Cancelled NHL futures bets @ 5Dimes

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • spicyyyyy
    SBR Rookie
    • 09-09-19
    • 36

    #1
    Cancelled NHL futures bets @ 5Dimes
    Hello,

    I have now had NHL futures bets cancelled multiple times in the last month or so at 5Dimes and am not only turned off by the process, but obviously it is a very slippery slope. As far as I'm concerned, if the 5Dimes team puts up a line that they later deem is a mistake and unintentional, then that is very simply a form on negligence on their part and should honor the bet as it stands. With that said, I do understand in their TOS that they state they reserve the right to cancel bets at any time for effectively any reason.

    My main concern is, where is the line drawn? In the first instance of this happening several weeks ago, the bets were cancelled within an hour or 2 and I was immediately refunded and informed they made a mistake with posting the line. In this 2nd instance, i made multiple bets on the same event across 2 days (and watched the line shift multiple times across that time frame) before getting an email yesterday that ALL of the bets i made on that event across the 2 days were cancelled because of a "mistake" in the line. So the question is, what is to stop 5Dimes from cancelling a bet 1 month from now? 3 months? the day before its obvious I will win and they are forced to pay me? It seems to me as I said to be a very slippery slope. If they have open-ended autonomy to cancel bets whenever they want, they can just wait until its a certainly i will win and just refuse to pay me and claim their stated TOS as just cause.

    Additionally, my customer service experience with one of the agents in live chat I found particularly disturbing. He claimed that it was not only wrong of me to take this line when it was "obviously not correct" (whatever that even means), he went even further to say that it was my RESPONSIBILITY to spend my personal time contacting them and letting them know of line that looked suspicious. I mean, this is so lol idk where to even start so i'll mostly just leave it there. I am not a bookmaker so idk every reason for why certain lines are the way they are certain times other than I assume they want as close to balanced action as possible to reduce their exposure to any single event. So in my mind, there are many reasons why it would make sense for a book to offer something maybe classified as a "good line/better than market line" for their own personal risk exposure reasons. I could get into a long discussion about business/customer practices and who is responsible for what, etc etc but that's a conversation for another time.

    I would love to hear everyone feedback about this, especially if you've had particular experience with futures bets being cancelled on 5Dimes as well as what can be done about the existing policy they have and how much leverage to cancel bets at their discretion they actually have.
  • dxp
    SBR Sharp
    • 10-06-18
    • 463

    #2
    5dimes consistently has screwed up lines. no one should feel comfortable placing any type of future wager with them.
    Comment
    • scottgodson1985
      SBR Sharp
      • 11-17-12
      • 347

      #3
      they've been doing this for a while, its there business model
      Comment
      • darkghost
        SBR MVP
        • 09-19-05
        • 1721

        #4
        How off were the lines when you bet them?
        Comment
        • ArunSh
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 09-24-07
          • 6801

          #5
          As always need context, gotta tell us what these exact bets were and such if we are to judge the situation.
          Comment
          • RedApples
            SBR Wise Guy
            • 10-02-18
            • 721

            #6
            IT'S NOT A SLIPPERY SLOPE. DON'T TAKE SHOTS. DON'T BET BAD LINES.

            Whats so hard to understand? If you can prove you DIDN'T take a shot and DIDN'T bet a bad line, then you have a case. Thats where the "line" is. Nothing else you said is part of the equation.
            Comment
            • RedApples
              SBR Wise Guy
              • 10-02-18
              • 721

              #7
              P.S. I have personal experience in contacting 5Dimes for line errors. I have never once bet a line I knew was incorrect. I've also contacted them each and every time that they graded a bet of mine incorrectly. I'm with the customer service person on this, and you "lol'ing" at him, is childish and it leads me to believe you would also take advantage of a bad line. All of the language in your post suggests this too. At no point in your post do you address how it could be even plausible that you would not know what the correct line was. Had you been a recreational player, betting all types of lines at a given time and it just so happened that you put a small amount on a random line that turned out to be bad, and it was cancelled, then you have reason to complain. Actually all you had to do at ANY point in your post is say you didn't know it was a bad line. But you didn't. So you knew. You're a clown.
              Comment
              • DontTailMe
                SBR MVP
                • 03-24-19
                • 2897

                #8
                Originally posted by RedApples
                IT'S NOT A SLIPPERY SLOPE. DON'T TAKE SHOTS. DON'T BET BAD LINES.

                Whats so hard to understand? If you can prove you DIDN'T take a shot and DIDN'T bet a bad line, then you have a case. Thats where the "line" is. Nothing else you said is part of the equation.
                It's not always so simple...



                I'll never understand this take by some. Why can't it BOTH be true that: (a) there are some players who take shots, and (b) 5Dimes has some issues in this area? At the very least, how they put the onus on the players to police their lines and harass players over it is inconsistent with the industry standard...and we're talking about a fairly customer unfriendly industry in offshore sportsbooks to begin with.
                Last edited by DontTailMe; 12-03-19, 01:45 AM.
                Comment
                • infotimbo
                  SBR Wise Guy
                  • 10-24-18
                  • 841

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ArunSh
                  As always need context, gotta tell us what these exact bets were and such if we are to judge the situation.
                  even then I find it hard to judge, especially for outright bets at long odds. It may look huge, but there isn't really much of a difference between @51 or @501, for example - 2% more or less probability to happen... that's beyond the numbers anyone can properly estimate anyway.
                  Comment
                  • Optional
                    Administrator
                    • 06-10-10
                    • 60939

                    #10
                    Originally posted by spicyyyyy
                    Hello,

                    I have now had NHL futures bets cancelled multiple times in the last month or so at 5Dimes and am not only turned off by the process, but obviously it is a very slippery slope. As far as I'm concerned, if the 5Dimes team puts up a line that they later deem is a mistake and unintentional, then that is very simply a form on negligence on their part and should honor the bet as it stands. With that said, I do understand in their TOS that they state they reserve the right to cancel bets at any time for effectively any reason.

                    My main concern is, where is the line drawn? In the first instance of this happening several weeks ago, the bets were cancelled within an hour or 2 and I was immediately refunded and informed they made a mistake with posting the line. In this 2nd instance, i made multiple bets on the same event across 2 days (and watched the line shift multiple times across that time frame) before getting an email yesterday that ALL of the bets i made on that event across the 2 days were cancelled because of a "mistake" in the line. So the question is, what is to stop 5Dimes from cancelling a bet 1 month from now? 3 months? the day before its obvious I will win and they are forced to pay me? It seems to me as I said to be a very slippery slope. If they have open-ended autonomy to cancel bets whenever they want, they can just wait until its a certainly i will win and just refuse to pay me and claim their stated TOS as just cause.

                    Additionally, my customer service experience with one of the agents in live chat I found particularly disturbing. He claimed that it was not only wrong of me to take this line when it was "obviously not correct" (whatever that even means), he went even further to say that it was my RESPONSIBILITY to spend my personal time contacting them and letting them know of line that looked suspicious. I mean, this is so lol idk where to even start so i'll mostly just leave it there. I am not a bookmaker so idk every reason for why certain lines are the way they are certain times other than I assume they want as close to balanced action as possible to reduce their exposure to any single event. So in my mind, there are many reasons why it would make sense for a book to offer something maybe classified as a "good line/better than market line" for their own personal risk exposure reasons. I could get into a long discussion about business/customer practices and who is responsible for what, etc etc but that's a conversation for another time.

                    I would love to hear everyone feedback about this, especially if you've had particular experience with futures bets being cancelled on 5Dimes as well as what can be done about the existing policy they have and how much leverage to cancel bets at their discretion they actually have.




                    Please post the actual bet/s involved.
                    .
                    Comment
                    • spicyyyyy
                      SBR Rookie
                      • 09-09-19
                      • 36

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Optional
                      Please post the actual bet/s involved.
                      There were 8 bets in total, all for $500 each on a team to win the cup. Actual lines I bet were somewhere between +2500 and +3500 (it obv moved over the course of 2-3 days as I and presumably others bet it). After a few days it got cancelled and they listed the reason as "human error. line should have "obviously" been + 1700".
                      Comment
                      • spicyyyyy
                        SBR Rookie
                        • 09-09-19
                        • 36

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RedApples
                        P.S. I have personal experience in contacting 5Dimes for line errors. I have never once bet a line I knew was incorrect. I've also contacted them each and every time that they graded a bet of mine incorrectly. I'm with the customer service person on this, and you "lol'ing" at him, is childish and it leads me to believe you would also take advantage of a bad line. All of the language in your post suggests this too. At no point in your post do you address how it could be even plausible that you would not know what the correct line was. Had you been a recreational player, betting all types of lines at a given time and it just so happened that you put a small amount on a random line that turned out to be bad, and it was cancelled, then you have reason to complain. Actually all you had to do at ANY point in your post is say you didn't know it was a bad line. But you didn't. So you knew. You're a clown.
                        Here is the reality. Me, you, and any other bettor (professional or casual or anything in between) have their own opinion of if there is value at a given line on any given event. So to make this argument that there exists a "correct" line is such a stupid claim. Correct or incorrect is a matter of opinion and necessity, and that is going to change from person to person just as it changes from book to book. Just because 5 other books all have the exact same line and 1 book doesn't does not mean that either of those lines are "correct". I may think they're all undervalued and bet all of them. Line shopping is just a responsibility of the bettor, period. And on the other side, it is the responsibility of the book to post lines they believe are accurate and are willing to offer to their customers.

                        If i make a "mistake" betting a line on 5Dimes and then 3 min later see the same line at better odds at another book, can I go to 5Dimes and say "hey, pls refund me, I found a better line at x book". Of course not!!!!! To say I "knew" it was a "bad line" and call me a clown, i mean lol. I don't think of lines as good or bad, I just think of them as having value or not. I bet the line at that price at that particular time because based on my opinion, there is value in that line. I am doing nothing wrong. The book posts the line and it is their responsibility that it is accurate. If a bettor comes along that sees value at that time and wants to bet his money, that's his choice (and oh yea, btw HE COULD BE WRONG!!!). If I took a "bad line" and later on realized I got the short end, I wouldn't expect a refund from a book and all of the responsibility should rightfully fall on my own shoulders for not doing my due diligence and taking a bad line. Has happened to me many times before and I'm sure will again.
                        Last edited by spicyyyyy; 12-03-19, 08:08 AM.
                        Comment
                        • spicyyyyy
                          SBR Rookie
                          • 09-09-19
                          • 36

                          #13
                          Also, for ppl claiming that I should know its a "bad line".....I bet another team to win cup a few weeks ago around +2200-2500 when the rest of the books were all around +1500-1800. Why wouldn't 5Dimes cancel these bets also? Point im making is different bookmakers have different opinions of what correct lines should be at any given time (and so do bettors). You determine your own opinions and act accordingly.
                          Comment
                          • milwaukee mike
                            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                            • 08-22-07
                            • 26914

                            #14
                            Originally posted by spicyyyyy
                            There were 8 bets in total, all for $500 each on a team to win the cup. Actual lines I bet were somewhere between +2500 and +3500 (it obv moved over the course of 2-3 days as I and presumably others bet it). After a few days it got cancelled and they listed the reason as "human error. line should have "obviously" been + 1700".
                            which teams?

                            if it's stuff like carolina/nashville/dallas/calg/pitt that is probably close enough to not be a "bad line"... if it's stuff like bost/stl/tampa/col/wash then those should be bad imho
                            Comment
                            • spicyyyyy
                              SBR Rookie
                              • 09-09-19
                              • 36

                              #15
                              Originally posted by milwaukee mike
                              which teams?

                              if it's stuff like carolina/nashville/dallas/calg/pitt that is probably close enough to not be a "bad line"... if it's stuff like bost/stl/tampa/col/wash then those should be bad imho
                              It was TOR. this whole classification of a line being bad or good i still stand by my argument as basically meaningless. If you're a book and put up a line and a bettor takes it because he/she sees value at that line, that is their business. Same would be true on either side whether they choose to bet a undervalued line or overvalued one. It is all relative to their opinion of what it should be as much as it is the book's opinion of what to mark and post it as.
                              Comment
                              • Microphone
                                SBR MVP
                                • 01-08-08
                                • 2950

                                #16
                                I won! I had THE UNDER 10 posts +125. And that's a good line!
                                Comment
                                • bubba
                                  SBR MVP
                                  • 09-29-05
                                  • 2432

                                  #17
                                  Bet at +2200 to + 2500 when line " should be" +1700 does not sound like an obvious error to me. Is that what happened here? Did I read right?
                                  Comment
                                  • PD77
                                    SBR MVP
                                    • 12-11-09
                                    • 2381

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by bubba
                                    Bet at +2200 to + 2500 when line " should be" +1700 does not sound like an obvious error to me. Is that what happened here? Did I read right?
                                    i thought the same thing. I’ve been playing at 5dimes for 15 years and if I saw a future at +2200-+2500 at 5D and +1700 elsewhere, I wouldn’t think twice that that was the line 5D meant to hang. They are known for giving better prices than the rest, that’s what makes 5Dimes, 5Dimes. Or it used to be anyway.

                                    probably why he didn’t get booted because it wasn’t an obvious bad line. More like a wager they took and realized they wanted out of it after the fact.
                                    Comment
                                    • Optional
                                      Administrator
                                      • 06-10-10
                                      • 60939

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by spicyyyyy
                                      There were 8 bets in total, all for $500 each on a team to win the cup. Actual lines I bet were somewhere between +2500 and +3500 (it obv moved over the course of 2-3 days as I and presumably others bet it). After a few days it got cancelled and they listed the reason as "human error. line should have "obviously" been + 1700".
                                      If you send in a sportsbook complaint form we can ask a manager to have another look at this for you.
                                      .
                                      Comment
                                      • spicyyyyy
                                        SBR Rookie
                                        • 09-09-19
                                        • 36

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by PD77
                                        i thought the same thing. I’ve been playing at 5dimes for 15 years and if I saw a future at +2200-+2500 at 5D and +1700 elsewhere, I wouldn’t think twice that that was the line 5D meant to hang. They are known for giving better prices than the rest, that’s what makes 5Dimes, 5Dimes. Or it used to be anyway.probably why he didn’t get booted because it wasn’t an obvious bad line. More like a wager they took and realized they wanted out of it after the fact.
                                        Correct, I just bet it because I thought the line for that team had value at the posted 5Dimes price. period. In general, I would agree and say I notice 5Dimes futures prices to be better value than other sites for what I am betting anyway and am happy to give action to them because of it.
                                        Comment
                                        • spicyyyyy
                                          SBR Rookie
                                          • 09-09-19
                                          • 36

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by bubba
                                          Bet at +2200 to + 2500 when line " should be" +1700 does not sound like an obvious error to me. Is that what happened here? Did I read right?
                                          Bet it initially at 1700 + 1800. day or 2 later saw it at 2500-2700 and bet it again. day after that it moved to 3500 and bet it a few more times until it was back down around 1850 or so. Didn't bet it again after that and then got emails the following day all of my bets made in that 3 day time frame were cancelled.
                                          Comment
                                          • spicyyyyy
                                            SBR Rookie
                                            • 09-09-19
                                            • 36

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by PD77
                                            probably why he didn’t get booted because it wasn’t an obvious bad line. More like a wager they took and realized they wanted out of it after the fact.
                                            I assume this is correct generally speaking as it took them several days to make a fuss about it....especially given this happened once before when i bet a NHL future and they corrected it/cancelled the bet within like 30 minutes.
                                            Comment
                                            • infotimbo
                                              SBR Wise Guy
                                              • 10-24-18
                                              • 841

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by spicyyyyy
                                              Bet it initially at 1700 + 1800. day or 2 later saw it at 2500-2700 and bet it again. day after that it moved to 3500 and bet it a few more times until it was back down around 1850 or so. Didn't bet it again after that and then got emails the following day all of my bets made in that 3 day time frame were cancelled.
                                              on one occasion (one or two years ago), I have had a price moving significantly up instead of down after placing a max bet with 5dimes - so there was definitely some kind of technical error involved (and I didn't bet again).

                                              If something like that happened in your case as well, I can see them having a point to cancel the later bets - but otherwise, they should relaly honor the bets. This sounds like a off-market difference not large enough to call it a "bad line".
                                              Comment
                                              • terpkeg
                                                SBR MVP
                                                • 10-26-09
                                                • 2364

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by RedApples
                                                IT'S NOT A SLIPPERY SLOPE. DON'T TAKE SHOTS. DON'T BET BAD LINES.

                                                Whats so hard to understand? If you can prove you DIDN'T take a shot and DIDN'T bet a bad line, then you have a case. Thats where the "line" is. Nothing else you said is part of the equation.
                                                Tony, is that you?
                                                Comment
                                                • DontTailMe
                                                  SBR MVP
                                                  • 03-24-19
                                                  • 2897

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by infotimbo
                                                  on one occasion (one or two years ago), I have had a price moving significantly up instead of down after placing a max bet with 5dimes - so there was definitely some kind of technical error involved (and I didn't bet again).

                                                  If something like that happened in your case as well, I can see them having a point to cancel the later bets - but otherwise, they should relaly honor the bets. This sounds like a off-market difference not large enough to call it a "bad line".
                                                  Or a marked account(s) were hammering the other side. I've had odds move the opposite direction of my betting. Love it when that happens.
                                                  Comment
                                                  • infotimbo
                                                    SBR Wise Guy
                                                    • 10-24-18
                                                    • 841

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by DontTailMe
                                                    Or a marked account(s) were hammering the other side. I've had odds move the opposite direction of my betting. Love it when that happens.
                                                    yeah, it can happen as well of course - but usually more on ML (or similar) kind of bets than on outrights with multiple options
                                                    Comment
                                                    • milwaukee mike
                                                      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                                      • 08-22-07
                                                      • 26914

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by infotimbo
                                                      on one occasion (one or two years ago), I have had a price moving significantly up instead of down after placing a max bet with 5dimes - so there was definitely some kind of technical error involved (and I didn't bet again).

                                                      If something like that happened in your case as well, I can see them having a point to cancel the later bets - but otherwise, they should relaly honor the bets. This sounds like a off-market difference not large enough to call it a "bad line".
                                                      i was thinking this exact same thing... from +1700 they had a technical issue where it moved the opposite direction on bets

                                                      finally caught it so they cancelled everything... in the past when that happened to me i did the same as you and avoided rebetting it

                                                      if i were the book i would've let the bets stand, but on the flip side as devil's advocate the poster seems knowledgeable enough to know that +3500 wasn't a legitimate line and there was something wrong
                                                      Comment
                                                      • RedApples
                                                        SBR Wise Guy
                                                        • 10-02-18
                                                        • 721

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by spicyyyyy
                                                        Also, for ppl claiming that I should know its a "bad line".....I bet another team to win cup a few weeks ago around +2200-2500 when the rest of the books were all around +1500-1800. Why wouldn't 5Dimes cancel these bets also? Point im making is different bookmakers have different opinions of what correct lines should be at any given time (and so do bettors). You determine your own opinions and act accordingly.
                                                        You are a moron shot taker, with zero reading comprehension and just looking to abuse. Again I'll restate it because you didn't address the issue... Did you or did you not bet a line that you KNEW was incorrect? If you knew the line was bad when you bet it, you deserve to have the bet cancelled and your action denied. If you didn't know the line was bad and you bet it, you have a case. So again, you're a moron and got caught abusing a bad line. No logic you are spewing makes any sense because the scenarios you are painting only exist in theory for something you explicitly did not do.
                                                        Comment
                                                        • RedApples
                                                          SBR Wise Guy
                                                          • 10-02-18
                                                          • 721

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by DontTailMe
                                                          It's not always so simple...



                                                          I'll never understand this take by some. Why can't it BOTH be true that: (a) there are some players who take shots, and (b) 5Dimes has some issues in this area? At the very least, how they put the onus on the players to police their lines and harass players over it is inconsistent with the industry standard...and we're talking about a fairly customer unfriendly industry in offshore sportsbooks to begin with.
                                                          You've seen my posts in at least a few threads similar to this. 5Dimes is one of the worst Sportsbooks around for what happened here. It is absolutely their fault for putting up bad lines, and the loss here is that they will need to continue to piss off customers such as the OP, and get threads like this which will turn people off. Just because they are at fault does not mean they have to eat losses and allow people to abuse their mistakes. The OP made up countless excuses and scenarios for where the line is between what they should need to let stand and what they can cancel, but did not at any point state that he did not know he was betting a bad line, which, is the only argument that can be made for not knowingly betting a bad line. It's pretty clear, intent is important in just about every action. The bettor is fully responsible for getting pushback from taking shots, and also for choosing fair Sportsbooks. I think what 5Dimes did here is fair and just per all of the information at hand, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. I would do the exact same thing in their position and to expect otherwise is just silly.
                                                          Comment
                                                          • spicyyyyy
                                                            SBR Rookie
                                                            • 09-09-19
                                                            • 36

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by RedApples
                                                            You are a moron shot taker, with zero reading comprehension and just looking to abuse. Again I'll restate it because you didn't address the issue... Did you or did you not bet a line that you KNEW was incorrect? If you knew the line was bad when you bet it, you deserve to have the bet cancelled and your action denied. If you didn't know the line was bad and you bet it, you have a case. So again, you're a moron and got caught abusing a bad line. No logic you are spewing makes any sense because the scenarios you are painting only exist in theory for something you explicitly did not do.
                                                            I'll bite here, though I likely shouldn't. I genuinely do not know what it means to bet a "bad" line. If you are asking did I think in my head "oh i bet 5Dimes made a mistake here and i'm going to try and exploit it before they realize their error", then the answer is very simply no. Did I attempt to book a bet at a line that I thought had value and was mispriced? Yes. I do that all the time, as I'm sure any reasonable bettor looking for the best lines across all books would. You bet when you think a line has value and you don't when you think it doesn't (pure gambling aside of course). That is as plainly as I can answer your condescending question.

                                                            I've bet futures lines on 5Dimes, bovada, bookmaker, and plenty of other sites/casinos before where I thought nothing more than "This line is badly priced, so im betting it". Again, I will use the earlier example I posted for comparison:

                                                            If 5 sites have a team's price at +1500 and 1 site has it at +2200, by your definition I am trying to abuse a "bad line". FYI, this exact thing happened on 5Dimes several weeks ago and that bet currently stands and hasn't been cancelled. So now we fast forward to the issue presented in the OP of this thread....SAME EXACT SITUATION. Toronto line is fairly consistent across a handful of sites, and 5Dimes has a much better price. My opinion was that it was worth betting at the 5Dimes line, so I bet it. Except now, 5Dimes cancels my bets and claims I am trying to exploit a "bad or incorrect line/employee mistake". Explain to me how the 2 situations are different in any way and why 1 bet would stand, and the other wouldn't. If 5Dimes and your logic is correct, I should "know" the correct line in example 1 was +1500 and shouldn't even bother betting +2200 as it MUST BE A BAD LINE/MISTAKE. This is such stupid f logic.

                                                            You seem to just want to give full autonomy to the book for either manually making a mistake in posting the line (lol @ this happening in 2019 btw) and/or the line they post being a reflection of their own opinion of the correct price/whatever their internal line pricing system or algos conclude.

                                                            Long story short is, this is akin to someone in a casino exploiting grey areas at Blackjack. Casino has a built in edge so you cant ever actually win, but then concedes certain rakeback/kickbacks or adheres to certain player requests because they want the action. Then said player figures out a way to overcome edge that is completely within the rules and casino cries wolf and refuses to pay/sues. So it is ok to exploit your customer, but when you get exploited for your own errors its unfair or illegal. Lol, ok.
                                                            Comment
                                                            • milwaukee mike
                                                              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                                              • 08-22-07
                                                              • 26914

                                                              #31
                                                              spicy there is a difference between betting something once at +2200 vs +1500 elsewhere... and max betting something 8 times all the way up to +3500

                                                              yes you are trying to make money but if you're gonna play that game it's probably better to stay off the radar then make $4000 futures bets on one team

                                                              at least they cancelled it relatively quickly rather than freerolling you
                                                              Comment
                                                              • spicyyyyy
                                                                SBR Rookie
                                                                • 09-09-19
                                                                • 36

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by milwaukee mike
                                                                spicy there is a difference between betting something once at +2200 vs +1500 elsewhere... and max betting something 8 times all the way up to +3500

                                                                yes you are trying to make money but if you're gonna play that game it's probably better to stay off the radar then make $4000 futures bets on one team

                                                                at least they cancelled it relatively quickly rather than freerolling you

                                                                fair enough, but like how do you even conclude its a "bad" line and that other ppl arent also seeing the mispriced line also and get to it before you? I mean, you have no way of knowing anything so from my view its just like if you dont get to it first, someone else will....and that opportunity is wasted because you were worried some guy that manually adjusts their lines made an error. I have no way of knowing that to be true anymore than 5Dimes just concluding based on their data that the price posted is correct. appreciate the feedback, just hard for me to get to how its really justified at the end of the day.
                                                                Last edited by spicyyyyy; 12-04-19, 02:04 PM.
                                                                Comment
                                                                • Optional
                                                                  Administrator
                                                                  • 06-10-10
                                                                  • 60939

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by spicyyyyy


                                                                  fair enough, but like how do you even conclude its a "bad" line and that other ppl arent also seeing the mispriced line also and get to it before you? I mean, you have no way of knowing anything so from my view its just like if you dont get to it first, someone else will....and that opportunity is wasted because you were worried some guy manually adjust their lines made some error. I have no way of knowing that to be true anymore than 5Dimes just concluding based on their data that the price posted is correct. appreciate the feedback, just don't hard for me to get to how its really justified at the end of the day.
                                                                  When Mike says it that way, it does sound like you did know what you were doing.

                                                                  But 5Dimes would not not have just cancelled the bets now if they thought you were definitely taking a shot. As someone else mentioned they would have left you in limbo until the end of the season to grade this instead of cancelling now. Or cancelled and closed your account now.

                                                                  So I suspect they understand your position.
                                                                  .
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • fried cheese
                                                                    SBR MVP
                                                                    • 09-17-13
                                                                    • 4461

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by RedApples
                                                                    Just because they are at fault does not mean they have to eat losses and allow people to abuse their mistakes.
                                                                    yes, i aspire to never be held responsible for my mistakes also.
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • InTheRed
                                                                      SBR Sharp
                                                                      • 12-25-09
                                                                      • 455

                                                                      #35
                                                                      I love how all of this is over future bets on a team that hasn't won the cup in 53 years, just fired their coach, sit outside of the playoffs and have no defense whatsoever.
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      SBR Contests
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Working...