NO and whoever did is an idiot... these replacement refs are an embarrasment and national fraud league is now a total joke even sinknig below the no1 cares league then nba NFL PAY THE REFS we NEED the best sport the AHL7
Does anybody else think that was a touchdown?
Collapse
X
-
jetsjets1028SBR MVP
- 02-10-10
- 1234
#36Comment -
jetsjets1028SBR MVP
- 02-10-10
- 1234
#37AHL*Comment -
griffey_mojoSBR Sharp
- 12-01-09
- 279
#38Clearly a touchdown ?
Clearly a dumb assComment -
byronbbSBR MVP
- 11-13-08
- 3067
#39The only thing I can think to actually give tate the td is that his feet are on the ground with his hands on the ball whereas jennings is in the air.Comment -
spankieSBR Hall of Famer- 02-10-11
- 9992
#40Td for sure. ...

Comment -
jizaySBR Wise Guy
- 08-07-09
- 975
#41There is no such thing as an INT signal. There are 3 signals the ref could make: TD if it's a TD, incomplete if it's incomplete, and hands waving over the head if it's a touchback, which means it is an INT. One ref therefore signaled INT.Originally posted by paranoyd androydThat did not happen. One ref signaled to stop the clock, the other signaled a TD. No signal for an INT at all.Comment -
paranoyd androydSBR Hall of Famer
- 10-01-11
- 6459
#42Not in the endzone, play is over on possession by either team. The key factor is there wasn't a signal for a touchback or a simple pointing the other way which would've indicated an INT, only a signal for a TD.Originally posted by onlookerDon't the officials signal to stop the clock, before signaling a touchback?Comment -
jizaySBR Wise Guy
- 08-07-09
- 975
#43Yes, typically.Originally posted by onlookerDon't the officials signal to stop the clock, before signaling a touchback?Comment -
jizaySBR Wise Guy
- 08-07-09
- 975
#44OK, I see what you're saying.Originally posted by paranoyd androydNot in the endzone, play is over on possession by either team. The key factor is there wasn't a signal for a touchback or a pointing the other way which would've indicated an INT, only a signal for a TD.Comment -
SteveRyanSBR MVP
- 11-15-11
- 1654
#45This picture is no good.Originally posted by krk1030
It was taken LOOOOOONG after the receivers were down. You can see the refs leg in the picture.
Any call on this play would be based upon what happened several seconds prior to this photo.
Regardless, there was not enough conclusive evidence to prove that the ball was not caught simultaneously. A simultaneous catch goes to the passing team.Comment -
yahooninoSBR MVP- 08-10-07
- 2651
#46i blame on the replay official,,wtf they doing ?????Comment -
paranoyd androydSBR Hall of Famer
- 10-01-11
- 6459
#47Yeah, it was a pretty messed up situation but the only call that seemed to seal the fate of the decision was the TD signal.Originally posted by jizayOK, I see what you're saying.
The other possible reason the other guy signaled to stop the clock is that he knew there was little time left in the game and saw that there was a lot of commotion. Maybe he wanted to stop the clock so it didn't keep running in the meantime while they sorted it out? Just speculating of course.Comment -
NardVaSBR Hall of Famer
- 10-02-07
- 8325
#48If you didn't know any circumstances surrounding the game and somebody showed you the hailmary play by itself in slow motion I guarantee everybody would say Jennings is the WR and he caught the ball.Comment -
Harry N. LloydSBR MVP
- 03-26-08
- 4810
#50You're a fool.Comment -
Harry N. LloydSBR MVP
- 03-26-08
- 4810
#51He's full of shit. He didn't cash any bet.Originally posted by NardVaLol @ Seattle backer saying it was a TD. You all need to get off the BS. Yes your bet cashed but no need to be blind to what really happened.Comment -
Harry N. LloydSBR MVP
- 03-26-08
- 4810
#52I say he didn't cash a ticket because I cashed a bet on Seattle (split getting +3 and +150 on the ML), but I recognize that it was the luckiest win ever. A total joke. I say we get pitchforks and torches and go find out where Goodell lives. He has ruined his legacy (a la Art Modell).Comment -
shopbar picksSBR MVP
- 12-08-10
- 2157
#53I agree with harryComment -
icancount2oneSBR MVP
- 01-05-10
- 1507
#54I've just seen so many cases where the possession is 70-30 or worse in favor of the defender, and they rule it a completion. In that freeze frame you guys keep quoting Golden Tate has both hands on the ball even though the DB has it in his arms, which was the case before they hit the ground.
If it wasn't replacement refs and the MNF announcers didn't both come out so strongly on their interpretation, I don't think it would be that controversial.
I agree. There were bad calls on both sides, and this was far from the worst one.Originally posted by ttwarrior1what about the 2 bogus pass interference calls on seatle to get the pack 9 pts ?????????
seatle deserves the win
I think you're right. I don't think the visual evidence was "indisputable" to overturn the ruling on the field.Originally posted by TheCentaurI somewhat agree. If it was called an int and reviewed they probably come back and say "ruling on the field stands" instead of confirmed.Walter forgot... when you're desperate's when you got no choice.Comment -
GunShardSBR Posting Legend
- 03-05-10
- 10033
#55lolOriginally posted by spankieTd for sure. ...

Comment -
icancount2oneSBR MVP
- 01-05-10
- 1507
#56I didn't say it was "clearly" a touchdown. I said I think it's a touchdown. That's just, like, my opinion man.Originally posted by griffey_mojoClearly a touchdown ?
Clearly a dumb ass
Yeah, if Jennings is the WR, it's a touchdown. What I'm saying is whoever is the WR gets the catch there regardless.Originally posted by NardVaIf you didn't know any circumstances surrounding the game and somebody showed you the hailmary play by itself in slow motion I guarantee everybody would say Jennings is the WR and he caught the ball.Walter forgot... when you're desperate's when you got no choice.Comment -
neverstoppers23SBR Hall of Famer- 11-26-09
- 6302
#57lol, are you high?
part 1

part 2
Comment -
onlookerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 36572
-
SteveRyanSBR MVP
- 11-15-11
- 1654
#60It was a touchdown.
When both receivers hit the ground, Tate's grasp of the ball prevented Jennings from relieving himself of that grasp.
We have simultaneous possession.
We have a touchdown.Comment -
PAYTON20SBR Hall of Famer
- 02-02-10
- 5217
#61Honestly if you took Green Bay in this game, it was so square, you deserved to loseComment -
StevedoreSBR MVP
- 11-10-10
- 1218
#62Tell that to the TENN. defender who tried to do exactly what you said only to have the ball end up in a Detroit receivers hand for the tying touchdown. Jennings did exactly what he's supposed to do, caught it at its highest point without question. He did his job, refs didn't do theirs.Originally posted by d2betsOne thing though that's why they tell defenders to KNOCK THE BALL DOWN. Can't catch it when it hits the ground.
Bet the NFL at your own risk with these scabs, I won my teaser, but I'm boycotting this BS. The NFL is telling the fans and bettors they don't give a fuk about you or the integrity of its game. If they don't care why should I or the fans? Stop being sheep or enablers to these greedy fuking owners and pass on this fraud of a game
"I didn't see the play, I turned it off at halftime" said Jerry Jones. Suuuuuuuuuuuure you corporate fuking D-bag!!! Open your eyes people and stop taking it up the ass!!!!Comment -
darkhatSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-18-10
- 5723
#63Originally posted by onlooker
Comment -
SteveRyanSBR MVP
- 11-15-11
- 1654
#64I had Seattle.Originally posted by PAYTON20Honestly if you took Green Bay in this game, it was so square, you deserved to lose
By the way, I'm from Seattle. It will always be The Jet City to me and the home of the Seattle Supersonics. : )Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
