Broncos Team Total o/u 50 vs Jags....

inter1097 · 10-09-13, 08:42 PM

I like Under 50. the Starters aint gonna play the whole game.

ChiLLx · 10-09-13, 10:00 PM

Wow that punts is a joke. At some point in the 2nd half they have to just run it and eventually go 3 and out.

TonyTall · 10-09-13, 10:01 PM

yeah where is this punts, what book?. one holding call for a 1st and 20 and they are in trouble

broadway6 · 10-09-13, 10:06 PM

Broncos will not score 50 BUT

over 53 (game) is the play...

BIGDAY · 10-09-13, 10:10 PM

Game will go over if Jax can muster up 10-13 Pts. Preferably early

jjgold · 10-10-13, 05:55 AM

I think taking the over in the punts is a pretty good bet this game is not going to be close and of Denvers going to run a lot

ChalkyDog · 10-10-13, 05:19 PM

Alright, so let me get this straight.

Denver TT is 50 (even though the under is juiced to hell)
Game O/U is 52.5
Game spread is 26.5

I have a hard time understanding this. Based on those numbers, doesn't it seem like Denver covering the spread is the easiest bet right there.

Vegas puts Denver scoring 50 alone. The total is less than a FG more than that.... anyway - I presume people can follow through with the thought process.

Pretty interesting.

yisman · 10-10-13, 05:22 PM

Where are those lines from?

k13 · 10-10-13, 05:27 PM

Hard to pass the Under on the 50, no?

It's a lot of points for only -200 as juicy as that is.

What's the "normal" o/u? Let me check.....I see 40.5, wow

2daBank · 10-10-13, 05:27 PM

Originally posted by ChalkyDog

Alright, so let me get this straight.

Denver TT is 50 (even though the under is juiced to hell)
Game O/U is 52.5
Game spread is 26.5

I have a hard time understanding this. Based on those numbers, doesn't it seem like Denver covering the spread is the easiest bet right there.

Vegas puts Denver scoring 50 alone. The total is less than a FG more than that.... anyway - I presume people can follow through with the thought process.

Pretty interesting.

freaking crazy is what it is.. i dunno why but this the 1st den ova i dont love this year, the last 2 weeks they were so far off my number (that was too low as well, had the philly gm within a point until late foles td, lol) it wasnt even funny.. this one brings a lot more question marks to me as i dont expect jags to keep up scoring like i thought dal would and philly to lesser extent,, clearly they agree on that..gotta think den running the whole second half, but i dunno maybe blackmon and shorts can do enough to keep den scoring?

k13 · 10-10-13, 05:28 PM

Originally posted by yisman

Where are those lines from?

Bovada/Bodog

yisman · 10-10-13, 05:29 PM

I would hammer under 50 if I could bet at bovada

and over 1.5 punts

TonyTall · 10-10-13, 05:29 PM

if its henne with a week to prepare that changes everything. guy isnt bad............gabbert is banged up and bad. if its henne i see

38-13

TonyTall · 10-10-13, 05:31 PM

Originally posted by yisman

I would hammer under 50 if I could bet at bovada

and over 1.5 punts

i think hes bs on this. come on 2 punts is a winner

yisman · 10-10-13, 05:54 PM

k13 you should max those and count me in as part of the bet

BriGuy · 10-10-13, 06:11 PM

Originally posted by k13

Under is -200....

What do you guys think?

They won't score that many because they won' t need to.

k13 · 10-10-13, 06:21 PM

Number of punts this season :

7
5
1
2
0

k13 · 10-10-13, 06:26 PM

The over on the Punts is -150 now, fukk me, should have took it right away.

I think the limit is $100 on these, is that what those "orange" lines represent ?

TonyTall · 10-10-13, 06:35 PM

what book bro?

LT Profits · 10-10-13, 06:41 PM

Originally posted by TonyTall

what book bro?

He answered in Post #12, Bovada/Bodog. And keep in mind there are really alternate props, thus the varying juice.

yisman · 10-10-13, 06:42 PM

Originally posted by TonyTall

what book bro?

bovada

k13 when you see these you gotta max right away before the bets start pouring in

k13 · 10-12-13, 05:57 PM

Punt prop is off the board now....

byronbb · 10-12-13, 06:55 PM

Obvious sucker bet for a square who sees + money for Denver over.

TobiasFunke · 10-12-13, 08:24 PM

If that's the case, then the Jax TT is 2.5?? I'll take it for the max

pavyracer · 10-12-13, 08:31 PM

Denver is not going to score 50 points. But Jacksonville will score in the 20s. This is Jacksonville's Superbowl.

frostno98 · 10-12-13, 08:32 PM

Is their a prop for a punt return TD? Trindon Holliday might take one to the house tomorrow because the Jags will punt a few times.

yisman · 10-12-13, 09:29 PM

Originally posted by TobiasFunke

If that's the case, then the Jax TT is 2.5?? I'll take it for the max

no

they offered an inflated denver team total with the under the heavy favorite

that doesn't mean the jax team total is game total-alt line for denver team total

hitman09 · 10-12-13, 09:48 PM

so what's is the best bet for this gm? under? or denver -26.5?

pavyracer · 10-12-13, 09:53 PM

Originally posted by hitman09

so what's is the best bet for this gm? under? or denver -26.5?

Jacksonville +26.5

Broncos barely won by 3 points last time. Huge letdown game for them.

byronbb · 10-12-13, 09:59 PM

Jax has proven to suck so badly no point betting them. Laying 26 just as dumb. I really think if you want to bet the game just tease den under 3 tds with NO +8.5.

cyclone22 · 10-12-13, 11:20 PM

under 50. over for the punts total is a no brainer you really think Denver is going to punt the ball 1 time in 4 quarters?

EdV38 · 10-12-13, 11:53 PM

People are over thinking this game. Broncos are far from defensive wizards and Jags put up 17 points against second string Seattle players so if Peyton sits half way through the third there's no guarantee the Jags won't get their fair share of points. I see 40-20, something around there.

I like the game over 52.5 (got in at 51 last Sunday) and over the first half of 28. 4 TD in the first half to push? I'll take that risk. As far as the Denver TT 50 is concerned...why not just take a home fav straight up or teaser numbers on any game with that juice? The real number is around 40...50 should only be in discussion for those who want to bet OVER 50...not under. It should be apparent to most people that under 50 hits and that's why it's a pretty worthless bet.

Noleafclover · 10-13-13, 05:20 AM

Can't believe you didn't pound that punts over harder than I'd pound my avatar.

Enkhbat · 10-13-13, 05:41 AM

If anything Jaguars team total over is the best play in this game. Denver's defense is nonexistent, Ayers, Woodyard hurting, Vol Miller still out