1. #1
    Bluehorseshoe
    Bluehorseshoe's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-13-06
    Posts: 14,930
    Betpoints: 1515

    How could these two staticians be this far off?

    In a paper in American Statistician, Michael Goodman makes the claim that double-headers are swept more often than they are split.[1] The Elias Sports Bureau, however, found that double headers are swept only 26.2% of the time
    I understand the time frame plays into each one's research, but for it to be that big a difference?

  2. #2
    Pokerjoe
    Pokerjoe's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-17-09
    Posts: 704
    Betpoints: 307

    Most likely the questions have been phrased differently in each case. IOW, I think it's just a semantics issue.

    If each game of the double header was a coin flip, you'd expect a sweep 50% of the time.
    You'd also have to say the chance of a given team sweeping was only 25%.

  3. #3
    gryfyn1
    gryfyn1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-30-10
    Posts: 3,285
    Betpoints: 42

    look at the citation -- the quoted article looked at just the 1966 season.

    seeing is is examining what amounts to probably 1-2% of all double headers i think it fair to pull the small sample size card.

  4. #4
    Jackson Hole
    Jackson Hole's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-22-11
    Posts: 96

    Got to know if any assumptions are being made.

  5. #5
    warriorfan707
    SBR Poster of the Milennium
    warriorfan707's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-29-08
    Posts: 13,698

    obviously most are split, not sure what the guys malfunction is but thats common sense and knowledge

  6. #6
    Bluehorseshoe
    Bluehorseshoe's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-13-06
    Posts: 14,930
    Betpoints: 1515

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan707 View Post
    obviously most are split, not sure what the guys malfunction is but thats common sense and knowledge
    Not true.

    Year - Sweeps - Splits

    * 2008 - 14-11
    * 2007 - 12-10
    * 2006 - 10-13
    * 2005 - 7-11
    * 2004 - 23-15
    * 2003 - 20-8
    * 2002 - 14-10


    http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/doubleheaders/_/year/2010
    Last edited by Bluehorseshoe; 04-09-11 at 10:01 PM.

  7. #7
    Pokerjoe
    Pokerjoe's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-17-09
    Posts: 704
    Betpoints: 307

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan707 View Post
    obviously most are split, not sure what the guys malfunction is but thats common sense and knowledge
    In order for "most are split" to be true, most times the winner of the first game would have to lose the second game.

    Why would you think that the winner of the first game--that is, a team for which you have some slight evidence of being better--would be less likely to win the second game?

    In your "common sense," stop emphasizing the first word, work more on the second.

  8. #8
    warriorfan707
    SBR Poster of the Milennium
    warriorfan707's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-29-08
    Posts: 13,698

    bust out with all of mlb history, not just one decade or so

    I remember watching a game where an announcer claimed historically most doubleheaders are split

    Unless he was just blatantly lying or misinformed, I am inclined to believe him before some random internet posters on a gambling forum

  9. #9
    ProlinePlayer
    ProlinePlayer's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-03-07
    Posts: 50
    Betpoints: 96

    Quote Originally Posted by Bluehorseshoe View Post
    I understand the time frame plays into each one's research, but for it to be that big a difference?
    I would be willing to bet that the 26% figure was in answer to a specific side sweeping. Probably on average a 26% chance of either a visit or home team sweep, making a sweep by one or the other a slight favourite.

    I`ve also done some research in this area and it agrees with the sweep as the most likely outcome as well. If you think about it`s only common sense really. Team A and team B are playing two games. Team A wins the first. You know nothing else about these teams - although the sample size is a bit small , the most likely case is that team A is the better team, and therefore a favourite to win game 2.

    PLP

  10. #10
    Pokerjoe
    Pokerjoe's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-17-09
    Posts: 704
    Betpoints: 307

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan707 View Post
    bust out with all of mlb history, not just one decade or so

    I remember watching a game where an announcer claimed historically most doubleheaders are split

    Unless he was just blatantly lying or misinformed, I am inclined to believe him before some random internet posters on a gambling forum
    You're inclined to believe ex-jocks who probably still think batting averages are good hitting metrics and have never done a statistical study in their lives, over "random" internet posters who aren't asking you to "believe" anything, but to instead think for yourself for once?

    Think, warriorfan.
    If the games were 50/50 propositions, what would the odds be of a sweep?
    In what ways and for what reasons are the games not 50/50 propositions?
    How would the fact that they aren't 50/50 propositions affect the odds of a sweep?

    You don't need a database to get the answer, you just need to think it through.

  11. #11
    Salamander
    Salamander's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-25-09
    Posts: 397

    A real doubleheader is an Ernie Banks "let's play two" where one game shortly follows the other, not the day-night doubleheaders you mostly see these days for weather related make up games.

  12. #12
    wiffle
    wiffle's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 610
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan707 View Post
    bust out with all of mlb history, not just one decade or so

    I remember watching a game where an announcer claimed historically most doubleheaders are split

    Unless he was just blatantly lying or misinformed, I am inclined to believe him before some random internet posters on a gambling forum

    so the loser of the first game is a -300 favorite in the second game.

    ok got it

  13. #13
    HoulihansTX
    Bowl $ea$on
    HoulihansTX's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-11-09
    Posts: 30,566
    Betpoints: 295

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan707 View Post
    bust out with all of mlb history, not just one decade or so I remember watching a game where an announcer claimed historically most doubleheaders are split Unless he was just blatantly lying or misinformed, I am inclined to believe him before some random internet posters on a gambling forum
    4 double headers so far.

    2 sweeps(both times Mets were swept.LOL)
    2 splits

  14. #14
    waco66
    Canucks -1.5
    waco66's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-14-09
    Posts: 1,645
    Betpoints: 39

    Quote Originally Posted by HoulihansTX View Post
    4 double headers so far.

    2 sweeps(both times Mets were swept.LOL)
    LOL...i should put my whole bankroll next time mets are in a double header.

  15. #15
    gregm
    gregm's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-14-11
    Posts: 3,535
    Betpoints: 121

    Time frames would have to come into play in a major way in any sort of data on double headers, the unions, relocation and basically money changed everything on double headers.

    They used to be much more common and the lineups would be completely up in the air, you literally would have to be out at the ball park to see who was playing and warming up to find out who was pitching in the second double header. .

    Sundays would be huge for double headers but this started to fade out in the 50's. Here are some percentage I had from the hardball times, www.hardballtimes.com . Its amazing looking at these stats, double headers used to make up 33% of games in the NL 1956 and 26% in the AL in 1956, they make up less than 2.5% of games in either league now.

    the percentage of double headers
    1956 33.17% 26.54%
    1957 26.49% 22.73%
    1958 23.05% 26.17%
    1959 19.35% 22.33%
    1960 18.42% 24.96%

    The percentage of double headers and the attendance of games. The attendance seems to have played a big part of the change, probably union pressure as well.

    Year NL AL NL Att AL Att
    1961 19.06% 29.84% 14,106 12,531
    1962 22.17% 27.44% 13,990 12,380
    1963 18.50% 26.73% 14,035 11,256
    1964 19.95% 28.75% 14,834 11,345
    1965 18.94% 28.13% 16,705 10,939
    1966 17.80% 26.05% 18,561 12,614
    1967 18.52% 29.14% 16,014 13,996
    1968 17.47% 21.43% 14,496 13,938
    1969 17.27% 18.91% 15,514 12,471
    1970 15.04% 17.06% 17,160 12,420
    1971 14.20% 18.43% 17,824 12,286
    1972 15.48% 19.59% 16,699 12,313
    1973 15.24% 15.84% 17,173 13,821
    1974 14.81% 13.99% 17,467 13,409
    1975 12.98% 17.01% 17,096 13,696
    1976 14.81% 14.27% 17,140 15,158
    1977 11.11% 15.56% 19,620 17,365
    1978 12.77% 14.32% 20,800 18,152
    1979 12.77% 9.57% 21,811 19,833
    1980 9.46% 9.36% 21,710 19,338
    1981 6.99% 6.67% 19,376 18,755
    1982 7.00% 7.93% 22,127 20,335
    1983 9.24% 8.63% 22,125 21,137
    1984 7.62% 6.88% 21,402 21,130
    1985 5.25% 5.30% 22,958 21,672
    1986 4.54% 4.41% 23,048 22,198
    1987 3.33% 3.00% 25,473 24,054
    1988 4.13% 3.71% 25,283 25,199
    1989 4.32% 4.59% 26,027 26,345
    1990 5.35% 3.71% 25,197 26,772
    1991 2.68% 2.82% 25,460 28,322
    1992 3.91% 3.00% 24,806 28,006
    1993 2.29% 2.47% 32,533 29,395
    1994 2.49% 2.51% 32,139 30,367
    1995 1.79% 2.18% 24,936 25,108
    1996 3.53% 2.82% 26,789 26,230
    1997 3.17% 4.77% 28,118 27,635
    1998 3.24% 2.65% 29,605 28,372
    1999 2.70% 2.38% 29,582 28,094
    2000 2.08% 2.38% 30,608 27,970
    2001 1.93% 1.85% 30,654 28,997
    2002 1.85% 2.12% 28,614 27,313
    2003 2.32% 2.11% 28,358 27,231
    2004 3.17% 3.09% 31,062 28,948
    2005 1.54% 1.41% 32,108 29,339
    2006 2.32% 1.41% 32,107 30,393
    2007 1.31% 2.38% 33,998 31,207
    2008 1.70% 2.47% 34,068 30,459
    2009 1.54% 2.29% 31,788 28,433
    Last edited by gregm; 04-18-11 at 10:53 PM.

  16. #16
    St8Ca$homie
    St8Ca$homie's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-07-11
    Posts: 161

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan707 View Post
    bust out with all of mlb history, not just one decade or so I remember watching a game where an announcer claimed historically most doubleheaders are split Unless he was just blatantly lying or misinformed, I am inclined to believe him before some random internet posters on a gambling forum
    ...

Top