First NBA release- Chicago Bulls +3 -110 on XMAS day

[crustyme]

bulls 9 point dogs???







Bulls are projected to be the 2nd or 3rd best team in the league. What planet do you live on???

kobe + paul + howard vs rose would he a 20pt lakers blowout you clueless fraud.

[ehp6737]

Just put 3 units on Lakers +155. Thanks in advance Fakerboy

[BigDan]

Yeah because he doesn't care about nba rosters. He took this early thinking if CP3 or Dwight went to LA, it wouldn't matter anyway and the bulls would still win. Lakerman doesn't believe the game is played on the court with the rosters. He believes adding a superstar wouldn't change the outcome of the game because it's already decided by line movement.

i saw all the crap you said about the finals last season so lets not get all high and mighty....you basically just a jockrider of superstars.. that said im with you on mia 2marro, bron will show out in a game that dont mean shit..

[PAULYPOKER]

LB you are finally on the right side for once.........

Ya might have sumthin here........

[crustyme]

btw kerrybull..... last time bulls visited la, they were 8pt dogs. but you think 9pts is far-fetched with paul and howard?

youre such a fool.

[lakerboy]

so funny how guys wont bet this game now but on gameday when the line unplayable for chi they will take lal.

[7secondsOrLess]

nice bump but youre still a loser

[Lakers714]

Haven't been in here for about a year. Is MT and Paco still around?

[BigDan]

Haven't been in here for about a year. Is MT and Paco still around?

yep

[brahmabull117]

kobe + paul + howard vs rose would he a 20pt lakers blowout you clueless fraud.

What a fucktard. You understand the bulls are projected to have one of the best teams in basketball right??? You're talking about a team with the best record in the league last year that added a solid shooting guard to improve their weakest position



Even with howard + paul + kobe, they would be no more than a 5-6 point favorites over the bulls (who said that 3 superstars automatically means a bunch of blowouts?? How many times did the bulls beat the heat last year in the regular season??). Furthermore, who the hell said the lakers had any real chance to get both those guys before this game anyways?? Orlando has shown zero interest in trading Dwight before the season starts



the bulls at +3 were a fantastic bet here regardless if the lakers got chris paul or not. They're clearly the better team across the board and they're gonna dominate the NBA this year (I expect them and the heat to steamroll the opposition all year long)

[Suarez]

Good luck

[crustyme]

What a fucktard. You understand the bulls are projected to have one of the best teams in basketball right??? You're talking about a team with the best record in the league last year that added a solid shooting guard to improve their weakest position



Even with howard + paul + kobe, they would be no more than a 5-6 point favorites over the bulls (who said that 3 superstars automatically means a bunch of blowouts?? How many times did the bulls beat the heat last year in the regular season??). Furthermore, who the hell said the lakers had any real chance to get both those guys before this game anyways?? Orlando has shown zero interest in trading Dwight before the season starts



the bulls at +3 were a fantastic bet here regardless if the lakers got chris paul or not. They're clearly the better team across the board and they're gonna dominate the NBA this year (I expect them and the heat to steamroll the opposition all year long)

stick to ghosting, pathological lying and laying -300 juice kerrybull cause you are obviously clueless about the nba and sportsbetting.

you honestly think adding some scrub that shoots .370% fg has more impact than adding 2 future hall of famers in paul and howard? lol... you are such a moron.

doesnt matter how many reg season games the bulls won, idiot. the same team that won all those games were 8pt dogs to the lakers last time they played in la. but adding paul and howard would make them less of a favorite????? lol.... such a clueless retard.

of course +3 looks good now that kobes hurt, lamar got traded and gasol grew a vagina. but the reason he took them was beyond stupid. it would be like me betting the celtics a month ago believing that they would get paul. imagine how stupid the bet would be then amare breaks his hand and carmelo gets into a car accident and cant play which swings the line in my favor. does that mean the bet was a genius? no, it was just dumb luck.

i hope you post your nba picks kerry. i need some good fade just like your lousy nfl, cfb, and mlb picks.

[crustyme]

bulls were 8pt dogs vs lakers last visit... care to comment on that kerrybull or are you just gonna continue to ignore it?

[ApricotSinner32]

Lakerboy if people followed your picks and bet ammounts based on your spreadsheet they'd be losing. You are being way too cocky for someone who is not profiting on their picks over a large sample.

[aman86]

Nice bet youre da man

[SimonSayz]

Bulls will win by 8....and that is conservative for what might happen to LA today....

[brahmabull117]

stick to ghosting, pathological lying and laying -300 juice kerrybull cause you are obviously clueless about the nba and sportsbetting.

you honestly think adding some scrub that shoots .370% fg has more impact than adding 2 future hall of famers in paul and howard? lol... you are such a moron.

doesnt matter how many reg season games the bulls won, idiot. the same team that won all those games were 8pt dogs to the lakers last time they played in la. but adding paul and howard would make them less of a favorite????? lol.... such a clueless retard.

of course +3 looks good now that kobes hurt, lamar got traded and gasol grew a vagina. but the reason he took them was beyond stupid. it would be like me betting the celtics a month ago believing that they would get paul. imagine how stupid the bet would be then amare breaks his hand and carmelo gets into a car accident and cant play which swings the line in my favor. does that mean the bet was a genius? no, it was just dumb luck.

i hope you post your nba picks kerry. i need some good fade just like your lousy nfl, cfb, and mlb picks.

1)The bulls were 8 point dogs last year because nobody knew they would be any good as the game was very early in the season. Are u retarded??? They had a mediocre record at that point and were coming off a pretty average season. How in the world could Vegas know how good they would be??


Furthermore the bulls team at the end of the season was miles better than the bulls team playing in that game (as that game was very early in the season)


2)Hamilton is a career 45% shooter (including 86% from free throw line), since when does he shoot sub 37%??



3)Again it doesn't matter if the lakers got paul or not - they're nowhere near as good as Chicago and +3 was a great play regardless

[crustyme]

1)The bulls were 8 point dogs last year because nobody knew they would be any good as the game was very early in the season. Are u retarded??? They had a mediocre record at that point and were coming off a pretty average season. How in the world could Vegas know how good they would be??


Furthermore the bulls team at the end of the season was miles better than the bulls team playing in that game (as that game was very early in the season)


2)Hamilton is a career 45% shooter (including 86% from free throw line), since when does he shoot sub 37%??



3)Again it doesn't matter if the lakers got paul or not - they're nowhere near as good as Chicago and +3 was a great play regardless

bulls were favored to win the division after a great showing in the playoffs and signing a great player in boozer, you clown. plus they had just won 5 of 6 going into la yet were 8pt dogs!!!!!!!

you think a guy who had his lowest scoring output since he was a rookie and was benched is the missing piece to a championship? you really are stupid as hell.



and yeah their roster is so scary good and title calibre that they tried to trade half the team for howard. lollllllllllll.

heres a reality check for you kerrybull: the bulls are a 1-man team. they will go as far as rose will take them and we all know it wont be a championship cause hes a choker (just like when he choked in ncaa championship game). when rose shot 20% fg vs heat in 4th quarters who stepped up? no one. which is why they tried to trade for another superstar.

like i said, post your nba picks early and often so i dont have to cap my own games.

[20Four7]

You could get a nice middle now lakerboy. I took the Lakers and the points that the bulls are now giving up.

[JR007]

Good Luck today LB

[BettingWizard]

LB always loses when Brah agrees with him

[andywend]

Brahmabull,
Crustyme is the biggest IDIOT in this entire forum.

He was trashing LakerBoy for taking the Bulls plus the 3 1/2 points against the Lakers so far in advance of the game and not surprisingly, the Bulls are favored by -4 on gameday.

Crustyme is dead wrong on EVERYTHING so its no surprise the line moved a full 7 1/2 points since Crustyme's IDIOTIC comment.

Crustyme has been on his knees for the last 3 years with his head so far up Obama's rear end. If Crustyme owned a chain of funeral parlors, NOBODY WOULD DIE!!!!

[crustyme]

Brahmabull,
Crustyme is the biggest IDIOT in this entire forum.

He was trashing LakerBoy for taking the Bulls plus the 3 1/2 points against the Lakers so far in advance of the game and not surprisingly, the Bulls are favored by -4 on gameday.

Crustyme is dead wrong on EVERYTHING so its no surprise the line moved a full 7 1/2 points since Crustyme's IDIOTIC comment.

Crustyme has been on his knees for the last 3 years with his head so far up Obama's rear end. If Crustyme owned a chain of funeral parlors, NOBODY WOULD DIE!!!!

yeah hes such a great capper....0-2 yesterday (2 favs that lost outright), 1-17, 0-10, 15-40 and currently on 90-135 run.



too bad you are too broke to actually tail him otherwise youd be dumpster diving alongside fishhead. without social security you wouldnt have money to pay for electricity.

pretty ironic the biggest neo-kook like you always defend the biggest crooks, frauds and liars on the site. speaks volumes about you.

[gregm]

Good call Lakerboy.

[crustyme]

LB always loses when Brah agrees with him

like he needs help?

[brahmabull117]

bulls were favored to win the division after a great showing in the playoffs and signing a great player in boozer, you clown. plus they had just won 5 of 6 going into la yet were 8pt dogs!!!!!!!

you think a guy who had his lowest scoring output since he was a rookie and was benched is the missing piece to a championship? you really are stupid as hell.



and yeah their roster is so scary good and title calibre that they tried to trade half the team for howard. lollllllllllll.

heres a reality check for you kerrybull: the bulls are a 1-man team. they will go as far as rose will take them and we all know it wont be a championship cause hes a choker (just like when he choked in ncaa championship game). when rose shot 20% fg vs heat in 4th quarters who stepped up? no one. which is why they tried to trade for another superstar.

like i said, post your nba picks early and often so i dont have to cap my own games.

1)The bulls were just 7-4 heading into the game and carlos boozer was out for that matchup retard. Are you really trying to argue with me about a team I've been watching since the 90s??


if you think the bulls team at the end of the season that won 60+ games was the same team (level of play wise) that was 7-4 at beginning of season, I dunno what to tell you



2)LOL @ bulls being a 1 man team, All 5 starters on the team are projected to score double digits this year (including 3 players that will likely score 17+)



3)this isn't a discussion about the playoffs or championships. This is a regular season game - the Bulls are projected to be a top 3 team by anybody who has half a clue. The lakers are projected to be a middle of the road playoff team in the west

[DOMINATER]

laker thanks ill be with you for a dime

[crustyme]

1)The bulls were just 7-4 heading into the game and carlos boozer was out for that matchup retard. Are you really trying to argue with me about a team I've been watching since the 90s??


if you think the bulls team at the end of the season that won 60+ games was the same team (level of play wise) that was 7-4 at beginning of season, I dunno what to tell you



2)LOL @ bulls being a 1 man team, All 5 starters on the team are projected to score double digits this year (including 3 players that will likely score 17+)



3)this isn't a discussion about the playoffs or championships. This is a regular season game - the Bulls are projected to be a top 3 team by anybody who has half a clue. The lakers are projected to be a middle of the road playoff team in the west

1. you claimed bulls surprised everyone by being good last season even tho many experts picked them to easily win their division and contend for a championship after they added boozer. it was a shock to no one, except to a clueless moron such as yourself.

2. doesnt matter if boozer played or not, bulls were the hottest team at the time winning 5 of 6, beating the mavs on the road the previous game. if my team was overwhelming picked ti win the division and also contend for a title, why the hell wouldnt i be excited about winning 5 of 6 to start the season???? should i feel doom and gloom instead?

yet this team picked to win the division, contend for a title and had just won 5 of 6 was an 8pt dog!!!!!!

3. i wouldnt be too premature to put this game in the w column just yet. this game sorta reminds me of the nets @ wiz few years ago. nets +3 went to -4 after a late scratch by gilbert arenas. nets mustve won big right? nope, lost by dd after trailing by as much as 30.

[d2bets]

1. you claimed bulls surprised everyone by being good last season even tho many experts picked them to easily win their division and contend for a championship after they added boozer. it was a shock to no one, except to a clueless moron such as yourself.

2. doesnt matter if boozer played or not, bulls were the hottest team at the time winning 5 of 6, beating the mavs on the road the previous game. if my team was overwhelming picked ti win the division and also contend for a title, why the hell wouldnt i be excited about winning 5 of 6 to start the season???? should i feel doom and gloom instead?

yet this team picked to win the division, contend for a title and had just won 5 of 6 was an 8pt dog!!!!!!

3. i wouldnt be too premature to put this game in the w column just yet. this game sorta reminds me of the nets @ wiz few years ago. nets +3 went to -4 after a late scratch by gilbert arenas. nets mustve won big right? nope, lost by dd after trailing by as much as 30.

Nonsense. I got the Bulls 40-1 to win the champ. early in the season. Going into the playoffs it was I believe around 8-1. I believe their TT was around 45 or 46. They won 62. You;re claiming that they didn't significantly exceed expectations going into the season is nonsense. Bulls are 8-1 to win title now, very different from entering last season.

The line today is more about the Lakers. There is a lot of thinking that they just aren't going to be very good. That, plus Bynum is out, and Kobe's wrist is pretty iffy.

[brahmabull117]

1. you claimed bulls surprised everyone by being good last season even tho many experts picked them to easily win their division and contend for a championship after they added boozer. it was a shock to no one, except to a clueless moron such as yourself.

There is not one person in the league (hell in the world) last year who expected the bulls to win 60 games. Are you kidding me here??


People expected them to win their division because their division was complete garbage. The bulls are projected to be a top 3 team this year - nobody thought they were even in the same league as the lakers, celtics or heat last year


8 point favorites was about reasonable for the matchup last year because the lakers were the better team. The bulls are the better team this year by a significant margin - lakers are an old team that got a year old, the bulls are a young team that got a year older. Bulls also added a very big piece in rip hamilton (say what you want to say about him but a shooting guard who can put up 13-14 points per game is a huuuuge improvement over keith bogans)

[d2bets]

bulls were favored to win the division after a great showing in the playoffs and signing a great player in boozer, you clown. plus they had just won 5 of 6 going into la yet were 8pt dogs!!!!!!!

you think a guy who had his lowest scoring output since he was a rookie and was benched is the missing piece to a championship? you really are stupid as hell.



and yeah their roster is so scary good and title calibre that they tried to trade half the team for howard. lollllllllllll.

heres a reality check for you kerrybull: the bulls are a 1-man team. they will go as far as rose will take them and we all know it wont be a championship cause hes a choker (just like when he choked in ncaa championship game). when rose shot 20% fg vs heat in 4th quarters who stepped up? no one. which is why they tried to trade for another superstar.

like i said, post your nba picks early and often so i dont have to cap my own games.

More nonsense. Hamilton being "benched" had nothing to do with his skill or abilities, and if you don't know that then you don't know much about basketball. It's no secret he didn't get along with the coach. Even with that his points per minute (.518) was barely different from his career (.538).

[crustyme]

Nonsense. I got the Bulls 40-1 to win the champ. early in the season. Going into the playoffs it was I believe around 8-1. I believe their TT was around 45 or 46. They won 62. You;re claiming that they didn't significantly exceed expectations going into the season is nonsense. Bulls are 8-1 to win title now, very different from entering last season.

The line today is more about the Lakers. There is a lot of thinking that they just aren't going to be very good. That, plus Bynum is out, and Kobe's wrist is pretty iffy.

either youre lying or your bookie is a moron... cause bulls were 24-1 at BetPhoenix. they had the 4th best odds to win the championships.

and the 4th best team usually wins high 50s. so they won about 4-5 games more than what a 4th best usually wins.

whats so surprising about that?

[crustyme]

More nonsense. Hamilton being "benched" had nothing to do with his skill or abilities, and if you don't know that then you don't know much about basketball. It's no secret he didn't get along with the coach. Even with that his points per minute (.518) was barely different from his career (.538).

so shooting 2-9fg is not struggling? that was the game prior to being benched. he was shooting a miserable 40.8% and scoring just 13.6ppg prior to being benched (lowest since his rookie season).

if you think his benching was unjustified then obviously you dont have a clue.

[d2bets]

so shooting 2-9fg is not struggling? that was the game prior to being benched. he was shooting a miserable 40.8% and scoring just 13.6ppg prior to being benched (lowest since his rookie season).

if you think his benching was unjustified then obviously you dont have a clue.

He was benched for 2 full games (a) because of trade possibilities at the time and (b) because he didn't get along with the coach. He wasn't benched because of how he shit in a game. It became a bad situation for him in Detroit. Unrelated to the skill and ability that he still has. Not that he shouldn't bear some blame for how things unfolded in Detroit, but it really doesn't effect how he will play this season.

[brahmabull117]

so shooting 2-9fg is not struggling? that was the game prior to being benched. he was shooting a miserable 40.8% and scoring just 13.6ppg prior to being benched (lowest since his rookie season).

if you think his benching was unjustified then obviously you dont have a clue.

I blame last year's detroit disaster on that franchise instead of Rip



Rip has been in the league for many years and has always been regarded as a man's man and a pro's pro. This is just a simple case where a change of scenery will do a player wonders



Rip is not the same scorer as he's been in years past (obviously) but if he just scores 13-15 ppg (very doable), that should make a huge difference for the bulls. I fully expect Chicago to steamroll the opposition this year...