Sbr mma contest...

**bogbat** · 12-31-11, 12:31 AM

Originally posted by NunyaBidness

I got ya. Just repay here.

Just finished paying you back NunyaBidness and included a little bonus for ya. Thanks again for backing me.

**NunyaBidness** · 12-31-11, 12:33 AM

Originally posted by gabe

Riddle didn't fight, so make it $250 to win $487.50 on Hettes (which is what i woulda done if Riddle wasn't an option)

The $200's cancel each other out, I'm +$487.50

lol

You're kidding right?

**NunyaBidness** · 12-31-11, 12:34 AM

Originally posted by bogbat

Just finished paying you back NunyaBidness and included a little bonus for ya. Thanks again for backing me.

No prob. Thanks for the extra.

**bogbat** · 12-31-11, 12:34 AM

Originally posted by gabe

Riddle didn't fight, so make it $250 to win $487.50 on Hettes (which is what i woulda done if Riddle wasn't an option)

The $200's cancel each other out, I'm +$487.50

lol you cant do that after the fight takes place.

Actually, it's not like it really matters for you at this time anyway :P

**gabe** · 12-31-11, 01:00 AM

Originally posted by bogbat

lol you cant do that after the fight takes place.

Actually, it's not like it really matters for you at this time anyway :P

i don't care what vaughany decides, but that's a fair move. if riddle wasn't an option, i'd have more on hettes.

again, don't care either way, just think that's fair.

**The HOFF** · 12-31-11, 02:44 AM

Originally posted by The HOFF

Danny Castillo -170 (340 to win 200)
Brock Lesnar +115 (300 to win 345)
Matt Riddle -120 (360 to win 300)

I didn't think Lesnar would win, so put that 300 on Jimy Hettes. Riddle didn't fight so I would have put that on Hendricks. Castillo wasn't an underdog so I change that bet also. I'm at +3400 for the event. Just trust me. Totally fair.

**Educ8d Degener8** · 12-31-11, 04:13 AM

Originally posted by Educ8d Degener8

Ross Pearson, risk 275 to win 100
Jacob Volkman, risk 245 to win 100
Nathan Diaz, risk 480 to win 1080

I'd like my Pearson and Volkman bets cancelled and put "all in" on my Diaz play, please. Cos of the whole Riddle fiasco.

Thank You Kindly,
ED

**Vaughany** · 12-31-11, 05:32 AM

When I've slept I'll try and sort this mess out

**Vitooch** · 12-31-11, 07:15 AM

Can I get in on whatever this is lol

**Vitooch** · 12-31-11, 07:17 AM

Nevermind lol. Can I get a PM when the next contest begins?

**Vaughany** · 12-31-11, 07:34 AM

Yeah I'll let u know

**gabe** · 12-31-11, 12:08 PM

These idiots are trying to be funny. Jim Hettes was my remaining play in the contest. Riddle out, it makes sense of the money to be transfered to the other fighter in my contest who I had under $200 on.

You fools are trying to be funny when you didn't even have Riddle picked. At least you keep each other entertained. Retards.

You guys are such little bitches that you try to make a joke about it instead of acknolweging it'd be the fair move LOL wow-- i don't care, count Riddle as a loss and make me an extra -$240 for all i care. That just would have been the fair move. Anybody who thinks otherwise is being a bitch.

Bottom line is, if Riddle wasn't on the card, my money would have CLEARLY been on Hettes. These retards making unfunny jokes didn't even have him picked.

Don't make the fair move and move the money on Hettes. Doesn't make a difference for me, just shows what kind of pussies I'm dealing with.

All fights with Riddle picked should have money transferred to the next fighter picked with the least $ risk. Either that, or an automatic win, since Riddle still got his Win bonus. =)

**bogbat** · 12-31-11, 01:25 PM

Originally posted by gabe

These idiots are trying to be funny. Jim Hettes was my remaining play in the contest. Riddle out, it makes sense of the money to be transfered to the other fighter in my contest who I had under $200 on.

You fools are trying to be funny when you didn't even have Riddle picked. At least you keep each other entertained. Retards.

You guys are such little bitches that you try to make a joke about it instead of acknolweging it'd be the fair move LOL wow-- i don't care, count Riddle as a loss and make me an extra -$240 for all i care. That just would have been the fair move. Anybody who thinks otherwise is being a bitch.

Bottom line is, if Riddle wasn't on the card, my money would have CLEARLY been on Hettes. These retards making unfunny jokes didn't even have him picked.

Don't make the fair move and move the money on Hettes. Doesn't make a difference for me, just shows what kind of pussies I'm dealing with.

All fights with Riddle picked should have money transferred to the next fighter picked with the least $ risk. Either that, or an automatic win, since Riddle still got his Win bonus. =)

How do we know that you wouldn't have found another spot on the card if Riddle wasn't available from the start? I had Riddle. My other two plays were $400 each on Gamburyan and Hettes. Should my remaining $200 go on Hettes or on Hendricks who I chose as a replacement before the fight took place?

**lucKO** · 12-31-11, 01:25 PM

Originally posted by gabe

These idiots are trying to be funny. Jim Hettes was my remaining play in the contest. Riddle out, it makes sense of the money to be transfered to the other fighter in my contest who I had under $200 on.

You fools are trying to be funny when you didn't even have Riddle picked. At least you keep each other entertained. Retards.

You guys are such little bitches that you try to make a joke about it instead of acknolweging it'd be the fair move LOL wow-- i don't care, count Riddle as a loss and make me an extra -$240 for all i care. That just would have been the fair move. Anybody who thinks otherwise is being a bitch.

Bottom line is, if Riddle wasn't on the card, my money would have CLEARLY been on Hettes. These retards making unfunny jokes didn't even have him picked.

Don't make the fair move and move the money on Hettes. Doesn't make a difference for me, just shows what kind of pussies I'm dealing with.

All fights with Riddle picked should have money transferred to the next fighter picked with the least $ risk. Either that, or an automatic win, since Riddle still got his Win bonus. =)

haha, CLEARLY

Vaughany if you could add me to the next contest as well

**Educ8d Degener8** · 12-31-11, 01:39 PM

Gabe, you bipolar brah?

**trevlyn1983** · 12-31-11, 03:03 PM

Just make it a no contest like a sportsbook would do ..Clearly it makes no since to put that money on another fighter that has won already .

**trevlyn1983** · 12-31-11, 03:05 PM

it split his bet among all his other bets evenly based on percentage .

**bogbat** · 12-31-11, 05:10 PM

Originally posted by trevlyn1983

it split his bet among all his other bets evenly based on percentage .

This, but accept replacement bets for those who placed them in time please.

**gabe** · 12-31-11, 06:24 PM

Originally posted by bogbat

How do we know that you wouldn't have found another spot on the card if Riddle wasn't available from the start? I had Riddle. My other two plays were $400 each on Gamburyan and Hettes. Should my remaining $200 go on Hettes or on Hendricks who I chose as a replacement before the fight took place?

Transferring 100 to each Gamburyan and Hettes would be the right move, in your case. Up an extra $95.

It can't be a no contest like it is with betting 'cos we only get 1k to use. Something like that effects the contest.

I didn't for a second think you guys would be fair and agree with me, but I had to say it, anyway.

**FightFightFight** · 12-31-11, 08:21 PM

Seems obvious its a push. Its a gambling forum after all. I mean, if I called 5dimes, and said you shouldve put my riddle money on hettes...
And certainly those that changed it before the first fight started should get the new bet.

**gabe** · 01-01-12, 08:32 PM

The only other fair move would be for everyone who had Riddle to have the $ risked on him transferred to the next card.

For example, I had $240 on Riddle, so for UFC 142, I'll have $1,240 to risk.

**Vitooch** · 01-01-12, 09:36 PM

Originally posted by gabe

The only other fair move would be for everyone who had Riddle to have the $ risked on him transferred to the next card.

For example, I had $240 on Riddle, so for UFC 142, I'll have $1,240 to risk.

I think Gabe is right

**RaiderNation MMA** · 01-01-12, 10:14 PM

is it too late to join?

**FightFightFight** · 01-01-12, 10:55 PM

Originally posted by Vitooch

I think Gabe is right

Ditto.

**bogbat** · 01-01-12, 11:10 PM

Originally posted by RaiderNation MMA

is it too late to join?

There's only one event left.

**Educ8d Degener8** · 01-01-12, 11:32 PM

Originally posted by Vitooch

I think Gabe is right

That's impossible.

**NunyaBidness** · 01-01-12, 11:40 PM

Originally posted by FightFightFight

Seems obvious its a push. Its a gambling forum after all. I mean, if I called 5dimes, and said you shouldve put my riddle money on hettes...
And certainly those that changed it before the first fight started should get the new bet.

I agree with this

**gabe** · 01-02-12, 12:04 AM

No, it doesn't seem obvious that it's a push. We're playing a contest, not making wagers. Having a fight not take place effects the contest. Not winning anything is almost like losing that bet, 'cos it hurts you in the contest.

**FightFightFight** · 01-02-12, 01:21 AM

Totally right. Very unexpectedly clear view of the situation.

**Kaladarus** · 01-02-12, 04:11 AM

Should have made a rule for this, but who would have known. For the others that bet during the event that is kind of against the rules as well, but we should definitely allow it in this spot. I think the best way to deal with this is to have the people that didn't chose a new play to carry over their Riddle bet amounts to the next event. If not maybe a portion of the Riddle bet amount. We can't assume anyone was going to play a certain fighter here even if that is what might be obvious to some. Like all betting and contests, small mistakes cause changes in results. We had posts in the past about having fighters names spelled wrong and the bets were cancelled. The books couldn't assume the obvious that the bet was made thinking the name was correct and not a different person. There's a reason people put smaller amounts on some fighters and if they had to chose a new fighter they might take someone with more juice rather than putting more on an underdog.

Basically, I agree with Gabe's new idea.

**Vaughany** · 01-02-12, 05:53 AM

Originally posted by FightFightFight

Totally right. Very unexpectedly clear view of the situation.

ha yeah that surprisingly might be the best suggestion

**Vaughany** · 01-03-12, 05:56 AM

Originally posted by gabe

The only other fair move would be for everyone who had Riddle to have the $ risked on him transferred to the next card.

For example, I had $240 on Riddle, so for UFC 142, I'll have $1,240 to risk.

So is everybody in agreement that we do what Gabe suggested above? For anybody that changed their Riddle or Ramos play before the event started then that will stand.

**The HOFF** · 01-03-12, 07:07 AM

I think moving the money bet on Riddle over to UFC 142 for everyone would be fair.

**JAKEPEAVY21** · 01-03-12, 10:08 AM

Originally posted by The HOFF

I think moving the money bet on Riddle over to UFC 142 for everyone would be fair.

agreed, this sounds like a fair solution

**bogbat** · 01-03-12, 11:40 AM

I changed my play after the event started but obviously before the fight I changed my play to started. I changed my play to Hendrix so I'd rather keep that play but it doesn't really matter (haha). When exactly was it announced that he pulled out of the fight anyway?