Bet365 doesn't stick to its own rules

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lonnie55
    SBR MVP
    • 04-08-16
    • 2689

    #1
    Bet365 doesn't stick to its own rules
    Bet365 voided bets on a friendly soccer match due to a change in the game time although the rules clearly say:

    "90 Minutes Play

    All match markets are based on the result at the end of a scheduled 90 minutes play unless otherwise stated. This includes any added injury or stoppage time but does not include extra-time, time allocated for a penalty shootout or golden goal. Bets on any match that finishes before the completion of 90 minutes play, unless otherwise stated, will be void; except for those bets the outcome of which has already been determined at the time the game finishes. The market must be fully determined for bets to stand, for example, First Player to Score or Time of the First Goal bets will stand provided a goal has been scored at the time the game finishes.

    The exceptions to this rule are in relation to friendly matches, where all match markets will be settled based on the actual result when the game finishes (excluding any extra-time), irrespective of whether the full 90 minutes is played, and Beach Soccer where markets are specifically settled on 36 minutes play only."

    b365's Statement:

    Having reviewed the previous emails, I can see that this bet has already been raised as a settlement query, this was then reviewed by our Sports Settlement Team.

    However, I appreciate that you may believe this was a friendly match. As such, I have spoken with our Sports Settlement team again to ensure that this bet is settled correctly. They have confirmed to me that there are discrepancies as for whether the match was a friendly match or not.

    With this in mind, our Trading Team have made the decision to settle all bets on this match based on the match being a normal 90 minute match. I can only apologise that this has meant your bet is Void. I appreciate that you may be unhappy with this, however our Sports Settlement Team have confirmed that the settlement from our side is correct and will not change unfortunately.

    In regards to your bet, I understand that this was originally settled as a winning bet*, returning €26.56 to your account. The returns were then removed and your stake amount was returned, for the amount of €7.81.

    In line with this, I would be more than happy to offer you the amount of €19.00 in the form of Bet Credits to cover the difference of these two amounts.

    You can use your Bet Credits to stake bets without risking your own cash by selecting Use Bet Credits on the bet slip. Your Bet Credits are non-withdrawable and Bet Credits stakes are not included in any returns. Any returns from bets placed with Bet Credits will be added to your Withdrawable Balance.

    If you wish to accept this offer, please confirm so in your response. Please also confirm your four digit security number. Once confirmed, we would be more than happy to credit this for you.

    Thank you, in advance, for your cooperation and understanding in this matter.
    *this was not the only bet affected by the void. I placed more than 70 bets on that match.


    In reply to my previous email:

    1) The match was: Soccer - Mauritania Women v Spain U19 Women - Friendly Match 70 Minutes
    2) I placed several live bets containing -Handicaps, -AHCs, Totals (Over) and other types of bets.
    3) The final result was Spain U19 Women 11-0 (5-0) Mauritania Women. All the bets had been correctly graded when the match was over. Bets on -Handicaps had been graded as 'won'.
    4) One day later you voided all the bets containing -Handicaps and -AHCs but bets on Totals still stand.
    As I was told by a live chat agent the reason for the void was an unexpected change in the game time: 2x35 minutes instead of the regular format 2x45 minutes.
    5) However, as it was a friendly match the rules say that a change in the game time does not result in a void of the bets.
    Here is the quotation of the rule: "90 Minutes Play
    All match markets are based on the result at the end of a scheduled 90 minutes play unless otherwise stated. This includes any added injury or stoppage time but does not include extra-time, time allocated for a penalty shootout or golden goal. Bets on any match that finishes before the completion of 90 minutes play, unless otherwise stated, will be void; except for those bets the outcome of which has already been determined at the time the game finishes. The market must be fully determined for bets to stand, for example, First Player to Score or Time of the First Goal bets will stand provided a goal has been scored at the time the game finishes.
    The exceptions to this rule are in relation to friendly matches, where all match markets will be settled based on the actual result when the game finishes (excluding any extra-time), irrespective of whether the full 90 minutes is played, and Beach Soccer where markets are specifically settled on 36 minutes play only."
    6) This means you didn't apply your own rules in this case.

    So I would like to ask you to review the case once more. Please regrade all the bets you have mistakenly voided. The match was a friendly match, not a competitive one which means the bets must stand according to your rules.
    The bets on the totals stand. The bets on -Handicaps, -AHCs have been voided.

    This is unacceptable as the matches of this tournament are from now on clearly displayed as "Friendly Match - 70 mins play" which means b365 is contradicting itself.

    How can they say the first match was not a friendly match if they classify all the upcoming matches within that tournament as "Friendly Match - 70 mins play"?​







  • lonnie55
    SBR MVP
    • 04-08-16
    • 2689

    #2
    I've already submitted a complaint.
    Comment
    • Optional
      Administrator
      • 06-10-10
      • 61112

      #3
      Originally posted by lonnie55
      I've already submitted a complaint.
      Did Bet365 offer the same compensation for the other 70 bets when you pointed out it was more than that one bet?
      .
      Comment
      • lonnie55
        SBR MVP
        • 04-08-16
        • 2689

        #4
        Originally posted by Optional
        Did Bet365 offer the same compensation for the other 70 bets when you pointed out it was more than that one bet?
        Not yet but I would reject this offer anyway.

        It's obvious they've made a mistake which they for whatever reason are not willing to correct
        Comment
        • Optional
          Administrator
          • 06-10-10
          • 61112

          #5
          Originally posted by lonnie55

          Not yet but I would reject this offer anyway.

          It's obvious they've made a mistake which they for whatever reason are not willing to correct
          It does seem like a strange ruling to stick by after re-querying.

          I wonder what this means exactly. "there are discrepancies as for whether the match was a friendly match or not".

          Could the match form part of qualification for a tourney?

          It looks like just a normal friendly as far as I can tell.

          Maybe they had the match listed wrong as not a friendly...
          .
          Comment
          • lonnie55
            SBR MVP
            • 04-08-16
            • 2689

            #6
            Originally posted by Optional
            I wonder what this means exactly. "there are discrepancies as for whether the match was a friendly match or not".
            No idea what they mean by that.


            Originally posted by Optional
            Could the match form part of qualification for a tourney?
            No, it's a stand-alone friendly tournament which takes place every year.

            According to Wikipedia (translated from ES to EN) the Alcudia U-20 International Soccer Tournament, or Organizing Committee of the U-20 International Soccer Tournament (abbreviated as COTIF), is a friendly soccer championship in which both clubs and national teams of players under the age of 20 participate and which is held annually in La Alcudia (Valencia) Spain.


            Originally posted by Optional
            Maybe they had the match listed wrong as not a friendly...
            They've listed it as an "international match".

            Try to approach it from a logical standpoint:

            How can a match

            - between a senior national soccer team and a junior national soccer team
            - which is not organized by an official governing body
            - which is not recognized by UEFA, FIFA, AFA or any other governing body
            - which is played in the format 2x35 minutes

            be considered anything other than a friendly match?

            What comes on top:

            I did not even have an advantage from the shortened game time. Bear in mind I placed bets on -Handicaps and Overs, not +Handicaps and Unders. Thus I actually had a disadvantage when I placed the bets in the belief that the match would run the regular 2x45 format. The bookie was the one who had the better position.

            So what is the point of voiding these bets?
            Comment
            • Optional
              Administrator
              • 06-10-10
              • 61112

              #7
              I am agreeing with all you said, it's just so strange for them to re-confirm the grading I was looking for what it might be they are thinking.
              .
              Comment
              • lonnie55
                SBR MVP
                • 04-08-16
                • 2689

                #8
                They have just repeated what they've said before without explaining what they actually mean by "discrepancies":


                Thank you for your message in regards to your recent bets on the Mauritania Women v Spain U19 Women match.

                I am sorry to hear you are unhappy with the settlement on the bets you have placed on this game.


                I would be more than happy to advise you further on this issue. As previously stated, although I appreciate you feel this falls under our exceptions within the the 90 minute rule we have for soccer, there are discrepancies as for whether the match was a friendly match or not. As such our Trading Team has decided to settle your bets in accordance with this, I can confirm that the settlement of these bets would remain the same.



                I understand that this may not be the outcome you were looking for, and I can appreciate the inconvenience that this may have caused you.
                Comment
                • semibluff
                  SBR MVP
                  • 04-12-16
                  • 1515

                  #9
                  It's not clear to me what the complaint or problem is here. The purpose of the main rule is state that periods of extra-time and/or penalties after the conclusion of the 2nd half do NOT count towards the betting outcome...and that's pretty much it. For reference England won the World Cup in 1966. The game was a 2-2 draw for betting purposes.

                  If the game in question was scheduled for 70 minutes and at least 70 minutes were played when the 2nd half concluded then that would be the final result regardless of any 90 minute rule. It would be up to the company posting odds to know how long the game was scheduled for.

                  Some betting companies have offered odds, (both game and futures) on UK indoor 5-a-side and 6-a-side tv tournaments, (normally Premier League or London teams). Tournament game lengths can vary considerably, (5-20 minutes). No betting company could reasonably void an outcome based on game time being less than 90 minutes.

                  For historical reference an English top division game was once cancelled about 90 seconds early due to problems with keeping the crowd off the field, (possibly Derby County last day of the season with Derby relegated as a result. Derby would have needed 2 goals in 90 seconds to change the outcome). The 88-minute score stood as the final result and betting companies paid on it.
                  Comment
                  • lonnie55
                    SBR MVP
                    • 04-08-16
                    • 2689

                    #10
                    Originally posted by semibluff
                    If the game in question was scheduled for 70 minutes
                    It was not displayed, that's the point. But as it was a friendly match according to their rules the bets must stand anyway.

                    Varying playtimes in soccer friendly matches are not uncommon. Popular formats are 2x30, 2x35, 2x40, 3x30, 3x45.

                    Sometimes it happens that the referee blows the whistle after 75, 80 or 85 minutes if both teams agree.

                    This is why the rule for friendly matches exist. As most of the bettors bet on Over, Team Goals Over and -HCs instead of Unders and +HCs the decision to let bets stand if the referee blows the whistle earlier than everybody expects is more profitable for the book in the long run.
                    Comment
                    • Optional
                      Administrator
                      • 06-10-10
                      • 61112

                      #11
                      Originally posted by lonnie55
                      It was not displayed, that's the point. But as it was a friendly match according to their rules the bets must stand anyway.

                      Varying playtimes in soccer friendly matches are not uncommon. Popular formats are 2x30, 2x35, 2x40, 3x30, 3x45.

                      Sometimes it happens that the referee blows the whistle after 75, 80 or 85 minutes if both teams agree.

                      This is why the rule for friendly matches exist. As most of the bettors bet on Over, Team Goals Over and -HCs instead of Unders and +HCs the decision to let bets stand if the referee blows the whistle earlier than everybody expects is more profitable for the book in the long run.
                      In that case, I would take the compensation offer if it is offered.

                      Although I agree with you that it's still a friendly, if the settlement people have twice said they have graded to correctly, I'd take what i could get as I doubt they will change the third time, and you know how frustrating it can be to try to dispute voids.
                      .
                      Comment
                      • semibluff
                        SBR MVP
                        • 04-12-16
                        • 1515

                        #12
                        I'm not disagreeing with @lonnie55 at all. I don't see a reason to void the bets, and the rule as written states the bets should stand. To be void the match would need to be a tournament or qualifying match that was shortened.

                        I am more surprised the B365 rule doesn't have a minimum time for play, EG 85 minutes on a 90-minute match, beyond which matches stand even if concluded prematurely.
                        Comment
                        • lonnie55
                          SBR MVP
                          • 04-08-16
                          • 2689

                          #13
                          The other thing which is odd: Why did they void the -HCs but let the Overs and Team Goals Overs stand?
                          Comment
                          • lonnie55
                            SBR MVP
                            • 04-08-16
                            • 2689

                            #14
                            Now they offer me 150 EUR although I've lost almost 500 through their void.


                            Thank you for your message confirming your four digit security number.I am sorry to hear that you are not happy with the settlement of your bet's on the Mauritania Women v Spain U19 Women match.As you have provided your four digit security number i have been able to look into these bets for you. I can see that the have all been re-settled on the ruling and Terms and Conditions regarding this fixture to which you have been provided with. I appreciate that you may not agree with the settlement of these bets i can confirm that they have been settled correctly and we are happy with the settlement. I do understand that this is not the outcome that you looking for however the bets have now been correctly settled. I do apologise for the inconvenience that the settlement of the bets may have caused and in line with that i would be more than happy to offer you €150 in the for of bet credits purely as a gesture of goodwill for the inconvenience of the situation.If you would like to accept the offer please state so in your reply and i can credit this to the account for you. Thank you for your cooperation regarding this.
                            Comment
                            • lonnie55
                              SBR MVP
                              • 04-08-16
                              • 2689

                              #15
                              It's so obvious they know they are wrong. But for some reason they won't change their settlement.

                              Is it like a general thing? Demonstrating power over the customer or something like that?
                              Comment
                              • Freddy928
                                SBR Rookie
                                • 08-05-19
                                • 8

                                #16
                                Looks like we are in the same boat. I placed three different handicap bets on this match and they all won. The winnings (around 1000€) were added to my balance after the match was over. When I logged into my account again the next day, I took notice of the lower balance and checked the account history where I saw that all bets had been voided.

                                Bet365 justifies the voiding with the fact that the match ended after 70 minutes. This isn't unusual for friendlies and therefore there is a section in the rules that states all bets on friendlies will stand even if 90 minutes of playtime are not completed. The CS keeps insisting that the match was "an international match" and hence their rules for friendlies would not apply.

                                This reasoning doesn't make any sense because the match was clearly a friendly. I'm not aware of any regular competition where national teams compete against U19 teams.

                                The only compensation Bet365 has offered me so far is a 50€ betting credit.

                                I haven't filed a complaint yet, but I will do this right now.. I'm also considering reporting them to IBAS.

                                Edit: Complaint is filed.
                                Last edited by Freddy928; 08-05-19, 03:53 PM.
                                Comment
                                • cashin81
                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                  • 09-10-14
                                  • 12946

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by lonnie55
                                  The other thing which is odd: Why did they void the -HCs but let the Overs and Team Goals Overs stand?
                                  I think because the overs were determined regardless if they played 20 mins more or 500 mins more.

                                  but the handicaps arent determined if you added 20 mins to the game, maybe in a really good position but not determined.
                                  Comment
                                  • cashin81
                                    SBR Posting Legend
                                    • 09-10-14
                                    • 12946

                                    #18
                                    are there any more games in that tournament,, see what it is listed as?
                                    Comment
                                    • lonnie55
                                      SBR MVP
                                      • 04-08-16
                                      • 2689

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by cashin81
                                      but the handicaps arent determined if you added 20 mins to the game, maybe in a really good position but not determined.
                                      You're right.

                                      Originally posted by cashin81
                                      are there any more games in that tournament,, see what it is listed as?
                                      Yes and they are all listed as "Friendly Match - 70 mins play", see the screenshots I shared in the opening post.
                                      Comment
                                      • cashin81
                                        SBR Posting Legend
                                        • 09-10-14
                                        • 12946

                                        #20
                                        If there were still games in the tournament listed as friendly matches, after your game, then i dont see their case here.

                                        Also ; Women's football is not supported by the Football Federation of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania


                                        Comment
                                        • lonnie55
                                          SBR MVP
                                          • 04-08-16
                                          • 2689

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by cashin81
                                          If there were still games in the tournament listed as friendly matches, after your game, then i dont see their case here.​
                                          Just look it up by yourself: Soccer -> Club Friendly List -> scroll down -> Friendly Match - 70 mins play



                                          Currently there is a match Villarreal Women - Bolivia U19 Women

                                          A match where a club and a national youth team is involved cannot be a competitive match by definition!









                                          Originally posted by cashin81
                                          Also ; Women's football is not supported by the Football Federation of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania

                                          Yes, Mauritania women's national football team did not make one competitive game to date. They are not even listed in the FIFA women's ranking: https://www.fifa.com/fifa-world-rank...g-table/women/
                                          Comment
                                          • lonnie55
                                            SBR MVP
                                            • 04-08-16
                                            • 2689

                                            #22
                                            Now they offered me 250 EUR as compensation which I think I will accept
                                            Comment
                                            • newton0038
                                              SBR MVP
                                              • 03-07-07
                                              • 2385

                                              #23
                                              y guess is they B365 got fleeced and being they have the monies, offering " goodwill" ( which I see as a fuk u take it or leave it by B365) some will settle for the bet credit and some will complain to IBAS. The IBAS complaint should only take about 3 years to complete, most degens put a bullet in their head waiting less than a month with an unknown status of their cash or bet grading in this case. If B365 fuked up their T&C , they need to pay up. They are not hurting the slightest for cash. Time for those with a B365 account to print off their CURRENT T&C so Denise and he fukin cronnies cant change it and say " look in the T&C"
                                              Comment
                                              • eaglesfan371
                                                SBR MVP
                                                • 01-08-19
                                                • 4079

                                                #24
                                                Surprised you’re allowed on bet365 Lonnie, figured you were the sharpest bettor in the world, betting at 100+ books. Hm, must be an arber (nothing wrong with that).
                                                Comment
                                                • lonnie55
                                                  SBR MVP
                                                  • 04-08-16
                                                  • 2689

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by eaglesfan371
                                                  Surprised you’re allowed on bet365 Lonnie, figured you were the sharpest bettor in the world, betting at 100+ books. Hm, must be an arber (nothing wrong with that).
                                                  It's my own 14 yr old account which is limited to 5-25 EUR depending on the market.

                                                  If you focus only on live bets you're still able to place 60-70 bets even if the account is limited.

                                                  Why would I submit a complaint containing my real name and email address if it was not my very own account idiot?
                                                  Comment
                                                  • KittiP
                                                    SBR Sharp
                                                    • 03-20-19
                                                    • 286

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by lonnie55
                                                    It's my own 14 yr old account which is limited to 5-25 EUR depending on the market.

                                                    If you focus only on live bets you're still able to place 60-70 bets even if the account is limited.

                                                    Why would I submit a complaint containing my real name and email address if it was not my very own account idiot?
                                                    Completely off topic, but from memory 10bet is similar btw.

                                                    You can keep placing bets to your max limit on a selection, as long as the odds aren't exactly the same.

                                                    E.g Limit £5, you can bet @1.7, and then @1.72 etc etc, but then not again @1.7 or @1.72
                                                    Comment
                                                    • cashin81
                                                      SBR Posting Legend
                                                      • 09-10-14
                                                      • 12946

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by newton0038
                                                      y guess is they B365 got fleeced and being they have the monies, offering " goodwill" ( which I see as a fuk u take it or leave it by B365) some will settle for the bet credit and some will complain to IBAS. The IBAS complaint should only take about 3 years to complete, most degens put a bullet in their head waiting less than a month with an unknown status of their cash or bet grading in this case. If B365 fuked up their T&C , they need to pay up. They are not hurting the slightest for cash. Time for those with a B365 account to print off their CURRENT T&C so Denise and he fukin cronnies cant change it and say " look in the T&C"
                                                      Comment
                                                      • Freddy928
                                                        SBR Rookie
                                                        • 08-05-19
                                                        • 8

                                                        #28
                                                        In the meantime, I have reached the highest internal complaint level at Bet365. They haven't moved one inch from their viewpoint of the matter and say it's there definite decision not to grade those bets or give me any compensation at all. They rejected my request to credit me 250€ (which they had offered Lonnie for his losses of about 500€) to compensate me for my lost winnings of 1k€. It's pretty upsetting how arbitrarily Bet365 deals with cases like this. Since I have nothing to lose now, I'll probably move forward with SBR and IBAS if they don't come up with something else.
                                                        Comment
                                                        • Optional
                                                          Administrator
                                                          • 06-10-10
                                                          • 61112

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by Freddy928
                                                          In the meantime, I have reached the highest internal complaint level at Bet365. They haven't moved one inch from their viewpoint of the matter and say it's there definite decision not to grade those bets or give me any compensation at all. They rejected my request to credit me 250€ (which they had offered Lonnie for his losses of about 500€) to compensate me for my lost winnings of 1k€. It's pretty upsetting how arbitrarily Bet365 deals with cases like this. Since I have nothing to lose now, I'll probably move forward with SBR and IBAS if they don't come up with something else.
                                                          As I mentioned to Lonnie above, as much as it sucks it's tough to just point blank dispute a void like this. I think the best SBR could do for you is to appeal for more generous goodwill, but that would be best coming from you directly anyway I think.

                                                          If you want to argue for full restitution http://ibas-uk.com is probably the only realistic option short of civil action.
                                                          .
                                                          Comment
                                                          • piterp
                                                            SBR High Roller
                                                            • 06-02-13
                                                            • 241

                                                            #30
                                                            Only way to get something from them is complain to gambling commission or go to court
                                                            Comment
                                                            • cincinnatikid513
                                                              SBR Aristocracy
                                                              • 11-23-17
                                                              • 45360

                                                              #31
                                                              on front page it says bet365 now avaliable in new jersey
                                                              Comment
                                                              • BigdaddyQH
                                                                SBR Posting Legend
                                                                • 07-13-09
                                                                • 19530

                                                                #32
                                                                Let JJ handle it. He is the know all of Sportsbooks in the entire world, or so he says.
                                                                Comment
                                                                • Mediterranean
                                                                  SBR Rookie
                                                                  • 05-12-18
                                                                  • 27

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Interesting trial but as stated its a pity that " ... robustness of a major bookmaker’s T&Cs will not be tested in court."


                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • Optional
                                                                    Administrator
                                                                    • 06-10-10
                                                                    • 61112

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by Mediterranean
                                                                    Interesting trial but as stated its a pity that " ... robustness of a major bookmaker’s T&Cs will not be tested in court."


                                                                    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...5-discontinued
                                                                    They as much as admitted in the original claim that she was a beard for a family member who had been shut down.

                                                                    I am kind of surprised if B365 settled that one.
                                                                    .
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • ichiro4thehall
                                                                      SBR High Roller
                                                                      • 12-02-09
                                                                      • 241

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by Mediterranean
                                                                      Interesting trial but as stated its a pity that " ... robustness of a major bookmaker’s T&Cs will not be tested in court."


                                                                      https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...5-discontinued
                                                                      Thanks for the link. Hadn't heard of this. Any guess what the settlement figure was? Hopefully she didn't settle for less than half a million.

                                                                      Can't recal ever reading a third party funding clause in terms, and I used to study terms closely on books I play at. Need to start rereading some.

                                                                      It seems such a ridiculously imprecise term and one that would be destroyed in court. Wages would fall under third party source of funds if it was interpreted losely enough.
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      SBR Contests
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Working...