In the think tank there is a very interesting discussion on how the books distribute the juice. There is a very interesting notion there that the books put a lot of the juice on a big dog.
These are common in tennis and I was wondering if your stats/experience show that backing all big dogs +900 and over is very unprofitable?
I'm asking because the first betting system I've developed is regularly steering me on big dogs (not always but it happens often enough). If I can improve it by removing 900+ dogs in tennis or other sports or require a larger edge, that would be a great help.
The discussion was about Pinnacle lines in particular but if you have a lot of relevant experience at other books, it's very interesting as well.
These are common in tennis and I was wondering if your stats/experience show that backing all big dogs +900 and over is very unprofitable?
I'm asking because the first betting system I've developed is regularly steering me on big dogs (not always but it happens often enough). If I can improve it by removing 900+ dogs in tennis or other sports or require a larger edge, that would be a great help.
The discussion was about Pinnacle lines in particular but if you have a lot of relevant experience at other books, it's very interesting as well.