Originally posted by t-wizzle
I don't have a problem with players having to prove themselves for a few years early in their careers before they start making bigger money. For every Pujols or Trout or Cabrera or McCutchen, there are a lot of guys who looked great for the first year or two until the league figured them out and they went bust.
The issue here is giving guys monster deals when they have nowhere to go but down. The motivation is gone, their bodies deteriorate, no steroids to get over injuries, etc. We can all agree on that. I don't see anything wrong with making a player prove himself with at least three years of consistent production, but I do see something wrong with max deals for Hamilton, Pujols, A-Rod, etc.
Again, there's a HUGE difference between signing a guy to a big deal at age 24-27 vs. 31-33. I'm amazed that teams haven't figured that out by now, yet I'm not. Like I said, I really think the owners are seeing the name and the brand only, which helps at the gate, which is all they care about anyway.

