Rules, we don't need no stinking rules

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daoilman
    SBR Wise Guy
    • 09-02-07
    • 930

    #1
    Rules, we don't need no stinking rules
    http://www.paulickreport.com/news/ray-s ... y-anarchy/


    U.S. Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico and Kentucky Congressman Ed Whitfield, sponsors of legislation that would provide federal oversight of medication rules for horse racing, don't have to travel very far from Washington, D.C., to discover the kind of lax and often fuzzy regulations their bill is designed to end.

    Recent events at Laurel Park in Maryland - just north of our nation's capital - help define the problem horse racing has with its current regulatory structure.

    This past week we learned in a hearing before the Maryland Racing Commission how a systematic breakdown in the adherence to the rules of racing - not just by a trainer and private veterinarian but by people employed by the commission - led to a horse that should have been scratched running and winning a race at Laurel Park in January. The winner was later disqualified.

    Last week, in a separate hearing before the Maryland commission, a previously disqualified horse was reinstated as the winner because of a difference of opinion over what constituted a "positive" drug test.

    Interestingly, the biggest beneficiaries in both rulings were the connections of Glib, a 3-year-old Maryland-bred daughter of Great Notion owned by jockey agent Gina Rosenthal's No Guts No Glory Stable and trained by John J. Robb. Glib finished first by 4 1/2 lengths in the $100,000 Maryland Million Nursery Stakes on Oct. 1 but was subsequently placed last after a post-race urine sample was flagged as positive by Maryland's official lab for the presence of the anti-inflammatory Naproxen.

    Two months later, on Dec. 17, Glib finished second in the Maryland Juvenile Championships Stakes, also at Laurel, 1 1/4 lengths behind King and Crusader, who traveled by van on the day of the race from New York for trainer Rick Dutrow and owner James Riccio. Glib was elevated to first place after a protest led to the disqualification of King and Crusader when it was determined the horse arrived late to Laurel and was treated with the anti-bleeder medication furosemide less than two hours before the race, a violation of Maryland rules.

    In separate hearings over the last 10 days, however, the disqualification of Glib from the Maryland Million was reversed, meaning his owner got to keep the $57,000 in first-place money, while the disqualification of King and Crusader was upheld, meaning No Guts No Glory got to keep the $45,000 winner's share of the Maryland Juvenile Championship.

    In ruling to reverse the Maryland Million DQ, it was determined the amount of Naproxen in the horse's system "did not have any pharmacological effect," Maryland Racing Commission executive director J. Michael Hopkins told the Paulick Report. Under the rules, Hopkins said, stewards "may" disqualify a horse that tests positive for a prohibited drug. Those rules also mean stewards "may not" disqualify, which in this case they decided not to do.

    Robb, however, was fined $500 for the positive test.

    Alan Foreman, who represented the connections of Glib, said the "new" director at Maryland's test lab (he was hired in 2006) changed the protocol for calling positives for Naproxen, using urine instead of blood plasma, which Foreman said was an industry "best practice."

    Foreman, incidentally, does not see any conflict of interest in his role as general counsel for the Maryland Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association while also practicing private law and representing one MTHA member against another.

    "There is no conflict, and it's been discussed and confronted for years, probably since 1983," said Foreman. "When I represent MTHA I represent them on matters of interest to them. On individual matters, the MTHA is not involved."

    Foreman also represented Glib's connections in the Maryland Juvenile Championship controversy, in which it came to light that state veterinarian Dr. David Zipf apparently was either unaware of or knowingly had not been following Maryland regulations on the administration of furosemide.

    According to testimony, Dutrow called the Laurel stakes coordinator and Zipf to inform them of a traffic tie-up on I-95 that meant King and Crusader would be late to arrive at the track. According to testimony, Dutrow asked about the rules pertaining to a furosemide shot. "I did explain to (Dutrow) that we didn't have specific rules but we did have recommended procedures," Zipf told Joseph Poag, a Maryland Racing Commission investigator.

    However, the rules of Maryland racing (below) seem quite specific:

    Race Day Administration of Lasix.
    (1) A horse scheduled to race that is permitted to use Lasix shall be administered Lasix by a veterinarian licensed by the Commission before the running of the race unless, under §G of this regulation, the horse has been declared off of Lasix by its owner or trainer.
    (2) Post-Race Quantitation. As indicated by post-race quantitation, a horse may not carry in its body at the time of the running of a race more than 100 nanograms of Lasix per milliliter of plasma.
    (3) Reports.
    (a) The veterinarian who administers Lasix to a horse scheduled to race shall prepare a written certification indicating:
    (i) That Lasix was administered; and
    (ii) If applicable, each adjunct medication that was administered.
    (b) The written certification shall be in the possession of a designated Commission representative at least 1 hour before the horse is scheduled to race.
    (c) The stewards or judges shall order a horse scratched if the written certification is not received in a timely manner

    No Lasix report was filled out and given to a designated commission representative for King and Crusader (or, apparently, any other horse in the race). In fact, during testimony, Zipf admitted that because of a manpower shortage the reports are no longer completed and handed in, as required under Maryland racing rules. Zipf said Hopkins told him to "do the best we can."

    Brian Delp, the veterinarian who treated King and Crusader, said it is not unusual for horses to arrive late and be given furosemide after the two-hour cutoff. "I didn't give it a second thought," Delp was quoted by the Baltimore Sun as saying. "I know horses have arrived late, been treated and allowed to race without repercussions ... I wasn't in violation in my mind."

    Drew Mollica, the former jockey agent turned attorney who represented King and Crusader's owner, wrote in his brief to the commission, "This statement alone is indicative of the complete regulatory anarchy that reigns on the backstretch at Laurel Park and all racetracks under the control of the Maryland Jockey Club on a daily basis."

    But the racing commission members voted to uphold the disqualification of King and Crusader. Hopkins denied to the Paulick Report that it was "selective enforcement" of the Lasix rule, adding that he was unaware Lasix reports were no longer being used.

    "This case was brought to our attention, and we addressed it," said Hopkins. "This was the first time it's come up. I was under the impression the (Lasix report) program was in place. That one got by them. When this happened, I met with the stewards and with my vet to implement a program to prevent this from happening again."

    Mollica said Dutrow is being treated like a "human piñata" by racing commissions but should not be "utilized as a scapegoat for the foibles of the racing officials and those under their direct supervision on duty at Laurel Park on the date in question, and at other times." Mollica said racing officials facilitated the breach of the furosemide administration rules through a "comedy of errors" that included not even having a record as to when King and Crusader arrived in the track's stable area.

    "The conduct of racing regulation at Laurel Park on at least Dec. 17, 2011, if not at all other times, was akin to that on a pirate ship and, while Mr. Dutrow may be suitably designated as a deckhand, the troika of captains and duly licensed subordinates of this wayward vessel are fully and completely responsible for the mayhem that resulted in the hours immediately prior to and following the race in question."

    Click here to read the hearing brief on behalf of James Riccio before the Maryland Racing Commission.
  • Easy-Rider 66
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 02-14-12
    • 36107

    #2
    Got to protect the safety of the jockeys and horses and the integrity of the game.
    Comment
    • str
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 01-12-09
      • 11765

      #3
      Originally posted by daoilman
      http://www.paulickreport.com/news/ray-s ... y-anarchy/


      U.S. Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico and Kentucky Congressman Ed Whitfield, sponsors of legislation that would provide federal oversight of medication rules for horse racing, don't have to travel very far from Washington, D.C., to discover the kind of lax and often fuzzy regulations their bill is designed to end.

      Recent events at Laurel Park in Maryland - just north of our nation's capital - help define the problem horse racing has with its current regulatory structure.

      This past week we learned in a hearing before the Maryland Racing Commission how a systematic breakdown in the adherence to the rules of racing - not just by a trainer and private veterinarian but by people employed by the commission - led to a horse that should have been scratched running and winning a race at Laurel Park in January. The winner was later disqualified.

      Last week, in a separate hearing before the Maryland commission, a previously disqualified horse was reinstated as the winner because of a difference of opinion over what constituted a "positive" drug test.

      Interestingly, the biggest beneficiaries in both rulings were the connections of Glib, a 3-year-old Maryland-bred daughter of Great Notion owned by jockey agent Gina Rosenthal's No Guts No Glory Stable and trained by John J. Robb. Glib finished first by 4 1/2 lengths in the $100,000 Maryland Million Nursery Stakes on Oct. 1 but was subsequently placed last after a post-race urine sample was flagged as positive by Maryland's official lab for the presence of the anti-inflammatory Naproxen.

      Two months later, on Dec. 17, Glib finished second in the Maryland Juvenile Championships Stakes, also at Laurel, 1 1/4 lengths behind King and Crusader, who traveled by van on the day of the race from New York for trainer Rick Dutrow and owner James Riccio. Glib was elevated to first place after a protest led to the disqualification of King and Crusader when it was determined the horse arrived late to Laurel and was treated with the anti-bleeder medication furosemide less than two hours before the race, a violation of Maryland rules.

      In separate hearings over the last 10 days, however, the disqualification of Glib from the Maryland Million was reversed, meaning his owner got to keep the $57,000 in first-place money, while the disqualification of King and Crusader was upheld, meaning No Guts No Glory got to keep the $45,000 winner's share of the Maryland Juvenile Championship.

      In ruling to reverse the Maryland Million DQ, it was determined the amount of Naproxen in the horse's system "did not have any pharmacological effect," Maryland Racing Commission executive director J. Michael Hopkins told the Paulick Report. Under the rules, Hopkins said, stewards "may" disqualify a horse that tests positive for a prohibited drug. Those rules also mean stewards "may not" disqualify, which in this case they decided not to do.

      Robb, however, was fined $500 for the positive test.

      Alan Foreman, who represented the connections of Glib, said the "new" director at Maryland's test lab (he was hired in 2006) changed the protocol for calling positives for Naproxen, using urine instead of blood plasma, which Foreman said was an industry "best practice."

      Foreman, incidentally, does not see any conflict of interest in his role as general counsel for the Maryland Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association while also practicing private law and representing one MTHA member against another.

      "There is no conflict, and it's been discussed and confronted for years, probably since 1983," said Foreman. "When I represent MTHA I represent them on matters of interest to them. On individual matters, the MTHA is not involved."

      Foreman also represented Glib's connections in the Maryland Juvenile Championship controversy, in which it came to light that state veterinarian Dr. David Zipf apparently was either unaware of or knowingly had not been following Maryland regulations on the administration of furosemide.

      According to testimony, Dutrow called the Laurel stakes coordinator and Zipf to inform them of a traffic tie-up on I-95 that meant King and Crusader would be late to arrive at the track. According to testimony, Dutrow asked about the rules pertaining to a furosemide shot. "I did explain to (Dutrow) that we didn't have specific rules but we did have recommended procedures," Zipf told Joseph Poag, a Maryland Racing Commission investigator.

      However, the rules of Maryland racing (below) seem quite specific:

      Race Day Administration of Lasix.
      (1) A horse scheduled to race that is permitted to use Lasix shall be administered Lasix by a veterinarian licensed by the Commission before the running of the race unless, under §G of this regulation, the horse has been declared off of Lasix by its owner or trainer.
      (2) Post-Race Quantitation. As indicated by post-race quantitation, a horse may not carry in its body at the time of the running of a race more than 100 nanograms of Lasix per milliliter of plasma.
      (3) Reports.
      (a) The veterinarian who administers Lasix to a horse scheduled to race shall prepare a written certification indicating:
      (i) That Lasix was administered; and
      (ii) If applicable, each adjunct medication that was administered.
      (b) The written certification shall be in the possession of a designated Commission representative at least 1 hour before the horse is scheduled to race.
      (c) The stewards or judges shall order a horse scratched if the written certification is not received in a timely manner

      No Lasix report was filled out and given to a designated commission representative for King and Crusader (or, apparently, any other horse in the race). In fact, during testimony, Zipf admitted that because of a manpower shortage the reports are no longer completed and handed in, as required under Maryland racing rules. Zipf said Hopkins told him to "do the best we can."

      Brian Delp, the veterinarian who treated King and Crusader, said it is not unusual for horses to arrive late and be given furosemide after the two-hour cutoff. "I didn't give it a second thought," Delp was quoted by the Baltimore Sun as saying. "I know horses have arrived late, been treated and allowed to race without repercussions ... I wasn't in violation in my mind."

      Drew Mollica, the former jockey agent turned attorney who represented King and Crusader's owner, wrote in his brief to the commission, "This statement alone is indicative of the complete regulatory anarchy that reigns on the backstretch at Laurel Park and all racetracks under the control of the Maryland Jockey Club on a daily basis."

      But the racing commission members voted to uphold the disqualification of King and Crusader. Hopkins denied to the Paulick Report that it was "selective enforcement" of the Lasix rule, adding that he was unaware Lasix reports were no longer being used.

      "This case was brought to our attention, and we addressed it," said Hopkins. "This was the first time it's come up. I was under the impression the (Lasix report) program was in place. That one got by them. When this happened, I met with the stewards and with my vet to implement a program to prevent this from happening again."

      Mollica said Dutrow is being treated like a "human piñata" by racing commissions but should not be "utilized as a scapegoat for the foibles of the racing officials and those under their direct supervision on duty at Laurel Park on the date in question, and at other times." Mollica said racing officials facilitated the breach of the furosemide administration rules through a "comedy of errors" that included not even having a record as to when King and Crusader arrived in the track's stable area.

      "The conduct of racing regulation at Laurel Park on at least Dec. 17, 2011, if not at all other times, was akin to that on a pirate ship and, while Mr. Dutrow may be suitably designated as a deckhand, the troika of captains and duly licensed subordinates of this wayward vessel are fully and completely responsible for the mayhem that resulted in the hours immediately prior to and following the race in question."

      Click here to read the hearing brief on behalf of James Riccio before the Maryland Racing Commission.
      Whoever wrote this story obviously has an agenda. I personally know almost everyone mentioned within this slanted "news" release.
      What really pisses me off is how the jerk that wrote this "news" flash. How about report the facts and let the reader make their own judgement . Love to have a chat with this opinionated "reporter".
      I need to comment on several items within this column .

      1. Let's get the feds involved, after all, they do such a bang up job on what they control now.

      2. If the owners of the 2nd place horse take the overturning of the DQ to circuit court, they will probably get the commission ruling overturned by mere precedence, much less, the actual trace amounts that were detected. Now, am I in favor of the commissions ruling? Actually, yes I am. Why? Because in my entire career I had one positive test come back out of the probably 3000-4000 tests that were taken on my horses. That positive was for a picogram of procaine. A picogram is One trillionth (10-12) of a gram. My horse had an infection in her rump and had been treated by an antibiotic for several days. The running time after treatment was no racing for 7 days after treatment. My horse ran 14 days after treatment and upon finishing second, was tested and found to have retained a picogram of procaine. This procaine was put in the antibiotic by the manufacturer because it was a thick liquid and you needed to inject this into the muscle with a thicker than normal needle due to it's thickness.Thus, the procaine to offset the gauge needle soreness to the immediate area. Also, there are two types of procaine that can be detected by the State chemist. Mine was NOT the type that crooks used to try an inject into joints to create numbness but a different type that was obviously apparent, to any chemist.
      When I went before the commission, the head of the racing commission, who was appointed by the governor and his expertise was that he owned car dealerships, asked me one final question after hearing all the evidence . He asked, " if you are going 56 in a 55 mph zone , are you speeding"? I answered "yes, but if you are going 55 and one trillionth, I would say no , you are not".
      They adjourned for about 10 minutes , came back and said guilty, 10 days, and loss of purse. At the time I was devastated. But the amount of overwhelming support that I received , even from the Stewards, who said that they had no choice but too make their call, made me feel much better.
      This trace amount of drug had absolutely no bearing on the outcome, and I would think that common sense at some point might prevail. If the federal government ever gets control of this, that will NEVER happen. Simply put, they would have no idea what they are doing and it would show quickly.
      As for the treatment of the horse with Lasix less than 2 hours before the race, I take all blame away from the trainer. He called too discuss this before the horse ever arrived. Why did he call? Because the entire time I trained and up until recently , I guess, there was an absolute cutoff as to when a horse could be administered Lasix. I thought it was 2 1/2 hours or maybe even 3 hours. Cant remember, but it was not 2 hours and certainly not, 1 1/2 hours. But the bottom line is, if a racing official tells you you can do something and then they play the absolute insurer card, that is a bunch of crap.
      Dr. Zipf and Dr. Delp are both friends of mine and there integrity is as solid as anyone's. Certainly more so than the instigating jerk that wrote this column.


      "in which it came to light that state veterinarian Dr. David Zipf apparently was either unaware of or knowingly had not been following Maryland regulations on the administration of furosemide."


      Dr Zipf " knowingly"... , really?



      Someone ought to kick your ass on that statement alone.

      "Foreman, incidentally, does not see any conflict of interest in his role as general counsel for the Maryland Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association while also practicing private law and representing one MTHA member against another."

      There is none you jackass!

      I will be glad to discuss this with anyone who wishes but please do me a favor and don't take this article and take anything from it other than the fact that it is written to confuse, alter and distort the truth.
      Comment
      SBR Contests
      Collapse
      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
      Collapse
      Working...