Ganchrow's Maximizing Expected Growth (Kelly criterion Part III)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Sask
    SBR Rookie
    • 10-28-07
    • 4

    #1
    Ganchrow's Maximizing Expected Growth (Kelly criterion Part III)
    Hi there:

    Ganchrow I was just wondering if you were going to post Part III in this very informative series.

    Since it is likely that most of us bet on more than one game per day (at the same time) with different odds (moneylines as opposed to spreads) I've often wondered how wageing should be handled when there are different EV values on each game. Stanford Wong gives kind of a rule of thumb suggesting that if you place bets on games that have at least an EV value of 5%, and if 1.5 - 2.5% is your win rate, then you should be able to wager on many games without risking too much of your bankroll. I find that the 1.5-2.5% to be too high of an amount. Maybe my calculated edges are too high (and maybe unrealistic). I try not to ever expose more than 1/3 of my bankroll in any given wagering session. Is this a good rule of thumb?

    I'm sure that you'll chuckle at these "rule of thumbs" because your ideas are heavily mathematically based which is what I like! After searching many forums, I think that your advice on these matters is likely the best.

    Is Part III coming around?

    Later...
  • Ganchrow
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 08-28-05
    • 5011

    #2
    Originally posted by Mr. Sask
    Hi there:

    Ganchrow I was just wondering if you were going to post Part III in this very informative series.

    Since it is likely that most of us bet on more than one game per day (at the same time) with different odds (moneylines as opposed to spreads) I've often wondered how wageing should be handled when there are different EV values on each game. Stanford Wong gives kind of a rule of thumb suggesting that if you place bets on games that have at least an EV value of 5%, and if 1.5 - 2.5% is your win rate, then you should be able to wager on many games without risking too much of your bankroll. I find that the 1.5-2.5% to be too high of an amount. Maybe my calculated edges are too high (and maybe unrealistic). I try not to ever expose more than 1/3 of my bankroll in any given wagering session. Is this a good rule of thumb?

    I'm sure that you'll chuckle at these "rule of thumbs" because your ideas are heavily mathematically based which is what I like! After searching many forums, I think that your advice on these matters is likely the best.

    Is Part III coming around?

    Later...
    Should be soon.

    Yeah, I know I've been promising it for a while. But this time I mean it. :-)

    I've posted a lot about Kelly on this forum if you search the forum for my Kelly posts you might get some ideas.

    You should also try playing around with my simultaneous bet Kelly calculator which I believe does what you're looking for.
    Comment
    • bigboydan
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 08-10-05
      • 55420

      #3
      Originally posted by Ganchrow
      Should be soon.

      Yeah, I know I've been promising it for a while. But this time I mean it. :-)
      I'll wait Ganchrow, because I don't want it rushed just in case a simple mistake slips through the cracks.
      Comment
      Search
      Collapse
      SBR Contests
      Collapse
      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
      Collapse
      Working...