When running NCAA pool what should be credited more?
The amount of wins or wins in the later stages of the tournament.
It seems over the years I've been running or entered contests that people have won, w/o having a very successful bracket overal. Predicting the 12 beating the 5 seems great at the time but really means nothing in the standings at the end.
People can have way less wins and still have their final 4 and champion correct and they come out of nowhere to win it all.
Last year for instance I had 7 more wins than anybody in a 5000 pool. However I had Ohio St winning it all but when they lost I ended up in second.
Just wanted some thoughts on what is the best way to run it.
How does SBR run it?
The amount of wins or wins in the later stages of the tournament.
It seems over the years I've been running or entered contests that people have won, w/o having a very successful bracket overal. Predicting the 12 beating the 5 seems great at the time but really means nothing in the standings at the end.
People can have way less wins and still have their final 4 and champion correct and they come out of nowhere to win it all.
Last year for instance I had 7 more wins than anybody in a 5000 pool. However I had Ohio St winning it all but when they lost I ended up in second.
Just wanted some thoughts on what is the best way to run it.
How does SBR run it?
