If you have a situation where targeting occurs by the defense, what happens if the offensive team declines the penalty?
I can’t remember if the offending player is still ejected.
RudyRuetigger
SBR Aristocracy
08-24-10
65084
#2
Isn't it a dead ball foul?
If so, no reason to decline
Comment
daneblazer
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-14-08
27861
#3
Why would they decline it? It’s free yards.
Targets are reviewed and refs decide if the kid is ejected
one of the worst rules in sports because it’s subjective. Now the punishment is even more severe
Comment
Eddy Munny
Benched
08-13-13
15769
#4
Show me a coach who declines a personal foul penalty and I'll show you a future McDonald's applicant.
Comment
clockwise1965
SBR Hall of Famer
10-01-13
6753
#5
Its 2 separate calls. Unsportsmanlike conduct is a 15 yard penalty. Targeting is an automatic ejection.
You can have unsportsmanlike conduct and targeting on the same play.
Comment
Eddy Munny
Benched
08-13-13
15769
#6
Originally posted by clockwise1965
Its 2 separate calls. Unsportsmanlike conduct is a 15 yard penalty. Targeting is an automatic ejection.
You can have unsportsmanlike conduct and targeting on the same play.
Started drinking early huh?
Comment
asiagambler
SBR Hall of Famer
07-23-17
6827
#7
I can see a situation where this could apply. There would have to be a turnover on the play and the targeting occurs after the turnover. There must also be a penalty before the turnover (by the defense). In that case, it's in the best interest of the offense to accept the first penalty to nullify the turnover and decline the targeting.
I know in college, they automatically review all targeting plays though so player may still be ejected.
Comment
BigdaddyQH
SBR Posting Legend
07-13-09
19530
#8
It will never happen. Targeting is an automatic 15 plus an ejection. There must be an ejection for a targeting penalty, or the penalty is NOT a targeting penalty. A team does not have the option of accepting or declining the penalty.
Comment
RudyRuetigger
SBR Aristocracy
08-24-10
65084
#9
Originally posted by asiagambler
I can see a situation where this could apply. There would have to be a turnover on the play and the targeting occurs after the turnover. There must also be a penalty before the turnover (by the defense). In that case, it's in the best interest of the offense to accept the first penalty to nullify the turnover and decline the targeting.
I know in college, they automatically review all targeting plays though so player may still be ejected.
I SAID
i think it is a DEAD BALL FOUL
Comment
pavyracer
SBR Aristocracy
04-12-07
82899
#10
Why decline? It's a free time out for the offense to plan next play until the refs review it.