risking 20$ to win 350$~ not bad right? I like this play.
-
-
In this case you are risking $20 to win 0. Cibulkova might win but Wavrinka won't.Comment -
I like Wawrinka's chances but concerning Ciblukova, I doubt she will be able to compete against Na Li. Let's see what happens next! GLComment -
Well we will have to wait and see but I like both of there chance's to upset. Remember Wawrinka beat fricking Djokovic who was playing 100% healthy. He beat a better-than-last year berdych. He has a great shot to win.
Cibulkova is younger, fitter, and is playing great tennis and I think that will be a great match.Comment -
I think wawa at plus 2.5 sets at -120 is god damn pound able. Nadal wins but wawa to get 1 set at those odds I want to hit it so hard so bad but I hate going against Nadal!Comment -
Agree on this one.Comment -
Li Na is not losing u guys, use your head and look at the matchup compared to the other opponents she played. 3rd time here as wellComment -
I agree, Matt.
Li Na lost as an underdog to Cljisters and Azarenka in three sets in her two previous attempts. I can't remember exactly, but weren't there outside reasons as to why she lost these? I.E. She got inured in one, fell at a crucial time in another, had a ball call go against her at a pivotal time when she was in full control of the point and it had to be replayed?
The fact she is now favourite, has the experience, and the likelihood she won't face the same bad luck for a third time makes her at the correct odds.
Wawrinka should be $4. I don't think he will win, but he is better than a 17% chance of winning.Comment -
Nadal will make an example out of wawrinka. Djokovic was good, but not at his best vs wawrinka.Dont get me wrong wawrinka has played great and has excellent skill, but I think Nadal will put a heavy bounce on the ball thus creating a dificult backhand attempt for wawrinka. Nadals return game is disgusting he will show why he's the best come Saturday. The funny part is nobody can beat the guy and he's got a fcked up hand. Just shows how good he really isComment -
Matt you taking li ml or set spread?Comment -
Li Na: Konjuh, Bencic, (26) Safarova, (22) Makarova, (29) Pennetta, (31) Bouchard
Cibulkova: (42) Schiavone, (46) Voegele, (16) Suarez-Navarro, (3) Sharapova, (11) Halep, (5) Radwanska
Considering who Cibulkova beat to make it to the final, I don't know how you can make an argument that she has no shot against Li Na. I think the price is inflated, making Li Na a bad bet, even if you think she wins.Comment -
I explained this in another thread already, dude ranks have nothing to do with this.
Cibulkova beat:
Sharapova... Who was injured/rusty
Halep... Solid returner, but little forehand winner power
Radwanska: great returner, no forehand winner power
Li Na Beat:
Makarova.. Decent returner, solid forehand winner
Pennetta.. Decent returner, solid forehand winner
Bouchard... Eratic returner, solid-great forehand winner
You see here, cibulkova is facing a Whole new style of PLAY. Li NA made the last 3 of her opponents look stupid. There similar to cibulkova. Li NA will fire home WINNERS that Radwanska and Halep couldn't do... Now do u get what I'm saying??? Lol trust me, this won't be a close matchComment -
Li Na is a diffrent breed of player than those Cibulkova played so far
Rided on Cibulkova against Halep and took the plus spread against Radwanska but they were soft-hitters.
I think Li Na cant lose her 3rd final here, but Cibulkova will give a very solid fight. She will probably cover the spread, but Li Na has the fire power that Cibulkova has not faced till now
Watched Li play against Serena at her best with bare eyes, very very close gameComment -
As long as Cibulkova plays like this, she will definitely win a few titles this year, some 250s and 500s
But it is Li's turn to win a hard court slamComment -
Li Na not played good vs Genie after strong start (0-5) a lot unforceds, I see a difficult match for she if continue at this level today.Comment -
Really??? Lol dude Li Na was beating Bouchard because the pace that Li NA was playing at was much faster than Ivanovic. Bouchard adjusted and started to make some shots near the end of the set.... Bouchards a future grand slam winner... Cibulkova has had the luxury of playing soft returners.. This won't be as close as many thinkComment -
Li na played flawless in that first set against Bouchard. Bouchard had two points off her serve in the first 5 games. Na made some shots in that match that were just unbelievable so I don't know why people keep saying if na plays how she did against Bouchard tonight she'll lose. If na plays like she did against Bouchard she rolls here it's as simple as that.Comment -
will li na nerves hold up is the question. even when she v bouchard wasnt she 5-0 up serving for the set then lost her service game 0-40?Comment -
i will tail small 100xComment -
Absolutely wasting your money. Nadal has no chance of losing. Yes, Wawrinka beat Djokovic but, to beat a player of that caliber in the finals is a totally different animal. Nadal is -700 for a reason. He's 12-0 against Wawrinka and has never lost a SET to him, that's saying a lot. Now, Na Li has a chance to lose. I personally think she wins but, there's a good chance she can lose. Since you're parlaying them you should throw the $20 in the garbage and save your time.Comment -
Matt so u on LI NA??? Good ill take Cibulkova thanks!Comment -
damn it cibulkockComment
