Sept 23 Ganchalysis: Early Plays and Leans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The HG
    SBR MVP
    • 11-01-06
    • 3566

    #1
    Sept 23 Ganchalysis: Early Plays and Leans
    Mets ML (-170), RL (-120), Over 10 (-115): The over just missed yesterday, but all the same factors hold here. Seddon is likely to be a bit of a sitting duck against the Mets. If Maine pitches well, the RL will be a likely win and the over will be a test. If Maine gets hit, the opposite will be the case, but both are reasonably likely to win IMO.


    KC ML (+230), Over 9 (-115): Verlander may well rebound from his last start with a shut-down outing here, but he tired at the end of last season, and the chances that that may happen again makes this huge dog line too high to pass up. If Verlander is a bit off, the over is very likely to come in, but even if he isn't, Detroit is entirely capable of getting to 9 all by themselves.


    Boston ML (-170), RL (-115): Wakefield has had a few rough starts in a row, but his dominance at Tropicana is attributable to real factors, and I think he is likely to have another high-quality start. Even if he doesn't, Jackson looks like he may be reverting back to his old disastrous form, and he may well get hit hard here. His September has been awful so far, even worse than any of his early season months when he was possibly the worst regular starter in the majors.


    Houston ML (-155), Over 8.5 (-110): Houston has some solid bats in their lineup as the season winds down, and they should be able to get to Wellemeyer, who wasn't terribly effective as a starter. If Houston gets 4, one of these will win, but I think there is value with both.


    Bal/Tex Over 10 (-120): Texas day games have trended under this year, but I think that is anomalous. The pitching here just isn't too solid in general, and the runs are more likely to reach double digits than not IMO.


    Cincinnati ML (-155), Under 8.5 (-105): Harang is likely to have a strong start, and Cincinnati may have a hard time getting most of this total on their own. If the game goes over, it is much more likely to result in a Cincy win than an SF win, but I see both bets as having value.
  • The HG
    SBR MVP
    • 11-01-06
    • 3566

    #2
    Philly ML (-185): Washington is sending out a seriously depleted lineup today, if Hamels is close to his normal self Washington should have a tough time scoring as long as he is in.
    Comment
    • moses millsap
      SBR Hall of Famer
      • 08-25-05
      • 8289

      #3
      Lots of chalk. Good luck sir.
      Comment
      • The HG
        SBR MVP
        • 11-01-06
        • 3566

        #4
        Oakland ML (+180), RL (-115), Under 10 (-105): Braden has legitimate ability, and the Oakland lines are too high IMO. Oakland should be competitive in this one and stay close down to the wire. The extreme under trend for Jacobs' Field day games this year is a bit anomalous IMO, but this is still a pretty high total considering the solid pitching and weather conditions involved.
        Comment
        • moses millsap
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 08-25-05
          • 8289

          #5
          Do you still favor the over in Detroit with the lineup Leyland put out there?
          Comment
          • dwaechte
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 08-27-07
            • 5481

            #6
            I agree with the Houston ML. Oswalt is consistent as they come.
            Comment
            • pokernut9999
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 07-25-07
              • 12757

              #7
              16 picks and 1 winner
              Comment
              • RickySteve
                Restricted User
                • 01-31-06
                • 3415

                #8
                Originally posted by pokernut9999
                16 picks and 1 winner
                No.

                3-12-1, -12.5 units
                Comment
                • Art Vandeleigh
                  SBR MVP
                  • 12-31-06
                  • 1494

                  #9
                  If you're going to correlate this much, ya just might get burned occasionally.

                  Risking 3.2 units in the Oak/Cle game where a team that had 91 wins going into the game, Cleveland, has to be held to 3 or fewer runs to win all three wagers. One big inning by Cleveland (a not too hard to believe 4 run 4th inning) was all that was needed mess that game up.

                  Cin/SF game seemed to be handicapped well, but there again one big Giant inning and (an improbable 5 run 6th to go along with seven other scoreless innings) took care of another 2.6 units.

                  Cardinals scoring 3 in the bottom of the 9th. Over had no chance, but that was a tough beat.

                  If someone followed all 16 wagers, several of which were correlated, blindly, then they are truly gamblers and need to expect days like this. Ganchrow HG analysis is always appreciated, bet 'em all at your own risk.
                  Comment
                  • The HG
                    SBR MVP
                    • 11-01-06
                    • 3566

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Art Vandeleigh
                    If you're going to correlate this much, ya just might get burned occasionally.

                    Risking 3.2 units in the Oak/Cle game where a team that had 91 wins going into the game, Cleveland, has to be held to 3 or fewer runs to win all three wagers. One big inning by Cleveland (a not too hard to believe 4 run 4th inning) was all that was needed mess that game up.

                    Cin/SF game seemed to be handicapped well, but there again one big Giant inning and (an improbable 5 run 6th to go along with seven other scoreless innings) took care of another 2.6 units.

                    Cardinals scoring 3 in the bottom of the 9th. Over had no chance, but that was a tough beat.

                    If someone followed all 16 wagers, several of which were correlated, blindly, then they are truly gamblers and need to expect days like this. Ganchrow HG analysis is always appreciated, bet 'em all at your own risk.
                    Yeah sorry if anyone was actually swayed by anything I picked on this day (I would be surprised if that were the case). I write this stuff to have discussions and also to solidify my own opinions, I find it enjoyable and helpful to have to write out this stuff.

                    It's neither exactly nor all of what I bet, although I never write anything that I don't at least intend to bet. But the Houston over for instance, was a terrible pick, I recognized that instantly, I didn't bet it, I guess I should have deleted it. I don't come back and update every change of opinion because I don't think anyone follows that closely.

                    The Cincy under I took at 9, something I often do when I take unders at 8.5 when I assess low volatility.

                    And of course, the games where I picked both the ML and the RL doesn't mean I bet double on that game, just that I think both have value worth noting. But again I write this stuff to talk about it, not to make anyone think I'm a great capper.

                    Also the Oak/Cle game was a +RL, not a negative RL obviously. All three could have won with Cle getting 4, and 2 could have won with Cle getting 5.


                    Maybe next year I'll address more unit size and volatility stuff instead of just making generic picks, that's the fun part of baseball capping.

                    Embarrassing day though, damn. I'm gonna make it up today though! Just watch! Only 7 games but I'll go like 8-2 or something like that. Watch!
                    Comment
                    SBR Contests
                    Collapse
                    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                    Collapse
                    Working...