They're practically a no-pay sportsbook. What is there to complain about? Players likely to cash out are banned quick enough. The ones who they know are profitable they rush to pay and service. If someone hits a big win they have dozens of gotcha rules they can use to void it. If someone hits them with "questionable betting" (new word for correlated parlays) their rules basically state they can go back and void whatever they'd like. And if they just prove a typo on the address form, or a phone number change, they can do that too. And for fairness if you don't like it you can go to a UK licensed arbitrator, even if you're in US and they're in Costa Rica. Again what is there to complain about? Reputable book only losers can use and they service them well so long as they don't get lucky and can get by all the gotchya rules, such cases are of course quite rare.
And yes I don't use them. My account transferring from TheGreek they declined.
And yes I don't use them. My account transferring from TheGreek they declined.
perhaps they are generally fine. Basically meant there are far less players to complain, because for years they used a closed door model that that targeted and cultivated relationships with "net depositors" only without taking much risk. They then took over Spiro's accounts except for the ones that were most unlikely to be "net depositors" but did take on some more risk, which they reduce with voiding bets (in advanced), limiting and banning accounts. Their model means they deal primarily with net depositors and actually are not too exposed to finding many sharp bettors, so it's very unlikely there will be many complaints. 
