Sharps are on SUPERCHARGERS!!!

[milwaukee mike]

congratulations, your ignorance has officially pushed me out of the public forums, if your looking for me, Ill be in my thread, wont be checking these public threads with all these dumbasses/fake accts/whichever it is, Im done not worth my time,

If you're calling k13 a dumbass that is the complete opposite of the truth. He always has quite a good handle on which teams will win in certain spots and where teams will be at the end of the season.

Perhaps it's just bitterness because you overestimated denver for this game

[SpeedPro]

Yeah looks like you were right. Game is another bust for the public.

[Monte]

Well i don't know really, pk for the chargers at home vs the Broncos?
I didn't bet this, but i could NEVER take the Broncos in this spot at pk. Never ever.

[Smutbucket]

ya suicideking, these guys cant be this dumb, maybe they are, its a little bit of both, sbr fake accts trying to troll and idiots, really is stupid though, doesnt take a genious to understand that the public %s are garbage, but theyll keep preaching it and preaching it and any randomn people who come across these forums will read it and believe it, whatya gonna do? try to tell them whats going on, but the couple dollars they just won from this game gives them to much of a "rush" to actually anaylze a game,

suicideking Ill remeber you atleast as one of the good ones, stop by in my thread in college football betting forum anytime,

Im pounding the shit outta denver -4.5 2nd half

[Smutbucket]

lol, im calling em a dumbass cuz he believes the public percentages, here comes the army of morons/fake accts to defend this moronic theory......

[milwaukee mike]

Well i don't know really, pk for the chargers at home vs the Broncos?
I didn't bet this, but i could NEVER take the Broncos in this spot at pk. Never ever.

I could and did take the broncos in this spot last year at san diego, in the middle of tebow's crazy 6 game winning streak

Quite interesting that the broncos made the playoffs with tebow, got rid of him for peyton manning, and will now miss the playoffs

I love it

[milwaukee mike]

lol, im calling em a dumbass cuz he believes the public percentages, here comes the army of morons/fake accts to defend this moronic theory......

Whether the % are accurate or not, i am fairly certain more individuals had the broncos tonight than the chargers. San diego is usually not a public team, and peyton manning is a fan favorite.

Keep in mind though i really don't care who the public is on, or rlm, or any of that nonsense.

[Monte]

Smutbucket...i don't know if you are partly talking to me, but all i say is: i couldn't take the Broncos pk.
+3.5? +3? Prolly sharp plays..but "sharps" would also never take pk cos they would have hammered this line much earlier, if it indeed was weak. Clearer?

[Romanov]

Smut bucket lives with his parents. Do not take his advice. Either a loser or just a kid in our game. Kid/loser took a pub road dog on mnf. Dumb

[BIGDAY]

17 points off turnovers are great for your side, but at least have the balls to admit you're getting very fortunate tonight.

Yes sir. I am very lucky.

[GunShard]

lol, im calling em a dumbass cuz he believes the public percentages, here comes the army of morons/fake accts to defend this moronic theory......

Stop accusing people of fake accounts.
I post on this part of the forum daily. How would you feel if some went in your thread and accused you of being a troll that make multiple accounts.

It's illegal to make multiple accounts on SBR. If this was on the Covers forum, then yea there are multiple accounts on that site because there are no rules against multiple accounts. Detecting an account's IP address can determine of a user of having multiple accounts.

If you don't believe fading the public is profitable, then you have the right to gamble money your way.

[Pete0]

BIGDAY, if only i listened to you

[suicidekings]

ya suicideking, these guys cant be this dumb, maybe they are, its a little bit of both, sbr fake accts trying to troll and idiots, really is stupid though, doesnt take a genious to understand that the public %s are garbage, but theyll keep preaching it and preaching it and any randomn people who come across these forums will read it and believe it, whatya gonna do? try to tell them whats going on, but the couple dollars they just won from this game gives them to much of a "rush" to actually anaylze a game,

suicideking Ill remeber you atleast as one of the good ones, stop by in my thread in college football betting forum anytime,

Im pounding the shit outta denver -4.5 2nd half

I don't think public betting percentages are completely worthless, but the simple percentage is a gross simplification of the data that makes it up. Bets are distributed all over the different prices and line moves, teasers, parlays, spreads and MLs. Big money isn't always smart money, and it takes different amounts of money to change a line depending on when the bets are placed, who's making the bets. History of the line over the course of the week tells more than just looking at the gameday swing. The most important factor that doesn't get mentioned is how sharp the line is to start with, if the game is featuring a big public team and/or if the books actually have an opinion on the game because of whatever information they have. The starting point matters a lot.

So IF someone is a skilled capper that can produce consistently good lines also does good analysis on the line movement over time, and makes a few smart assumptions, then the public betting numbers can have some value. But "betting against the public" as a concept is too simple to succeed over a large sample.

[CanuckG]

Denver not making it easy whenever Big Day has a bet it's a sweat

[BIGDAY]

Canuck, I'm blade sharp tonight pal.

[BIGDAY]

[King Mayan]

This is out of this world.

[CanuckG]

Canuck, I'm blade sharp tonight pal.

[BIGDAY]

Someone in here told me, ya can't cap turnovers...

[CanuckG]

shocker

[BIGDAY]

Canuck, my blade went dull. Too much slicin and Dicen in the first half.

[Smutbucket]

dont get ur mouths cut on my nuts, theyre pretty damn sharp

[wtt0315]

broncos -3.5 +165 is sharp play.

[Smutbucket]

public is on chargers. sharps are on denver. your all morons for believing otherwise.

no nominations? no love?

[oChRoNiCo]

Canuck, I'm blade sharp tonight pal.

How is that working out for ya now biggay?

I guess I am just a square but I am going to get paid tonight YEAH BUDDY!

[BIGDAY]

Nice hit smut bucket

[CanuckG]

Books needed SD and Under so would not say public was on SD

[No coincidences]

no nominations? no love?

Where did you see or why would the public be on the Chargers? The betting public loves Peyton Manning. Always has.

[BIGDAY]

How is that working out for ya now biggay?

I guess I am just a square but I am going to get paid tonight YEAH BUDDY!

Not very well.

[No coincidences]

Books needed SD and Under so would not say public was on SD

Not only that, but they're going to get double dipped on people who hammered Denver at halftime.

[hawley]

Bigger was huge on broncos

Messaged me earlier to tell me to load up

[soccerzyko]

Public was on Denver and Over. Vegas getting f'ed in the ass.

[BIGDAY]

Bigger was huge on broncos

Messaged me earlier to tell me to load up

[Smutbucket]

Where did you see or why would the public be on the Chargers? The betting public loves Peyton Manning. Always has.

your guess is as good as mine, but ill laugh mine off and think nothing of it, (also notice how I was joking about assumption and even said that multiple times) again your still assuming you have any clue who the betting public likes and doesnt like and its probably way off (because its just what youve been told), although I love peyton manning and bet on em alot because hes a stud,

ya if any of you are unsure the refs got a stake in this game too, I think its pretty obvious with that pass INT,

not to mention its obvious where the sharp money was

based on this "possibly wrong" assumption:
sharp money = opposite of ref money

[jjgold]

BigDay rarely picks winners

I feel bad for the kid actually

If I had a few extra hundred I would send to him