Wrong.
You could argue rust alone would create a fantastic 1H under play for that particular 1st game, hell it should be your wet dream if you believe the dream of the TNF 1H Under "auto-bet"!
But honestly the only truly good season this system had was the first 4 games of last year, where it went 4-0.
After that the books adjusted the lines in response, and since that fourth W in a row last year it basically has regressed back to not being worth playing over another more educated bet. Break-even at a -110 essentially, and that's when things are going WELL.
But you keep on playing it, it is "proven" after all.
For everyone else, everyone who took their meds today, this isn't some sort of critique on Bank, I tail his picks myself and love the commentary he provides. This was an attempt to actually validate a betting theory based on a too-small sample size and unfortunately it just didn't pan out as being solid in the big picture.
You could argue rust alone would create a fantastic 1H under play for that particular 1st game, hell it should be your wet dream if you believe the dream of the TNF 1H Under "auto-bet"!

But honestly the only truly good season this system had was the first 4 games of last year, where it went 4-0.
After that the books adjusted the lines in response, and since that fourth W in a row last year it basically has regressed back to not being worth playing over another more educated bet. Break-even at a -110 essentially, and that's when things are going WELL.
But you keep on playing it, it is "proven" after all.

For everyone else, everyone who took their meds today, this isn't some sort of critique on Bank, I tail his picks myself and love the commentary he provides. This was an attempt to actually validate a betting theory based on a too-small sample size and unfortunately it just didn't pan out as being solid in the big picture.
