Beat the Prick Contest Week 1 Sponsored by CRIS - Weekly Results

[Prick Bot]

(To view a player's scoring breakdown, click either the score or the record link next next to the player's name.)<span id="divLoading"><br><br><br><br> <br> <center> <img src="http://www.sbrodds.com/images/loadingorange.gif"> <br> <small>Loading<br>Please Wait</small> </center> </span>
<!--Beat the Prick Contest Week 1 Sponsored by CRIS - Weekly Results--><!--Mon Sep 11 00:35:28 2006--> <iframe id="PrickIFRAME" onLoad = 'document.getElementById("divLoading").i nnerHTML = "";' src="http://forum.sbrforum.com/btp/cgi-bin/display_results_post.pl?date=20060909" frameborder=0 width=100% height=1></iframe>

__________________
This message was autoposted by Prick Bot.

[JohnnyBoy928]

Final Post Counts

Yay!!!!!! Congrats to all who got sumthin for nuthin!!!
Its only week one though and we have a long way to go...

Can these Post counts be acurate though?.... I mean I know mine is about right.. but what about people with like 14,000 hahahah or even 1000 + over the week? yet their daily average would show otherwise... wow I can not compete with those numbers... I would have to be a friggin Meth head for that... lmao

PS: No offense to the actual meth heads out there... you do what you gotta do...

[Ganchrow]

Can these Post counts be acurate though?.... I mean I know mine is about right.. but what about people with like 14,000 hahahah or even 1000 + over the week? yet their daily average would show otherwise

Post counts refer to a player's total number of posts since joining the forum.

[onlooker]

Congratulations to everyone that won.

Great job Sean. To get first place this week.

[JohnnyBoy928]

wow how can I ever compete with some with 1000+ who has been on this site longer then I have then? and I was under the impression that it was post counts of the week or something to that affect.. I will look at the rules again or previous post somewhere I saw something like that...

Either way still was fun.. I am just asking out of curiousity...

Post counts refer to a player's TOTAL number of a posts since joining the forum.

[onlooker]

wow how can I ever compete with some with 1000+ who has been on this site longer then I have then? and I was under the impression that it was post counts of the week or something to that affect.. I will look at the rules again or previous post somewhere I saw something like that...

Either way still was fun.. I am just asking out of curiousity...

Sure you can, get 4-0 and be a regular on here, so your post count increases everyday. Not everyweek is someone with a 1000 or more post going to win top spot. Just look at this week, it was a member with just over a 100 posts.

[JohnnyBoy928]

True but there is always the possibly of that happening...
I just hope they are a SBR employee.. Hahahahahah

Hey like I said onlooker... I'm just a squirrel trying to get a nut...

Either way I think its a cool contest and look forward participating in it... Good luck to all!

Sure you can, get 4-0 and be a regular on here, so your post count increases everyday. Not everyweek is someone with a 1000 or more post going to win top spot. Just look at this week, it was a member with just over a 100 posts.

[DrSlamm]

weekly ties should be broken based on your SEASON long prick status.. either that or by who hasnt won a prize yet ..

I have a decent post count.. but really why should someone get to keep winning every tie??

[Ganchrow]

Not everyweek is someone with a 1000 or more post going to win top spot. Just look at this week, it was a member with just over a 100 posts.

Exactly.

Just think, Johnny, had you started spamming the message board just a couple days earlier you would have won this week ...

[JohnnyBoy928]

Ohhhhhhhhhh!!!!! So now your busting my chops?
This is what you guys wanted... I am being involved in the forum as a whole... Mainly football but whatever...

Its ok I can take it... I give it enough.. So, I can take it...

Someone has to keep you guys on your toes!

Exactly.

Just think, Johnny, had you started spamming the message board just a couple days earlier you would have won this week ...

[pags11]

sweet, I barely made the cut, but I'll take it!...thanks for totaling these ganchrow...

[Ganchrow]

sweet, I barely made the cut, but I'll take it!...thanks for totaling these ganchrow...

Don't thank me, thank Prick Bot.

[rm18]

Oh man can't believe I am 51st, I think 3-1 is more impressive than 2-2 with a BB, but its alright though.

[JohnnyBoy928]

Oh man can't believe I am 51st, I think 3-1 is more impressive than 2-2 with a BB, but its alright though.

I think best bet counts for week 17 and ties... Not for sure though... read the Rules and Regs again...

[JohnnyBoy928]

Something is def better then nothing... Good job mang!!!

sweet, I barely made the cut, but I'll take it!...thanks for totaling these ganchrow...

[Ganchrow]

I think 3-1 is more impressive than 2-2 with a BB.

Not as far as this contest is concerned.

[onlooker]

Oh man can't believe I am 51st, I think 3-1 is more impressive than 2-2 with a BB, but its alright though.

Well not really. It is more of a pain to pick a higher rated play, so thats why they are worth 2 points. So make sure the best bet, is truely your best bet. Be more careful with that selection.

[rm18]

best bets are two points others are 1, so I lose the contest to people who go 2-2, when I was 3-1.

[framboise]

in my opinion, weekly ties should be broken based on total number of wins. example : a 3-1 record with 1 point is better than a 2-2 record with 1 point. (note that they must have the same total of points). Example: A 3-1 record with 1 point cannot win over a 2-2 record with 2 points.

[onlooker]

best bets are two points others are 1, so I lose the contest to people who go 2-2, when I was 3-1.

Just think of it in units. In real bets, you would of won less by losing your higher unit play, then if you hit it.

Its not always about the record in betting. Its about the the profit you make doing it.

You have to pick your spots when betting more units, so do the same with your best bet selections.

[onlooker]

in my opinion, weekly ties should be broken based on total number of wins. example : a 3-1 record with 1 point is better than a 2-2 record with 1 point. (note that they must have the same total of points). Example: A 3-1 record with 1 point cannot win over a 2-2 record with 2 points.

That is the reason for the "BEST BET" selection. So you have to pick that selection with more on the line then the others. To make the contest a little more tougher.

[JohnnyBoy928]

Yeah when I look at the breakdown it makes more sense... Someone with a hot streak can rack up a lot of points.. Someone with 2-2 can make a come back lets say mid season and catch up... Keep ya in the game.. makes sense.. keeps the competition going... and without that it would not be a "Contest"... Not bad... Not bad... Hey! This kind of contest is new to me... sounds good though..

That is the reason for the "BEST BET" selection. So you have to pick that selection with more on the line then the others. To make the contest a little more tougher.

[framboise]

I understand onlooker, but to me, a 3-1 record is better than a 2-2 record with the same total of points, no matter if the best bet play won or lose.

[pags11]

johnny, thanks bud...

guys, took me a while to get used to the format last year as well...

[moses millsap]

-Isn't Mudcat a moderator here?

-I wish you guys went back to the original rules from last year where the loyal posters got first shot at the money Seems like the posters that just missed the cut have been around here since the start. But I understand that wouldn't be fair to the new entries, just sucks to see rm18, HAPPY BOY, fixxer, etc. miss out to people just here for the contests.

-Disappointed in my result, but surrounded by some good company on that list.

[onlooker]

-Isn't Mudcat a moderator here?

No, not no more. Not for about a month or so. I think thats how long its been.

[framboise]

I agree with OWNED comments. Loyal posters should be priviliged first. People that wins with zero post at their active are just here for one reason. I don't think we'll see them on here after the beat the prick contest.

[DrSlamm]

the contest is about making money.. not getting people to post on the boards...

[framboise]

the contest is about making money.. not getting people to post on the boards...

true. but they should contribute a little to the forum as a mark of appreciation.

[Ganchrow]

Loyal posters should be priviliged first.

They are. As per the contest rules, "All ties for weekly prize(s) shall be broken in favor of the contestant with the highest number of posts at SBR Forum."

That seems like a reward, no?

[McBa1n]

I still love the rules.
My post count is nothing, as I like reading more than posting, usually.... It took almost 18 months to get me active here heh.

It's the post-padding that's already getting on my nerves, though. I like to actually contribute something when I type and hopefully offer something usefull.
Regulars made this forum what it is - they deserve the rewards over some shmo who just showed up.
At least, that's MY opinion.
If it weren't for the regulars, I wouldn't have been a lurker for months before finally posting last season.

[pags11]

McBa1n,

you the man buddy...a prime example of a lurker turned poster that benefits SBR...

[framboise]

They are. As per the contest rules, "All ties for weekly prize(s) shall be broken in favor of the contestant with the highest number of posts at SBR Forum."

That seems like a reward, no?

yes, it is.

[JohnnyBoy928]

Yeah you are right... Took me a while to get into the whole forum thing... This contest did just that... Of course I like the contest but now I also like the feedback... and to laugh... So all the jokes and competition is fun....

oh and good night

I still love the rules.
My post count is nothing, as I like reading more than posting, usually.... It took almost 18 months to get me active here heh.

It's the post-padding that's already getting on my nerves, though. I like to actually contribute something when I type and hopefully offer something usefull.
Regulars made this forum what it is - they deserve the rewards over some shmo who just showed up.
At least, that's MY opinion.
If it weren't for the regulars, I wouldn't have been a lurker for months before finally posting last season.

[goldengoat]

congrats to the winners

i capped lousy

they looked good when i made them but thats the game for ya!