OT: History of US Military sexually assaulting foreign civilians

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ritehook
    SBR MVP
    • 08-12-06
    • 2244

    #1
    OT: History of US Military sexually assaulting foreign civilians
    Chalmers Johnson, former CIA analyst, is a San Diegan who has written about how the "blowback" of Empire always ends up burning Rome (ie the US) to the ground.

    SPEAKING FREELY
    The 'rape' of Okinawa
    By Chalmers Johnson

    Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.


    It all seemed deadly familiar: an adult, 38-year-old US Marine sergeant accused by the Okinawan police of sexually violating a 14-year-old Okinawan schoolgirl. He claims he did not actually rape her but only forcibly kissed her, as if knocking down an innocent child and slobbering all over her face is OK if you're a representative of the American military forces. The accused marine has now been released because the girl has refused to press charges - perhaps because he is innocent as he claimed or perhaps because she can't face the ignominy of appearing in court.

    Let us briefly recall some of the other incidents since the



    notorious 1995 kidnapping, beating and gang rape of a 12-year-old girl by two marines and a sailor in Kin village, Okinawa. The convicted assailants in that outrage were Marine Private First Class Roderico Harp, Marine Private First Class Kendrick Ledet and Seaman Marcus Gill. Other incidents of bodily harm, intimidation and death continue in Okinawa on an almost daily basis, including hit-and-run collisions between American troops and Okinawans on foot or on auto bikes, robberies and assaults, bar brawls and drunken and disorderly conduct.

    On June 29, 2001, a 24-year-old air force staff sergeant, Timothy Woodland, was arrested for publicly raping a 20-year-old Okinawan woman on the hood of a car.

    On November 2, 2002, Okinawan authorities took into custody Marine Major Michael J Brown, 41 years old, for sexually assaulting a Filipina barmaid outside the Camp Courtney officer's club.

    On May 25, 2003, Marine Military Police turned over to Japanese police a 21-year-old lance corporal, Jose Torres, for breaking a 19-year-old woman's nose and raping her, once again in Kin village.

    In early July 2005, a drunken air force staff sergeant molested a 10-year-old Okinawan girl on her way to Sunday school. He at first claimed to be innocent, but then police found a photo of the girl's nude torso on his cell phone.

    After each of these incidents and innumerable others that make up the daily police blotter of Japan's most southerly prefecture, the commander of US forces in Okinawa, a Marine Corps lieutenant general, and the American ambassador in Tokyo, make public and abject apologies for the behavior of US troops.

    Occasionally the remorse goes up to the Pacific commander-in-chief or, in the most recent case, to the secretary of state. On February 27, Condoleezza Rice said, "Our concern is for the girl and her family. We really, really deeply regret it." The various officers responsible for the discipline of US troops in Japan invariably promise to tighten supervision over them, who currently number 92,491, including civilian employees and dependents. But nothing ever changes. Why?

    Because the Japanese government speaks with a forked tongue. For the sake of the Okinawans forced to live cheek-by-jowl with 37 US military bases on their small island, Tokyo condemns the behavior of the Americans. Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda called the recent assault "unforgivable" and demanded tighter military discipline. But that is as far as it goes.

    The Japanese government has never even discussed why a large standing army of Americans is garrisoned on Japanese territory, some 63 years after the end of World War II. There is never any analysis in the Japanese press or by the government of whether the Japanese-American Security Treaty actually requires such American troops.

    Couldn't the terms of the treaty be met just as effectively if the marines were sent back to their own country and called on only in an emergency? The American military has never agreed to rewrite the Status of Forces Agreement, as demanded by every local community in Japan that plays host to American military facilities, and the Japanese government meekly goes along with this stonewalling.

    Once an incident "blows over", as this latest one now has, the pundits and diplomats go back to their boiler-plate pronouncements about the "long-standing and strong alliance" (Rice in Tokyo), about how Japan is an advanced democracy (although it has been ruled by the same political party since 1949 except for a few years after the collapse of the Soviet Union), and about how indispensable America's empire of over 800 military bases in other people's countries is to the maintenance of peace and security.

    As long as Japan remains a satellite of the United States, women and girls in Okinawa will continue to be slugged, beaten and raped by heavily armed young Americans who have no other reason for being there than the pretensions of American imperialism. As long as the Japanese government refuses to stand up and demand that the American troops based on its territory simply go home, nothing will change.

    Chalmers Johnson in the author of the Blowback Trilogy - Blowback (2000), The Sorrows of Empire (2004), and Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic (2007).

    (Copyright 2008 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)
  • Red_Sux
    SBR MVP
    • 06-25-07
    • 1262

    #2
    i thought japanese girls like american men
    Comment
    • Mr Fury
      SBR Rookie
      • 03-20-08
      • 19

      #3
      I dare you to name me one country whose armed forces
      did not rape and abuse the women of countries they
      invaded.
      Now, I'm not saying it is right but I am not going to
      sit here and say we are the bad guys either because
      a handful of our soldiers commit a few abuses.
      War sometimes makes a man do things he would
      never do in civilian life. It can change your thought
      process.
      It is just a sad part of life.
      Comment
      • JBC77
        SBR MVP
        • 03-23-07
        • 3816

        #4
        Yeah, it's really no big deal. You go kick ass, you earn the rite to rape and pillage. The U.S is a minor offender.

        Why don't you start a thread telling us the history of how muslim women have been treated under Sharia law in Iran and other muslim countries. Where they execute you if you are a homosexual, or cut your hands off if you steal something.
        Comment
        • JBC77
          SBR MVP
          • 03-23-07
          • 3816

          #5
          Or maybe you can start a thread to tell us the history behind the decapitation of civilians by muslim terrorists. Have you ever watched a human being with their hands tied behind their back, feet bound while some muslim scumbag removes the head and holds it up high with praise to allah? The screams alone will haunt you. Go watch the Nick Berg video on the net........then ask me if I give a sh1t if a marine rapes a gook.
          Comment
          • Deuce
            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
            • 01-12-08
            • 29843

            #6
            Lot's of folks are butthurt about their great Military. Always looking for a reason to bash them. Unreal.
            Comment
            • thegreatdiatchi
              SBR MVP
              • 03-07-08
              • 1154

              #7
              All of these situations mentioned above are terrible and inhumane. no matter who it is and no matter how many times world leaders say "this is against the geneva convention" it still happens. If you really think about it, war is the equivalent of the Christian hell. Soldiers become demons during war.
              Comment
              • 4625
                SBR Rookie
                • 02-10-08
                • 9

                #8
                So Americans are to comport their behavior with what behavior other peoples are engaging in?? WTF? Since when did Americans strive to behave at the level of Islamofascist thugs!! Or behave like other militaries?? When did Americans lose the pride of being American! We are supposed to be different; OUR military is not like the military of some two-bit, tinhorn, banana-republic dictator, so rationalizing our behavior as being consistent with such is an insult to every American who wore the uniform from Valley Forge to Fallujah.
                I promise you that those who proudly wear the uniform for America are not trying to make excuses for the child molesters and rapists depicted in the story. Accepting the cure necessarily requires recognizing the problem. The author is apparently attempting to point out an example of what he believes to be imperialistic behavior on the part of American troops. I don't happen to agree here, but the facts can't be denied, and rationalizing the behavior or attacking the messenger are self-destructive and un-American. . .
                Comment
                • thegreatdiatchi
                  SBR MVP
                  • 03-07-08
                  • 1154

                  #9
                  Originally posted by 4625
                  So Americans are to comport their behavior with what behavior other peoples are engaging in?? WTF? Since when did Americans strive to behave at the level of Islamofascist thugs!! Or behave like other militaries?? When did Americans lose the pride of being American! We are supposed to be different; OUR military is not like the military of some two-bit, tinhorn, banana-republic dictator, so rationalizing our behavior as being consistent with such is an insult to every American who wore the uniform from Valley Forge to Fallujah.
                  I promise you that those who proudly wear the uniform for America are not trying to make excuses for the child molesters and rapists depicted in the story. Accepting the cure necessarily requires recognizing the problem. The author is apparently attempting to point out an example of what he believes to be imperialistic behavior on the part of American troops. I don't happen to agree here, but the facts can't be denied, and rationalizing the behavior or attacking the messenger are self-destructive and un-American. . .
                  I agree with what you are saying here. It doesn't matter who is doing it - these things are wrong and shouldn't be done by anyone.
                  Comment
                  • SBR Lou
                    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                    • 08-02-07
                    • 37863

                    #10
                    Originally posted by 4625
                    When did Americans lose the pride of being American! We are supposed to be different;
                    I think that right there is the problem.

                    American citizens are too proud. There's nothing wrong with a sense of nationalism, but it should be for the right reasons. Not a mere "my country is better than yours yet I've never traveled" mentality.

                    Many of these soldiers committing these crimes are just simple minded thugs in uniform, hormonal, racist, gun loving young men who feel that being American is a better class than being human. It's also interesting that you seldom hear of the intelligence analysts, or satellite technologists committing these crimes. Always the dumb as rocks grunt that is loaded with weaponry.
                    Comment
                    • JBC77
                      SBR MVP
                      • 03-23-07
                      • 3816

                      #11
                      The problem is liberalism and a 24 hour far left media monster. The point I was trying to make is this: You have a country, Iran, who executes homo's on a regular basis. Don't hear much about it do you. Let an athlete call someone a fag and his career is almost over. You get the picture?

                      Liberals hate this country.....maybe I'm just tired of hearing them beat it up on a daily basis. Then to come out here and have to see a post knocking soldiers.....I don't like that sh1t. I happen to like and appreciate U.S soldiers. Most of them are kids for God sake.
                      Comment
                      • ritehook
                        SBR MVP
                        • 08-12-06
                        • 2244

                        #12
                        Japan was defeated over 60 years ago. The larger question Johnson was asking is why the US still has bases in a Japan that is democratic and capitalistic.

                        Ditto in Germany.

                        And while rape etc will take place whenver a country is invaded (the Japanese did it in China and Korea) it seems superficially strange that US forces should still be so engaged in this practice.

                        Esp since we were supposed to be bringing decency etc all theAmericanWay stuff . .. their way.

                        The USA is the greatest empire the world has ever known. We make old Rome look like a piker. Yet the American people have not benefitted from this empire -- our de facto standard of living is lower than it was 40 years ago.

                        When you occupy a defeated nation for generations - one that has done everything you wish, copied your system, gotten rid of their military, and such - you have become the monster that your proganda brayed against at the time of active hostilities.

                        Nowadays, Guatanamo, Abu Gharab, the like.

                        Johnson, a former Cia analyst, calls it "blowback," the unitended consequences of suppoedly righteous action. The utter mess in the ME and the ever-rising hatred of the US in Muslim lands is evidence.

                        Ron Paul had it right. "They're over here because we're over there." And they will be back.

                        The Blowback of Empire. And the peasants (that's you and I, bub)pay the highest price, as the elites have hightailed it outta here long before the blood rises to the skies.

                        Qui bono? Not I. Not you, unless you a nabob of the Military Industrial Complex, that Eisenhower warned about in his farewell address.

                        (On the specific problem of Okinawa, this seems the result of the shockingly low quality of the US Army. The recruits, esp now when they know they'll most likely be cannot fodder, are the bottom of the barrel. Criminal record? No prob. Gang membership, ditto. IQ slightly above moron level? Welcome aboard, soldier!!

                        I once knew a guy who worked in credit and collections, specializing in military. The most responsible debtors,he said, were, number 1, Air Force; # 2, Navy; # 3 USMC. and there on the bottom, # 4, the Liberators of the World, the Soldiers of Civilization, the US Army.

                        But don't worry. When and if (curse the day!) that Johnny Boots becomes president, the army will get a quality boost (I think). He will offer automatic citizenship to any foreign national who agrees to a tour of duty with the US army.

                        Precedent? Old Imperial Rome - they gave automatic citizenship to any barbarian who would fight with the Roman legions, all over the known world at that time.

                        Sevral hundred years later the barbarians were in control of Rome. Won't take that long here, with communication and events compressed like a squeezed lemon.
                        Comment
                        • thegreatdiatchi
                          SBR MVP
                          • 03-07-08
                          • 1154

                          #13
                          Originally posted by JBC77
                          The problem is liberalism and a 24 hour far left media monster. The point I was trying to make is this: You have a country, Iran, who executes homo's on a regular basis. Don't hear much about it do you. Let an athlete call someone a fag and his career is almost over. You get the picture?

                          Liberals hate this country.....maybe I'm just tired of hearing them beat it up on a daily basis. Then to come out here and have to see a post knocking soldiers.....I don't like that sh1t. I happen to like and appreciate U.S soldiers. Most of them are kids for God sake.
                          Not that i'm completely defending liberals here because you are right about the fag comment but I think individuals, regardless of their profession or political stance, need to be responsible for their own actions. A true soldier's objective should be to execute a military tactic in the most effective and least violent way possible. Granted, in a time of war, the chance of doing something in the "least violent way possible" is slim. However, the raping of an innocent woman and/or the beheading or torture of a captured soldier or other person for that manner does not reflect the actions of a true solider. People who do these things are not soldiers but assholes and these are the members of the military who need to be tried and sentenced according to the crimes they commit.
                          Comment
                          • thegreatdiatchi
                            SBR MVP
                            • 03-07-08
                            • 1154

                            #14
                            Originally posted by ritehook
                            Japan was defeated over 60 years ago. The larger question Johnson was asking is why the US still has bases in a Japan that is democratic and capitalistic.

                            Ditto in Germany.

                            And while rape etc will take place whenver a country is invaded (the Japanese did it in China and Korea) it seems superficially strange that US forces should still be so engaged in this practice.

                            Esp since we were supposed to be bringing decency etc all theAmericanWay stuff . .. their way.

                            The USA is the greatest empire the world has ever known. We make old Rome look like a piker. Yet the American people have not benefitted from this empire -- our de facto standard of living is lower than it was 40 years ago.

                            When you occupy a defeated nation for generations - one that has done everything you wish, copied your system, gotten rid of their military, and such - you have become the monster that your proganda brayed against at the time of active hostilities.

                            Nowadays, Guatanamo, Abu Gharab, the like.

                            Johnson, a former Cia analyst, calls it "blowback," the unitended consequences of suppoedly righteous action. The utter mess in the ME and the ever-rising hatred of the US in Muslim lands is evidence.

                            Ron Paul had it right. "They're over here because we're over there." And they will be back.

                            The Blowback of Empire. And the peasants (that's you and I, bub)pay the highest price, as the elites have hightailed it outta here long before the blood rises to the skies.

                            Qui bono? Not I. Not you, unless you a nabob of the Military Industrial Complex, that Eisenhower warned about in his farewell address.

                            (On the specific problem of Okinawa, this seems the result of the shockingly low quality of the US Army. The recruits, esp now when they know they'll most likely be cannot fodder, are the bottom of the barrel. Criminal record? No prob. Gang membership, ditto. IQ slightly above moron level? Welcome aboard, soldier!!

                            I once knew a guy who worked in credit and collections, specializing in military. The most responsible debtors,he said, were, number 1, Air Force; # 2, Navy; # 3 USMC. and there on the bottom, # 4, the Liberators of the World, the Soldiers of Civilization, the US Army.

                            But don't worry. When and if (curse the day!) that Johnny Boots becomes president, the army will get a quality boost (I think). He will offer automatic citizenship to any foreign national who agrees to a tour of duty with the US army.

                            Precedent? Old Imperial Rome - they gave automatic citizenship to any barbarian who would fight with the Roman legions, all over the known world at that time.

                            Sevral hundred years later the barbarians were in control of Rome. Won't take that long here, with communication and events compressed like a squeezed lemon.
                            I believe it was honest Abe who said that the USA would never be toppled via outside forces. He said the only way it could come apart is from within. I think US citizens are no longer self reliant like they were 40+ years ago (you can mostly thank hippie parents for that but you also must blame government & big business). We need to get back to wiping our own asses and creating our own goods. Right now we are stuck in the 1970's with the idea that everything is going to be given to us and that's not how the world works. If you want it you must earn it. With that being said, the stronger big business gets, the harder it will be for this country to return to what it once was.
                            Comment
                            • ritehook
                              SBR MVP
                              • 08-12-06
                              • 2244

                              #15
                              With that being said, the stronger big business gets, the harder it will be for this country to return to what it once was.

                              Right. The global corporations own the country. The legislators, almost all of them, basically do the bidding of the moneyed elites. And the defense industry is one of the most potent.

                              Several of the Founders understood that the "right to petition govt" found in the Constitution, could become what we now know as all-powerful lobbies. But the far-seeing founders had no real solution to what has 200+ years later, a major problem of the foundering republic.
                              Comment
                              • ritehook
                                SBR MVP
                                • 08-12-06
                                • 2244

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Mr Fury
                                I dare you to name me one country whose armed forces
                                did not rape and abuse the women of countries they
                                invaded.
                                Now, I'm not saying it is right but I am not going to
                                sit here and say we are the bad guys either because
                                a handful of our soldiers commit a few abuses.
                                War sometimes makes a man do things he would
                                never do in civilian life. It can change your thought
                                process.
                                It is just a sad part of life.

                                You are right. The military of all nations commit atrocities while at war. (Read "Guadalcanal Diary" or a"50000 to One" true accounts of WWII,for reports of American atrocities agaisnt Japanese).

                                BUT -- we have not been at war with Japan for over 60 years!

                                In fact, when the US occupied Japan in August of 1945, they sent,mostly, soldiers who had not seen combat, so as to minimize the risk of an angry combat vet taking his hatred of the "Japs," out on the civilian population.

                                The US does not want its soldiers committing atrocities. But it is the blowback of Empire, hundreds of bases all ovr the world.

                                Who in hell are our bases in Japan or Korea supposed to be defending against? Our good friend, China? The China who owns a major portion of our national debt?

                                A N.Korea so weak it would have trouble sucessfully invading S. Korea (and S Korea wants our 30,000 or so troops out of there).

                                The MIC, our rulers.
                                Comment
                                • purecarnagge
                                  SBR MVP
                                  • 10-05-07
                                  • 4843

                                  #17
                                  I'm pretty sure that the Japan and Germany both signed agreements as part of the tready for WWII stating they would not have its own military force and that we would protect them. They have never really gone and revisited it because now the american troops are part of the local economy and have been for 50 plus years...

                                  I'm not saying its right wrong or indifferent. You don't hear about all the crimes committed AGAINST US troops over there.

                                  Besides, Muslims do far worse and thats true.

                                  Also, N Korea is not weak, it could take S Korea in less than a week even with our troops there. All of S Korea is in artillery range of N Korea...
                                  Comment
                                  Search
                                  Collapse
                                  SBR Contests
                                  Collapse
                                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                  Collapse
                                  Working...