Yesterday I had the UNDER 22.5 total combined shots in the Italy / England Euro final. According to the website's terms, soccer wagers only count regulation time; extra time and penalties are not included.
Shots finished Italy 15-4 England after regulation, which means my under should be a winner (19). There were 6 more shots in extra time, making the final after extra time Italy 19-6 England, and my wager was graded a loss (25). Am I wrong to think this should have been a winner?
I have contacted customer service, and they told me they would pass along my request to the provider -- the bet was through the Prop Kingz platform some sites use -- but I'm still waiting on a response.
I also had a wager at the same site OVER 1.5 shots on Harry Maguire. Maguire had 1 shot during regulation time, and the wager was graded a loss. However, Maguire took one of England's penalties, so if they're including extra time and penalties, at least one of these wagers should be a winner. The only way they both lose if if they're including extra time but not penalties. There's no way that should happen, right?
I'm still waiting on a response from the book, but I'm curious to get the thoughts of others while I wait. Am I wrong to think my UNDER 22.5 should have been a winner?
Shots finished Italy 15-4 England after regulation, which means my under should be a winner (19). There were 6 more shots in extra time, making the final after extra time Italy 19-6 England, and my wager was graded a loss (25). Am I wrong to think this should have been a winner?
I have contacted customer service, and they told me they would pass along my request to the provider -- the bet was through the Prop Kingz platform some sites use -- but I'm still waiting on a response.
I also had a wager at the same site OVER 1.5 shots on Harry Maguire. Maguire had 1 shot during regulation time, and the wager was graded a loss. However, Maguire took one of England's penalties, so if they're including extra time and penalties, at least one of these wagers should be a winner. The only way they both lose if if they're including extra time but not penalties. There's no way that should happen, right?
I'm still waiting on a response from the book, but I'm curious to get the thoughts of others while I wait. Am I wrong to think my UNDER 22.5 should have been a winner?