And I am asking Should I continue the serie or consider it as a win (I lost it) and move on to the next serie?
-
Comment -
I missed it too... im pretty pissed about it actually.. I looked on Elcaptians thread and he had nothing posted so I just figured there was no games... will def be checking out your thread from now on..Comment -
I didn't know you made a thread. I thought you were just doing chase110 on here.
I have a spread sheet for the NHL v1 bets, but i just was not home in order to look at it, thats the reason i missed it. It will be alright. Pick up some money with todays [B] bet and lots of bets on Tuesday; hopefully win a bunch of those.Comment -
Here is the spread sheet for NHL v1 bets. Almost everything is abbreviated, but i am sure you all will be able to figure it out.Comment -
As far as John Hitting 10 straight A bets... i believe he hit 9 then the 10th went to C bet, which was followed by 2 more straight A bets.
He is right though this is one of the worst NBA seasons, but we are still in the positive.
Not a fortune by any means, but as long as we are not negative that is what counts.
Comment -
It is strictly traditional JM NHL v1 system. Not the v2 or the extra wagers ElCaptain has added to his revised JM system. Not as many regular bets as ElCaptain, but only 1 loss to date, and still very profitable. I use no filters.
Comment -
EAST vs. WEST ALL STAR GAME STARTING IN 2 HOURS
Comment -
Why can't you receive points?Comment -
02/22/11
John Morrison NBA
V1: Boston [A] vs Golden state
JM NHL v1:
Montreal [C]+1.5 vs Van
SJS [A] +1.5 vs DET
Chase110:
Next games:
(2/22/11) Minnesota@ Milwaukee(A)
(2/22/11) Atlanta @ L.A.Lakers(A)
SBP original:
SBP updated:
TPS:
JW Hockey: *3 game chase following certain teams to go under or over
Montreal vs Van: under 5 [A]
*note someone needs to confirm this one.Comment -
JMD, I appreciate all you have to offer in these forums. But if you can, please refrain from posting spreadsheets and plays in my hockey forum. I have already posted spreadsheets earlier in thread, and picks are posted every day. Every one knows the plays, and it has been running smooth. Then you pop in and post a spreadsheet, which is different than the system I am posting about, because all v2 games are on there also. Now all of a sudden I am fielding questions about why my results are different than yours. You just put it up, and it is already confusing people. If you can, please find a way to edit your text to say that spreadsheet is not the same as the plays I am posting. Or better yet, edit the spreadsheet or remove it all together. I know you meant well, but this is going to lead to a ton of unnecessary questions, when up until now, it was easy to follow. And before any confusion happens on here, please allow me to post my own Chase 110 plays. I am very capable of doing that. At least wait until I offically put them up before you include them in your everything sheet. If some of the filters get missed, and you post a play that wasn't accurate, I don't want to start answering all the questions of why it was posted in the first place. You have plenty to do with the five systems you post, I can handle this one. Thanks a lot, and no disrespect intended here.
Comment -
Walco, why don't you refer to page that you have your 110 chase so everybody can see it easily?Comment -
I only posted the chase110 after you wallco. As you can see i just copied and pasted what you already posted a couple pages back. I did let you post it first
ill try edit the post, but idk if i can still or not.... let me see what i can do.
I'm pretty sure though that was all the v1 plays only. At least all the plays that came up so far since i started following have only been v1. Haven't seen Elcaptain post any v2 plays that were on that spread sheet yet.Comment -
As I said, no problem, but you know some people don't read everthing written. They only read what they want, then ask questions that actually would have been answered if they read it all. I understood your spreadsheet, because I read it, And v1 and v2 plays are clearly marked. But some people open it, don't read it all, then start asking why the system has three losses when it only has one. If they actually took the time to see that two of the losses were v2, they wouldn't need to ask unnecessary questions. But as you said before, some people just want everything posted for them, don't want to do any work, and too much info. sends them into a question frenzy. I apologize, I didn't realize you cut and pasted the Chase 110 plays. I forgot I posted them last week. As I said before, thanks for all you contribute, and I am just trying to stop any confusion before it starts. All good.I only posted the chase110 after you wallco. As you can see i just copied and pasted what you already posted a couple pages back. I did let you post it first
ill try edit the post, but idk if i can still or not.... let me see what i can do.
I'm pretty sure though that was all the v1 plays only. At least all the plays that came up so far since i started following have only been v1. Haven't seen Elcaptain post any v2 plays that were on that spread sheet yet.Comment -
What are you talking about? For the past month and a half, it has been on EVERY page. The plays are posted every single day. There is no master spreadsheet for Chase 110, because the teams are constantly changing. There are no games for a few days because of the all-star break. After the break, the plays will be posted as they always have, both before the game, and results after conclusion of game. I don't know how I can post them any differently. The rules post # for my system is clearly marked on every post. #4475.Comment -
J.M
You forgot-
JM v1
A Bet Atlanta @ LAL 2/22 (the start of a 4 game Western Road Trip)
A Bet Sacramento Queens @ Miami (start their 3 game Eastern Conf road trip)Comment -
Maybe because of the all star break you could consider these plays, but technically, these two series are continuation of road trip series that already won. Because of the break, I will be playing both of those series anyway. He actually didn't miss them, they aren't really official plays.Comment -
If you just play V1 then these are plays- before the break Atl and Sac played their own conf- so those would be a V2- capisce?Comment -
Thats JMD for putting the plays together early and on one postComment -
I've been doing this system for three years so I guess I've been doing it wrong. I just play the opposite conference on 3 road games. I treat every system differently and use some of my own filters. I've never had a prob. I don't bet against leading teams and try to stay within the middle of the standings (unless the team I'm betting on is on top). I never buy points and don't play injured teams. So far no losses but I have gone break even on C a lot. I mostly just play b,c.Comment -
I original had ATL on my spread sheet, but seened that it was in the middle of their road trip. It is not an official play and I will not be playing it. You only play it, if they had lost their previous games by 3 or more points against the srpead. THere for it is unofficial.
BTW guys JW Cash HOckey system is def a GOLD MINE! 128-3 NOW I BELIEVE and its based on overs / unders for hockey so a lot of the time you get -110 odds. There for only cost you between 8-15 units max! per series. You would be up 100 units this year already if you followed his system from the beginning. idk if its going to be same strategy for next year or not or when he started doing this. but extremely profitable!
heres the link:
Comment -
02/22/11
John Morrison NBA
V1: Boston -2 [A] vs Golden state
JM NHL v1:
Montreal [C]+1.5 vs Van
SJS [A] +1.5 vs DET
Chase110:
Next games:
(2/22/11) Minnesota@ Milwaukee(A)
(2/22/11) Atlanta @ L.A.Lakers(A) -7
SBP original:
SBP updated:
TPS:
JW Hockey:
Montreal vs Van: under 5 [A]
NYR under 5 [A] vs CAR
Detroit over [A] vs SJS
Toronto home under 5.5 [A]
Lots of bets tomorrow GL everyone.
Comment -
I agree with you to a point, I will be playing these games also. But they are not standard v1 plays, because disregarding the all star break, these are the back end of 6 game road trips. The ststem says only play these games as v1 if the team has lost all of the games in the road trip, up to that point, by more than three points (ATS). Clearly both teams already won their v2 series, so these wouldn't be plays. JM will probably not send emails or count them as a"W" or "L", as he shouldn't. Well, knowing that jackass, he will probably count a win. Just see these as optional. If JMD would have posted these as plays, we would have had at least 6-7 people asking us why JM didn't send them an email. It happens every single time. Read the actual rules before you post that somebody forgot something. Just because you, and in this case me, are playing something a little differently, it doesn't make it the standard for actual plays.Comment -
Chase 110 - Plays for 2/22/11
2010-11 System to date: 56-0
System Rules can be found in post #4475
Minnesota (+8) @ Milwaukee (A)
Atlanta @ L.A. Lakers (M/L) (A)Comment -
Does anyone not play the A bet when it has a low ML?
Thinking about skipping this first bet. Since if this bets loses the total unit loss is potentially huge. Just hate huge variance like any bettorComment -
JM's NBA system:
V1record so far (finished series): 39-3
(A): 20-22
(B): 15-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 18-1
(A): 13-6
(B): 2-4
(C): 3-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 43-2
(A): 23-21-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 17-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
Next JM's plays:
02/22/2011 Boston @ Golden State - V1, A bet
02/23/2011 Utah @ Dallas - V2, A bet
02/25/2011 Phoenix @ Toronto - V1, A bet
02/25/2011 New Jersey @ San Antonio - V2, B bet
02/25/2011 New York @ Cleveland - V3, A bet
02/26/2011 Dallas @ Washington - V1, A bet
02/26/2011 Chicago @ Milwaukee - V3, A bet
02/27/2011 Charlotte @ Orlando - V2, A bet
02/27/2011 Golden State @ Minnesota - V2, A bet
02/27/2011 Houston @ New Orleans - V3, A betComment -
Usually if I take a bigger loss than normal on one of my bets, I will make my next bet smaller, and split some of the money on other teams. I am currently doing that now with my Montreal Canadiens (C) bet. I guess in a way, it is a sort of labby strategy for a bet or two. There were far too many M/L victories in this system to be skipping them. Also, many of the system wins over the past 8 seasons would have been losses, had you played the point line instead of the M/L. It's up to you what to play and when. But you might get a loss when the system actually records a win, then you really have to decide what to do.Comment -
you are right, that is the risk. I am using a labby system anyway on all my bets if i bet on sequences.
Anyway i am not taking the point line. If i bet i will bet the ML or no bet at all at this one
Addtionally, i see the timberwolve line is moving up so i will keep a close eye on it. Since the line 8 currently (started at 7.5)Comment -
I think I made a mistake I had Atlanta on my sheet at LA and I didn't notice that AtlANTA WAS unofficial and I did pounted it.....same units I will hope to luck nowComment -
looks like SBP ORG bet will will be
SAC +13 1/2Comment -
There is one other option but it involves a parlay. A 6 pt. 2 team teaser is -130.
I use it more as a strategy when I am faced with betting games with large money lines. For instance today is a perfect example. BOS is a V1 [A] bet and they are favored by 4.5 and the ML is around -200 and the LAL are a 7 pt. fav vs ATL and the ML is way too steep for my liking so I put them together on a teaser with Lakers -1 and Boston +1.5. If one of them kills the ticket I chase the other team out and try to recover my losses there. The juice is also less to chase. Hope this helps a little. GLComment
