Has there ever been a Wild Card weekend where all 4 games were won by the road teams?

[playersonly69]

Seems that all 4 road teams could easily win this weekend

[JayDr3am]

but we both know that's not gonna happen..

[El Nino]

2-2 Vikes and Redskins win.

[RickyRoma]

Washington and Texans most likely to win IMO. But maybe only Texans pull it off

[NavsPicks]

In my opinion there's a better chance of all the home teams winning.

[thechaoz]

Seattle is not losing to the Vikings

[NavsPicks]

Seattle is not losing to the Vikings

Meh gun to my head id rather back all 4 home teams.

That being said, don't plan on betting anything on most of these games. Razor sharp lines

[matrix1022]

Here in Vegas. Most games 50/50 with spread. Closest in a while here. Usually there's one game 65 /35. Not this time

[jjgold]

I think 2-2

Nobody knows because if we did you would bet $50,000 a game

[PorkChop]

Bengals will be lone winner.

[JameisBrady]

2-2 Vikes and Redskins win.

This.

Cringing and laughing at the welfare cheats picking seattle.

[JMon]

Not since 2002, don't know about before. A few 3-1's. Interesting there has only been 12 wild card road favs since 2002. They are 8-4 SU and 6-4-2 ATS.

[rake922]

Bengals will be lone winner.

Okay

[innovation]

skins moving to a dog was the kiss of death for pack

[rake922]

skins moving to a dog was the kiss of death for pack

whys that

[innovation]

I doubt sharps jumped early on skins as a small fave.....and the public that did is shitting their pants right now

[rake922]

I doubt sharps jumped early on skins as a small fave.....and the public that did is shitting their pants right now

This isn't a reason to shit your pants dude.

[LT Profits]

No never. Closest was 2 years ago when Chiefs blew 38-10 lead at Indianapolis and lost 45-44, and then the other three road teams all won (Saints at Philly, Chargers at Cincy, 49ers at Green Bay).

[frostno98]

Play underdogs and the Under in the 1st round if you want to win. The next round is anyone's game.

[LT Profits]

Play underdogs and the Under in the 1st round if you want to win. The next round is anyone's game.

Meh. Underdogs are 27-25 ATS during wild card round since conferences went to 4 divisions in 2002. Under has done much better though, 29-22-1, 56.9%.

[Renegades]

Agreed WC round is usually unders

[Renegades]

Game is played much different in the playoffs. The team with the lead takes the air out of the ball real early in the 4th qtr

[klemopixx]

Andy Reid usually plays it close to the vest in the playoffs, but this team is good enough grind out a win in that style. All comes down to how well Hoyer can run that offense against the Chiefs D. One of the best matchups if you ask me. The other home team I like is the Skins. Cousins is playing well enough to hang with Rodgers. Key to this game will be if the Packers can get the running game going. If its just Rodgers throwing all day then they'll be in trouble, that WR corps is not up to its usual standards.

[slacker00]

Not since 2002, don't know about before. A few 3-1's. Interesting there has only been 12 wild card road favs since 2002. They are 8-4 SU and 6-4-2 ATS.

I'm seeing 7-5 SU and 5-6-1 ATS. The 5 SU losers: 2010Saints, 2011Steelers, 2008Colts, 2013Chiefs, 2009Packers.

[TheMoneyShot]

Andy Reid usually plays it close to the vest in the playoffs, but this team is good enough grind out a win in that style. All comes down to how well Hoyer can run that offense against the Chiefs D. One of the best matchups if you ask me. The other home team I like is the Skins. Cousins is playing well enough to hang with Rodgers. Key to this game will be if the Packers can get the running game going. If its just Rodgers throwing all day then they'll be in trouble, that WR corps is not up to its usual standards.

Andy Reid has a LARGE HISTORY of playing conservative playoff games. Even though Houston's QB position is junk... maybe the defense can hold them in? I think that's why Vegas is having problems with this game. Game could easily land on 3. Setting the line at 3.5 and everyone might start tilting Houston. I'm sure they don't want pushes.

[The Giant]

Meh. Underdogs are 27-25 ATS during wild card round since conferences went to 4 divisions in 2002. Under has done much better though, 29-22-1, 56.9%.

How can you meh over 54.4%?

[POOLSIDE]

How can you meh over 54.4%?

54.4% on a sample size that small, where one game having a different outcome could bring it down to 50%, is nothing to not scoff at.

[LT Profits]

Not since 2002, don't know about before. A few 3-1's. Interesting there has only been 12 wild card road favs since 2002. They are 8-4 SU and 6-4-2 ATS.

Favored SIX-seeds are 3-0 SU and ATS in Wild Card Round and 6-1 SU and ATS throughout playoffs (including 2-0 in Super Bowl)

[innovation]

Favored SIX-seeds are 3-0 SU and ATS in Wild Card Round and 6-1 SU and ATS throughout playoffs (including 2-0 in Super Bowl)

Did you take any futures?

the divisional late Sunday game has been a dog lovers heaven last decade, if Pitt beats cincy the +500 to win conf champ is worth a poke....

hawks +320 a much tougher road to blaze imo

[LT Profits]

Did you take any futures?

the divisional late Sunday game has been a dog lovers heaven last decade, if Pitt beats cincy the +500 to win conf champ is worth a poke....

hawks +320 a much tougher road to blaze imo

I feel it is just the opposite, I think Seahawks are one of the best 3 or 4 teams in the NFL right now despite their seeding. The Steelers could be out this week with no DeAngelo and suspect defense. Offense may have peaked too early, Pitt did not look good the last two weeks.

[JMon]

I'm seeing 7-5 SU and 5-6-1 ATS. The 5 SU losers: 2010Saints, 2011Steelers, 2008Colts, 2013Chiefs, 2009Packers.

Looks like you're right. I must have a bad recorded line. Did by chance Chiefs open as dogs? I don't recall

[innovation]

I feel it is just the opposite, I think Seahawks are one of the best 3 or 4 teams in the NFL right now despite their seeding. The Steelers could be out this week with no DeAngelo and suspect defense. Offense may have peaked too early, Pitt did not look good the last two weeks.

thats because you're not a cards homer

ive already posted why I liked bungholes in another thread but if steelers get past them....despite the recent history of them potentially going to the best two home field win % teams den/ne....I think the 3 of those best teams in NFL you are referring to reside in the NFC this year....who ever comes out of that conference will have earned it, hopefully they won't be to banged up, come the big dance

[TheMoneyShot]

I feel it is just the opposite, I think Seahawks are one of the best 3 or 4 teams in the NFL right now despite their seeding. The Steelers could be out this week with no DeAngelo and suspect defense. Offense may have peaked too early, Pitt did not look good the last two weeks.

Even though Pittsburgh may not have a running game... Ben is throwing the ball "Brady-like" better than ever. Not saying Cincinnati won't have a defense to prevent this.... but if Ben has to throw 50+ times in this game... he will. It's just a matter of how precise he is. Even with no RB... still a coin flip game. To me... still a hard game to choose either way...

[slacker00]

How can you meh over 54.4%?

Run that thru your calculator again. 27-25 ATS = 51.9%

[d2bets]

I'd be very surprised if all 4 road teams won. Probably go 2-2.