 Posters' Poll: Top Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks
|
|||||
| #1 5Dimes (SBR rating A+) | 675 Pts | #1 Bookmaker | SBR rating A+ | Review | ||
| #2 Heritage Sports (SBR rating A+) | 665 Pts | #2 5Dimes | SBR rating A+ | Review | ||
| #3 Bookmaker (SBR rating A+) | 380 Pts | #3 Heritage | SBR rating A+ | Review | ||
| #4 Pinnacle (SBR rating A+) | 310 Pts | #4 BetOnline | SBR rating A+ | Review | ||
| #5 BetOnline (SBR rating A+) | 165 Pts | #5 Intertops | SBR rating A | Review | ||
Supreme Court Approves State Sports Betting
Daniel Wallach @WALLACHLEGAL 6m6 minutes ago
BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court rules that federal ban on state-sanctioned sports betting is unconstitutional. Decides case in favor of New Jersey. Floodgates now officially open for other states to allow sports betting
|
This post was nominated 1
time
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: PromiseLand
|
With Gorsuch, everything’s is going to the states.
Lets see who’s second
Hell to the yeah!
BTP
Week 33-2-0 156 pts
Yes! Please allow it in Michigan. We have 3 fukking Casinos right downtown.
BTP
Week 63-1-1 205 pts
BTP
Week 33-2-0 133 pts
This is awesome!
3-QUESTION
SBR TRIVIA WINNER 10/18/2018
BTP
Week 45-0-0 544 pts
"Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each State is free to act on its own."
"PAPSA is not consistent with the Constitution"
Out freaking standing
BTP
Week 34-1-0 328 pts
Legal Sports Betting Is Coming To US, As New Jersey Wins Supreme Court Case
Dustin Gouker, May 14, 2018
It’s game on for sports betting in New Jersey, and perhaps the rest of the country as well.
The state of New Jersey won its US Supreme Court case, as a majority of justices declared that the federal ban on sports wagering is unconstitutional.
More on the backstory of NJ sports betting here. Previously, single-game wagering was legal in the US only via the Nevada sports betting industry.
Here is the conclusion of the majority opinion:
The legalization of sports gambling requires an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make. Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each State is free to act on its own. Our job is to interpret the law Congress has enacted and decide whether it is consistent with the Constitution. PASPA is not. PASPA “regulate[s] state governments’ regulation” of their citizens. …. The Constitution gives Congress no such power. The judgment of the Third Circuit is reversed.
SCOTUS impacts on sports betting
The real-world applications of the verdict:
New Jersey can now move forward with its plans to legalize wagering. Some gaming facilities in the state have indicated it could be just a matter of weeks until sportsbooks are operations.
West Virginia sports betting and Mississippi sports betting are also prepared to move forward with laws on the books.
So can Pennsylvania, which legalized sports wagering in 2017. A PA sports betting rollout there is up in the air, but could come later this year.
Sports betting legislation advancing in a number of states can take effect immediately upon passage.
A quick timeline of the case
New Jersey enacted a law in 2014 in which it partially repealed its own sports betting ban. That law was an attempt to allow the state’s casinos and horse betting tracks to offer sports wagering by working around a federal law, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act. That law bans single-game wagering outside of Nevada sports betting.
The NCAA and the major US pro sports leagues — NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL — along with the NCAA filed suit to stop the law from taking effect. The leagues have standing under PASPA to bring suits that authorize sports betting.
Over the next three years, New Jersey lost in both federal district court and the US Third Circuit Court of Appeals. New Jersey then appealed the case to the US Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear New Jersey’s appeal in the summer of 2017.
Oral arguments took place in December; many believed the hour of conversation between justices and counsel went well for New Jersey.
SBR
Forum
Mod
Squad
In your face Roger Goodell
SBR
Forum
Mod
Squad
BTP
Week 34-1-0 328 pts
Passed 7-2
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.
SBR Founder Join Date: 10/30/2005
It's unreal to me, I never thought I would see this day....Watch congress attempt to fsck this up
BTP
Week 34-1-0 328 pts
Offshore is going to grow like you’ve never seen
BTP
Week 64-1-0 412 pts
BTP
Week 54-1-0 446 pts
SBR
Sharp
Bettor
Bald
& Proud
of Myself
-jjgold
SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005
Unless they pass a bill blocking every state I do not think that we have to worry.Originally Posted by hubie69
On the surface, this sounds good. We all can place bets without breaking the law or needing to be in Vegas. I'll temper my enthusiasm until I see how much the states screw it up. Putting your faith in the state or federal government generally is not a wise thing to do.
Liberals. Vote in November
Death to online Sports books?
|
|
How long before I can bet at Pinnacle again and fund my account with Neteller?
|
|
BTP
Week 54-1-0 455 pts
I could see jj setting up shop on a corner somewhere in NJ
3-QUESTION
SBR TRIVIA WINNER 10/18/2018
3-QUESTION
SBR TRIVIA WINNER 10/15/2018
SBR
Forum
Mod
Squad
This has always been my dream fellas - =}
|
This post was nominated 1
time
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: hubie69
|
No
Likely growth
SBR
Forum
Mod
Squad
Just he opposite actually it grows
BTP
Week 43-2-0 159 pts
BTP
Week 33-2-0 137 pts
$20
Angelman
donation
02/15/2018
no way
3-QUESTION
SBR TRIVIA WINNER 10/18/2018
3-QUESTION
SBR TRIVIA WINNER 10/15/2018
SBR
Forum
Mod
Squad
don't hold your breath
SBR Founder Join Date: 10/30/2005
Betting was not illegal on the federal level. Accepting the bet or transferring money to a known sports gambling establishment was illegal for the banks or financial institutions.
I think the opposite ikid. Remember this is convenient and legal. It doesn't mean well run. Remember it's our local and federal government at the helm.
BTP
Week 43-1-1 254 pts
What if a new federal law bans off shore?
|
|
Taxes
SBR Founder Join Date: 10/30/2005
I’ll be 99 before by the time Texas allows a bet to be placed.
BTP
Week 55-0-0 688 pts
BTP
Week 32-2-1 55 pts
$20
Angelman
donation
02/15/2018
SBR Bash
Punta Cana
Attendee
2/4/2017
SBR Bash
Punta Cana
Attendee
1/31/2015
Agreed
BTP
Week 64-0-1 522 pts
DK already tweets they are moving to offer sports betting. That was fast. Lol
BTP
Week 43-2-0 159 pts
BTP
Week 33-2-0 137 pts
$20
Angelman
donation
02/15/2018
Offshore yes.
Not at all unless the new legal books offer reduced odds.
BTP
Week 34-1-0 131 pts
Manny states will still not offer it because of the party system and anti-gambling
BTP
Week 64-1-0 412 pts
BTP
Week 54-1-0 446 pts
SBR
Sharp
Bettor
Bald
& Proud
of Myself
-jjgold
SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005
Reply With Quote
SouthBayGame gave ikid2groove415 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
