MLB - Wednesday, 9/19/12

[LT Profits]

3 MLB Plays Wednesday


Brewers / Pirates UNDER 8 -110 (5 Dimes)
Twins / Indians UNDER 9 -110 (5 Dimes)
Rangers +111 (5 Dimes)


YTD: 341-305-25, +47.75

[vigster]

love the rangers play.

gl

Adding BALT ML +136

[LT Profits]

2 EARLY Additions

3 MLB Plays Wednesday


Brewers / Pirates UNDER 8 -110 (5 Dimes)
Twins / Indians UNDER 9 -110 (5 Dimes)
Rangers +111 (5 Dimes)


YTD: 341-305-25, +47.75

Adding:

Blue Jays / Yankees UNDER 9.5 -122 (Game 1) (5 Dimes)
Blue Jays / Yankees RHE UNDER 29.5 -120 (Game 1) (Heritage)

Probably one more update coming

[AceKingHigh]

Good luck my friend, ttttaililinnggggg

[HoulihansTX]

yea Pirates unders look tasty. Horrific lineup, and bullpen is still a strength.

[LT Profits]

BIG MLB 10-Pack

Brewers / Pirates UNDER 8 -110 (5 Dimes)
Twins / Indians UNDER 9 -110 (5 Dimes)
Rangers +111 (5 Dimes)
Blue Jays / Yankees UNDER 9.5 -122 (Game 1) (5 Dimes)
Blue Jays / Yankees RHE UNDER 29.5 -120 (Game 1) (Heritage)


YTD: 341-305-25, +47.75

Adding:

Athletics +156 (Rebate Wager)
Reds / Cubs UNDER 14 -117 (5 Dimes)
Rangers / Angels RHE OVER 27 -110 (Rebate Wager)
Orioles / Mariners UNDER 6.5 -110 (5 Dimes)
Rockies / Giants Score 1st inning YES +120 (Rebate Wager)


MLB Card complete

[BamaCBass]

Hey LT, where do you think that Cubs total should be? Seems like a disproportionate number of totals like this are easy overs.

[mitch51]

Thanks LT...

[fitguy67]

Hey LT,

Important Money-Management Q for you...right now you've got 8 remaining MLB plays locked in (btw, congrats on the two TOR/NYY winners!)...and 9 Football plays (2 college/7 pro) also locked in (1 NFL will be settled tomorrow, 2 CF on Sat, and 6 NFL on Sun)...

**You've stated often that a unit for you is 2.5% of bankroll. I've always assumed that this means each play represents 1/40th or 2.5% of your total-bank for ALL sports...in this case the 17 units yet-to-be-settled represent a bit over 42.5% of your total all-sports bankroll...

****It has recently occurred to me that you instead might mean that a unit is 2.5% of each "sport-specific" (or "segregated") bankroll. Meaning u'd have about 20% of your MLB-bank tied up with your 8 open MLB plays, about 5% of your CF-bank tied up in your two open CF plays, and about 17.5% of your NFL-bank tied up in your 7 open NFL plays.

The $-size of the open-play "footprint" is much larger in the case of the former (total-bank based units) definition, than in the latter (segregated-bank based units) case. If your "2.5% units" were based separately on each sport's specific bank, the total $ amounts in play right now would be considerably smaller...eg. if each sport had an even one-third of the total-bank...then each unit would really represent just about 0.833%...and the 17 outstanding plays would tie up just 14.17%...not 42.5% of one's total betting funds.
_____________

I've assumed right along that your unit-size definition is based on one's TOTAL bank...is this right (or have u defined your units in relation to each sport's specific sub-account)?

[LT Profits]

Hey LT,

Important Money-Management Q for you...right now you've got 8 remaining MLB plays locked in (btw, congrats on the two TOR/NYY winners!)...and 9 Football plays (2 college/7 pro) also locked in (1 NFL will be settled tomorrow, 2 CF on Sat, and 6 NFL on Sun)...

**You've stated often that a unit for you is 2.5% of bankroll. I've always assumed that this means each play represents 1/40th or 2.5% of your total-bank for ALL sports...in this case the 17 units yet-to-be-settled represent a bit over 42.5% of your total all-sports bankroll...

****It has recently occurred to me that you instead might mean that a unit is 2.5% of each "sport-specific" (or "segregated") bankroll. Meaning u'd have about 20% of your MLB-bank tied up with your 8 open MLB plays, about 5% of your CF-bank tied up in your two open CF plays, and about 17.5% of your NFL-bank tied up in your 7 open NFL plays.

The $-size of the open-play "footprint" is much larger in the case of the former (total-bank based units) definition, than in the latter (segregated-bank based units) case. If your "2.5% units" were based separately on each sport's specific bank, the total $ amounts in play right now would be considerably smaller...eg. if each sport had an even one-third of the total-bank...then each unit would really represent just about 0.833%...and the 17 outstanding plays would tie up just 14.17%...not 42.5% of one's total betting funds.
_____________

I've assumed right along that your unit-size definition is based on one's TOTAL bank...is this right (or have u defined your units in relation to each sport's specific sub-account)?

What you do is obviously up to you, but I personally do not segregate by sport and look at it as one big bankroll. It would take about 40 plays to have my entire BR in play.

[LT Profits]

And as Meat Loaf once sang, 7 out of 10 ain't bad.

[BamaCBass]

Meat Loaf was understating. Awesome job!