Murray Will Be Number 1 Within 1 Year

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jjgold
    replied
    JJ you know the game

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • beefcake
    replied
    Hey he beat Nick the dikk today.If he can beat Berrentini tomm he might be seeded for wimbledon!

    Leave a comment:


  • Brock Landers
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer
    What happened to Murray?
    Hip injury, he accomplished a ton for a while

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    Originally posted by jjgold
    I thought Del Potro would be the new number 1 but watching Murray he has the whole package and unreal court speed. Fed was hammering the corners and Murray got to most of him. If he won third set I think he would of won match.
    What happened to Murray?

    Leave a comment:


  • Seto
    replied
    Originally posted by jjgold
    I think Murray win 2 grand slams after I started this thread

    Tsonga a failure his whole career
    Yeah and he's still only 27 so I guess he has time.

    Tsonga has become such a joke it's sad. Him and Berdych are the 2 biggest jokes on tour as of now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Seto
    replied
    Originally posted by yisman
    I'd probably rather win the GS, but the truth is it's more difficult to maintain excellence over a year (consistently reaching semis), than it is to win one GS tournament.


    Before Federer/Nadal/Djokovic took over, you had several guys win a major without ever being number 1, and recently we've had del Potro and Murray.
    I somewhat agree but seeing Wozniacki be world number 1 for basically 2 years reaching 1 grand slam semi and 0 finals in those 2 years completely discredited the whole concept of being #1 for me (and people like Federer and Serena would agree with me). Not to mention all the other series of losers we had as #1s (Ivanovic, Jankovic...) Now I understand that's the WTA and only big time guys have been #1 in the ATP in recent memory but still, to me the rankings are pretty much just what determines who gets easier draws in slams.

    Leave a comment:


  • thirtytwo
    replied
    Originally posted by yisman
    Still waiting on this and the other thread:

    http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...etro-09-a.html
    del petro

    Leave a comment:


  • yisman
    replied
    Originally posted by jjgold
    I think Murray win 2 grand slams after I started this thread

    Tsonga a failure his whole career
    It wasn't whether Murray will win a grand slam. I thought that was pretty obvious, and I said he would.

    It was whether he'd be number 1. Much more difficult than winning a grand slam.

    Originally posted by Seto
    Looks like it may never happen for Andy.

    I'm not too upset about it tbh, winning slams is way more important than being #1. The whole concept of being #1 was kinda ruined when we had a succession of losers being #1 in the WTA 3-5 years ago. I guess it still somewhat has prestige in the mens' game but I'd rather win 1 slam and be #3 for the year than make 3 slam finals and win 3 Masters 1000 and be #1 for the year (random example).
    I'd probably rather win the GS, but the truth is it's more difficult to maintain excellence over a year (consistently reaching semis), than it is to win one GS tournament.


    Before Federer/Nadal/Djokovic took over, you had several guys win a major without ever being number 1, and recently we've had del Potro and Murray.

    Leave a comment:


  • jjgold
    replied
    I think Murray win 2 grand slams after I started this thread

    Tsonga a failure his whole career

    Leave a comment:


  • Seto
    replied
    Looks like it may never happen for Andy.

    I'm not too upset about it tbh, winning slams is way more important than being #1. The whole concept of being #1 was kinda ruined when we had a succession of losers being #1 in the WTA 3-5 years ago. I guess it still somewhat has prestige in the mens' game but I'd rather win 1 slam and be #3 for the year than make 3 slam finals and win 3 Masters 1000 and be #1 for the year (random example).

    Leave a comment:


  • EmpireMaker
    replied
    4 years

    Leave a comment:


  • yisman
    replied
    Still waiting on this and the other thread:

    Leave a comment:


  • matt1216
    replied
    ​Andy was number 2 in spring 2013

    Leave a comment:


  • homie1975
    replied
    Djoko had 5 of his 6 slams while Andy was getting 2. Rafa had 4 of his 13 slams during that time

    Leave a comment:


  • yisman
    replied
    Originally posted by rankslash
    Murray was number 2 (behind Federer) in August 2009. He was 22 years old at the time.
    Yes, I am aware of that. Please re-read what I wrote.

    Leave a comment:


  • rankslash
    replied
    Originally posted by yisman
    Since you posted this four years ago, I don't think he's been ranked higher than third.

    del Potro was never ranked higher than fourth.
    Murray was number 2 (behind Federer) in August 2009. He was 22 years old at the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • JustSomeCash
    replied
    NBA....Tennis....

    This man talking bullshit anywhere, anytime....

    just wow...each penetrating thread, not even close to shit, and has no clue

    How can you be so disaster

    Leave a comment:


  • yisman
    replied
    Since you posted this four years ago, I don't think he's been ranked higher than third.

    del Potro was never ranked higher than fourth.

    Leave a comment:


  • jjgold
    replied
    2 majors
    Gold medal
    Dead on

    Leave a comment:


  • yisman
    replied
    Originally posted by jjgold
    I thought Del Potro would be the new number 1 but watching Murray he has the whole package and unreal court speed.


    ...

    Leave a comment:


  • yisman
    replied
    Originally posted by yisman
    nole?

    I like Murray and Djokovic the most because of what they have proven and because of their age.

    Del Potro and Cilic could be up there, but the next year should tell the story.

    Then there will be new youngsters on the rise.

    bumping my old Djokovic posts.




    Originally posted by yisman
    don't sleep on Djokovic. I'm feeling a breakthrough one of these days.

    Maybe Ball covers, but I see Djoker advancing deep.
    http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/216442-djokovic-vs-federer-post2142522.html#post2142522

    Leave a comment:


  • Smoke
    replied
    27K on OKC thunder after game 1 in finals

    How'd that go for you??????????? huh

    Leave a comment:


  • Smoke
    replied
    How'd that go for you??????????? huh

    Leave a comment:


  • Smoke
    replied
    Derrick Rose will never be a dominant player

    Leave a comment:


  • jjgold
    replied
    He wins this I will be right again

    So close already

    I am sharpest tennis guy here

    Leave a comment:


  • yisman
    replied
    Another good one...

    Leave a comment:


  • yisman
    replied
    Originally posted by jjgold
    I thought Del Potro would be the new number 1 but watching Murray he has the whole package and unreal court speed. Fed was hammering the corners and Murray got to most of him. If he won third set I think he would of won match.
    Coach knows his tennis!

    Leave a comment:


  • shari91
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • beefcake
    replied
    Go get it Gold!

    Leave a comment:


  • jjgold
    replied
    Shari you love gossip

    I also do not know where you are telling people am fukkin you

    I AM NOT...well not yet

    Leave a comment:


  • shari91
    replied
    Originally posted by TennisProFrance
    Djokovic and his best mate (and best man at his wedding) Murray will have some interesting battles over the next 12 months for sure, they will probably pull away now. Murray needs to overcome his choking in slam finals but if he can do this he can start to establish himself as number 1 in time. Djokovic may take time to regain his level, Nadal may never regain it and Fed. is probably behind the curve right now. Interesting times.
    Not his best man. Silly rumour. But I do think Murray has a good chance of becoming #2 unless Nadal pulls it together.

    From his press conference today:

    Q. Rumors that Djokovic is going to have his wedding very soon and named you as the best man of his wedding.
    ANDY MURRAY: No, he hasn’t. I don’t know where that came from.

    Q. That’s not true?
    ANDY MURRAY: No.

    Leave a comment:


  • TennisProFrance
    replied
    Djokovic and his best mate (and best man at his wedding) Murray will have some interesting battles over the next 12 months for sure, they will probably pull away now. Murray needs to overcome his choking in slam finals but if he can do this he can start to establish himself as number 1 in time. Djokovic may take time to regain his level, Nadal may never regain it and Fed. is probably behind the curve right now. Interesting times.

    Leave a comment:


  • jjgold
    replied
    I might be a 1yr off

    He is COMING

    Leave a comment:


  • HeeeHAWWWW
    replied
    Murray only played about 2 more good tournaments the entire rest of the year :-) Pretty much tanked the rest.

    He was actually nearer in Wimbledon 2009 - was only two matches away from number 1 then. Now with Nadal back and hoovering up 5k points on clay alone, it's basically impossible for anyone else to pass him.

    Leave a comment:


  • yisman
    replied
    jj, considering Murray hasn't even really moved up in the rankings since then, I'd say you were off by a lot.

    Leave a comment:

Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...