Cavs -3.5.. did I read that correctly?

[lunchbawks]

No brainer. This is a statement game for the best team in the league. They blow the bulls out the building, all but ending the series .


CLEVELAND -3.5
LA -3.5

??whatcha think?

[Durrrr]

isn't LA +3.5?

[nebraskasux]

isn't LA +3.5?

Yes, OKC favored by 3.5.

Kind of weird odds, 8 seed favored by more over the 1 seed than than Utah is over Denver.

[dula14]

Yes, OKC favored by 3.5.

Kind of weird odds, 8 seed favored by more over the 1 seed than than Utah is over Denver.

Lakers have been atrocious on the road down the stretch so I'm guessing Vegas expects that trend to continue.

[Manaconda]

cleveland -3.5 seems like a no brainer to me, too good to be true!

[Brock Landers]

These playoffs have been a little tough to figure

[Wilforth]

There's not a no-brainer in these games. Cavs can fall in Chicago.

[tltaylor89]

Only playoff series that has worked is the Magic we all know the Bobcats cant comepete.

[LT Profits]

I don't think either line is weird.

Cavs would be about -6.5 on on a neutral court, so -10 or -10.5 made sense in Cleveland and -3.5 makes sense in Chicago.

Thunder are not your garden variety eight-seeds and this is the game in the series the Lakers figure to relax a bit.

[pat venditto]

NBA is rigged.

[durito]

Teams at home down 2-0 ran about 60%+ ats at home in game 3 for years, now oddsmakers/maket is compensating for that, perhaps too much. Those lines would be much different if it was 1-1.

[watchdog]

cleveland -3.5 seems like a no brainer to me, too good to be true!

openner 4.5 now go down 3.5 i think vegas know something we don't

[rfr3sh]

bulls can do some damage at home

[zogdog]

Cavs will win by quite a bit. No screwing around on the road by them.

[krk1030]

cavs are 8-10 points better on any court.

[LT Profits]

cavs are 8-10 points better on any court.

If that was true, they would have been more than -10.5 at home

[genius]

Pound It Or ML

[Rich Boy]

I like Cavs, but what do i know?

If vegas says -3.5, its -3.5...

[blix177]

I think alot of people are on Cavs by game time.

[Donkwin47]

2 "squarest" possible.. Bulls win tomorrow.

[LT Profits]

Well I do think Cavs have better chance of winning than Lakers do. My only point was that the lines are not "off", as some of you are saying.

[ttwarrior1]

you could buy a point and be safe i guess

[peeiempee]

Yup, the Cavs has sucker bet written all over it. So call me a sucker, -3.5 is too hard to pass up. Taking the Cavs to the bank tomorrow

[ttwarrior1]

do you like my teaser bet, i get cavs + 4, lakers + 8 and suns + 8, risking 500 to win 455

[peeiempee]

Looks solid...good luck

[LT Profits]

do you like my teaser bet, i get cavs + 4, lakers + 8 and suns + 8, risking 500 to win 455

No for two reasons:

1 - NEVER tease through 0 (Cavs)

2 - Lakers could lose by double-digits

[pittmatt80]

Yeah I think Cleveland in a no brainer. To good to be true, I don't think so they keep on trucking with another double digit win.

[qhdlhdjtn]

Cavs ML

[MrSink]

Cavs could be hard pick. It's really okay to put them on -3.5 line @ road. In my opinion they will win only one game on road so Im going to skip this one.

[Mr Windy City]

This will be the only game the Bulls win. Bulls 102 Cavs 97

[pat venditto]

Cavs -3.5 will not win stern needs more games so he can make some more revenue to make up for the 400 mill the nba lost this year.

[Reigntrs8]

Lines normally try to say something vegas wants,(or if you want to think really hard, what vegas wants us to think that they are thinking..So we would go nuts and go the opposite lol).. So from -4.5 to -3.5.. maybe they are expecting more money to the bulls but want more money on the cavs.. but the question is.. why? lol..

[raiders32]

I believe Cleveland covers -3.5 easily.

[7secondsOrLess]

lol james johnson

[S.K.M.]

No for two reasons:

1 - NEVER tease through 0 (Cavs)

2 - Lakers could lose by double-digits

I agree...