Another winner. I'm also holding back, but ready to up the units.
Keep up the good work.
Comment
meader99
SBR MVP
10-30-10
4223
#37
Nice little system you've found here.
Comment
thunderous
SBR MVP
06-05-12
1870
#38
3-0 following this system since yesterday......hope this continues!! Thanks!!
Comment
leo2302
SBR High Roller
03-27-07
234
#39
You're welcome everyone... would love some points or nominations if you guys like this... I've tailed many here before and happy to finally be able to contribute.
No plays tomorrow, but already looking forward to next week. Enjoy your Sunday!
Comment
16johnnymac
SBR MVP
10-27-10
3499
#40
Bro way to go juiced it up to 100 a play heading up to 2.5 units thank you made my day I am treading lightly and I am taking one day at time keep up the good job $$$$$$$ in da bank
Originally posted by leo2302
You're welcome everyone... would love some points or nominations if you guys like this... I've tailed many here before and happy to finally be able to contribute.
No plays tomorrow, but already looking forward to next week. Enjoy your Sunday!
Comment
RatMAn2787
SBR Hustler
11-09-10
61
#41
Leo wasn't too sure about this system the first time I read it, but seems to be working. 3-0 since I began tailing you. One question I have is that I have yet to have to double up on the 2H of a game, does this 2H bet usually win at a high %? Just trying to figure out if I should just cut loses after the original bet loses.
Comment
sbrhgary
SBR Sharp
11-28-12
275
#42
Looks like only bucks game fits the system tonight.
Comment
password
SBR Hustler
04-16-12
76
#43
Yeah but Hornets are below .300 Leo, do we have a play on the Bucks tonight?
Comment
leo2302
SBR High Roller
03-27-07
234
#44
One play today: Milwaukee Bucks 1Q -1
Past years, the 2H bets did have a very high winning %. Up to you if you want to double down, but I've been very successful in the past with this system.
Past years, the 2H bets did have a very high winning %. Up to you if you want to double down, but I've been very successful in the past with this system.
So Leo can I also bet the 2nd half before the match starts? I live in Europe and because of the time difference I'm usually asleep before most 1st quarters finish. But if the winning % is good I can place both bets right?
Thanks already for the units I made because of you
Comment
leo2302
SBR High Roller
03-27-07
234
#46
Originally posted by GhostNL
[/B][/B][/B]
So Leo can I also bet the 2nd half before the match starts? I live in Europe and because of the time difference I'm usually asleep before most 1st quarters finish. But if the winning % is good I can place both bets right?
Thanks already for the units I made because of you
I don't believe you can bet the 2nd Half before the game starts... plus you wouldn't want to, as if they win the 1st Q, you wouldn't bet the 2nd Half. It's only if they lose the 1Q.
If anything, I would just stick to the 1Q bet if you can't double down on the 2H.
Comment
GhostNL
SBR Rookie
12-03-12
17
#47
Originally posted by leo2302
I don't believe you can bet the 2nd Half before the game starts... plus you wouldn't want to, as if they win the 1st Q, you wouldn't bet the 2nd Half. It's only if they lose the 1Q.
If anything, I would just stick to the 1Q bet if you can't double down on the 2H.
Ok man, thanks
Probably gonna have to set the alarm if I'm gonna play with more cash haha.
PS Your system rocks !
Comment
16johnnymac
SBR MVP
10-27-10
3499
#48
You can but all 4 qtrs usually are posted closer to game time
Originally posted by GhostNL
[/B][/B][/B]
So Leo can I also bet the 2nd half before the match starts? I live in Europe and because of the time difference I'm usually asleep before most 1st quarters finish. But if the winning % is good I can place both bets right?
Thanks already for the units I made because of you
Comment
16johnnymac
SBR MVP
10-27-10
3499
#49
Forget my 3 & 4th qtr bets makes no sense sorry
Comment
blanco
SBR Wise Guy
03-06-12
876
#50
Lopez already out in foul trouble and the bucks in the bonus with 6:00 left in the quarter. this bodes will for the bucks
Comment
blanco
SBR Wise Guy
03-06-12
876
#51
jynx
Comment
brigade125
SBR Wise Guy
07-03-11
685
#52
Got -4 2nd half ...lets go buck
Comment
leo2302
SBR High Roller
03-27-07
234
#53
Milwaukee Bucks 2nd Half -4
Comment
brigade125
SBR Wise Guy
07-03-11
685
#54
The bucks lost every qtr...we will get it next time
Comment
leo2302
SBR High Roller
03-27-07
234
#55
well... we suffered our first system loss. No worries... we got some good matchups coming up this week.
Leo isn't the wizards winning % under .300? Or did I interpret the rules of the system wrong?
Comment
leo2302
SBR High Roller
03-27-07
234
#61
Originally posted by GhostNL
Leo isn't the wizards winning % under .300? Or did I interpret the rules of the system wrong?
yes, but the rule says:
bet on road favorites at least 16% higher win percentage than opponents as long as they have an over .500 winning record (which Miami does)
UNLESS opponents are horrible (.300 or less).
So as an example, if MIA had .460 record and WASH had .300, then it would be a play
But if MIA had .480 record and WASH had .320, event though it's 16% difference, it would not be a play, since MIA is not over .500 winning record.
Does that make sense?
Comment
BlueDreams
SBR Rookie
12-04-12
3
#62
Love what you are doing!! Just wondering why doesn't OKC fit in this system? When you calc the winning percentage for road favorite are you looking at the first quarts of all their games or just on the road and for the home underdog, is it for all their 1q or just at home?
Comment
thunderous
SBR MVP
06-05-12
1870
#63
Originally posted by leo2302
yes, but the rule says:
bet on road favorites at least 16% higher win percentage than opponents as long as they have an over .500 winning record (which Miami does) UNLESS opponents are horrible (.300 or less).
So as an example, if MIA had .460 record and WASH had .300, then it would be a play
But if MIA had .480 record and WASH had .320, event though it's 16% difference, it would not be a play, since MIA is not over .500 winning record.
Does that make sense?
Aren't the Wizards under .300 and hence a no play?
Comment
GhostNL
SBR Rookie
12-03-12
17
#64
Originally posted by thunderous
Aren't the Wizards under .300 and hence a no play?
My point right here!
Comment
leo2302
SBR High Roller
03-27-07
234
#65
Originally posted by BlueDreams
Love what you are doing!! Just wondering why doesn't OKC fit in this system? When you calc the winning percentage for road favorite are you looking at the first quarts of all their games or just on the road and for the home underdog, is it for all their 1q or just at home?
OKC record = 0.778
BKLYN record = 0.688
0.778 - 0.688 = 0.09 ... does not meet the minimum .16 threshold.
Originally posted by thunderous
Aren't the Wizards under .300 and hence a no play?
That part only comes into play if the road favorite is under .500
So if road favorite is .490 and home dog is .310, even though it's more than 16% difference, it would not be a play. Only a play if road favorite is over .500 UNLESS the home dog is .300 or below. Then the road favorite could be under .500
So in this case, Miami is a play since they are over .500
Comment
Riceboi
SBR Wise Guy
10-03-11
857
#66
The method you use makes it hard to backtest, but it seems the average spreads are like 7-13+ for the road fav depending on the teams. What are the average full game spreads for your picks? I know it won't be the 16% thing, but if there is a correlation to the spread it can be backtested in a way. Hope this makes sense.
Comment
GhostNL
SBR Rookie
12-03-12
17
#67
Cool man, got it now
Thanks for the quick response!
Placed the bet
BOL!
Comment
RatMAn2787
SBR Hustler
11-09-10
61
#68
Think I may sit this one out and jump on Miami 2nd half if the game is close at the half. They seem to get off to a slow start and pick it up late. GL leo
Comment
thunderous
SBR MVP
06-05-12
1870
#69
Got it now...u mean to say if the road fav is under .500 then its only a play if the opp is garbage?
Comment
16johnnymac
SBR MVP
10-27-10
3499
#70
This is the correct play Miami is now -3 1/2
UOTE=leo2302;17006250]Alright... let's go back to our winning ways today: