Targeting...call reversed..penalty still enforced 15yards..your thoughts??
Interesting call...happened in Georiga/Vandy game on Saturday...Targeting was called..reversed after review..15 yard penalty still enforced..on a reversed penalty call..giving Vanderbilt a much needed first down...(it was 3rd down on the call..which was an incomplete pass..which would have leead to 4th down..if no penalty).. Any thoughts...by the way Vanderbilt scored a TD and went on to defeat Georiga..on a Reversed penalty..where 15 yards were still awarded..any thoughts??
-
-
the STUPIDEST CALL IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!! IF ITS OVERTURNED AFTER REPLAY NO FLAG!!!!!!!!!!!!Comment -
It was actually 4th down when that play happened.
First of all I think it's ridiculous to kick a kid out of a game w/o at least a warning. Secondly if its reviewable and review shows it was the wrong call then should be able to pick the flag upComment -
My thoughts exactly...NO penalty should be enforced..if reversed..makes absolutely no senseComment -
Youre right..my mistake..it was 4th down..I stand corrected.Comment -
The rule is fine. It can still be personal foul, helmet to helmet, etc without it being targeting.
That being said, that UGA penalty was BS, he did not go helmet to helmet at all. That was just a shit call from the beginning.Comment -
Yep...he hit him hard and in the shoulder...legal hitComment -
It's overruling a call in words but confirming in consequences. It's illogical. Only reason I can think why the rule is as it is is the NCAA is trying to protect themselves in possible future litigations, where they can argue they penalized a particular play and thus did all they could to protect a playerComment -
i've seen this numerous times throughout the year. it's the rule. they can only reverse the ejection.Comment