monneyline machine
-
Comment -
Did anybody really see that comin with the Titans though? I gotta tip my hat at least a little bit to anyone who cashed that one.Comment -
Guy actually had a good week and picking the Titals ML was a very nice pick. Well done this week SSK
Comment -
Let's not forget----SSK is still down more than 3 units on the season.
He is still a losing bettor in this thread.
SSK 2011 NFL Season: -3.5 UNITSComment -
By the way...let's give it up for SSK.
In SBR's Best NFL Capper contest----SSK has cracked 44%. He is 13-16.
Comment -
Oh come on guys, Titans pick was nothing special. In fact, I was surprised they were even the underdog. They have a solid QB, solid defense, and a top RB, and they were at home. No surprise they wonComment -
This post right here just tells us how big of a hater you are
1. That contest requires you to pick EACH game played. Anyone who bets knows a contest like that is not a good indicator of how good you bet. The fact you even bring it up shows how desperate you are
2. I've already said I don't make those picks. As you can see in my thread, me personally, have liked 0 ATS games. So really what does that ATS record have to do with what I want to pick or don't? My contest team takes care of it.
3. Lastly, the most ironic, you list that contest, knowing one has to pick every game and that is a horrible indicator of how good you are, but you don't discuss that "Beat the Prick" contest which you so wanted me to join. At least that restricts you to 4 picks/week max. I am 63% there. Which is not at all good, once again I wouldn't have picked any of those games in real life, but I found it hilarious you don't bring that up in this thread
MartinBlanks, though it's already appearing so, but your attempts at hating are going to look more and more desperate. Having to use a contest where 'every game' has to be picked ATS vs. Beat the Prick, shows it already. Haters in desperation mode.Comment -
seriously dude...people would give you a little bit more respect if you didnt talk a bunch of garbage and didnt blame a "friend" or a "team" for you losses...If you really want to shut up the hater post a screen shot...otherwise,shut the fck up and let your picks do the talkingComment -
Post a screen shot of what?
There are only 3 plays in this thread that at the exact time I posted the plays I said these were not mine, I said they were my friends plays. I still counted those losses but we can't now sit here and act like those were my plays when I said right then they weren't. It's that simple.
Now that I kicked my friend out, my picks are doing the talking. And don't you find it funny, ignoring the contest teams, Martin chooses to talk about the contest where each ATS game has to be picked (thus no indicator of how good you really are) rather than the contest he wanted me to join which is 4 games/week, that guy is such a joke.Comment -
ok give a respect,
looking forward to it
Comment -
Hes talking about producing a screenshot of one of the bets you placed at the sportsbook.Comment -
Comment -
Whoever offered contest for SSK this was nuts.. You know it's a win-win for him.. If he does well, well... ya... We'll hear about on ESPN soon...This post right here just tells us how big of a hater you are
1. That contest requires you to pick EACH game played. Anyone who bets knows a contest like that is not a good indicator of how good you bet. The fact you even bring it up shows how desperate you are
2. I've already said I don't make those picks. As you can see in my thread, me personally, have liked 0 ATS games. So really what does that ATS record have to do with what I want to pick or don't? My contest team takes care of it.
3. Lastly, the most ironic, you list that contest, knowing one has to pick every game and that is a horrible indicator of how good you are, but you don't discuss that "Beat the Prick" contest which you so wanted me to join. At least that restricts you to 4 picks/week max. I am 63% there. Which is not at all good, once again I wouldn't have picked any of those games in real life, but I found it hilarious you don't bring that up in this thread
MartinBlanks, though it's already appearing so, but your attempts at hating are going to look more and more desperate. Having to use a contest where 'every game' has to be picked ATS vs. Beat the Prick, shows it already. Haters in desperation mode.
If he does poorly, he claims selectivity... and being the humble guy he is... he will let you know that it's not his strength to pick all the games...
On the ssk vs Hater scorecard, this is clearly one for ssk...Comment -
It's not only that, there was another contest MartinBlanks asked me to join that made me pick 4 games/week. That's still too much for me, but at least it's a better indicator than picking EVERY game. And here I am hitting 63% (which is still bad) there, but Martin of course will ignore that and look at the horrible skill indicating contest and see how I am doing there. Pathetic
But we need to start getting used to these desperate attempts by the haters to put me down. Things are only going to get better for me and worse for the haters from here and out.Comment -
100+ plays in 2010, with "70%"... and 4 games/week is too much???It's not only that, there was another contest MartinBlanks asked me to join that made me pick 4 games/week. That's still too much for me, but at least it's a better indicator than picking EVERY game. And here I am hitting 63% (which is still bad) there, but Martin of course will ignore that and look at the horrible skill indicating contest and see how I am doing there. Pathetic
But we need to start getting used to these desperate attempts by the haters to put me down. Things are only going to get better for me and worse for the haters from here and out.
Interesting math.Comment -
How goes it Mr. Negative Units? -3.5. That is the only number that matters.It's not only that, there was another contest MartinBlanks asked me to join that made me pick 4 games/week. That's still too much for me, but at least it's a better indicator than picking EVERY game. And here I am hitting 63% (which is still bad) there, but Martin of course will ignore that and look at the horrible skill indicating contest and see how I am doing there. Pathetic
But we need to start getting used to these desperate attempts by the haters to put me down. Things are only going to get better for me and worse for the haters from here and out.Comment -
100+ plays = ATS, ML, Teasers, Parlays all combined...not just ATS.
And if you are still confused, you can see I made 0 ATS plays in this thread, so that's how many ATS games I actually wanted to bet. I was forced to name 4 ATS games/week, and I did bad in them (63%), but oh well I was forced.Comment -
Hey you guys want to know something funny
I am in a contest with MartinBlanks...and he is ranked 200 members BEHIND me
This guy is making fun of me? I'm here being 'forced' to pick ATS games every week (I actually would've played none of them, proof is in this thread, 0 ATS plays) and I am still ranked higher than this guy who actually bet the games he played (Proof is in his thread).
MartinBlank you're pathetic. GTFO with your sub-60% ATS rate which is embarrassing, horrible capperComment -
as I said, -4 units you phucking moron
you dont even know how addition and subtraction works, and you try to trick people into believing you can actually make money gamblingComment -
ssk shutin em down right now, thanks for playsComment -
Cant believe you are being forced to make your contest team make picks.Comment -
So have we determined if phillybadboy is just ssk? because I remember back to last year in SSK's horrendous attempt(s) at capping basketball, philly would back him no matter what, even when he was down 300 units....and here we are again, surprise surprise SSK is down units again, and philly is backing him up again? Either philly doesn't hold a shread of intelligence within him, or else it's SSKComment
