to beat Joker so early in the season
nadal unsure of victory chances
Rafael Nadal feels Sunday's Australian Open final against defending champion Novak Djokovic may have come too soon for his off-season adjustments to take full effect.
While Djokovic received all the plaudits in 2011 for a remarkable year which saw him win three grand slam crowns, Nadal's efforts slipped under the radar.
The Spaniard took the French Open title and finished runner-up to the Serbian at Wimbledon and the US Open.
Those impressive achievements did not stop him attempting to add more aggression to his game during the winter break, though.
And while he is happy with how the tinkering has gone so far, he reckons it could be months before they are translated into better results.
He said: "I am trying to play a little bit more aggressive and hit more winners but the improvement I want is not complete.
"I haven't practised a lot with that so I need time to play with this aggressive plan during matches.
"I probably need a few more months and a few more tournaments."
And while Nadal leads his overall head-to-head record with Djokovic 16-13, the world number one has had the upper hand recently, winning the last six, all finals.
"I am happy with how I am doing," Nadal added, "but I don't know if it's going to be enough against him.
"I need to play a little better, in my opinion, to have a chance.
"But I think I am going the right way to compete against the best players in the world.
"I got here by beating the sixth best player (Tomas Berdych) and the number three (Roger Federer).
"So it's a fantastic way to start the season but now is another big, big test.
"I don't know if I am ready to win the match tomorrow but I am going to fight for it."
Djokovic comes into the clash under a cloud physically after struggling with his breathing during the quarter-final win over David Ferrer and his last-four defeat of Andy Murray.
And while Nadal was quick to suggest there could be an element of gamesmanship at play - "it is difficult to imagine he has these problems", he said - Djokovic claims his may have been hit by an allergy.
The Serbian said: "I've seen the doctor and I've talked with some people.
"I've also talked with a couple of players that have had little allergy problems this year in Australia for some reason, ones they didn't have in the last couple of years but they have had reactions this year.
"I suppose that's my problem."
And having witnessed Nadal's impressive four-set defeat of Federer in the semis, Djokovic accepts he will have to be at his best to retain the trophy and become just the fifth man to win three consecutive grand slam titles.
"It was a fantastic match from both of them," he added.
"It was an incredible effort from Rafa to come back and he played some incredible passing shots. That's why he's a champion and one of the best players to ever play this game.
"He never gives up, has a great fighting spirit and very few weaknesses.
"He's eager and motivated to win the title, like I am.
"It's unpredictable as to what's going to happen."Comment -
gregmSBR MVP- 03-14-11
- 3535
#42Awesome article JJ, surprised to see Nadal to say some of those things. I put some spaces in between the quotes, easier to read. Definitely worth reading.Originally posted by jjgoldNadal said in an interview his game is better and he is going for more winners but he might not be ready to beat Joker so early in the season
nadal unsure of victory chances
Rafael Nadal feels Sunday's Australian Open final against defending champion Novak Djokovic may have come too soon for his off-season adjustments to take full effect.
While Djokovic received all the plaudits in 2011 for a remarkable year which saw him win three grand slam crowns, Nadal's efforts slipped under the radar.
The Spaniard took the French Open title and finished runner-up to the Serbian at Wimbledon and the US Open.
Those impressive achievements did not stop him attempting to add more aggression to his game during the winter break, though.
And while he is happy with how the tinkering has gone so far, he reckons it could be months before they are translated into better results.
He said: "I am trying to play a little bit more aggressive and hit more winners but the improvement I want is not complete.
"I haven't practised a lot with that so I need time to play with this aggressive plan during matches.
"I probably need a few more months and a few more tournaments."
And while Nadal leads his overall head-to-head record with Djokovic 16-13, the world number one has had the upper hand recently, winning the last six, all finals.
"I am happy with how I am doing," Nadal added, "but I don't know if it's going to be enough against him.
"I need to play a little better, in my opinion, to have a chance.
"But I think I am going the right way to compete against the best players in the world.
"I got here by beating the sixth best player (Tomas Berdych) and the number three (Roger Federer).
"So it's a fantastic way to start the season but now is another big, big test.
"I don't know if I am ready to win the match tomorrow but I am going to fight for it."
Djokovic comes into the clash under a cloud physically after struggling with his breathing during the quarter-final win over David Ferrer and his last-four defeat of Andy Murray.
And while Nadal was quick to suggest there could be an element of gamesmanship at play - "it is difficult to imagine he has these problems", he said - Djokovic claims his may have been hit by an allergy.
The Serbian said: "I've seen the doctor and I've talked with some people.
"I've also talked with a couple of players that have had little allergy problems this year in Australia for some reason, ones they didn't have in the last couple of years but they have had reactions this year.
"I suppose that's my problem."
And having witnessed Nadal's impressive four-set defeat of Federer in the semis, Djokovic accepts he will have to be at his best to retain the trophy and become just the fifth man to win three consecutive grand slam titles.
"It was a fantastic match from both of them," he added.
"It was an incredible effort from Rafa to come back and he played some incredible passing shots. That's why he's a champion and one of the best players to ever play this game.
"He never gives up, has a great fighting spirit and very few weaknesses.
"He's eager and motivated to win the title, like I am.
"It's unpredictable as to what's going to happen."
Nadal said in an interview his game is better and he is going for more winners but he might not be ready to beat Joker so early in the season
nadal unsure of victory chances
Rafael Nadal feels Sunday's Australian Open final against defending champion Novak Djokovic may have come too soon for his off-season adjustments to take full effect. While Djokovic received all the plaudits in 2011 for a remarkable year which saw him win three grand slam crowns, Nadal's efforts slipped under the radar.
The Spaniard took the French Open title and finished runner-up to the Serbian at Wimbledon and the US Open.
Those impressive achievements did not stop him attempting to add more aggression to his game during the winter break, though.
And while he is happy with how the tinkering has gone so far, he reckons it could be months before they are translated into better results.
He said: "I am trying to play a little bit more aggressive and hit more winners but the improvement I want is not complete.
"I haven't practised a lot with that so I need time to play with this aggressive plan during matches.
"I probably need a few more months and a few more tournaments."
And while Nadal leads his overall head-to-head record with Djokovic 16-13, the world number one has had the upper hand recently, winning the last six, all finals.
"I am happy with how I am doing," Nadal added, "but I don't know if it's going to be enough against him.
"I need to play a little better, in my opinion, to have a chance. "But I think I am going the right way to compete against the best players in the world.
"I got here by beating the sixth best player (Tomas Berdych) and the number three (Roger Federer).
"So it's a fantastic way to start the season but now is another big, big test.
"I don't know if I am ready to win the match tomorrow but I am going to fight for it."
Djokovic comes into the clash under a cloud physically after struggling with his breathing during the quarter-final win over David Ferrer and his last-four defeat of Andy Murray.
And while Nadal was quick to suggest there could be an element of gamesmanship at play - "it is difficult to imagine he has these problems", he said - Djokovic claims his may have been hit by an allergy.
The Serbian said: "I've seen the doctor and I've talked with some people.
"I've also talked with a couple of players that have had little allergy problems this year in Australia for some reason, ones they didn't have in the last couple of years but they have had reactions this year.
"I suppose that's my problem."
And having witnessed Nadal's impressive four-set defeat of Federer in the semis, Djokovic accepts he will have to be at his best to retain the trophy and become just the fifth man to win three consecutive grand slam titles.
"It was a fantastic match from both of them," he added.
"It was an incredible effort from Rafa to come back and he played some incredible passing shots. That's why he's a champion and one of the best players to ever play this game.
"He never gives up, has a great fighting spirit and very few weaknesses.
"He's eager and motivated to win the title, like I am.
"It's unpredictable as to what's going to happen."Comment -
FourLengthsClearSBR MVP
- 12-29-10
- 3808
#43I think most of us would agree with that article if Djoker is at his best. Best on the evidence from his last two matches however, that is a big if. If Djokovic is prone to fatigue tomorrow, Nadal is the perfect guy to exploit that.Comment -
TsongaSBR MVP
- 10-12-09
- 2349
#44Originally posted by jjgoldGreat write up
He does seem slightly off but not much
He is still in the final
If Nadal loses he should quit
Can we get a count on how many players JJ has said should quit. How are you even posting on tennis? Every loss that goes badly for you ends up having you tell someone to quit. Ferrer being the last one. You do realize there is only 1 #1 at a time. Should the rest just quit?Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#45Novak Djokovic is banking on his "mental edge" over Rafael Nadal to carry him to more Australian Open glory after suffering through a "physical crisis" to reach Sunday night's final.
The world No.1 overcame breathing difficulties and severe fatigue to put Andy Murray to the sword in an exhausting five-set semi-final that finished in the wee hours of Saturday morning.
Djokovic admitted to having consulted doctors in a desperate bid to diagnose his mystery "allergy" and was only hoping - rather than expecting - to be ready for his record-setting title showdown with Nadal.
For the first time in open-era history, the same two men will contest three consecutive grand slam finals after Djokovic denied Nadal in four-set deciders at Wimbledon and the US Open last year.
The powerhouse Serb also conquered Nadal in four Masters Series finals in 2011 to wrestle the top ranking from the Spaniard with six successive victories over the 10-times major winner.
"I know that I maybe have a mental edge because I've won six finals, the five or six times we played, in 2011 and I've had lots of success against him," Djokovic said after outlasting Murray 6-3 3-6 6-7 (4-7) 6-1 7-5 in their midnight cliffhanger.
"On the other hand, it's a new year. It's a new challenge. It's a different situation.
"He has maybe a day advantage over me for recovery and for getting ready for the finals.
"That's going to be my main priority and concern the next day and a half, to physically be able to perform my best and be ready to play five sets.
"If I am able to do that, then I can believe that I can win.
"Again, I'm repeating that physically I need to be fit."
Djokovic planned to sleep as much as possible and said he was unlikely to practise before the final, while his camp even quietly complained about Nadal having an extra day's rest.
Nadal, though, reminded the defending champion that he backed up to win the crown in similar circumstances three years ago after needing five hours and 14 minutes to beat fellow Spaniard Fernando Verdasco in the second semi.
"In 2009, I played longer than him in the semi-finals," Nadal said.
"I played more than five hours at very high intensity, too. I had only one day and Federer had two.
"I was recovered for the final, so I think you can say it's unfair, yes, but not crazy unfair.
"The US Open when you don't have day off between semi-finals and final, that's really unfair.
"If the match of yesterday happened in the US Open and the other semi-final is in straight sets, you are in big trouble for the final.
"Having one day off, I believe you are not in big trouble."
The vanquished Murray agreed, saying he "wouldn't be fancying his chances" if Djokovic had to take on Nadal on Saturday, but felt the extra day's rest would be hugely helpful.Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#46Something else to keep in mind, and I think EP mentioned this in another thread, this will be the first time in 3yrs Nadal has even completed an Australian Open.
2009: won the title against Fed
2010: retired against Murray
2011: injured against Ferrer but refused to retire
This court is quite suited to Nadal's game. Whether that translates into a win or not, I don't know but Djokovic has never played him here. I'm just hoping for an awesome match - we've been out all day and finally had to come home because it is really so bloody hot and humid that you feel like you can't breathe. If Nadal wins it, I want it to be because he was the better player... not because Djoko can't breathe either.Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388208
#47Shari dont forget Nadal lost to Joker on clay so that theory goes out the door
Joker is better on all surfaces vs NadalComment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#48Ummm, he lost to Djoko in Rome and Madrid. The next tournament - the French (you know, that Grand Slam that's kind of important) - Djoko didn't even make the Final and Nadal won the whole thing.Originally posted by jjgoldShari dont forget Nadal lost to Joker on clay so that theory goes out the door
Joker is better on all surfaces vs Nadal
Irrelevant to my post though: They have never played here.Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388208
#49Shari................Joker never played him at French that is why he lost
Fed played an unreal match to beat Joker
Hun your know your stuff thoughComment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#50Ummm, Joker couldn't get past Fed, who couldn't get past Nadal. Not Nadal's fault he couldn't even make the bloody final. He can only play who's in front of him.Originally posted by jjgoldShari................Joker never played him at French that is why he lost
Fed played an unreal match to beat Joker
Hun your know your stuff though
I said it earlier, this one is a coin flip. For all those with it enough to know that betting a side in the Super Bowl is just asking for trouble, just increase the dollars wagered on this match worldwide and then think of how sharp the lines are. As long as this sucker gets to over 3 sets, I'm happy.Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388208
#51I hope Nadal wins and backing him based on your leanComment -
ApricotSinner32Restricted User
- 11-28-10
- 10648
#52Calling it a coinflip and than talking about how sharp the lines is with a -148/+139 lineOriginally posted by shari91
Ummm, Joker couldn't get past Fed, who couldn't get past Nadal. Not Nadal's fault he couldn't even make the bloody final. He can only play who's in front of him.
I said it earlier, this one is a coin flip. For all those with it enough to know that betting a side in the Super Bowl is just asking for trouble, just increase the dollars wagered on this match worldwide and then think of how sharp the lines are. As long as this sucker gets to over 3 sets, I'm happy.
Comment -
DiggityDaggityDoSBR Aristocracy
- 11-30-08
- 81463
#53I'm going to try to stay up to watch this shit. But holy fukk i'm gonna be drunk at 12:30amComment -
King MayanSBR Posting Legend
- 09-22-10
- 21330
#54Originally posted by DiggityDaggityDoI'm going to try to stay up to watch this shit. But holy fukk i'm gonna be drunk at 12:30am
make a video..
Should I pound Nadal then??Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#55Coinflip is a term Patty... you should know that by now considering the plays you made in that contest with JJ. I was referring to the fact that none of us know how Djoko will pull up, none of us know if Nadal will still be able to get 60% of his serve in as he has throughout the rest of the tournament, etc... We're all just speculating. The lines on a Slam in the Final are the sharpest that they'll ever be throughout a tennis season. So for anyone saying they have a significant edge in this match - considering everyone is reviewing the same info, including those who only troll the Tennis Forum 4 times a year - they are incorrect. Everyone's just taking a guess regardless of how many stats they have to back their case up. GL.Originally posted by ApricotSinner32
Calling it a coinflip and than talking about how sharp the lines is with a -148/+139 line
Comment -
ApricotSinner32Restricted User
- 11-28-10
- 10648
#56Yes coin flip is a term for a 50/50 proposition shari. I would expect such an educated woman as yourself to know this.
Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388208
#57Its -141/+138 at BetfairComment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#58Yes I know what it means, thank you. I was referring to it in the context of the lines that are posted for this match. Placing a bet on either of these players - as always, but especially now in a Final of a Slam - is making an assumption that you have an edge with one of these lines. In order to do that, you have to decide which one and in that regard, I believe it's a coinflip as the market will be more efficient now than in any other match leading up to the Final. That edge simply doesn't exist today so we're all merely guessing. I wasn't referring to PK lines. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough for you or my wording threw you off.Originally posted by ApricotSinner32Yes coin flip is a term for a 50/50 proposition shari. I would expect such an educated woman as yourself to know this.
Comment -
DiggityDaggityDoSBR Aristocracy
- 11-30-08
- 81463
#59Pound Joker, mayan!!! I fukkin did!!! Lets get this!!!Originally posted by King Mayan
make a video..
Should I pound Nadal then??Comment -
ApricotSinner32Restricted User
- 11-28-10
- 10648
#60Apology accepted.
Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#61Originally posted by ApricotSinner32Apology accepted.

Are you making a bet on this one?
The more I've been reading today online, the more it throws me off everything. Too many armchair analysts, including myself, who are hoping they have a clue. Throw in the stats and it becomes a mess.Comment -
mathdotcomSBR Posting Legend
- 03-24-08
- 11689
#62shari this is a man's forum so I suggest you take a walk
Comment -
ApricotSinner32Restricted User
- 11-28-10
- 10648
#63Obviously never playing joker as I don't bet favs. I will start to look at the match to consider if nadal is worth a play or not (imo) of course.Comment -
PR9SBR MVP
- 12-30-11
- 2813
#64ARTICLE:
"Nadal changes game for Djokovic – but is it enough?"
Novak Djokovic has dominated Rafael Nadal in recent times, but the Spanish great has tweaked his game in a clear strategy to get the better of his Serbian rival.
Another Grand Slam final, another Djokovic-Nadal clash - last year this duo did battle in six important finals with the Serb winning all of them, but can the Spaniard snap his losing streak?
In this blog I will look at how important this match is to Nadal, the elements of his game that Djokovic has been exploiting, and how Rafa has worked on these aspects at the Australian Open with this final in mind.
Last-chance saloon for Rafa?
The Majorcan is not used to failure. But he has lost six big finals in a row to Nole, who last season was pretty much unstoppable.
This final is of tremendous importance for Nadal. His path is constantly troubled by Nole and it's frustrating for him. I'm convinced that if this pattern continues Rafa could lose what has made him so strong throughout his career: his unwavering belief, desire, determination and passion.
Given how much effort he has put into getting past the final hurdle, these repeated blows could well traumatise Nadal. This problem needs to be solved quickly, so Nadal can prove to himself that he can stay the master of the game.
Why has Nadal failed?
There are several reasons why Rafael is struggling against Novak. Here are the main ones:
Nadal's serve, especially his second serve, lacks depth and power; Djokovic, meanwhile, boasts the best returning stats on second serve. Throughout 2011, Nole won the most points on his opponents' second serve. Against Rafa, he's "having fun" when he takes these chances, and always starts these points as the offensive player.
The Spaniard, when challenged like this, plays short and gets punished.
Nadal's general depth of shots is also to blame for his losses against Djokovic. While most players don't take advantage when Nadal shortens his shots, the Serb is outstanding in the way he steps inside the court to take the ball early - taking time off Nadal who, when attacked, plays even shorter.
When Rafa is the attacking one, he doesn't generate enough power to hurt Nole. The Serb is one of the best retrievers in the world and can to go from defence to offence on any ball that doesn't have enough power. This happens a lot in their battles.
What is at stake in this final?
The Serb certainly has the mental edge. Six finals played against the Majorcan, six victories. The numbers tell it all. Furthermore, Nole nearly saw himself lose against Andy Murray, like in the last US Open semi-final against Federer. Rather than fatiguing him, Nole will now feel even more invincible.
Rafa broke down mentally for the first time in his life in a Masters 1000 final against the Serb. He acknowledged it. But I feel he has bounced back since January and regained his legendary fighting spirit. He's ready, now more than ever.
Physically, both players have huge qualities. They both spent a lot of time on court in their semi-final. Even when Nadal has had an extra day off, Novak has previously shown himself to be fresher in their fights.
I have to give a little advantage to the Serb because of this. But Rafa has searched for solutions in two areas that have been troubling his game.
What has Nadal changed with Djokovic in mind?
Nadal has kept 70% of his first serves in play throughout this Australian Open - this shows he is dealing with his aforementioned second-serve problem by seeking to minimise the need to use it; previously he was at 57% of first serves in during his matches against Novak, a stat the Serb exploited ruthlessly last season. By reducing the need to use his second serve Nadal is protecting himself from Nole's attacks on it: Rafa has been preparing for this match against Djokovic. The only issue is that Rafa's best serve - the slice he often uses on deuce and advantage - plays directly to Nole's best shot: his backhand.
Regarding his shot efficiency, Nadal has added some weight on his racquet in order to change his swing weight (from 308 to 314): this means he can get more power and more length on his shots, reducing the shortening and power problem I talked about. He wants to make the Serb move backwards and to be more decisive on attacking balls so he can't turn defence into offence so easily.
Finally, game-plan wise, Rafa has to stop avoiding the diagonal with his backhand on to Nole's forehand. Indeed, it's when he changes to the diagonal shot that he gets punished by the Serbian. He has to make Novak go backwards, forcing him to use his forehand to dictate the game. Will he do it? I'm not sure as he has not had to so far, but I think so.
Personally, I'm convinced Djokovic will play a great match, like he always does against Nadal.
But this time Rafa has a new plan, one he has executed throughout this tournament, and I think he is readier than ever.Comment -
helsSBR Hall of Famer
- 04-12-09
- 8767
#65You don't sound like a girl from TBay.Originally posted by shari91Yes I know what it means, thank you. I was referring to it in the context of the lines that are posted for this match. Placing a bet on either of these players - as always, but especially now in a Final of a Slam - is making an assumption that you have an edge with one of these lines. In order to do that, you have to decide which one and in that regard, I believe it's a coinflip as the market will be more efficient now than in any other match leading up to the Final. That edge simply doesn't exist today so we're all merely guessing. I wasn't referring to PK lines. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough for you or my wording threw you off.Comment -
FourLengthsClearSBR MVP
- 12-29-10
- 3808
#66Laying Djoker @ 1.72 is eqivalent to backing Nadal at +139.Originally posted by jjgoldIts -141/+138 at BetfairComment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#67And yet you're here. In a thread about tennisOriginally posted by mathdotcomshari this is a man's forum so I suggest you take a walk

FLC posted in another thread that money's been coming in on Nadal on Betfair and the line has dropped 2 cents and he expected Pinny to follow suit so it might be a good time to grab him if you're debating it before the other books adjust.Originally posted by ApricotSinner32Obviously never playing joker as I don't bet favs. I will start to look at the match to consider if nadal is worth a play or not (imo) of course.Comment -
sweethookSBR Posting Legend
- 11-21-07
- 12667
#68from what i read shari you and i like nadal 3-1 or 3-2 ?Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#69What assumptions would you have about a female from TBay who hasn't lived there in 12 years?Originally posted by helsYou don't sound like a girl from TBay.Comment -
WvGamblerSBR Posting Legend
- 04-19-10
- 11618
#70Is Nadal where you're putting your money, my sweet Australian rose?Originally posted by shari91
And yet you're here. In a thread about tennis
FLC posted in another thread that money's been coming in on Nadal on Betfair and the line has dropped 2 cents and he expected Pinny to follow suit so it might be a good time to grab him if you're debating it before the other books adjust.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
