SBR posters are not this stupid..

milwaukee mike · 10-18-12, 10:51 PM

Yes sadly a lot of sbr posters are just as dumb as the announcers that couldn't figure it out.

Harbaughs are smart people, parents live near me in the milwaukee area.

Justin3587 · 10-18-12, 10:53 PM

Actually pretty ridiculous the amount of controversy over it. Hahah.

DrStale · 10-18-12, 10:54 PM

Thread title wrong. Everything else right.

ABEHONEST · 10-19-12, 12:37 AM

Also, no star players get hurt for SF.

A4K · 10-19-12, 01:43 AM

Originally posted by milwaukee mike

Yes sadly a lot of sbr posters are just as dumb as the announcers that couldn't figure it out.

Harbaughs are smart people, parents live near me in the milwaukee area.

Can't be too smart if they live in Milwaukee, ZIIIING!

rumnblack · 10-19-12, 01:49 AM

I thought it was the right call.

ZetaPsi808 · 10-19-12, 01:50 AM

MeatWad · 10-19-12, 02:52 AM

Not even a debatable call, unless you are results oriented and sweating the spread.

Avenger · 10-19-12, 03:08 AM

Whatever... I'm not replying to this topic anymore.

If you think that Seahawks would've recovered an onside kick, score a TD, recover another onside kick, score a FG in 50 secs.... I dunno what to say. You probably believe in Santa, the tooth fairy, and WWE.

But who cares?

It was one game. The sharp bet was Niners 2H, which cashed. Yes, I took the -7.5, but it was a mistake after I saw the ticket, I forgot to say Niners ML.

But don't say Harbaugh didn't know the spread or his decisions wasn't based on gambling.... geez, so naive.

As I stated many times in this forum, NFL spreads are near impossible to beat. They are way too sharp. I don't know how anyone can do it year after year.

Justin3587 · 10-19-12, 03:38 AM

Avenger said it best. It's a government conspiracy put together so well that nobody can prove it!

paco · 10-19-12, 06:09 AM

Seattle was covering 59 mins and 45 seconds of that game anyway, stop acting like u caught some crazy bad beat SF bettors. U were losing ats the whole freaking game. Keep laying more than a td to the toughest defense in the nfl lol

2daBank · 10-19-12, 06:56 AM

Originally posted by Avenger

Whatever... I'm not replying to this topic anymore.

If you think that Seahawks would've recovered an onside kick, score a TD, recover another onside kick, score a FG in 50 secs.... I dunno what to say. You probably believe in Santa, the tooth fairy, and WWE.

But who cares?

It was one game. The sharp bet was Niners 2H, which cashed. Yes, I took the -7.5, but it was a mistake after I saw the ticket, I forgot to say Niners ML.

But don't say Harbaugh didn't know the spread or his decisions wasn't based on gambling.... geez, so naive.

As I stated many times in this forum, NFL spreads are near impossible to beat. They are way too sharp. I don't know how anyone can do it year after year.

under was rather easy and obviously best play in the gm... could have had 8 safeties and it still went under...far as last part no one beats nfl year after year, if they tell you different they very new to this, or lying, most likely both...

JayLA · 10-19-12, 07:03 AM

Originally posted by 2daBank

under was rather easy and obviously best play in the gm... could have had 8 safeties and it still went under...far as last part no one beats nfl year after year, if they tell you different they very new to this, or lying, most likely both...

i played 1H U19, thanks to you bank-and went to work, heard some chatter about the whole thing but did not know it was only 50 seconds that Seattle had. Harbaugh just wanted the game to end. he's playing low, get the fukk out alive and well, ball.

2daBank · 10-19-12, 07:15 AM

Originally posted by JayLA

i played 1H U19, thanks to you bank-and went to work, heard some chatter about the whole thing but did not know it was only 50 seconds that Seattle had. Harbaugh just wanted the game to end. he's playing low, get the fukk out alive and well, ball.

i was at cardinal gm so i just hearing what i read this morning,,gotta luv thur nights

BigDeem5 · 10-19-12, 07:17 AM

Originally posted by paco

Seattle was covering 59 mins and 45 seconds of that game anyway, stop acting like u caught some crazy bad beat SF bettors. U were losing ats the whole freaking game. Keep laying more than a td to the toughest defense in the nfl lol

Well said pac

2daBank · 10-19-12, 07:37 AM

Originally posted by paco

Seattle was covering 59 mins and 45 seconds of that game anyway, stop acting like u caught some crazy bad beat SF bettors. U were losing ats the whole freaking game. Keep laying more than a td to the toughest defense in the nfl lol

said this before gm,,,seems really crazy to lay more than a td in a gm neither team gonna score more than 20..

Smoke · 10-19-12, 07:43 AM

Originally posted by BigDeem5

Well said pac

Well said deemer

Justin3587 · 10-19-12, 09:03 AM

Originally posted by Smoke

Well said deemer

Well said Smoke

dj_destroyer · 10-19-12, 09:35 AM

Originally posted by Avenger

Whatever... I'm not replying to this topic anymore.

If you think that Seahawks would've recovered an onside kick, score a TD, recover another onside kick, score a FG in 50 secs.... I dunno what to say. You probably believe in Santa, the tooth fairy, and WWE.

But who cares?

It was one game. The sharp bet was Niners 2H, which cashed. Yes, I took the -7.5, but it was a mistake after I saw the ticket, I forgot to say Niners ML.

But don't say Harbaugh didn't know the spread or his decisions wasn't based on gambling.... geez, so naive.

As I stated many times in this forum, NFL spreads are near impossible to beat. They are way too sharp. I don't know how anyone can do it year after year.

What a shitty post, top to bottom.

William Walters · 10-19-12, 09:42 AM

Originally posted by Avenger

Whatever... I'm not replying to this topic anymore.

If you think that Seahawks would've recovered an onside kick, score a TD, recover another onside kick, score a FG in 50 secs.... I dunno what to say. You probably believe in Santa, the tooth fairy, and WWE.

But who cares?

It was one game. The sharp bet was Niners 2H, which cashed. Yes, I took the -7.5, but it was a mistake after I saw the ticket, I forgot to say Niners ML.

But don't say Harbaugh didn't know the spread or his decisions wasn't based on gambling.... geez, so naive.

As I stated many times in this forum, NFL spreads are near impossible to beat. They are way too sharp. I don't know how anyone can do it year after year.

p19101 · 10-19-12, 10:10 AM

Originally posted by Avenger

As I stated many times in this forum, NFL spreads are near impossible to beat. They are way too sharp. I don't know how anyone can do it year after year.

Yeah, just because you fail terribly it must be impossible for everyone else as well. Maybe the problem is not the spreads them self but what's in the mirror?

WHATaTEASE · 10-19-12, 10:12 AM

SF -13 ? where is the value ?

SteveRyan · 10-19-12, 10:13 AM

Originally posted by Justin3587

Harbaugh declined the safety. Why? Because he gets the ball WITHOUT a risk of a turnover (provided nobody on the receiving team touched the ball or drops it) . No timeouts for Seattle. I know you penis fellatio artists dont get it STILL. But for the record, I had SF-13. And I totally get it. Check the spreadsheet if you dont believe it.

Declining the safety does not prevent the risk of a turnover because if Seattle did have the 1st down, he would have accepted the safety. Then Seattle kicks onside with the opportunity to recover.

Harbaugh had the option depending upon where the refs spot the ball.

Justin3587 · 10-19-12, 10:24 AM

Originally posted by WHATaTEASE

SF -13 ? where is the value ?

I sold the points to get it up to +141, I did the same with Oregon. That way, if one doesn't cover, I still get a profit. I felt like Oregon and SF were both significantly better than their opponents to where I could take a stab at it. It just so happens, Oregon covered for me.

WHATaTEASE · 10-19-12, 10:37 AM

Not a bad strategy. I was waiting for the line to move to 9 so I could jump on Seattle but it never did, just pounded the under.

Justin3587 · 10-19-12, 10:40 AM

Originally posted by WHATaTEASE

Not a bad strategy. I was waiting for the line to move to 9 so I could jump on Seattle but it never did, just pounded the under.

That's a good bet. I wanted to , but I didn't pull the trigger.

str · 10-19-12, 11:35 AM

When you lay points, the team is no longer going to make decisions that will help YOU.

They will make decisions that is in THEIR best interest.

If that does not sit well with the bettor, they should play underdogs that make decisions that ARE in the THEIR best interest and many more times over also in YOUR interest.

A4K · 10-19-12, 12:57 PM

Originally posted by Avenger

Whatever... I'm not replying to this topic anymore.

If you think that Seahawks would've recovered an onside kick, score a TD, recover another onside kick, score a FG in 50 secs.... I dunno what to say. You probably believe in Santa, the tooth fairy, and WWE.

But who cares?

It was one game. The sharp bet was Niners 2H, which cashed. Yes, I took the -7.5, but it was a mistake after I saw the ticket, I forgot to say Niners ML.

But don't say Harbaugh didn't know the spread or his decisions wasn't based on gambling.... geez, so naive.

As I stated many times in this forum, NFL spreads are near impossible to beat. They are way too sharp. I don't know how anyone can do it year after year.

How dare you question the authenticity of Santa Claus and Wrestling?!

Avenger · 10-19-12, 05:09 PM

Originally posted by p19101

Yeah, just because you fail terribly it must be impossible for everyone else as well. Maybe the problem is not the spreads them self but what's in the mirror?

Never had a winning year betting spreads in NFL, I've been betting almost 7 years.

Last year was the only year I beat NFL and it was betting crazy NFL MLs. But you gotta lay the juice. If you like high risk, low return, then yeah, I guess NFL can be profitable. I use the same strategy I use in MLB.

This year I'm ahead (knock on wood) but only because of 2H bets and very lucky wins.

People can say whatever they want, but NFL is way harder to make money than MLB. I'll take the 162 games/season grind over sweating it 16 weeks, with 4x units on the line each bet.

I still do it because I'm a degen, but I've been screwed by the spread more often than not.

But who cares? It's one game. I don't care if Harbaugh did it on purpose or not. I've accepted that all pro sports are rigged, long time ago, it's just a matter of working around the rig.

Avenger · 10-19-12, 05:12 PM

Originally posted by str

When you lay points, the team is no longer going to make decisions that will help YOU.

They will make decisions that is in THEIR best interest.

If that does not sit well with the bettor, they should play underdogs that make decisions that ARE in the THEIR best interest and many more times over also in YOUR interest.

Best post of the day. See, SBR teaches me something every day.

I like it, so when I feel like the underdog should win, I can take the points. But NEVER take the points on a big fav.

I can say that, but it's hard to not get greedy and lay a bet with the tasty dog ML. If I can wait it out and take the small win, I'm sure I'll be ahead by the end of the season.