To Fishhead...

[forsberg21]

I've read that you've got in and out of that 50% Rebate Wager promo twice now.

What's your strategy here? It's just as hard picking losers as it is winners, how do you do it? I've thought about parlaying to get money in and out of accounts, but the juice adds up very quickly.

[pavyracer]

He scalps the losses there. He bets his winning play at other books and fades the play at RW so when he loses all his balance he collects the rebate. Brilliant strategy if you ask me.

[forsberg21]

He scalps the losses there. He bets his winning play at other books and fades the play at RW so when he loses all his balance he collects the rebate. Brilliant strategy if you ask me.

Yea I know exactly what he's doing, but picking losers is just like picking winners, it's not easy. I've tried doing this, but I've actually added to my RW balance. Parlaying would work, but the juice just doesn't make it worthwhile.

I want to know what Fishhead is doing to scalp to get the money outta RW. Fishy, what kinda strategy are you using here? I've been thinking about betting soccer and taking the fav and draw on my other book and the dog on RW. Just a thought, lemme know yours!

[flyingillini]

God Bless Fishy!

[Fishhead]

Forsberg

Sending you a PM shortly

[pavyracer]

Yea I know exactly what he's doing, but picking losers is just like picking winners, it's not easy. I've tried doing this, but I've actually added to my RW balance. Parlaying would work, but the juice just doesn't make it worthwhile.

I want to know what Fishhead is doing to scalp to get the money outta RW. Fishy, what kinda strategy are you using here? I've been thinking about betting soccer and taking the fav and draw on my other book and the dog on RW. Just a thought, lemme know yours!

I'm not sure what you don't understand. Yesterday his play was -2 Magic. He played it at 5Dimes and he played Hawks +2 at Rebatewager. Is this clear enough?

[forsberg21]

I'm not sure what you don't understand. Yesterday his play was -2 Magic. He played it at 5Dimes and he played Hawks +2 at Rebatewager. Is this clear enough?

Yea and what if +2 Hawks came through and won? And what if his next 10 plays at RW were the winning plays? His RW balance goes up and he doesn't get the 50% rebate because there are no losses because he is winning. Picking losers is the exact same thing as picking winners. If it were this easy, we wouldn't have these talks because we'd all be picking winners while sitting on a beach in the Caribbean with a laptop.

[jjgold]

No such thing as bettng winning plays at one book and losing at another

oh my some rookies here

it just happens losing picks were at rebatewager , eventually fishhead will win there. It is all by chance.

[Fishhead]

Yea and what if +2 Hawks came through and won? And what if his next 10 plays at RW were the winning plays? His RW balance goes up and he doesn't get the 50% rebate because there are no losses because he is winning. Picking losers is the exact same thing as picking winners. If it were this easy, we wouldn't have these talks because we'd all be picking winners while sitting on a beach in the Caribbean with a laptop.

Headed to Clearwater Beach in a couple hours....... and bringing my laptop just in case.


-FH-

[SlickFazzer]

FH is a true professional.

[RealSlimShady]

No such thing as bettng winning plays at one book and losing at another

oh my some rookies here

it just happens losing picks were at rebatewager , eventually fishhead will win there. It is all by chance.

Yep. I tried the same thing, but my winning picks happened to be at RW and I lost on the oppositre side elsewhere.

[Fishhead]

Yep. I tried the same thing, but my winning picks happened to be at RW and I lost on the oppositre side elsewhere.

I hope you had more on the RW side...........

[pokernut9999]

Real question is why does somebody not take advantage of this great offer ?

[RealSlimShady]

Yes, I did.

[Fishhead]

Real question is why does somebody not take advantage of this great offer ?

1. They can't register a good deal when they see one

2. They have no money

[sharpcat]

This type of stuff really should not be discussed on a public forum

[pavyracer]

Yea and what if +2 Hawks came through and won? And what if his next 10 plays at RW were the winning plays? His RW balance goes up and he doesn't get the 50% rebate because there are no losses because he is winning. Picking losers is the exact same thing as picking winners. If it were this easy, we wouldn't have these talks because we'd all be picking winners while sitting on a beach in the Caribbean with a laptop.

How do you think he became a millionaire? It was not by betting losers son.

[RealSlimShady]

This type of stuff really should not be discussed on a public forum

Not really. I think RW is already aware of people trying to scalp. In any case, it's not that much different from taking an upfront bonus and scalping.

[Fishhead]

REBATEWAGER should care less........and my guess is they don't.

[sharpcat]

Not really. I think RW is already aware of people trying to scalp. In any case, it's not that much different from taking an upfront bonus and scalping.

And they likely do not mind it when kept to a minimum but once thousands of squares start doing such we will all lose our benefits. Long term effects are similar to giving away your picks in a pari-mutual betting pool at the horse track, give your plays to enough people and eventually they will run down the market price of your play.

[Fishhead]

Cat, they could care less..............if they did, they wouldn't make the offer.

[Bones402]

Im gonna go with fishhead here and say they dont care

[pokernut9999]

1. They can't register a good deal when they see one

2. They have no money

$250 mininum deposit would kill over half of this forum

[forsberg21]

How do you think he became a millionaire? It was not by betting losers son.

Sigh... then what is the point of even scalping then? Why not just bet winners at will, if you have that ability?

I was trying to find out Fishhead's strategy for betting winners at one book and losers at the other, assuming he does use a strategy. I know exactly what he's doing Pavy, but I don't know HOW he does it. He's done this twice now, so obviously the man knows what he's doing. Does this make sense to you now?

[mathdotcom]

No such thing as bettng winning plays at one book and losing at another

oh my some rookies here

it just happens losing picks were at rebatewager , eventually fishhead will win there. It is all by chance.

Finally a sharp post.

if he could just pick winners he wouldn't have to fukk around with RW to begin with

[mathdotcom]

I hope you had more on the RW side...........

Unreal what people could learn if they paid closer attention

[Fishhead]

Unreal what people could learn if they paid closer attention

[pavyracer]

Only a few select can use this strategy. If you are square and do what Fishhead does you will lose. He didn't become a legend overnight.

[forsberg21]

Unreal what people could learn if they paid closer attention

Yea I noticed that, but I'm still not following. How does it make a difference? Assuming that you can't pick winners at will, in the long run, you'll end up with the same amount of money in RW, minus the vig. But if we look at upping wagers at RW, here's what we get:

$100 on Team A at Book X, $100 on Team B at RW, -110 lines.

You lose $9 regardless of what happens, hopefully that loss occurs at RW and you get a net of $41 (after getting $50 back).

Now if you up your bet like what is being suggested, here's what happens:

$100 at Book X at -110, $150 at RW at -110.

If Book X bet wins, you lose $59, but gain $75 because of the promo, so net is $16.
If RW bet wins, you gain $36.50.

So, your gain is either $16 or $36.50, not bad at all. But... I would rather take the $50 gain (assuming your planned $100 wager at RW pans out). You can also get better lines that -110 as a base too.

Also... it doesn't work this easily because you have to get your entire account down to $0, you don't just get a 50% rebate on your losses as they occur. Add to this the fact that you can't bet your entire account on one game because of limits.

I hope I'm missing something here. Fishy, plz check your email.

[forsberg21]

The fact that you have to get your ENTIRE account down to $0 makes this thing a lot tougher than it seems.

[pavyracer]

If RW gives you 50% rebate on losses you take 10K and deposit it over there then deposit 10K at 5Dimes where they have 10 cent lines for baseball. All you have to do is not lose more than 4K in your 5Dimes bets so that when you run dry the RW account you get back 5K and this is a cool 1K profit without doing pretty much anything.

[Fishhead]

Email sent that contains a COUPLE TIPS not mentioned here.


GOOD LUCK FORSBERG

[forsberg21]

Email sent that contains a COUPLE TIPS not mentioned here. GOOD LUCK FORSBERG

Thanks Fishy, I'll have a look at it now... you da man!

[pokernut9999]

More ways than to just bet opposite of each game , if you think a little harder.

[forsberg21]

More ways than to just bet opposite of each game , if you think a little harder.

Care to share Pokernut???