Wallco NHL GOLD (+453 units in 6 years)

[Ri¢h Bank$]

63 to 1

[Wallco99]

There is nothing cryptic about clearly written rules that don't get read.

[Wallco99]

What are the chances sports books have seen this system + thread and have adjusted their odds to make it less profitable?

63 to 1

[RollinDo]

Just read the rules...not really the system for me - may be profitable, but not enjoyable betting against a team with a 3-game win streak...rather ride the team until they fall. On the flipside, teams that can't even cover the PL for 3 straight don't have an interest in betting because they probably SUCK!

Well, GL to all who follow this...no knocks here - just not my cup of Joe. Have a great season y'all.

[gadzooks]

Don't confuse people with these irrelevant posts. Danhimal, and ONLY Danhimal, will be posting the plays in my absence. Nothing listed in post #5437 is a play in this system. Apparently no one is reading the rules. I suggest you do so you understand system and not have to ask questions that are already answered. THE RULES ARE VERY SIMPLE TO READ.

Since this guy is consistently cryptic, I'll help you understand Malik: I believe the rules he's referring to is that for v1 you can't count the first 3 games of the season and for v2 you can't count the first 2 games of the season.

[gadzooks]

What are the chances sports books have seen this system + thread and have adjusted their odds to make it less profitable?

[Wallco99]

Won 3 - Vacouver and TampaBay
Lost 3 - Carolina, LA
Lost 4 - Anaheim

all 5 teams play on Thursday

Don't confuse people with these irrelevant posts. Danhimal, and ONLY Danhimal, will be posting the plays in my absence. Nothing listed in post #5437 is a play in this system. Apparently no one is reading the rules. I suggest you do so you understand system and not have to ask questions that are already answered. THE RULES ARE VERY SIMPLE TO READ.

[RollinDo]

Won 3 - Vacouver and TampaBay
Lost 3 - Carolina, LA
Lost 4 - Anaheim

all 5 teams play on Thursday

What does this mean?
I am going to pick and choose some plays on this system this season to see how it goes.
Or do we play every pick? Seems like a solid, profitable system!

[MalikHusam]

Won 3 - Vacouver and TampaBay
Lost 3 - Carolina, LA
Lost 4 - Anaheim

all 5 teams play on Thursday

[Wallco99]

Tnx a lot wallco so the NBA chase 110 2016- 2017 not yet started right? Tnx

I would have to say "NO", since the NBA season hasn't even started yet.

[danhimal]

Kind of hoping danhimal can take the reigns for a while until I am ready. I will be here to answer questions, but can't fully run it just yet.

No problem, I got you covered.

[Ri¢h Bank$]

Short answer is NO. The first THREE games of v1 doesn't count and the first TWO games of v2 doesn't count. That means potentially at the earliest we have to wait till after game 5 completes.

THANKS

[skyscrapers]

Are there any plays for tomorrow ?

Short answer is NO. The first THREE games of v1 doesn't count and the first TWO games of v2 doesn't count. That means potentially at the earliest we have to wait till after game 5 completes.

[19th Hole]

Checking In

[Ri¢h Bank$]

Are there any plays for tomorrow ?

[MrHappy]

Checking in

[BigBo$$]

Tnx a lot wallco so the NBA chase 110 2016- 2017 not yet started right? Tnx

[Wallco99]

Is anyone here know the link for NBA chase110? Tnx in advance

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/foru...ase-110-a.html

[BigBo$$]

Is anyone here know the link for NBA chase110? Tnx in advance

[Ri¢h Bank$]

Kind of hoping danhimal can take the reigns for a while until I am ready. I will be here to answer questions, but can't fully run it just yet.

I would run it if I had the time and knew what I was doing exactly

[Ri¢h Bank$]

Do we have any plays today ?

[Ri¢h Bank$]

Calling Danhimal to the thread!

[Wallco99]

Kind of hoping danhimal can take the reigns for a while until I am ready. I will be here to answer questions, but can't fully run it just yet.

[ken23lau]

v1 starts counting from the 4th game.

[boycali01]

Wallco99 are you going post for this season? thanks

[Reeseta]

you grasp by just following and winning. it takes months if not years to research all data to get this

Hi all, I'm fairly new to sports betting and I have a few questions after looking over this system and thread.

1) Wallco, how did you come up with this system? Or a more general question, how does anyone come up with a system like this? For example, for v1, did you just think to yourself "hmm perhaps it is profitable to bet against teams that have been on a 3 game winning streak because streaks aren't sustainable / players get tired" and then start testing it? Or is there more to it?

2) Is this system something of a perfect version, or could minor tweaks yield unknown (perhaps even more profitable) results? For example, adjusting v1 or v2 to look for winning / losing streaks of 2 or 4 rather than 3. Or adjusting the amount of games we chase a profit (from 3 to X). Or perhaps not counting a shootout win towards a win streak, just as a wacky example.

3) What are the chances sports books have seen this thread and are now adjusting their odds to make this system less profitable?

4) What are the chances there are very simple "systems" out there that are profitable? As some nutty examples that probably aren't profitable (but in my mind, could be): Betting on every underdog listed above +130 all season long, or betting on every team whose previous game was a shutout, or betting on every team whose previous game was a win as an underdog, etc.

Sorry if my questions are dumb, but again I'm new and I'm trying to get a grasp of how everything works. Thanks!

[Reeseta]

we have our first bets tomorrow correct?

super excited!!!

Ducks and STL

[gadzooks]

Well maybe you guys misunderstood, I'm not trying to make suggestions for the system, I just had 4 informational questions.

The first question (how do people come up with systems) was jokingly answered because I doubt divine intervention is a real reason.

The other 3 haven't been touched.

I didn't mean to come across as pointing out any problems with the system, I'm just genuinely interested in the concept of systems and how they work...

[Ri¢h Bank$]

Is this a response to my post? If so I'm disappointed and still confused. :/

I think it is what it is. His system works for him so all these suggestions don't interest him. If it ain't broke broke don't fix it.

That's what I gather. I may be mistaken.

I think you would have hoped he would be more open to answering a newbies question, since you stated you were just that and trying to learn.

He's like Dennis Miller, u just gotta understand his sense of humor.

That being said not trying to talk shit or undermine you Wallco99 just trying to help a newbie understand your communications.

[Wallco99]

Is this a response to my post? If so I'm disappointed and still confused. :/

Yes, divine intervention played a key role. Don't know what's so confusing, rules are simple.

[gadzooks]

I met the Lord, and he suggested backtesting that criteria. Who am I to argue with this Lord?

Is this a response to my post? If so I'm disappointed and still confused. :/

[Wallco99]

I met the Lord, and he suggested backtesting that criteria. Who am I to argue with this Lord?

[gadzooks]

Hi all, I'm fairly new to sports betting and I have a few questions after looking over this system and thread.

1) Wallco, how did you come up with this system? Or a more general question, how does anyone come up with a system like this? For example, for v1, did you just think to yourself "hmm perhaps it is profitable to bet against teams that have been on a 3 game winning streak because streaks aren't sustainable / players get tired" and then start testing it? Or is there more to it?

2) Is this system something of a perfect version, or could minor tweaks yield unknown (perhaps even more profitable) results? For example, adjusting v1 or v2 to look for winning / losing streaks of 2 or 4 rather than 3. Or adjusting the amount of games we chase a profit (from 3 to X). Or perhaps not counting a shootout win towards a win streak, just as a wacky example.

3) What are the chances sports books have seen this thread and are now adjusting their odds to make this system less profitable?

4) What are the chances there are very simple "systems" out there that are profitable? As some nutty examples that probably aren't profitable (but in my mind, could be): Betting on every underdog listed above +130 all season long, or betting on every team whose previous game was a shutout, or betting on every team whose previous game was a win as an underdog, etc.

Sorry if my questions are dumb, but again I'm new and I'm trying to get a grasp of how everything works. Thanks!

[Ri¢h Bank$]

NO.

Wallco, I appreciate the straight forward, cut and dry, NO.

[Wallco99]

For example last year
v1 fades would be 141-81
v2 plays 60-23

So if you bet a small percentage of your bankroll you should be able to profit more safely, UNLESS the juice is so ridiculous it makes it to where it wouldn't work ?

NO.