Ball didn't break the plain.  Coach threw the challenge flag on a play already challenged.  GB player tries to hide the flag which is a personal foul.  What a fuked up call
							
						
					Worst Call of the Season
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	daneblazerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 09-14-08
- 27862
 
 #1Worst Call of the SeasonTags: None
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	 Rich BoySBR Hall of Famer Rich BoySBR Hall of Famer- 02-01-09
- 9714
 
 #2I hope they change this rule for next season. Not even sure why it was approved in the first place.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	TeamDetroitSBR Sharp- 09-12-12
- 486
 
 #3Fukk that ruleComment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	brewcrew2kSBR MVP- 01-26-10
- 1158
 
 #4LolOriginally posted by TeamDetroitFukk that ruleComment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	HardspunSBR High Roller- 12-26-12
- 182
 
 #52nd worst call. The worst call still remains the GB/Sea touchdown at the end of the game. That really cost me!Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	ttwarrior1BARRELED IN @ SBR!- 06-23-09
- 28478
 
 #6either way , it was no fumble and they would of had the ball on the half inch line , all u have to do is go over any part of the white areaComment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	daneblazerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 09-14-08
- 27862
 
 #7Originally posted by ttwarrior1either way , it was no fumble and they would of had the ball on the half inch line , all u have to do is go over any part of the white area
 they would have had it on the 16Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	trytrytrySBR Posting Legend- 03-13-06
- 23666
 
 #8vikings also giving this game away..too bad but this one is over..GB wins it.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	Double BogeySBR MVP- 07-24-10
- 1465
 
 #9I just don't understand the drafting of the rule. It's not reviewable if the flag is thrown before the booth buzzes, but is if the flag comes after? Comment Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	DeuceBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 01-12-08
- 29843
 
 #10Rodgers was fukkin ticked, think he told McCarthy to take a fukkin bath.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	McDabsSBR Wise Guy- 09-19-12
- 888
 
 #11Refs are all over the Vikings nuts stfuComment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	ttwarrior1BARRELED IN @ SBR!- 06-23-09
- 28478
 
 #12 Comment Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	TeamDetroitSBR Sharp- 09-12-12
- 486
 
 #13Why does it even matter? He is going to review the play no matter what, whether he buzzes 10 seconds after the play or he buzzes 1 min after the play, the result is the same. The play is gona be reviewed.Originally posted by Double BogeyI just don't understand the drafting of the rule. It's not reviewable if the flag is thrown before the booth buzzes, but is if the flag comes after? Comment Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	suicidekingsSBR Hall of Famer- 03-23-09
- 9962
 
 #14And how about that reception that wasn't a reception in the 2Q by Minny off the deflection? That was NOT a catch, and yet Minnesota turned it into a TD.Originally posted by daneblazerBall didn't break the plain. Coach threw the challenge flag on a play already challenged. GB player tries to hide the flag which is a personal foul. What a fuked up callComment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	JerseyRobbySBR MVP- 12-14-11
- 1494
 
 #15Bad call but the rule is the real problem. Imagine that rule changing a playoff game.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 08-10-05
- 39847
 
 #16I thought that's what this thread was going to be about. That play cost GB the game.Originally posted by suicidekingsAnd how about that reception that wasn't a reception in the 2Q by Minny off the deflection? That was NOT a catch, and yet Minnesota turned it into a TD.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	crustymeSBR Posting Legend- 09-29-10
- 16896
 
 #17blame the idiot coach for not being able to challenge cause he wasted all his timeouts.Originally posted by suicidekingsAnd how about that reception that wasn't a reception in the 2Q by Minny off the deflection? That was NOT a catch, and yet Minnesota turned it into a TD.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	InTheDrinkSBR Posting Legend- 11-23-09
- 23983
 
 #18your lack of basic intelligence in any situation is completely unsurprising at this pointOriginally posted by ttwarrior1either way , it was no fumble and they would of had the ball on the half inch line , all u have to do is go over any part of the white areaComment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	DrStaleSBR Hall of Famer- 12-07-08
- 9692
 
 #19Not a horrible call, a horrible rule. Call was accurate based on the rule.Originally posted by Dark HorseIf with religion you mean belief system, your belief system is your religion. Again, it matters not what it is. You believe in it, you are loyal to it, would defend it, and yet have no proof of it, other than that, at one point or another, you chose to believe in it. Self-hypnosis. What if there were a snapping of fingers that broke the hypnosis?Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 08-10-05
- 39847
 
 #20OK, but that doesn't make the call itself any less bad, does it?Originally posted by crustymeblame the idiot coach for not being able to challenge cause he wasted all his timeouts.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	suicidekingsSBR Hall of Famer- 03-23-09
- 9962
 
 #21For sure. McCarthy didn't manage this game all that well. That first challenge was really obviously not going to win.Originally posted by crustymeblame the idiot coach for not being able to challenge cause he wasted all his timeouts.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	onlookerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 08-10-05
- 36572
 
 #22Okay. I'm confused.
 
 Should the throwing of the challenge flag wipe out the automatic challenge? Like it did on the Lions Thanksgiving day game.
 
  Comment Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	crustymeSBR Posting Legend- 09-29-10
- 16896
 
 #23it looked like a catch to everyone until the 10th replay with the 10th different angel. which is why you dont waste all your timeouts prior to the 2 min warning so can challenge.Originally posted by d2betsOK, but that doesn't make the call itself any less bad, does it?Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	TC WoodsSBR MVP- 12-17-11
- 1780
 
 #24How did you get her picture in there instead of your own?Originally posted by ttwarrior1 Comment Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	crustymeSBR Posting Legend- 09-29-10
- 16896
 
 #25challenge was supposedly initiated from the booth prior to the throwing of the flag. so they went ahead with the review.Originally posted by onlookerOkay. I'm confused.
 
 Should the throwing of the challenge flag wipe out the automatic challenge? Like it did on the Lions Thanksgiving day game.
 
  Comment Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	 Rich BoySBR Hall of Famer Rich BoySBR Hall of Famer- 02-01-09
- 9714
 
 #26Normally it would, but they are saying the challenge was thrown after they decided to review it. In which case its a 15 yard penalty.Originally posted by onlookerOkay. I'm confused.
 
 Should the throwing of the challenge flag wipe out the automatic challenge? Like it did on the Lions Thanksgiving day game.
 
  
 
 But its also a 15 penalty for trying to hide/cover up the challenge flag, which is what Jordy Nelson did. He picked up the flag and tried to hide it. not sure if the refs caught it though.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	 Full Time HoboSBR MVP Full Time HoboSBR MVP- 05-16-10
- 2778
 
 #27I think the explanation during the game was that because the review was buzzed in from "upstairs" before the flag was thrown that it would be reviewed regardless...Originally posted by onlookerOkay. I'm confused.
 
 Should the throwing of the challenge flag wipe out the automatic challenge? Like it did on the Lions Thanksgiving day game.
 
  
 
 Overall stupid rule. Whole thing depends on the mental capacity of the refs on the field.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	onlookerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 08-10-05
- 36572
 
 #28That is a given on any turnover or scoring play, the play being reviewed, so why did the Lions get dicked on Thanksgiving?Originally posted by crustymechallenge was supposedly initiated from the booth prior to the throwing of the flag. so they went ahead with the review.
 
 Just a total mess that rule is. I'm sure it will change in the offseason.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	swordsandtequilaSBR Hall of Famer- 02-23-12
- 9763
 
 #29Right call, dumb rule. Was a touchdown.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	crustymeSBR Posting Legend- 09-29-10
- 16896
 
 #30in the detroit game, booth hadnt buzzed down yet.Originally posted by onlookerThat is a given on any turnover or scoring play, the play being reviewed, so why did the Lions get dicked on Thanksgiving?
 
 Just a total mess that rule is. I'm sure it will change in the offseason.
 
 it is a dumb rule but again blame the idiot coach who didnt know while his players did. he was breathing a sigh of relief when they reversed it to a td.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	onlookerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 08-10-05
- 36572
 
 #31I know what your saying, but it shouldn't need buzzing on scoring and turnovers, since they are automatically reviewed.Originally posted by crustymein the detroit game, booth hadnt buzzed down yet.
 
 it is a dumb rule but again blame the idiot coach who didnt know while his players did. he was breathing a sigh of relief when they reversed it to a td.
 
 One team got fuked, and the other caught a break.
 
 Rule needs changed.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	McBa1nSBR MVP- 01-02-06
- 2642
 
 #32I'm actually shocked by the development of the ruling on the play. First, the ruling on the field was complete dogshit. Second - this rule is something I knew about and thought I had down prior to the season, I don't understand the ruling that 'the replay booth buzzed down prior to the challenge flag being thrown' bullschtein. That's a new hook, ala the Lance Moore '2nd act' ruling that was not in the rule book. Yes, the play was called correctly, but the rules, in that situation, are super-confusing. I'm sure Mike Smith and Jim Schwartz have a bone to pick about it.
 
 From what I understand, it doesn't matter if the booth buzzes down for a replay, because it's AUTOMATIC on a turnover or scoring play - if the coach throws the challenge flag on a play already being reviewed anyway (like Smith/Schwartz rulings), then it can no longer be reviewed no matter what. To further compound the problem/issue is Mike Perreira came on and agreed with Mike Carey's ruling. But the thing of it is, McCarthy threw the flag in about the same fashion as Smith or Schwartz. So what part about the rule is not in the rulebook?
 
 Most officials are lawyers, by profession, and I can see why. Interpreting the rules, in certain HUGE situations like this, is something the NFL has to address. Yes, most pro-punters know NEVER to bet the favorite in Mike Carey officiated games, because his crew is not on the square and/or incompetent... But it's crap that a rule that gets graded one way is changed in another situation. To me, that's not a square ruling because it defies precedent.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	onlookerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 08-10-05
- 36572
 
 #33Exactly what I was getting at.Originally posted by McBa1nFrom what I understand, it doesn't matter if the booth buzzes down for a replay, because it's AUTOMATIC on a turnover or scoring play - if the coach throws the challenge flag on a play already being reviewed anyway (like Smith/Schwartz rulings), then it can no longer be reviewed no matter what. To further compound the problem/issue is Mike Perreira came on and agreed with Mike Carey's ruling. But the thing of it is, McCarthy threw the flag in about the same fashion as Smith or Schwartz. So what part about the rule is not in the rulebook?
 
 They just added a twist to it with the "buzzing" ruling.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	StevedoreSBR MVP- 11-10-10
- 1218
 
 #34Worst call was Dom Capers rushing only 3 on the biggest play of the game, 3rd and 11 which the Queens picked up. He pussed out and went prevent, cost GB the game.Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	crustymeSBR Posting Legend- 09-29-10
- 16896
 
 #35true, every turnover and td are reviewed upstairs but not every play is buzzed down for a field review. unless they see something that may overturn it.Comment
Search
			
			
			
			
		
		
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	SBR Contests
			
			
			
			
		
		
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
			
			
			
			
		
		
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	#1 BetMGM
    4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
    #2 FanDuel
    4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
    #3 Caesars
    4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
    #4 DraftKings
    4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
    #5 Fanatics
    
    #6 bet365
    4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
    #7 Hard Rock
    4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
    #8 BetRivers
    4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
	
  