Nash 2015 MLB Thread

[BigDeem5]

Thanks Deemer, hope your Indians keep raking.
That's a scary good crew there in Cleveland.
You got some nice front line pitching, you got relief that won't (usually) burn you.
Nice team.

Best rotation in AL.

4 headed monster. Just can't get any contributions from Swisher/Gomes yet.

[pilebuck13]

Man your striking out Nash

That Arizona bet of mine last night is among the top 10 crappy wagers I have made in the last year.

Watching it was like getting waterboarded, After the first inning I thought the reports of Bradley being back to form were valid, than bang, the f'n pitcher breaks it open in the second with a hit, and to compound matters, I'm sitting there in the third inning wating for the Snakes bats to start cranking, nothing, fourth inning, nothing, fifth inning, nothing, and on and on and on.....

It was like I made a shitty wager (and I did) and the baseball gods are going to punish me further by making me watch it.

That makes three straight losses for Nasher, but like Jimmy V. said "don't give up, don't ever give up"

40 minutes to first pitch, I won't get long winded here.

GIANTS/PIRATES UNDER 7

(reminder, I'm on a 3 game cooler folks)

[pilebuck13]

Starting to think waiting after all star break will be the bet with baseball just how after week 5 is money for me with football

[stevenash]

Man your striking out Nash

Right now, yes, I'm on a four game cooler, going back the last two weeks, I ran off a six pack, (6 straight winners) then split two games, (7-1) then lost two straight (7-3) then won two of three (9-4) now on a four game losing streak (9-8)

So, even though I have lost 4 consecutive (two of them were so bad I even have to laugh, but people who have been following me for the last seven years, 3 1/2 years here, 4 at the other place, and I don't think anybody remembers the old baseball.com site (which I can't get in trouble for for bringing up because it doesn't exist anymore, it got sold out) know when I go on coolers, and I do, it's not a pretty thing. My losses are not 9-8 bad bounce bad beats, my losses are 53-7 football games (wrong end) or I'm on the wrong end of an 11-2 baseball game. Yeah, that kind of stink bombs.

But I digress, but that 9-8 record over the past few weeks, include a 3* winner on the Braves at +167, which returned 5*, I don't lay more than -120, so chalk will never eat my bankroll, so I'm always in the game.

The style I wager sports (pick 'em game or underdogs 9 plays out of 10 will never, ever, produce gaudy over the top won / loss records, but sports betting is not all about 120-90 won loss records, if you achieve a 120-90 record betting chalk and the average you are laying is -140, you would collect 120 dollars for a one dollar wager on your 120 winners, but pay out 1.40 on your 90 losses (doing the math that's 126 dollars) the chalk bettor banging his chest about his amazing 120 and 90 record won't tell you he's actually showing a negative return, yet I can go 9 an 11 for 45 percent winners but show you a positive return.

So, is the 12 and 9 won loss/ chalk bettor really better then 9 and 11 or even the 9 and 12 'dog bettor when the nine winners at an average of say +135 returns 12.15

What would you rather bet, 12 and 9 and be out 3 bucks, or be 9 and 12 and be + chump change.

I can spew out -180 chalk winners until the cows come home, but at the end of the season, if you bet -180 or -160 favorites day in day out, you'll be eating minute rice and wearing a pickle barrel as your Sunday suit.

There's no excitement on grinding up a bankroll, I get that, there is no thrill ride.
Hey, nothing beats the rush of an all in play on a -160 favorite, you just won't see it here.

What you get here is me sharing some knowledge I have picked up along the way, you are going to get four game losing streaks, you'll get three more four game losing streaks in the next 5 months, but you are going to get six game winning streaks again, but what I hope to get across is I'm going to go on 4 and 5 game coolers, betting pick's and dogs, and the chalk eater will also go on 4 and 5 game coolers as well, but when the chalk eater goes on a 5 game losing streak he's not out 5 units, he's out more like at least 7 units, the dog bettor that goes on a 5 game losing streak is out 5 units.

Once again, there is no such think as a 60 percent plus winning dog bettor, you don't even have to be 50 percent to turn a profit, I just showed you how a 45 percent winner can still turn a profit.

And I've been preaching that since I don't know, day one since I've been here.

a) I'm still more than in the game.
b) Still showing a small, modest profit for the year, even though I'm cold as ice right now.

Be back in a little bit, it's not a pretty thing when Nasher gets hungry, and I'm hungry.

I'm still here, I don't disappear when I go bad, and even though I lose my temper sometimes at my trolling haters, and I have some of those, nobody laughs harder at myself then me when I lay some stink bombs.

After I eat, I'll look at what's left for tonight and look at Thursday, and using my tools and such I have at my disposal, let me see if I can correct this slide, if not, I can always laught at myself a little bit more.

[Ra77er]

Nash fuk the haters, just keep posting in this biotch.


FYI

I'm on Yankees, Dodgers, Rays

[Big Bear]

Right now, yes, I'm on a four game cooler, going back the last two weeks, I ran off a six pack, (6 straight winners) then split two games, (7-1) then lost two straight (7-3) then won two of three (9-4) now on a four game losing streak (9-8)

So, even though I have lost 4 consecutive (two of them were so bad I even have to laugh, but people who have been following me for the last seven years, 3 1/2 years here, 4 at the other place, and I don't think anybody remembers the old baseball.com site (which I can't get in trouble for for bringing up because it doesn't exist anymore, it got sold out) know when I go on coolers, and I do, it's not a pretty thing. My losses are not 9-8 bad bounce bad beats, my losses are 53-7 football games (wrong end) or I'm on the wrong end of an 11-2 baseball game. Yeah, that kind of stink bombs.

But I digress, but that 9-8 record over the past few weeks, include a 3* winner on the Braves at +167, which returned 5*, I don't lay more than -120, so chalk will never eat my bankroll, so I'm always in the game.

The style I wager sports (pick 'em game or underdogs 9 plays out of 10 will never, ever, produce gaudy over the top won / loss records, but sports betting is not all about 120-90 won loss records, if you achieve a 120-90 record betting chalk and the average you are laying is -140, you would collect 120 dollars for a one dollar wager on your 120 winners, but pay out 1.40 on your 90 losses (doing the math that's 126 dollars) the chalk bettor banging his chest about his amazing 120 and 90 record won't tell you he's actually showing a negative return, yet I can go 9 an 11 for 45 percent winners but show you a positive return.

So, is the 12 and 9 won loss/ chalk bettor really better then 9 and 11 or even the 9 and 12 'dog bettor when the nine winners at an average of say +135 returns 12.15

What would you rather bet, 12 and 9 and be out 3 bucks, or be 9 and 12 and be + chump change.

I can spew out -180 chalk winners until the cows come home, but at the end of the season, if you bet -180 or -160 favorites day in day out, you'll be eating minute rice and wearing a pickle barrel as your Sunday suit.

There's no excitement on grinding up a bankroll, I get that, there is no thrill ride.
Hey, nothing beats the rush of an all in play on a -160 favorite, you just won't see it here.

What you get here is me sharing some knowledge I have picked up along the way, you are going to get four game losing streaks, you'll get three more four game losing streaks in the next 5 months, but you are going to get six game winning streaks again, but what I hope to get across is I'm going to go on 4 and 5 game coolers, betting pick's and dogs, and the chalk eater will also go on 4 and 5 game coolers as well, but when the chalk eater goes on a 5 game losing streak he's not out 5 units, he's out more like at least 7 units, the dog bettor that goes on a 5 game losing streak is out 5 units.

Once again, there is no such think as a 60 percent plus winning dog bettor, you don't even have to be 50 percent to turn a profit, I just showed you how a 45 percent winner can still turn a profit.

And I've been preaching that since I don't know, day one since I've been here.

a) I'm still more than in the game.
b) Still showing a small, modest profit for the year, even though I'm cold as ice right now.

Be back in a little bit, it's not a pretty thing when Nasher gets hungry, and I'm hungry.

I'm still here, I don't disappear when I go bad, and even though I lose my temper sometimes at my trolling haters, and I have some of those, nobody laughs harder at myself then me when I lay some stink bombs.

After I eat, I'll look at what's left for tonight and look at Thursday, and using my tools and such I have at my disposal, let me see if I can correct this slide, if not, I can always laught at myself a little bit more.

take the Angels tonight and thank me later

[pattymayo]

Shut up and post a winner Nasher

[pilebuck13]

I enjoy your in sight nash definitely not trying to find holes in your game

[STAX]

Right now, yes, I'm on a four game cooler, going back the last two weeks, I ran off a six pack, (6 straight winners) then split two games, (7-1) then lost two straight (7-3) then won two of three (9-4) now on a four game losing streak (9-8)

So, even though I have lost 4 consecutive (two of them were so bad I even have to laugh, but people who have been following me for the last seven years, 3 1/2 years here, 4 at the other place, and I don't think anybody remembers the old baseball.com site (which I can't get in trouble for for bringing up because it doesn't exist anymore, it got sold out) know when I go on coolers, and I do, it's not a pretty thing. My losses are not 9-8 bad bounce bad beats, my losses are 53-7 football games (wrong end) or I'm on the wrong end of an 11-2 baseball game. Yeah, that kind of stink bombs.

But I digress, but that 9-8 record over the past few weeks, include a 3* winner on the Braves at +167, which returned 5*, I don't lay more than -120, so chalk will never eat my bankroll, so I'm always in the game.

The style I wager sports (pick 'em game or underdogs 9 plays out of 10 will never, ever, produce gaudy over the top won / loss records, but sports betting is not all about 120-90 won loss records, if you achieve a 120-90 record betting chalk and the average you are laying is -140, you would collect 120 dollars for a one dollar wager on your 120 winners, but pay out 1.40 on your 90 losses (doing the math that's 126 dollars) the chalk bettor banging his chest about his amazing 120 and 90 record won't tell you he's actually showing a negative return, yet I can go 9 an 11 for 45 percent winners but show you a positive return.

So, is the 12 and 9 won loss/ chalk bettor really better then 9 and 11 or even the 9 and 12 'dog bettor when the nine winners at an average of say +135 returns 12.15

What would you rather bet, 12 and 9 and be out 3 bucks, or be 9 and 12 and be + chump change.

I can spew out -180 chalk winners until the cows come home, but at the end of the season, if you bet -180 or -160 favorites day in day out, you'll be eating minute rice and wearing a pickle barrel as your Sunday suit.

There's no excitement on grinding up a bankroll, I get that, there is no thrill ride.
Hey, nothing beats the rush of an all in play on a -160 favorite, you just won't see it here.

What you get here is me sharing some knowledge I have picked up along the way, you are going to get four game losing streaks, you'll get three more four game losing streaks in the next 5 months, but you are going to get six game winning streaks again, but what I hope to get across is I'm going to go on 4 and 5 game coolers, betting pick's and dogs, and the chalk eater will also go on 4 and 5 game coolers as well, but when the chalk eater goes on a 5 game losing streak he's not out 5 units, he's out more like at least 7 units, the dog bettor that goes on a 5 game losing streak is out 5 units.

Once again, there is no such think as a 60 percent plus winning dog bettor, you don't even have to be 50 percent to turn a profit, I just showed you how a 45 percent winner can still turn a profit.

And I've been preaching that since I don't know, day one since I've been here.

a) I'm still more than in the game.
b) Still showing a small, modest profit for the year, even though I'm cold as ice right now.

Be back in a little bit, it's not a pretty thing when Nasher gets hungry, and I'm hungry.

I'm still here, I don't disappear when I go bad, and even though I lose my temper sometimes at my trolling haters, and I have some of those, nobody laughs harder at myself then me when I lay some stink bombs.

After I eat, I'll look at what's left for tonight and look at Thursday, and using my tools and such I have at my disposal, let me see if I can correct this slide, if not, I can always laught at myself a little bit more.

Its just variance... im sure youve had worse streaks before when betting dogs and small favs. youll have worse streaks in the future... Ive always been a big believer that the only way to win in sportsbetting is to bet underdog MLs (not just baseball, in all sports).

[Ra77er]

Oh man Tampa is taking a hot poop on me tonight. That first inning should have produced a few runs

[Big Bear]

take the Angels tonight and thank me later

[Ra77er]

Big bearial jinx one time please

[Big Bear]

Big bearial jinx one time please

[Vegas39]

Big bearial jinx one time please

just like that 4-2

[Vinnie Paz]

Only you big bear. Only you.

[Ra77er]

[Vegas39]

5-4

holy fukkkk

[Ra77er]

Bear tried to peacock in the 6th

[Big Bear]

Only you big bear. Only you.

[Vegas39]

Bear tried to peacock in the 6th

tried that with nash weeks ago in 3rd inning

mutual fund manager in making

[tony_come]

Way to manage the game soc

[Vegas39]

Big bearial jinx one time please

boom

[Vasco]

Nashy this slump just means a win is right around the corner. I like Cleveland and Stl today.

[dfish]

Nash your Royals look like a play , throw out the metrics on Young.
4-0 0.43 @ Kaufman.

[Ra77er]

I like it too Fish

KC
LAD
TB

[dfish]

I like it too Fish

KC
LAD
TB

Good spot for Dodgers
GL

[stevenash]

6/4 Play

REDS -118 4*
REDS +145 2*

20 minutes to first pitch

Briefly, Desclafani is a beast on the road this season, 2.25 ERA 1.00 WH/IP in 32 road innings, and the Phils offense is rock bottom dead last. .226 as a team and .697 OPS.

Best looking play on the short card tonight.

REDS run and money lines.

[pattymayo]

Right now, yes, I'm on a four game cooler, going back the last two weeks, I ran off a six pack, (6 straight winners) then split two games, (7-1) then lost two straight (7-3) then won two of three (9-4) now on a four game losing streak (9-8)

So, even though I have lost 4 consecutive (two of them were so bad I even have to laugh, but people who have been following me for the last seven years, 3 1/2 years here, 4 at the other place, and I don't think anybody remembers the old baseball.com site (which I can't get in trouble for for bringing up because it doesn't exist anymore, it got sold out) know when I go on coolers, and I do, it's not a pretty thing. My losses are not 9-8 bad bounce bad beats, my losses are 53-7 football games (wrong end) or I'm on the wrong end of an 11-2 baseball game. Yeah, that kind of stink bombs.

But I digress, but that 9-8 record over the past few weeks, include a 3* winner on the Braves at +167, which returned 5*, I don't lay more than -120, so chalk will never eat my bankroll, so I'm always in the game.

The style I wager sports (pick 'em game or underdogs 9 plays out of 10 will never, ever, produce gaudy over the top won / loss records, but sports betting is not all about 120-90 won loss records, if you achieve a 120-90 record betting chalk and the average you are laying is -140, you would collect 120 dollars for a one dollar wager on your 120 winners, but pay out 1.40 on your 90 losses (doing the math that's 126 dollars) the chalk bettor banging his chest about his amazing 120 and 90 record won't tell you he's actually showing a negative return, yet I can go 9 an 11 for 45 percent winners but show you a positive return.

So, is the 12 and 9 won loss/ chalk bettor really better then 9 and 11 or even the 9 and 12 'dog bettor when the nine winners at an average of say +135 returns 12.15

What would you rather bet, 12 and 9 and be out 3 bucks, or be 9 and 12 and be + chump change.

I can spew out -180 chalk winners until the cows come home, but at the end of the season, if you bet -180 or -160 favorites day in day out, you'll be eating minute rice and wearing a pickle barrel as your Sunday suit.

There's no excitement on grinding up a bankroll, I get that, there is no thrill ride.
Hey, nothing beats the rush of an all in play on a -160 favorite, you just won't see it here.

What you get here is me sharing some knowledge I have picked up along the way, you are going to get four game losing streaks, you'll get three more four game losing streaks in the next 5 months, but you are going to get six game winning streaks again, but what I hope to get across is I'm going to go on 4 and 5 game coolers, betting pick's and dogs, and the chalk eater will also go on 4 and 5 game coolers as well, but when the chalk eater goes on a 5 game losing streak he's not out 5 units, he's out more like at least 7 units, the dog bettor that goes on a 5 game losing streak is out 5 units.

Once again, there is no such think as a 60 percent plus winning dog bettor, you don't even have to be 50 percent to turn a profit, I just showed you how a 45 percent winner can still turn a profit.

And I've been preaching that since I don't know, day one since I've been here.

a) I'm still more than in the game.
b) Still showing a small, modest profit for the year, even though I'm cold as ice right now.

Be back in a little bit, it's not a pretty thing when Nasher gets hungry, and I'm hungry.

I'm still here, I don't disappear when I go bad, and even though I lose my temper sometimes at my trolling haters, and I have some of those, nobody laughs harder at myself then me when I lay some stink bombs.

After I eat, I'll look at what's left for tonight and look at Thursday, and using my tools and such I have at my disposal, let me see if I can correct this slide, if not, I can always laught at myself a little bit more.

reading Nash's posts to yourself out loud is kind of fun.

so, many, commas, and never, ending, sentences, i don't, know, how, to handle, myself

[stevenash]

Good spot for Dodgers
GL

Lefties torture Frias (.389)
Carpenter, Wong, and Heyward might treat him as batting practice, conversly, Dodgers righties are the best in the majors OPS.
Something has to give, good pitching usually beats good hitting, line is a pick for a reason, because it is a pick.

You can make a case for both sides, I may wager the over, I'll root your Dodgers home however.

[stevenash]

reading Nash's posts to yourself out loud is kind of fun.

so, many, commas, and never, ending, sentences, i don't, know, how, to handle, myself

I've been called "comma boy" before. (true fact)

[GT21Megatron]

What about Arizona and fading Harvey again?

[stevenash]

What about Arizona and fading Harvey again?

Don't sleep on the Snake's bats.
Snakes could be a sharp play.

[GT21Megatron]

Don't sleep on the Snake's bats.
Snakes could be a sharp play.

I took for $125 to win $150

i kinda like Mariners at 10:00 might stay put....hope Chapman can shut shit down

[stevenash]

If Chapman blows this save for me it's not going to be pretty here at casa de Nasher

[reaclast]

steveee what do u have for today bro? come backk