I seldom start threads...but thought i'd put these out there for a larger audience who might not frequent the threads i usually haunt (shouts to Kenz, Eaglesphan36, and Hardcoar)...i got both of these not long ago at Pinnacle, but similar odds exist elsewhere...see http://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/tennis/
__________________
most appealing value-dog play on tomoro's WTA card by far to me is Garcia over Arad...at 3.87/+287 (implied odds required to break even just 25.8%)...thing to note is that Garcia is decidedly non-French (neither a choker like the men, nor an easily distracted head-case like Alize)...despite the Arad-loving odds, Garcia has at least as good a chance as Kuznetsova who had triple-break point a few days ago before pulling an MMMm (Mannarino-Monfils-Mahut meltdown) and letting ARad off the hook
and if you prefer REAL tennis...Deliciano at 6.84/+584 over Nishikori...no way he's got a less than 14.6% chance of winning...these two guys h2h record is dead even...they've alternated straight-setting each other over the last few years...JapMaster won their last meeting in Japan...so it's Lopez' "turn" and playing in his home country of Spain would make it all the more fitting
____________
and before any adolescents want to tell me that they'll probably lose...OF COURSE THEY'RE LIKELY TO (AKA. ARE "PROBABLY GOING TO") LOSE...THEY'RE DOGS!!!...If someone recommending plays he "doesn't think will" WIN (ie. he actually KNOWS they have a less than 50% probability or "chance" of winning) is puzzling to you...do yourself a favor and read this lengthy post by yours truly explaining in detail exactly why I bet on Junior dosSantos a few months ago over CainVelasquez knowing full well he'd much more likely lose than win...AND why you must learn to recognize and submit counter-intuitive bets like this...because OVER TIME they are money-makers (aka. are +expected value)...hmmm...let me find the damn thing now
hmmm...search "eating spinach" (cuz that's what taking value bets are like)
__________________
most appealing value-dog play on tomoro's WTA card by far to me is Garcia over Arad...at 3.87/+287 (implied odds required to break even just 25.8%)...thing to note is that Garcia is decidedly non-French (neither a choker like the men, nor an easily distracted head-case like Alize)...despite the Arad-loving odds, Garcia has at least as good a chance as Kuznetsova who had triple-break point a few days ago before pulling an MMMm (Mannarino-Monfils-Mahut meltdown) and letting ARad off the hook
and if you prefer REAL tennis...Deliciano at 6.84/+584 over Nishikori...no way he's got a less than 14.6% chance of winning...these two guys h2h record is dead even...they've alternated straight-setting each other over the last few years...JapMaster won their last meeting in Japan...so it's Lopez' "turn" and playing in his home country of Spain would make it all the more fitting
____________
and before any adolescents want to tell me that they'll probably lose...OF COURSE THEY'RE LIKELY TO (AKA. ARE "PROBABLY GOING TO") LOSE...THEY'RE DOGS!!!...If someone recommending plays he "doesn't think will" WIN (ie. he actually KNOWS they have a less than 50% probability or "chance" of winning) is puzzling to you...do yourself a favor and read this lengthy post by yours truly explaining in detail exactly why I bet on Junior dosSantos a few months ago over CainVelasquez knowing full well he'd much more likely lose than win...AND why you must learn to recognize and submit counter-intuitive bets like this...because OVER TIME they are money-makers (aka. are +expected value)...hmmm...let me find the damn thing now
hmmm...search "eating spinach" (cuz that's what taking value bets are like)