1. #1
    Sean81
    Sean81's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-31-09
    Posts: 281
    Betpoints: 756

    Football Money Lines (Bookmaker)

    I very rarely play money lines in football but noticed the spreads on these are very tight at bookmaker. For instance its:

    Arizona St. +145
    Oregon St. -165

    This has a theoretical hold of ~2.9%, or 35% less than the -110 spread pricing.

    Is it safe to say you would lose less money in the long run (per $1 bet) by randomly betting money lines over point spreads at these levels, or am I missing something?

    I am sure the money management equation becomes very complicated if only playing ML's, but does anyone have experience playing these primarily and would like to share any pros/cons.

    Thanks
    Last edited by Sean81; 09-29-10 at 02:21 PM.

  2. #2
    Justin7
    Justin7's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-31-06
    Posts: 8,577
    Betpoints: 1506

    If you play MLB, you play a lot of moneylines. You're right though -- in general, the lower the hold the better. You should check the MLs at Pinnacle, and Matchbook an hour before the game goes.

  3. #3
    Shonner
    Shonner's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-05-10
    Posts: 1,361
    Betpoints: 85

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin7 View Post
    If you play MLB, you play a lot of moneylines. You're right though -- in general, the lower the hold the better. You should check the MLs at Pinnacle, and Matchbook an hour before the game goes.
    Justin, is there a tool that allows you to calculate the true odds of a moneyline (0 vig)?

    So basically, if the line is -110 / -110, the 0 vig line is 100 / 100

    is there a took to calculate it for the example given -165 / +145??

  4. #4
    clarkacal
    clarkacal's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-03-09
    Posts: 353

    It seems like figuring true odds of a moneyline would be much more inexact than a pointspread. Especially with 3 and 7 in football there are wide ranges of moneylines across different games.

  5. #5
    Shonner
    Shonner's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-05-10
    Posts: 1,361
    Betpoints: 85

    I could have sworn I have see it before. Maybe I'm wrong.

  6. #6
    jgilmartin
    jgilmartin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-31-09
    Posts: 1,119

    Quote Originally Posted by Shonner View Post

    Justin, is there a tool that allows you to calculate the true odds of a moneyline (0 vig)?

    So basically, if the line is -110 / -110, the 0 vig line is 100 / 100

    is there a took to calculate it for the example given -165 / +145??
    If you have Excel, you can do it with Ganchrow's Functions:
    http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/handicappe...ate-excel.html

    Or check this thread:
    http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/handicappe...-line-mls.html

  7. #7
    Shonner
    Shonner's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-05-10
    Posts: 1,361
    Betpoints: 85

    Quote Originally Posted by jgilmartin View Post
    If you have Excel, you can do it with Ganchrow's Functions:
    http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/handicappe...ate-excel.html
    Thanks.
    Last edited by Shonner; 09-29-10 at 09:19 PM.

  8. #8
    xyz
    xyz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-14-08
    Posts: 521
    Betpoints: 3251

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean81 View Post
    Is it safe to say you would lose less money in the long run (per $1 bet) by randomly betting money lines over point spreads at these levels, or am I missing something?
    The goal is to make money. Losing less money over the long run can still cost you alot of money.

  9. #9
    Sean81
    Sean81's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-31-09
    Posts: 281
    Betpoints: 756

    Quote Originally Posted by xyz View Post
    The goal is to make money. Losing less money over the long run can still cost you alot of money.
    Thats not the point I was trying to make, notice I said randomly betting money lines.

Top