I hope that guy gets at least some of his money. this is just so wrong to seal from a player like this...
EasyStreetSports steals 46k from Casino Player (Video)
Collapse
X
-
frankthetankSBR Wise Guy
- 08-29-09
- 652
#71Comment -
KGamblerSBR MVP
- 07-09-09
- 2404
#72Originally posted by ChopsticksI think you are right. I did have a read over there yesterday and it appears that they are not as clueless as you may think. I think this Wilhelm guy and EZ believes that therx readers are clueless though. Very poorly constructed case with so many inaccuracies/lies.
Therx is a heavily censored forum, so those types of posts/posters have been weeded out to a large degree.Comment -
pokerplayer22SBR MVP
- 05-09-09
- 1207
#73This is all so ridiculous...Powers, Marvin and Wilheim all seem to be tripping over their own lies. What a joke this has become.Comment -
donkdownRestricted User
- 07-09-09
- 4423
#74This is the nail in the coffin!! Just got my money out I suggest u do the same!!Comment -
donkdownRestricted User
- 07-09-09
- 4423
#75Fish plz tell me u didn't have EZ as one of your top 10!! U did tout these scum sucking thiefs pretty hard!! Ill let u know if i get paid low 4 fig!!!Comment -
MBENZSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-07-07
- 5238
#76Originally posted by KGamblerWell maybe they just don't want to get banned, but that entire thread should basically consist of people calling Shilheim out for all of the lies he has been caught telling. And asking him if he is ever going to accrue any actual evidence in the course of his "investigation"... Instead most of the posters seem to be swallowing any new claim he comes out with, without any actual proof, despite his dismal record as a lying shill and apologist for Easystreet.
Therx is a heavily censored forum, so those types of posts/posters have been weeded out to a large degree.Comment -
cc440unnSBR Wise Guy
- 03-18-11
- 737
#77Easystreet = bullshitP.S. Im not good in english. I apologize for any error in my post.Comment -
FishheadSBR Aristocracy
- 08-11-05
- 40179
#78Originally posted by KGamblerFishhead, are you paying attention?
KG, my most recent post across the street.............
Still Wil, an accomplished player that has been playing JOB on a regular basis will make very, very, very few errors.............and Cory is obviously a sharp player and been playing JOB regularly for the past 12-24 months.
Even if a player can be proved to have played flawlessly at 16+ hands per minute for 1-2 hours it does not conclusively prove that he or she used a BOT of any sort............if this were to be used as evidence, it would prevent anyone ever again from playing perfect strategy online for any length of time at a reasonable rate of speed.
I stated this long ago, if this game were DOUBLE BONUS instead of JOB, it would be much, much more unlikely for a player to play 17 hands per minute online and NEVER make a mistake over a 2+ hour period, simply because DB presents some very difficult hands quite often...........but even then, it would not be conclusive.
At this time, I just believe one is going to have a very difficult time proving that Cory used a BOT, unless further evidence is provided of the highest degree.........just my opinion.Comment -
WVUSBR Sharp
- 02-01-08
- 417
#79Originally posted by wilheimRaiders, I am going to do my best to prove that he did exactly that - play thousands of hands over many hours of play avereging 18 hands a minute and using the same strategy that was demonstrated by the three already posted. This is not a simple job of compiling enough hands to create a viable sized sample of hands but I am working on it. I am looking for hands that clearly require some decision making by the player (human or otherwise). eg. 9 high rainbow dealt is not what I am looking for. A pair of jacks and say one of jacks is a club with Qc-KC and a 10H kicker and the second jack a diamond.
Here is hand that has three to the royal, a pair of jacks which guarantees a free hand, and a 4 card open ended straight which if hit pays I believe 8 for 1 but am not 100% sure on that payoff as I don't have the game opened right now.
Wil.
LOL. Wil claims to have worked a bank of 10 video poker machines for 12 years and he doesn't know what a straight pays? Someone better check this guy's references.Comment -
PoweRayRestricted User
- 09-07-10
- 417
#80From post #31 this thread:Originally posted by cory1111....I CANT BELIEVE I DEPOSITED 10,000 TO THIS COMPANY.....I AM NOT GOING TO COSTA RICA, AND EVEN SBR AGREES THAT I SHOULDNT HAVE TOO. THIS IS JUST ANOTHER EXCUSE NOT TO PAY ME....I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY WOULD DO TO ME IF I WENT TO COSTA RICA... I ALREADY KNOW WHAT TIME OF PEOPLE IM DEALING WITH WHO WONT PAY ME AND CONTINUE TO LIE,YET IM GOING TO FLY TO A FOREIGN COUNTRY IN ORDER TO COLLECT THE PAYOUT. EASYSTREET LIED AGAIN BECAUSE NOBODY ASKED ME TO COME DOWN THERE EXCEPT FOR EASYSTREET. SBR EVEN BELIEVES THAT ME COMING DOWN TO COSTA RICA IS ABSURD.Comment -
FishheadSBR Aristocracy
- 08-11-05
- 40179
#81Originally posted by PoweRayFrom post #31 this thread:
Did he actually deposit $10k to EasyStreet?
Don't believe so.....Comment -
Justin7SBR Hall of Famer
- 07-31-06
- 8577
#82Originally posted by PoweRayFrom post #31 this thread:
Did he actually deposit $10k to EasyStreet?
However, (according to the player) EZMarvin told him that he had lost 10k there on the telephone a few weeks ago.Comment -
PoweRayRestricted User
- 09-07-10
- 417
#83Originally posted by FishheadWhere is CORY from?Originally posted by WVUI thought I read he was from FloridaOriginally posted by FishheadAs interested as you are in this case, coupled with the fact that both you and Cory are from Florida, are you not concerned that more than a few people might believe that Cory is working for you in some capacity?........... Stating this because you openly have admitted to have had teams working for you in the past in brick and morger casinos, so I'm sure the online gaming world would be no different.............after all, this was a very nice overlay that EZ was offerring with the bonus coupled with a close to 100% payback VP machine....... By the way, not implying that you have done such here or anywhere else, or even if you did, implying you did anything wrong............ having said that.............. Consider the following example.......... say I personally take advantage of a casino bonus at online sportsbook XXX and pick up a few bucks simply because it was indeed an overlay. Now, knowing its a good play, would it be UNethical for me to go to JOE BLOW at my local watering hole and give him $4,000 and have him open an account under his name and have him attack the same promo under his legal signup, telling him that we will split the profits..................IS THIS UNETHICAL???Originally posted by WVUYour experiences around VP in Vegas is not comparable to my experiences around VP online. I also have extensive experience using/observing/developing bots, and I can only assume you have none. EZ was resting its case on several factors that were debunked with the game data. There was indeed a long pause after the royal and his play speed is not that unusual. I am also sure that if we were to have the actual card log that I could find numerous errors in the play. Remember Wil, Bot play is the reason stated as to why they were not paying him. If they want to change that stance to something else then we better get it out on the table.Originally posted by WVUThe damage was done when he didn't plan for pauses in the bot program after his big hits and more pauses along the way. He didn't expect to hit a royal, let alone 3 of them in a short period of time. I have made similar mistakes, but always managed to come up with a good enough defense. Posting forums help a good bit too. You have to work the managers first and then when that doesn't work you have to scream the loudest at the biggest forums. If I were this guy I would be signing up at all the casino and sports forums................................. When I used a bot long term, we had the option of inserting non optimal play that didn't hurt the bankroll too much. If I scheduled sessions longer than an hour then I would use the non optimal setting which would cost me about $10-$20 over $100,000 in wagers, but it would show up on their radar as non-perfect play. Sometimes I would make mistakes on purpose to disguise bot play as well. With the bot I used there was zero chance of detection if you used it right. As far as I know, no one ever got busted using it.Originally posted by WVUUnder the circumstances this guy is handling this as well as he can. I would never admit to bot use, and continue to challenge them to prove he did. It is possible they will pay him something to make this whole PR nightmare go away. He won too much at a underfunded shop, simple as that. My biggest score (team wise) was 1.65 million, but we targeted a huge casino with much to lose with bad publicity. We also knew their operating budget and advertising expenses beforehand and presumed correctly that they could take the hit. Many years ago we targeted a small upstart casino and won mid 5 figures from them. They reacted the worst way possible and simply closed up shop instead of paying us. They likely re-opened under a different name, but they did spend time and money trying to get their original shop off the ground.Comment -
PoweRayRestricted User
- 09-07-10
- 417
#84Originally posted by Justin7No, he did not.
However, (according to the player) EZMarvin told him that he had lost 10k there on the telephone a few weeks ago.Comment -
BigDaddySBR Hall of Famer
- 02-01-06
- 8378
#85Originally posted by WVULOL. Wil claims to have worked a bank of 10 video poker machines for 12 years and he doesn't know what a straight pays? Someone better check this guy's references.
high pair is the play.
no thinking involved at all.
he also talks about 9high rainbow garbage why does he say 9 high
he should say 10 high rainbow garbage
does he even know how to play JOB?Comment -
ttwarrior1BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 06-23-09
- 28469
#86any person that has ever done a ********** ever , should never get to play on any casino ever no matter what.Comment -
BigDaddySBR Hall of Famer
- 02-01-06
- 8378
#87Originally posted by ttwarrior1any person that has ever done a ********** ever , should never get to play on any casino ever no matter what.Comment -
WVUSBR Sharp
- 02-01-08
- 417
#88Originally posted by PoweRay(Before spreadsheet was released)
WVU, Did you end up knowing Cory1111?
I still don't know who he is, but I have corresponded with him a good bit recently. Until this dispute I don't think I have ever seen any of his posts here or elsewhere.Comment -
YiSBR Wise Guy
- 03-19-09
- 646
#89awesome videoComment -
macoericSBR Wise Guy
- 09-29-10
- 626
#90Wow Fish is actually saying the player should be paid..
We can expect Armageddon any day now..Comment -
bruceBRUCEbruceSBR MVP
- 06-20-09
- 2560
#91Originally posted by WinNowI dont trust any sportsbook even my own book, (VIP.com) which i have been with over 10 years. I always like to withdraw anything over $1000 in balance. Any of these sportsbook can close your account and there's nothing we can do.Comment -
greg66Restricted User
- 09-04-06
- 151
#92Originally posted by bruceBRUCEbruceUnfortunately, I reluctantly agree, though I praise SBR for doing what they can and at least publicizing which books are completely crooked.
And that is why it is so apalling that the RX would immediately agree to shift the burden of proof to the accused player. I really lost any respect I had left for Rx.Comment -
sideloadedSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-21-10
- 7561
#93Originally posted by ttwarrior1any person that has ever done a ********** ever , should never get to play on any casino ever no matter what.Comment -
vividjohn45SBR Hall of Famer
- 11-21-10
- 6331
#94ez sports presents its damining evidence. listen up forum.Comment -
vividjohn45SBR Hall of Famer
- 11-21-10
- 6331
#95HElllllll YYYYYeeeaahhhh.Comment -
dikefaleSBR MVP
- 09-20-10
- 1017
#96Well done Justin,great job!Comment -
polskboySBR MVP
- 01-29-10
- 1688
#97great job justin great job.Comment -
KGamblerSBR MVP
- 07-09-09
- 2404
#98Originally posted by FishheadKG, my most recent post across the street.............
You want to post something useful "across the street"? Call out Shilheim for the four lies he has been consistently telling about this case:
1. cory1111 played 18 hands a minute for many hours straight
2. cory1111 hit his royals at such a high rate that it is indicative of possible cheating
3. cory1111 hit 3 royals in 8,000 hands
4. cory1111 did not pause after hitting royals
Why did Shilheim repeat these lies? These four lies have been proven to be false.
How about this one:
5. cory1111 played perfect strategy
Why does he keep saying this, when even easystreet (the originators of this fabrication) now admit that they only looked at a handful of actual hand histories?
How about his recent claims that cory1111 couldn't remember how he hit his 3rd royal when speaking with ezstreet on the phone only two hours afterward? Or how cory has been involved in 31 cases of fraud at 25 different books? Is he lying again or does he have some actual proof? Why should we believe this shill, who has been caught red handed in numerous fabrications already???Comment -
CollegeProSBR MVP
- 02-23-09
- 4006
#99nice video indeed.. but why the hell would you say ** and ** if sbr wouldn't allow us to type that in??Comment -
pokerplayer22SBR MVP
- 05-09-09
- 1207
#100bumpComment -
chemicalbrotherRestricted User
- 01-26-11
- 4086
#101i guess my question to all the people slapping J7 on the back is: 'what difference did he make?'
bringing everything to light, yeah okay..but to the player? what difference will it make to him?Comment -
Justin7SBR Hall of Famer
- 07-31-06
- 8577
#102Originally posted by chemicalbrotheri guess my question to all the people slapping J7 on the back is: 'what difference did he make?'
bringing everything to light, yeah okay..but to the player? what difference will it make to him?
Failing that, I hope to prevent other players from getting defrauded here.Comment -
SoVSBR Hall of Famer
- 03-21-10
- 6420
#103Anyone else who got distracted by Justin7's chest hair in that video?Comment -
FishheadSBR Aristocracy
- 08-11-05
- 40179
#104Originally posted by Justin7I am still hoping that the overwhelming evidence in favor of the player will convince Wilheim to recommend payment.
Failing that, I hope to prevent other players from getting defrauded here.
Let's wait for WIL's final analysis..........
He may side with the EZComment -
DougSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-10-05
- 6324
#105Originally posted by FishheadLet's wait for WIL's final analysis..........
He may side with the EZ
When you you sleep with dogs ( EZ) you get fleas ( RX) !
I'm now banned at RX, so I'll speak honestly. Anybody from there wanting to contact me will have to do it elsewhere ( like here).
Now I want RX to go the way of other failed forums.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code