At least one third of the people in this country are drooling halfwits

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • obama our lord
    SBR Wise Guy
    • 12-24-08
    • 562

    #1
    At least one third of the people in this country are drooling halfwits
    We always encourage visitors to be open GFEAffairs minded. Steve feels Curious about all of the good which External Duo has realized over the years. When the colours of the world start to seem closer and brighter, that’s when the others are drawn to the colors and brightness of one’s own spirit. Recently awarded since …


    At least one third of the people in this country are drooling halfwits who don’t deserve to live here, call themselves Americans or vote to destroy our liberties.

    New Rasmussen surveys confirm this.


    The first tells us nearly a third of Americans under 40 believes they can get reliable news from the Colbert Report and the Jon Stewart “comedy” shows. In the 18 to 29 group (30%) and 30 to 39 (32%) believe this, proving these people are actually getting dumber as they age.


    Of all respondents four in ten (the real jackasses) believe these comedy shows make Americans “more informed about news events.” Democrats of course, believe this dribble by a ratio of approximately 5 to 1.


    The next survey’s data reminds us our government schools are failures. Just under a third of respondents are in favor of salary caps on professional athletes and movie actors. They want one million dollar salary caps for these people.

    The worst news in these numbers is that the younger the respondent the more likely he or she is to favor handing government the power to cap salaries.

    The last survey tells us 47% don’t think capitalism is better than socialism.


    History tells us during the American Revolution we were divided into thirds. One third risked their lives and fought for our liberty. One third fought shoulder to shoulder with the British against American liberty. The final third hid in their basements with our flag and a Union Jack waiting to see which one they should come up waving. It seems to be little different today.


    We are fighting on two fronts. We have to beat Obama’s socialist power grab, and his army of simpleton lackeys. Teach your children about American freedom because government schools won’t. We can’t lose this fight.


    Get educated and get up and fight. America needs you. We have to pull this wagon or no one will.

    Write letters make phone calls, talk to people at every opportunity. “I never talk about politics” just doesn’t cut it anymore. Thinking like this has led to us being where we are.
  • ItchyHooHoo
    SBR Sharp
    • 03-06-09
    • 423

    #2
    Hey. Dont talk about bobbyfk like that.
    Comment
    • Willie Bee
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 02-14-06
      • 15726

      #3
      At least 100% of the people that start threads like this are drooling halfwits.
      Comment
      • Mudcat
        Restricted User
        • 07-21-05
        • 9287

        #4
        At least one third of the people in this country are drooling halfwits

        I believe it. They should come up with some way to mark them so they can be easily identified.

        Perhaps carve backwards B's into their faces.
        Comment
        • BatemanPatrickl
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 06-21-07
          • 18772

          #5
          That number is low; I would say 80% at least. Most work as politicians.
          Comment
          • obama our lord
            SBR Wise Guy
            • 12-24-08
            • 562

            #6
            Obama hires one of his faggot friends to change America

            The head of a conservative activist group says President Obama’s appointment of a leading homosexual activist to his faith-based council is an ominous sign that he may enforce a “pro-ho…


            The head of a conservative activist group says President Obama’s appointment of a leading homosexual activist to his faith-based council is an ominous sign that he may enforce a “pro-homosexuality orthodoxy” on religious groups receiving federal funds, which is itself a form of bigotry.


            Barack Obama has appointed outspoken homosexual activist Harry Knox to the White House Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Knox, who is the director of the Human Rights Campaign’s (HRC) Religion and Faith program, will serve a one-year term on the 25-member Council.


            Two years ago during an appearance on MSNBC, Knox argued that scientific evidence supports the notion that certain people are born homosexuals. “What’s clear from our experience and from science is that being gay or lesbian is an immutable, unchangeable gift from God – one for which I’m very grateful,” he said. According to the HRC website, Knox is a former licensed pastor of a United Methodist Church in Georgia, and was denied ordination because of his sexual orientation.


            Last month, Knox was critical of Pope Benedict’s statement that condom usage increases HIV infections. That stance, said Knox, “is hurting people in the name of Jesus.” He has also referred to “lesbian and gay” ministerial candidates as “gifted ministers.”


            HRC cites Knox as “instrumental in creating a national network for 22 progressive state clergy coalitions” across the U.S. But Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, says the HRC staff member is at the forefront of a movement that seeks to rewrite the Bible to support homosexuality.


            “Harry Knox is part of an organization which is fundamentally bigoted against Christians and promotes the exclusion of Christians from various fora,” he contends. “For example, Human Rights Campaign used its influence to kick me off a diversity panel that I was supposed to be part of on dealing with faith and controversial issues, including homosexuality.”
            While the HRC staffer claims he “will support the president in living up to his promise that government has no place in funding bigotry against any group of people,” LaBarbera says Knox will be “using his influence to keep Christians out of government-funded programs.”


            Obama established his faith-based office by executive order on February 5, 2009. That office is headed up by Joshua Dubois
            Comment
            • SBR Lou
              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
              • 08-02-07
              • 37863

              #7
              The only place to watch real news is O'Reilly & Hannity.
              Comment
              • Willie Bee
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 02-14-06
                • 15726

                #8
                There is no single source to get unbiased reporting. Anyone that thinks so is only kidding themself.
                Comment
                • tacomax
                  SBR Hall of Famer
                  • 08-10-05
                  • 9619

                  #9
                  Originally posted by CrazyLou
                  The only place to watch real news is O'Reilly & Hannity.
                  At first I thought you were joking but I think you actually believe that.

                  Anyone who doesn't want to end up a drooling halfwit by watching Fox and reading OOL's posts might want to fire up PBS and check out The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer and/or the BBC World News. May contain real news which may prove a turn-off for most.
                  Originally posted by pags11
                  SBR would never get rid of me...ever...
                  Originally posted by BuddyBear
                  I'd probably most likely chose Pags to jack off too.
                  Originally posted by curious
                  taco is not a troll, he is a bubonic plague bacteria.
                  Comment
                  • obama our lord
                    SBR Wise Guy
                    • 12-24-08
                    • 562

                    #10
                    Originally posted by tacomax
                    The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer and/or the BBC World News.
                    Left wing socialist drivel. You bone smugglers probably enjoy it, though.
                    Comment
                    • obama our lord
                      SBR Wise Guy
                      • 12-24-08
                      • 562

                      #11
                      President ‘Bitterly Disappointed’ in Biden



                      Newsmax has learned from sources in Washington that President Barack Obama is “bitterly disappointed” in his vice president, Joe Biden.


                      The sources say Obama feels Biden was excellent in the Senate, where he chaired the Foreign Relations Committee. But they whisper to the media that the president and some advisers believe Biden has been a dismal failure as vice president, often being “not on message” and unpredictable.


                      Biden raised concerns within the Obama camp even before the November election, when he said that if his running mate was elected president, he would almost immediately be challenged with an international crisis that would test his strength and character.
                      The remarks prompted newsman Dan Rather to say that the Obama campaign “can’t be happy” about the comments.


                      Obama also couldn’t have been happy when Biden poked fun at the president’s ego at the Gridiron Club’s annual dinner on March 23. He said Obama “can’t be here tonight, because he’s busy getting ready for Easter.” Then he added in a hushed voice: “He thinks it’s about him.”


                      More recently, Biden caught heat from Republican strategist Karl Rove, who called Biden a “liar” for concocting a story about President George W. Bush “out of whole cloth.”
                      Biden told CNN on Tuesday about what he claimed was a meeting with Bush in the Oval Office: “'Well, Joe,' he said, 'I’m a leader.' And I said, 'Mr. President, turn around and look behind you. No one’s following.'”


                      Said Rove, a close Bush adviser: “It didn’t happen . . . He’s making these things up out of whole cloth.”


                      Rove also called Biden a “blowhard” and “serial exaggerator.”
                      Comment
                      • tacomax
                        SBR Hall of Famer
                        • 08-10-05
                        • 9619

                        #12
                        Originally posted by obama our lord
                        Left wing socialist drivel. You bone smugglers probably enjoy it, though.
                        Have you seen it? It's on around 5pm in my area - that's probably the time you have to go out and deliver pizzas to keep a roof over you head.

                        And you should be the last person accusing anyone else of pumping out biased drivel.
                        Originally posted by pags11
                        SBR would never get rid of me...ever...
                        Originally posted by BuddyBear
                        I'd probably most likely chose Pags to jack off too.
                        Originally posted by curious
                        taco is not a troll, he is a bubonic plague bacteria.
                        Comment
                        • obama our lord
                          SBR Wise Guy
                          • 12-24-08
                          • 562

                          #13
                          Originally posted by tacomax
                          Have you seen it? It's on around 5pm in my area - that's probably the time you have to go out and deliver pizzas to keep a roof over you head.

                          And you should be the last person accusing anyone else of pumping out biased drivel.
                          Leher is not too bad, actually, but BBC is a joke.
                          Comment
                          • SBR Lou
                            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                            • 08-02-07
                            • 37863

                            #14
                            Originally posted by tacomax
                            At first I thought you were joking but I think you actually believe that.
                            Incorrect, but I'm sure you can find some O'Reilly threads to suggest otherwise.
                            Comment
                            • pavyracer
                              SBR Aristocracy
                              • 04-12-07
                              • 82673

                              #15
                              Originally posted by CrazyLou
                              The only place to watch real news is O'Reilly & Hannity.
                              Why can't we talk about Padma Lakshmi everyday at SBR instead of right wing propaganda?

                              Comment
                              • dwest718
                                SBR Sharp
                                • 12-06-07
                                • 443

                                #16
                                I watch Comedy Central and my local news channel for my news. I watch Fox News for my comedy. The Daily Show and Colbert Report are satires but are no more biased than any primetime news show on a none local channel.

                                If believing government involvement in the economic problems of our country can be more beneficial than the laissez faire policies of the last 8 years makes me a drooling halfwit, than I am proud to be a drooling halfwit.
                                Comment
                                • obama our lord
                                  SBR Wise Guy
                                  • 12-24-08
                                  • 562

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by dwest718

                                  laissez faire policies of the last 8 years makes me a drooling halfwit, than I am proud to be a drooling halfwit.
                                  If you think we've had an actual laissez faire economy for the last 8 years, then yes, you are a drooling idiot. But I'm glad you're proud of it.
                                  Comment
                                  • dwest718
                                    SBR Sharp
                                    • 12-06-07
                                    • 443

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by obama our lord
                                    If you think we've had an actual laissez faire economy for the last 8 years, then yes, you are a drooling idiot. But I'm glad you're proud of it.

                                    It's a generalization and an exaggeration but compared to the "SOCIALISM" in place now, we've been much closer to laissez faire. Find me a country with a modestly significant GDP practicing complete laissez faire economics anytime in the last 3 decades and I'll give you a pat on the back and stop arguing with you and MilfDriller and your conservative drivel.

                                    Comment
                                    • obama our lord
                                      SBR Wise Guy
                                      • 12-24-08
                                      • 562

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by dwest718
                                      It's a generalization and an exaggeration but compared to the "SOCIALISM" in place now, we've been much closer to laissez faire. Find me a country with a modestly significant GDP practicing complete laissez faire economics anytime in the last 3 decades and I'll give you a pat on the back and stop arguing with you and MilfDriller and your conservative drivel.


                                      What we have now is an attempted take over of private industry by the Federal government. It should scare the SHIT out of you.
                                      Comment
                                      • Willie Bee
                                        SBR Posting Legend
                                        • 02-14-06
                                        • 15726

                                        #20
                                        Yes, this is a brand new move by the feds, OOL. Congress was perfect from 1994-2006 and the White House was in sound hands from Jan 2001 to Jan 2009.



                                        Now bring me a pizza with extra cheese. Chop, chop.
                                        Comment
                                        • dwest718
                                          SBR Sharp
                                          • 12-06-07
                                          • 443

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by obama our lord
                                          What we have now is an attempted take over of private industry by the Federal government. It should scare the SHIT out of you.
                                          It worked 80 years ago...

                                          Some companies need to fail. Some companies need to be regulated by a third party. This is no different.

                                          The thing that YOU should be scared about is the private equity pouring into the government that sways or makes decisions... not the government itself.

                                          for ignorance.
                                          Comment
                                          • louisvillekid
                                            SBR Hall of Famer
                                            • 08-14-07
                                            • 9268

                                            #22
                                            i need more info about how credible the Rasmussen survey is, I'm sure they are just as credible as all the others.

                                            All those talking bobblehead news shows are garbage no matter what your beliefs are. I get my news from the daily paper(while it still exists, mine just got thinner at the 1st of the year, before long it will be a flyer or pamphlet) and my local news. I like just a quick article stating what facts are known about something and letting me draw my own conclusions.
                                            And i watch the Daily Show with Stewart, not the Colbert as much, but i do know that the daily show is satire and mocking the cable news outlets. I like when they show a montage of sound bites from the big 4 cable news outlets after some new catchphrase pops up, they show all them using it and everyone usually trying to act like they coined it or are the first to use it.
                                            Comment
                                            • obama our lord
                                              SBR Wise Guy
                                              • 12-24-08
                                              • 562

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by dwest718
                                              It worked 80 years ago...

                                              Some companies need to fail. Some companies need to be regulated by a third party. This is no different.

                                              The thing that YOU should be scared about is the private equity pouring into the government that sways or makes decisions... not the government itself.

                                              for ignorance
                                              First of all, we are not doing now what we did 80 years ago. This is far more harsh. And what was done 80 years ago extended what should have been a historical short downturn into a 10 year one.

                                              In 1921, a Harding faced a severe recession when he took Office. He cut taxes and spending. Wages were allowed to temporarily fall to market conditions.

                                              The recession was over within a year.

                                              In 82, the severe recession lasted about 18 months. Reagan cut taxes during that time and raised them near the end of the recession. In fact, that recession was purposely caused by the Fed's monetary policy to stem inflation. But certainly no tax and spend programs ended it.

                                              The 92 recession was mild and ended of its own accord.

                                              Bush cut taxes in 2001 to stem a downturned economy, and the recession was over by 2003, even with the aftereffects of 911.

                                              We are clearly headed down the wrong path.
                                              Comment
                                              • pavyracer
                                                SBR Aristocracy
                                                • 04-12-07
                                                • 82673

                                                #24
                                                All donkey presidents are evil. All elephant presidents are saints. Sign hanging above OOL's dungeon.
                                                Comment
                                                • dwest718
                                                  SBR Sharp
                                                  • 12-06-07
                                                  • 443

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by obama our lord
                                                  First of all, we are not doing now what we did 80 years ago. This is far more harsh. And what was done 80 years ago extended what should have been a historical short downturn into a 10 year one.

                                                  In 1921, a Harding faced a severe recession when he took Office. He cut taxes and spending. Wages were allowed to temporarily fall to market conditions.

                                                  The recession was over within a year.

                                                  In 82, the severe recession lasted about 18 months. Reagan cut taxes during that time and raised them near the end of the recession. In fact, that recession was purposely caused by the Fed's monetary policy to stem inflation. But certainly no tax and spend programs ended it.

                                                  The 92 recession was mild and ended of its own accord.

                                                  Bush cut taxes in 2001 to stem a downturned economy, and the recession was over by 2003, even with the aftereffects of 911.

                                                  We are clearly headed down the wrong path.
                                                  So by your logic: "Tax cuts fix recessions"

                                                  and: "Short term results are more important than long term stabilization."

                                                  You must be over 40 and think that Reagan is one of the top 3 presidents in history? The policies of "Obama and his administration" may make things worse in the short term, but they would actually get worse no matter what policy is pushed. In the end it comes down to what is better for the nation in 10 years and even farther down the road and some trivial tax cuts are going to do nothing to help that.
                                                  Comment
                                                  • dwest718
                                                    SBR Sharp
                                                    • 12-06-07
                                                    • 443

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by pavyracer
                                                    All donkey presidents are evil. All elephant presidents are saints. Sign hanging above OOL's dungeon.

                                                    Comment
                                                    • obama our lord
                                                      SBR Wise Guy
                                                      • 12-24-08
                                                      • 562

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by dwest718
                                                      So by your logic: "Tax cuts fix recessions"

                                                      and: "Short term results are more important than long term stabilization."

                                                      You must be over 40 and think that Reagan is one of the top 3 presidents in history? The policies of "Obama and his administration" may make things worse in the short term, but they would actually get worse no matter what policy is pushed. In the end it comes down to what is better for the nation in 10 years and even farther down the road and some trivial tax cuts are going to do nothing to help that.
                                                      And you think nationalization of the financial and manufacturing industries is a "long term" answer? You actually think government is competent to run such organizations better than private industry?
                                                      Comment
                                                      • obama our lord
                                                        SBR Wise Guy
                                                        • 12-24-08
                                                        • 562

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by dwest718

                                                        You must be over 40 and think that Reagan is one of the top 3 presidents in history?
                                                        I'm thinking that you must be about 20 and still unable to think outside the box of your dumb-downed leftist public education.
                                                        Comment
                                                        • reno cool
                                                          SBR MVP
                                                          • 07-02-08
                                                          • 3567

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by obama our lord
                                                          And you think nationalization of the financial and manufacturing industries is a "long term" answer? You actually think government is competent to run such organizations better than private industry?
                                                          it would be a start. At least then there would have to be some accountability. You're trying to scare people with empty slogans. We're passed that.
                                                          bird bird da bird's da word
                                                          Comment
                                                          • losturmarbles
                                                            SBR MVP
                                                            • 07-01-08
                                                            • 4604

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Willie Bee
                                                            At least 100% of the people that start threads like this are drooling halfwits.
                                                            what exactly is "threads like this"?

                                                            can't question how many wits it takes to make a post "like this"

                                                            Originally posted by Willie Bee
                                                            Yes, this is a brand new move by the feds, OOL. Congress was perfect from 1994-2006 and the White House was in sound hands from Jan 2001 to Jan 2009.



                                                            Now bring me a pizza with extra cheese. Chop, chop.
                                                            do you ever get tired of ghosting as daggerkobe?

                                                            actually your strawman arguments are sounding more like ryanxl.
                                                            Comment
                                                            • losturmarbles
                                                              SBR MVP
                                                              • 07-01-08
                                                              • 4604

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by dwest718
                                                              I watch Comedy Central and my local news channel for my news. I watch Fox News for my comedy. The Daily Show and Colbert Report are satires but are no more biased than any primetime news show on a none local channel.

                                                              If believing government involvement in the economic problems of our country can be more beneficial than the laissez faire policies of the last 8 years makes me a drooling halfwit, than I am proud to be a drooling halfwit.
                                                              what laissez faire policies was that?

                                                              if you actually believe government is the solution and not the problem, then calling you a drooling halfwit would be a compliment.
                                                              Comment
                                                              • losturmarbles
                                                                SBR MVP
                                                                • 07-01-08
                                                                • 4604

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by reno cool
                                                                it would be a start. At least then there would have to be some accountability. You're trying to scare people with empty slogans. We're passed that.

                                                                who wants accountability? your government heroes certainly dont. and what about individual accountability? ie self responsibility? your socialist utopia encourages the exact opposite.
                                                                Comment
                                                                • losturmarbles
                                                                  SBR MVP
                                                                  • 07-01-08
                                                                  • 4604

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by dwest718
                                                                  It worked 80 years ago...

                                                                  Some companies need to fail. Some companies need to be regulated by a third party. This is no different.

                                                                  The thing that YOU should be scared about is the private equity pouring into the government that sways or makes decisions... not the government itself.

                                                                  for ignorance.
                                                                  you imply that companies are evil for bribing the government "that sways or makes decisions", then you express your content with the government picking winners and losers rather than the free market.

                                                                  for ignorance indeed.
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • dwest718
                                                                    SBR Sharp
                                                                    • 12-06-07
                                                                    • 443

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by losturmarbles
                                                                    you imply that companies are evil for bribing the government "that sways or makes decisions", then you express your content with the government picking winners and losers rather than the free market.

                                                                    for ignorance indeed.
                                                                    Contrary to popular belief... there is no static equilibrium in the free market. Neither the government nor the free market by itself is capable of correcting to said equilibrium. There are only dynamic conditions that maximize social welfare. Compromise from all sides and involvement from all sides is necessary.

                                                                    I don't really know where im trying to go with this but I feel like it justifies some of my comments.
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • obama our lord
                                                                      SBR Wise Guy
                                                                      • 12-24-08
                                                                      • 562

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by dwest718
                                                                      Contrary to popular belief... there is no static equilibrium in the free market. Neither the government nor the free market by itself is capable of correcting to said equilibrium. There are only dynamic conditions that maximize social welfare. Compromise from all sides and involvement from all sides is necessary.

                                                                      I don't really know where im trying to go with this but I feel like it justifies some of my comments.

                                                                      Honestly, you sound like you are trying to regurgitate some talking points delivered by some effeminite liberal college professor in some freshman social policy course.
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      Search
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      SBR Contests
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Working...