Rosol just dropped three spots in the rankings

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yisman
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 09-01-08
    • 75682

    #1
    Rosol just dropped three spots in the rankings
    I have to admit, it's pretty funny. Obviously he doesn't get any more credit for beating Nadal than anyone would for winning in the second, but:



    Date Singles Doubles
    09.07.2012 103 106
    25.06.2012 100 120
    18.06.2012 100 119
    11.06.2012 101 118
    28.05.2012 79 122
    21.05.2012 78 122
    14.05.2012 91 121
    07.05.2012 93 135
    30.04.2012 79 129
    23.04.2012 79 121
    16.04.2012 80 122
    09.04.2012 81 121
    02.04.2012 82 122
    19.03.2012 83 108
    05.03.2012 84 106
    27.02.2012 96 106
    20.02.2012 79 107
    13.02.2012 77 112
    06.02.2012 78 106
    30.01.2012 81 109
    16.01.2012 69 110
    [quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
    [/quote]

    [quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
  • yisman
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 09-01-08
    • 75682

    #2
    He was actually ranked 65th in August 2011.
    [quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
    [/quote]

    [quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
    Comment
    • Sport_Fish
      SBR MVP
      • 12-06-10
      • 4079

      #3
      I hope Federer gave Rosol a thank you call after yesterday's win.

      He made all this possible.
      Comment
      • yisman
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 09-01-08
        • 75682

        #4
        beat Nadal, and your reward is to drop out of the top 100.

        I wonder if Rosol is going to be able to capitalize on this at all. People now have heard of him, I guess.
        [quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
        [/quote]

        [quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
        Comment
        • Sport_Fish
          SBR MVP
          • 12-06-10
          • 4079

          #5
          It def should give him alot of confidence....clearly has talent to be much better than a 100 ranked opponent...

          One of the players we'll have to keep an eye on in the coming months.
          Comment
          • SBR Lou
            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
            • 08-02-07
            • 37863

            #6
            Originally posted by Sport_Fish
            I hope Federer gave Rosol a thank you call after yesterday's win.

            He made all this possible.
            Nadal wouldn't have beaten Fed Djokovic or even Murray in all likelihood.
            Comment
            • JNic
              SBR MVP
              • 01-03-10
              • 4272

              #7
              Originally posted by SBR Lou
              Nadal wouldn't have beaten Fed Djokovic or even Murray in all likelihood.
              That's an overreaction, the grass slowed down as the tourney progresses and Nadal is Federer's nightmare
              Comment
              • SBR Lou
                BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                • 08-02-07
                • 37863

                #8
                Originally posted by JNic
                That's an overreaction, the grass slowed down as the tourney progresses and Nadal is Federer's nightmare
                Federer has been the best player in the world since last year's US Open.

                He'll retire with at least 20 slams.
                Comment
                • PharaohUB
                  SBR MVP
                  • 01-23-07
                  • 4865

                  #9
                  Any shot at winning Mercedes against a not very impressive field? How is he on clay? 50-1 odds on Rosol or would I be throwing my money away?
                  Comment
                  • yisman
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 09-01-08
                    • 75682

                    #10
                    Originally posted by SBR Lou
                    Federer has been the best player in the world since last year's US Open.
                    I'd go with Djokovic. Federer has only made three GS finals in 2010-2012. One in 2010, one in 2011, and one in 2012. Including smaller tournaments, it would be difficult to make the case for Federer.

                    He'll retire with at least 20 slams.
                    I'd bet heavily on the under.
                    [quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
                    [/quote]

                    [quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
                    Comment
                    • greenhippo
                      SBR Hall of Famer
                      • 02-15-12
                      • 9091

                      #11
                      Yis I was looking back and I think I still owed you 2 from my betting thread.
                      Comment
                      • SBR Lou
                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                        • 08-02-07
                        • 37863

                        #12
                        Originally posted by yisman


                        I'd bet heavily on the under.
                        You realize he has 17, right? He'll play another 4-5 years.
                        Comment
                        • yisman
                          SBR Aristocracy
                          • 09-01-08
                          • 75682

                          #13
                          Originally posted by SBR Lou
                          You realize he has 17, right? He'll play another 4-5 years.
                          Yes, I know how many he has. I'd gladly bet under 20.

                          How long he plays is not what's relevant. The question is how long he'll be an elite player. I'd wager that's less than 4-5 years.
                          [quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
                          [/quote]

                          [quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
                          Comment
                          • Sport_Fish
                            SBR MVP
                            • 12-06-10
                            • 4079

                            #14
                            Originally posted by SBR Lou
                            Nadal wouldn't have beaten Fed Djokovic or even Murray in all likelihood.
                            Well, you can argue that Murray would've beaten Nadal to get to the finals because 'Nadal lost to Rosol'. But I simply don't believe that. Nadal is NOT a bad grass player, granted it may not be his best surface. But don't forget he has had success in this Slam. And the only reason Nadal lost was because Rosol played some of the most ridiculous tennis I've ever seen anyone play - the way he played that 5th set, he was playing as if he was the best Tennis player on tour. If Nadal had made it, I'm fairly certain he would've gotten through Murray, because as well as Murray had played, he would still not have played like Rosol did in that set (which is the only way Nadal would've been out).

                            And then, Fed would still make it to the finals because he beats Djoker but then he sets up a final against Nadal lol....and I don't think I have to even say what would happen there. Bottom line, Federer just can't beat Nadal in best of 5's, he plays like a little girl against him. Can't even remember how long it was since it happened.
                            Comment
                            • yisman
                              SBR Aristocracy
                              • 09-01-08
                              • 75682

                              #15
                              Fed used to be able to beat Nadal in GSs. I think he could still do it.

                              I'd discard clay because that's not really the issue (Nadal owns everyone at RG).

                              Federer is 2-3 career vs. Rafa other than RG. Rafa beat him in 2012, 2009, and 2008. All were tightly contested matches. Federer won in 2006 and 2007.
                              [quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
                              [/quote]

                              [quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
                              Comment
                              SBR Contests
                              Collapse
                              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                              Collapse
                              Working...