all this talk of kelly has been pretty silly
the idea of maximizing expected growth is obviously important but people slaving over the correct kelly formula and worrying about whether to bet 3.4% or 3.5% is dumb. the reason is you never know your ev exactly. there is never one perfect model. one model might predict of a total of 40 and another a total of 40.5 or 41. If the market total is 43 you know you have a +ev bet but how ev is it exactly? depends which you take to be the true value - 40 or 40.5 or 41.
real pros bet in the kelly area and bet some amount on premium plays and some other amount on regular plays. if on average the market is off by 2 pts they bet $x and if the market is off by 3-4 points or more then they bet $y
and for those where limits are effectively binding then kelly is even more irrelevant
the idea of maximizing expected growth is obviously important but people slaving over the correct kelly formula and worrying about whether to bet 3.4% or 3.5% is dumb. the reason is you never know your ev exactly. there is never one perfect model. one model might predict of a total of 40 and another a total of 40.5 or 41. If the market total is 43 you know you have a +ev bet but how ev is it exactly? depends which you take to be the true value - 40 or 40.5 or 41.
real pros bet in the kelly area and bet some amount on premium plays and some other amount on regular plays. if on average the market is off by 2 pts they bet $x and if the market is off by 3-4 points or more then they bet $y
and for those where limits are effectively binding then kelly is even more irrelevant