Pinny's MNF limits...

FourLengthsClear · 12-05-11, 08:32 PM

Is he on the 'right side'?

iifold · 12-05-11, 08:33 PM

I'm assuming he took Chargers...

hanziman · 12-05-11, 08:33 PM

Hope he's on Jacksonville

Justin7 · 12-05-11, 08:35 PM

Jax is the sharp side tonight.

sideloaded · 12-05-11, 08:36 PM

was it rsigely?

antifoil · 12-05-11, 08:38 PM

rsigely is a sociopath.

iifold · 12-05-11, 08:39 PM

Originally posted by Justin7

Jax is the sharp side tonight.

With Gabbert and their conservative style, I don't see how there can be much of an edge taking Jaguars

HoulihansTX · 12-05-11, 08:41 PM

Originally posted by iifold

With Gabbert and their conservative style, I don't see how there can be much of an edge taking Jaguars

Norv Turner coaches the opposing team. That means B4 the game starts, the Jags have a TD lead.

k13 · 12-05-11, 08:43 PM

They won't move the line much depending who you are and who you are on.

k13 · 12-05-11, 08:44 PM

Originally posted by iifold

With Gabbert and their conservative style, I don't see how there can be much of an edge taking Jaguars

How about the new black head coach....

BAUS · 12-05-11, 09:17 PM

Depends how they have him profiled.

BAUS

John Dough · 12-05-11, 09:18 PM

Originally posted by Justin7

Jax is the sharp side tonight.

So SD -2.5 was the square side even though it crushed the closing line?

Winner_13 · 12-05-11, 09:18 PM

wow if only moved line 1 cent they must be gettin ridiculous volume unless they don't have your friends account labeled sharp or they dont respect him much, depends on time too.if he did this at 7 in morning id be really surprised.
prob did this late though.

justin7 aren't you close with them? you can just ask them

Justin7 · 12-05-11, 09:26 PM

Originally posted by John Dough

So SD -2.5 was the square side even though it crushed the closing line?

SD-2.5 is a great bet. The sharps I talked to were betting Jax +3 +105 near post.

jjgold · 12-05-11, 09:28 PM

100k bet was not one side

no one is that stupid especially betting that type of money

I can assure you it was a risk free bet

Winner_13 · 12-05-11, 09:33 PM

JJ ..thats what they want u to think

sneakerhead · 12-05-11, 09:36 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

100k bet was not one side

no one is that stupid especially betting that type of money

I can assure you it was a risk free bet

Can't fool coach

wrongturn · 12-05-11, 09:36 PM

So he bet 100k on +3, the money line moved one cent. Why not? It is a different market.

Deuce · 12-05-11, 09:37 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

100k bet was not one side no one is that stupid especially betting that type of money I can assure you it was a risk free bet

k13 · 12-05-11, 09:52 PM

Is taking Jags +12.5 Live sharp even though you planned on having no play?

big0mar · 12-05-11, 09:58 PM

Books need liquidity too

jjgold · 12-05-11, 10:19 PM

No one fools me

I have access to much more than anyone can possibly imagine

iifold · 12-05-11, 10:29 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

100k bet was not one side

no one is that stupid especially betting that type of money

I can assure you it was a risk free bet

We finally smoked out the real JJ...

What is the point of this thread?

Risk Free? No such thing...

k13 · 12-05-11, 10:37 PM

Looks like we know why Pinny never moved the line much.....

onacloud · 12-05-11, 10:40 PM

so he lost 100k

John Dough · 12-05-11, 10:45 PM

Originally posted by Justin7

SD-2.5 is a great bet. The sharps I talked to were betting Jax +3 +105 near post.

Fair enough.

The Seer · 12-05-11, 10:48 PM

Originally posted by iifold

We finally smoked out the real JJ...

What is the point of this thread?

Risk Free? No such thing...

It is if he was arbing, or even so, if he had SD -2.5 and then Jax at +3 +105 it is not far from risk free. That was similar to what happened to me with Penn St and Nebraska. I had Nebraska -3 and then turned around and bet Penn State when it went to 3.5 and the game hit on the key number of 3. A win and a push was basically fee money.

k13 · 12-05-11, 10:48 PM

Sharps took -1.5, don't kid yourself.

iifold · 12-05-11, 10:55 PM

Originally posted by The Seer

It is if he was arbing, or even so, if he had SD -2.5 and then Jax at +3 +105 it is not far from risk free. That was similar to what happened to me with Penn St and Nebraska. I had Nebraska -3 and then turned around and bet Penn State when it went to 3.5 and the game hit on the key number of 3. A win and a push was basically fee money.

Seer you fukk,

I am upset that you think I don't understand this...

Fact of the matter is these guys are talking about putting a hundred K on the worst QB we have seen since Dumbmarcus Russell, and the team has a banged up secondary at that...

I just don't understand the point of the thread?

Brahmabulls posts hold more weight than this...

I'm confused... hope it lands on 3 for this guy...

Not rooting for anybody to lose...

k13 · 12-05-11, 11:00 PM

Line opened +120 and closed like +155

Hard to believe someone who has 100k would ever bet on Gabbret and a rookie black coach in his first game.

wrongturn · 12-05-11, 11:01 PM

If not a hedge bet, he must have around 5m to play with sports.

rain_e · 12-06-11, 12:41 AM

Originally posted by onacloud

so he lost 100k

Yes but he was sharp so that's the important thing.

baskets · 12-06-11, 12:47 AM

lol, "i don't see the point of this thread"

Full Time Hobo · 12-06-11, 12:51 AM

The thread is about the volume on the game considering the size of the bet had little effect on the line....

Everyone is fixed on the 100k being lost, when if it was placed was most likely a hedge