Monday, heavy on Vandy already and also like Iowa State and Clemson a lot, but no rush there given where the lines are. that's probably what i'm on through Monday, waiting for TTs before i book new years. after that, will almost certainly play Wisky/Stanford 1H under, Michigan/S Carolina under somehow, Gators, Louisville TT under, A&M 1H/TT over/game over, Ole Miss, Kent.
-
Comment -
that CMU/WKU 1H under was a fkn pisser. some really fluky TDs and a FG off the upright, lose under 28' on 31 points (and beat the closer). oh well, glad it was 1u.Comment -
Im on nc state
....mainly cuz I like what Ive seen from glennon a lot. I watched 2 games of vandy, against south carolina and missouri, neither game I was very impressed. just think 7.5 pts is a lot especially when rodgers should have a turnover or 2....hes not anywhere near the intellect of his older bro, many bad decisions....good luck buddy, was gonna add a unit to this bet but since ur on vandy so big I think Ill just ride out thinking.....kinda thinking of hopping on the over though too, think its gonna be a shootout but with ncstates tough defense being able to come up with a few more stops/ maybe a pick 6
awesome bowl run your having though!
Comment -
does anyone here know how Navy fairs in bowl games following their game with army?Comment -
i will be riding the SEC > ACC angle til the wheels fall off with Vandy and LSU. i like Glennon, but i love James Franklin (also like Zac Stacy a lot). i think that he wants this game like no one's business and will have his team ready to win the hometown bowl. i listen to a lot of Bill King (he's out of Nashville) and they devote some special attention to Vandy (sort of like they're the SEC's little-program-that-could). i have Vandy with significant advantages at RB, special teams, coaching, geography, and decent advantages on defense and offensive line (and i think that Vandy will get to Glennon more easily than NCSU will get to Rodgers, though i expect Glennon to handle the pressure better than will Rodgers). the one significant advantage for NCSU is their strong third down defense vs Vandy's weak 3rd down offense. i also rate QB as a decent advantage for NCSU, but i think that Vandy will be able to make NCSU one-dimensional because i don't think that NCSU will be able to run much.Im on nc state....mainly cuz I like what Ive seen from glennon a lot. I watched 2 games of vandy, against south carolina and missouri, neither game I was very impressed. just think 7.5 pts is a lot especially when rodgers should have a turnover or 2....hes not anywhere near the intellect of his older bro, many bad decisions....good luck buddy, was gonna add a unit to this bet but since ur on vandy so big I think Ill just ride out thinking.....kinda thinking of hopping on the over though too, think its gonna be a shootout but with ncstates tough defense being able to come up with a few more stops/ maybe a pick 6
awesome bowl run your having though!
BOL whatever you decide Smut, don't like seeing you on the other side here since i always respect your opinion, but i spent a lot of time on this game and love Vandy (so, it's probably doomed but i'll believe it when i see it).Comment -
Dex, i think that Army and Navy have played in final regular season game on a consistent basis for awhile, so any bowl game in which Navy has appears should come directly after Army/Navy game. i did not spend a ton of time on this game, but i think that ASU will win by 14+. Navy does well against teams when they can slow the game and control the clock. ASU's quick strike offense and huge athletic advantage make for the wrong kind of opponent for Navy, which has no ability to play from behind if they get down multiple scores against a team with better athletes. Middies haven't seen a team even in ASU's zip code talent-wise since September (vs Penn State and Notre Dame).
also, ASU chicks are so hot and will distract Middies constantly cooped up in all-dude environment. i can speak to this since i went to military school and wife went to ASU.Comment -
on BG with you brother.. fading the public for these shitty bowls seems to be cashing like a mother.
most of my sharp book sites haven't budged the number from 7 to 7.5.. very telling to me
i know some people don't like lookin at this shit, but vegas clearly wants san jose money hereComment -
Good luck Biff with you on Bowling Green got them at 7.5. Opposite the Bruins in that game I like Baylor. GLComment -
hey, Hot Wings, good to see you, pal. pissed at myself for not waiting for shot at 7' with BG, should've known i'd get another shot at the hook. oh well. sorry to see that we're opposite on Baylor/UCLA, but BOL to you nevertheless.
did i tell you that my wife now makes yesterdogs at home? not as good as the original of course but great option given we're like five hours away. chopped pickles are the secret!Comment -
What's up Biffer, something tells me Duke wins on the field this evening.......
Comment -
I see alot of people like the over in cincy Duke its up too 62.5 now I don't knw where all these points will come from I knw cincy has some athletes but what does Duke haveComment -
i feel like its a prime letdown spot for navy after the game which really matters to them. i want to pound asu but would like confimation on navys bowl results.....actually, VI may have this info. i will share if i find
since 2000 (during their win streak vs army):
L21, W, L10, L3, L1, W, W, L24
no edge as i had hoped....Comment -
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
tough one with the late fumble. BG had their chances but man does that offense remind me of the '99 Browns.Comment -
Dex, for what it's worth, my opinion is that a team like Navy doesn't really have letdown spots. those guys are fkn hardcore and i bet that the bowl game really matters to them too (esp with time in between). that said, i don't think that motivation/effort is their problem here - they don't have the athletes to hang with ASU and their scheme. i'd expect Graham to run a lot of plays that will isolate individual Navy defenders against ASU receivers and backs, and coupled with the pace, i expect some big plays from ASU. BOL whatever you decide.Comment -
Late mistakes was horrible in that BG / SJST game, especially that under. That basically killed the spread and total for the game.Comment -
2012-13 Bowls updated card
5* Vanderbilt (4* Vandy -6.5, 1* Vandy -7 -115)
3* BYU (2* BYU -2', 1* BYU -3 -115) - WINNER
3* UCLA (2* UCLA -2' (-105), 1* UCLA -3) - LOSER
2* Utah St -10 - WINNER
2* East Carolina/Louisiana Lafayette over 64' - WINNER
2* Washington/Boise State under 46 - LOSER
2* Cincinnati/Duke over 60' (-105)
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
1* Nevada +10 - WINNER
1* Nevada TT over 35' - WINNER
1* Washington/Boise State 1H under 21' (+100) - LOSER
1* Central Michigan/Western Kentucky 1H under 28' (-105) - LOSER
1* UCLA TT over 41 - LOSER
6-6 +0.41uComment -
who can squander a 5-0 +9u start? right here! so penetrating frustrated.Comment -
after endings of BG and Duke bowls, i don't even feel that much like watching sports tonight (could also be that these were three of my least-favorite bowls and i had already decided to pass tonight but still). i didn't even have money on Duke (and i generally root against them in sports), but that ending was plain wrong on so many levels. if i hear anyone bragging about cashing a Cincy -7' ticket, i will drag him into the street and curb his ass. aberrant outlier horseshit fkn finish, an affront to theology and geometry, shakes my faith in the cosmos. bah.Comment -
Exhibit A as to why you want to fade the board at SBR. if anyone says that UC was the right side in that game, after watching it, they are either egging you on or they have no business having access to electronics or a car, much less any sort of wagering account.
don't want to pour salt in your wounds, but the over in that game was my only lean for today (you can look back in thread). so, i lost by sitting, you lost by playing. awesome.Comment -
leans for today
Cuse +3'
WV/Cuse over 71
Cuse TT over 34
Oregon State/Texas over 57'
MSU +2/ML +120
TCU/MSU under 40'/1H under 20'
passing on AF/Rice (like over best there), Navy/ASU (lean ASU -14 there but not crazy about giving two scores to triple option)Comment -
adding
2* TCU/Michigan State first half under 20'
2012-13 Bowls updated card
5* Vanderbilt (4* Vandy -6.5, 1* Vandy -7 -115)
3* BYU (2* BYU -2', 1* BYU -3 -115) - WINNER
3* UCLA (2* UCLA -2' (-105), 1* UCLA -3) - LOSER
2* Utah St -10 - WINNER
2* East Carolina/Louisiana Lafayette over 64' - WINNER
2* Washington/Boise State under 46 - LOSER
2* Cincinnati/Duke over 60' (-105)
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
2* TCU/Michigan State 1H under 20'
1* Nevada +10 - WINNER
1* Nevada TT over 35' - WINNER
1* Washington/Boise State 1H under 21' (+100) - LOSER
1* Central Michigan/Western Kentucky 1H under 28' (-105) - LOSER
1* UCLA TT over 41 - LOSERComment -
TCU/Sparty 1H under write-up
While Mark Dantonio has done a good job during his six-year tenure in East Lansing, his teams' performance in bowl games have been a blemish (1-4 SU/2-3 ATS; although it should be noted that three of those five games were vs. Bama or Georgia). If Sparty is to win the game (which Dantonio desperately wants to do), they'll need to rely heavily upon their defense as Andrew Maxwell isn't accurate or poised enough to bring MSU back if they get down multiple scores. The defenses are much better than the offenses in Tempe tonight, and the coaches are as conservative as Rick Santorum's holiday reading list. This should play out in a slow start, something both teams are accustomed to in their respective last five bowls (TCU 1H under 5-0; Sparty 1H under 3-2).Comment
